Kangaroo Care for Hospitalized Infants with Congenital Heart Disease

Simulation Training to Increase Holding of Fragile Infants in Cardiac Intensive Care Units

BACKGROUND

Promoting bonding and neurodevelopmental care is an important element in the cardiovascular intensive care unit (CICU); however, holding of infants by family members is inconsistently practiced.

OBJECTIVES

This quality improvement study aimed to safely increase the holding of medically complex infants in the CICU by developing a holding guideline and offering simulation-based staff education.

METHODS

Using consensus methodology and high-fidelity simulation, an expert work group created a holding guideline and training to increase staff confidence and competence in holding critically ill infants in the CICU. The effectiveness of the intervention was tested via a postintervention survey used to assess participants' confidence in and comfort with holding critically ill infants and elicit suggestions for further support. Participants who engaged with the mannequin were surveyed to assess the validity of the simulation trainer.

RESULTS

After the intervention, participants (N = 130) reported increased confidence with infant holding (76%) and greater confidence in preparing families to hold their infants. Participants (95%) strongly agreed that the simulation enabled realistic, safe practice in holding a medically complex infant with catheters and tubes. More years of experience and engagement with the simulation trainer were associated with increased posttraining confidence. Participants cited increased resources, practice, and adherence monitoring as key supports for infant holding.

CONCLUSIONS

Expert group consensus with high-fidelity simulation training is a feasible, safe, and reliable method for teaching higher risk skills and guiding protocol development.

Developmental care pathway for hospitalised infants with CHD: on behalf of the Cardiac Newborn Neuroprotective Network, a Special Interest Group of the Cardiac Neurodevelopmental Outcome Collaborative

Infants and children born with CHD are at significant risk for neurodevelopmental delays and abnormalities. Individualised developmental care is widely recognised as best practice to support early neurodevelopment for medically fragile infants born premature or requiring surgical intervention after birth. However, wide variability in clinical practice is consistently demonstrated in units caring for infants with CHD. The Cardiac Newborn Neuroprotective Network, a Special Interest Group of the Cardiac Neurodevelopmental Outcome Collaborative, formed a working group of experts to create an evidence-based developmental care pathway to guide clinical practice in hospital settings caring for infants with CHD. The clinical pathway, "Developmental Care Pathway for Hospitalized Infants with Congenital Heart Disease," includes recommendations for standardised developmental assessment, parent mental health screening, and the implementation of a daily developmental care bundle, which incorporates individualised assessments and interventions tailored to meet the needs of this unique infant population and their families. Hospitals caring for infants with CHD are encouraged to adopt this developmental care pathway and track metrics and outcomes using a quality improvement framework.

Wayfinding through the "ocean of the great unknown": how lactating parents establish a direct breastfeeding relationship with an infant with critical CHD

INTRODUCTION

Lactating parents of infants hospitalised for critical congenital heart disease (CHD) face significant barriers to direct breastfeeding. While experiences of directly breastfeeding other hospitalised neonates have been described, studies including infants with critical CHD are scarce. There is no evidence-based standard of direct breastfeeding care for these infants, and substantial practice variation exists.

AIM

To explain how direct breastfeeding is established with an infant hospitalised for critical CHD, from lactating parents' perspectives.

MATERIALS & METHODS

This study is a qualitative grounded dimensional analysis of interviews with 30 lactating parents of infants with critical CHD who directly breastfed within 3 years. Infants received care from 26 United States cardiac centres; 57% had single ventricle physiology. Analysis included open, axial, and selective coding; memoing; member checking; and explanatory matrices.

RESULTS

Findings were represented by a conceptual model, "Wayfinding through the 'ocean of the great unknown'." The core process of Wayfinding involved a nonlinear trajectory requiring immense persistence in navigating obstacles, occurring in a context of life-and-death consequences for the infant. Wayfinding was characterised by three subprocesses: navigating the relationship with the healthcare team; protecting the direct breastfeeding relationship; and doing the long, hard work. Primary influencing conditions included relentless concern about weight gain, the infant's clinical course, and the parent's previous direct breastfeeding experience.

CONCLUSIONS

For parents, engaging in the Wayfinding process to establish direct breastfeeding was feasible and meaningful - though challenging. The conceptual model of Wayfinding explains how direct breastfeeding can be established and provides a framework for research and practice.

Predictors of Human Milk Feeding and Direct Breastfeeding for Infants with Single Ventricle Congenital Heart Disease: Machine Learning Analysis of the National Pediatric Cardiology Quality Improvement Collaborative Registry

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors that support or limit human milk (HM) feeding and direct breastfeeding (BF) for infants with single ventricle congenital heart disease at neonatal stage 1 palliation (S1P) discharge and at stage 2 palliation (S2P) (∼4-6 months old).

STUDY DESIGN

Analysis of the National Pediatric Cardiology Quality Improvement Collaborative (NPC-QIC) registry (2016-2021; 67 sites). Primary outcomes were any HM, exclusive HM, and any direct BF at S1P discharge and at S2P. The main analysis involved multiple phases of elastic net logistic regression on imputed data to identify important predictors.

