Meta-analysis of Virtual Reality Based on Delaying Mild Cognitive Impairment

Neuropsychological and behavioral benefits of virtual cognitive rehabilitation training among pediatric population surviving malaria: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Severe and nonsevere forms of repeated malaria can cause numerous cognitive impairments, usually in the aspects of problem-solving, executive function, memory, and attention. Several studies have suggested that rehabilitation treatment interventions can be effective in treating cognitive symptoms of cerebral malaria (CM). Virtual reality (VR) technology potentiates as a useful tool for the assessment and rehabilitation of cognitive processes. The aim of the present systematic review is to examine neuropsychological and behavioral benefits of virtual cognitive rehabilitation training among children with Malaria. Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), Excerpta Medica Database, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov., and Global Health databases were searched for studies that investigated the effect of VR on cognitive functions post-CM. The methodological quality was evaluated using PEDro scale. Six studies were included for qualitative analyses, with five being randomized controlled trials and one was parallel-group randomized trial. The scores on the PEDro scale ranged from 5 to 7 with a mean score of 6. The results showed improvement in various aspects of cognitive functions such as: memory, executive function, and attention in CM survivors. Using computerized cognitive rehabilitation training with the treatment protocol of 16-24 sessions, each of 45-60 min in duration, with 2-3 sessions per week, may improve neuropsychological performance and behavior in terms of executive functions, working memory, and attention in severe malaria survivors.

The Effects of Virtual Reality Training on Cognition in Older Adults: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression of Randomized Controlled Trials

The aim of this systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression was to examine the effects of virtual reality-based training on global cognition and executive function compared with conventional training or information-based treatment in older adults, regardless of cognitive level. A systematic literature search was conducted using four databases. A total of 31 randomized controlled trials were identified. Pooled effect sizes were calculated, the risk of bias was assessed, and evidence was graded. The primary analyses showed a small but statistically significant effect of virtual reality-based training compared with control on global cognition (Hedges' g 0.42, 95% confidence interval [0.17, 0.68], I2 = 70.1%, n = 876, 20 randomized controlled trials, low evidence) and executive function (Hedges' g 0.35, 95% confidence interval [0.06, 0.65], I2 = 68.4%, n = 810, 16 randomized controlled trials, very low evidence). Meta-regression yielded inconclusive results. Virtual reality-based training may be more effective than control in improving cognition in older adults; however, more high-quality studies are needed.

Therapeutic Application of Virtual Reality in the Rehabilitation of Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This review aimed to quantify the effect of therapeutic application of virtual reality (VR) on cognitive function in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We searched for randomized controlled trials involving VR in the interventions provided to individuals with MCI. After searching four international electronic databases, we analyzed six studies involving 279 individuals with MCI. RevMan 5.4 was used for quality assessment and quantitative analysis. Therapeutic application of VR in individuals with MCI resulted in a significant improvement in cognitive function (mean difference = -1.46; 95% confidence interval: -2.53 to -0.39; heterogeneity: χ² = 970.56, df = 18, I² = 98%; and overall effect: Z = 2.67, p = 0.008). However, there was no significant improvement in the subcategories such as global cognition, working memory, executive function, memory function, and attention. In conclusion, feedback stimulation through VR has a potential value in improving cognitive function in individuals with MCI. However, on the basis of the results of the subcategories, a personalized VR program is required for the individual subcategories of cognitive function.

Veterans Affairs Health Care Provider Perceptions of Virtual Reality: Brief Exploratory Survey

Background

Virtual reality (VR), a simulated experience that can be similar to or completely different from the real world, has become increasingly useful within the psychiatric and medical fields. This VR technology has been applied in medical school trainings, exposure therapy for individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and reminiscence therapy associated with mood disorders for older adults. Perceptions of VR through the lens of the health care provider require further exploration. VR has grown in popularity; however, this modality continues to be underused in most Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals.

Objective

A web-based survey was used to explore health care provider perceptions of immersive VR availability and use for older adults and identify potential barriers for immersive VR use in older adults with cognitive impairment.

Methods

An 8-item web-based survey was developed to obtain health care provider feedback. This survey was disseminated throughout a single Veterans Integrated Services Network (VISN). The VR survey was developed via the Survey Monkey platform and distributed through the secure VA email network. Providers were asked to voluntarily participate in the brief, anonymous survey and offer their perceptions of immersive VR use within their patient population. Survey data were reviewed and interpreted using descriptive statistics.

Results

A total of 49 respondents completed the survey over a 15-day period. Of them, 36 respondents (73%) had heard of a VR device, though the majority (n=44, 90%) had never used or prescribed a VR device. Respondents identified several potential barriers to immersive VR use in older adults with cognitive impairment (eg, hearing difficulties, perceptions of technology, cognitive concerns, access to resources, and visual impairment). Despite the barriers identified, providers (n=48, 98%) still reported that they would feel comfortable prescribing immersive VR as an intervention for their patient population.

Conclusions

Survey findings revealed that health care providers within this VISN for VAs have heard of VR, although they may not have actively engaged in its use. Most of the providers reported that they would prescribe the use of an immersive VR intervention for their older adult patients. This key point highlights the desire to implement VR strategies for patient use by their providers. If underlying barriers can be addressed and relatively resolved, this technological intervention has the potential to create substantial breakthroughs in clinical care.