RESULTS

For 1944 infants, the strongest predictor domain areas included preoperative feeding, demographics/social determinants of health, feeding route, clinical course, and site. Significant findings included: preoperative BF was associated with any HM at S1P discharge (OR = 2.02, 95% CI = 1.74-3.44) and any BF at S2P (OR = 2.29, 95% CI = 1.38-3.80); private/self-insurance was associated with any HM at S1P discharge (OR = 1.91, 95% CI = 1.58-2.47); and Black/African-American infants had lower odds of any HM at S1P discharge (OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.38-0.65) and at S2P (0.57, 0.30-0.86). Adjusted odds of HM/BF practices varied among NPC-QIC sites.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative feeding practices predict later HM and BF for infants with single ventricle congenital heart disease; therefore, family-centered interventions focused on HM/BF during the S1P preoperative time are needed. These interventions should include evidence-based strategies to address implicit bias and seek to minimize disparities related to social determinants of health. Future research is needed to identify supportive practices common to high-performing NPC-QIC sites.

The Role of the Neonatologist in Fetuses Diagnosed with Congenital Heart Disease

Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease (CHD) can decrease preoperative morbidity and mortality. Delivery room planning can improve cardiac hemodynamics and time to critical catheter and surgical interventions. Care algorithms have defined lesion-specific level-of-care assignments and delivery room action plans that can facilitate team-based approaches to safe deliveries. Neonatologists play critical roles in the care of fetuses diagnosed with CHD, from the time of diagnosis through the postnatal intensive care unit (ICU) stays. Prenatally, neonatologists are members of the multidisciplinary counseling teams, with expertise to counsel expectant parents about what to expect during the ICU stay, which is especially valuable in CHD associated with extracardiac or genetic anomalies. Neonatologists' role in delivery planning includes identification of the optimal delivery location and allocation of appropriate personnel and resources. After delivery, postnatal care considerations include hemodynamic stability, optimization of end-organ function, genetics consultation, developmentally appropriate care practices to encourage caregiver bonding, and optimization of care to improve neurodevelopmental outcomes of neonates with CHD.

Safety and Feasibility of Skin-to-Skin Contact in the Delivery Room for High-Risk Cardiac Neonates

Early skin-to-skin contact (SSC), beginning in the delivery room, provides myriad health benefits for mother and baby. Early SSC in the delivery room is the standard of care for healthy neonates following both vaginal and cesarean delivery. However, there is little published evidence on the safety of this practice in infants with congenital anomalies requiring immediate postnatal evaluation, including critical congenital heart disease (CCHD). Currently, the standard practice following delivery of infants with CCHD in many delivery centers has been immediate separation of mother and baby for neonatal stabilization and transfer to a different hospital unit or a different hospital altogether. However, most neonates with prenatally diagnosed congenital heart disease, even those with ductal-dependent lesions, are clinically stable in the immediate newborn period. Therefore, we sought to increase the percentage of newborns with prenatally diagnosed CCHD who are born in our regional level II-III delivery hospitals who receive mother-baby SSC in the delivery room. Using quality improvement methodology, through a series of Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles we successfully increased mother-baby skin-to-skin contact in the delivery room for eligible cardiac patients born across our city-wide delivery hospitals from a baseline 15% to greater than 50%.

Optimizing Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Neonates With Congenital Heart Disease

Neurodevelopmental impairment is a common and important long-term morbidity among infants with congenital heart disease (CHD). More than half of those with complex CHD will demonstrate some form of neurodevelopmental, neurocognitive, and/or psychosocial dysfunction requiring specialized care and impacting long-term quality of life. Preventing brain injury and treating long-term neurologic sequelae in this high-risk clinical population is imperative for improving neurodevelopmental and psychosocial outcomes. Thus, cardiac neurodevelopmental care is now at the forefront of clinical and research efforts. Initial research primarily focused on neurocritical care and operative strategies to mitigate brain injury. As the field has evolved, investigations have shifted to understanding the prenatal, genetic, and environmental contributions to impaired neurodevelopment. This article summarizes the recent literature detailing the brain abnormalities affecting neurodevelopment in children with CHD, the impact of genetics on neurodevelopmental outcomes, and the best practices for neonatal neurocritical care, focusing on developmental care and parental support as new areas of importance. A framework is also provided for the infrastructure and resources needed to support CHD families across the continuum of care settings.

Individualized Family-Centered Developmental Care for Infants With Congenital Heart Disease in the Intensive Care Unit

BACKGROUND

Individualized family-centered developmental care (IFDC) is considered the standard of care for premature/medically fragile newborns and their families in intensive care units (ICUs). Such care for infants with congenital heart disease (CHD) varies.

OBJECTIVE

The Consortium for Congenital Cardiac Care- Measurement of Nursing Practice (C4-MNP) was surveyed to determine the state of IFDC for infants younger than 6 months with CHD in ICUs.

METHODS

An electronic survey was disseminated to 1 nurse at each participating center. The survey included questions on IFDC-related nursing practice, organized in 4 sections: demographics, nursing practice, interdisciplinary practice, and parent support. Data were summarized by using descriptive statistics. Differences in IFDC practices and IFDC-related education were assessed, and practices were compared across 3 clinical scenarios of varying infant acuity by using the χ2 test.

RESULTS

The response rate was 66% (25 centers). Most respondents (72%) did not have IFDC guidelines; 63% incorporated IFDC interventions and 67% documented IFDC practices. Only 29% reported that their ICU had a neurodevelopmental team. Significant differences were reported across the 3 clinical scenarios for 11 of 14 IFDC practices. Skin-to-skin holding was provided least often across all levels of acuity. Nurse education related to IFDC was associated with more use of IFDC (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Practices related to IFDC vary among ICUs. Opportunities exist to develop IFDC guidelines for infants with CHD to inform clinical practice and nurse education. Next steps include convening a C4-MNP group to develop guidelines and implement IFDC initiatives for collaborative evaluation.