Care of the Patient With Enteral Tube Feeding: An Evidence-Based Practice Protocol

Effects of implementation strategies aimed at improving high-value verification methods of nasogastric tube placement: A systematic review

Background

X-ray and pH testing, which clinical practice guidelines have proven to be effective in determining nasogastric tube (NGT) placement, were named the high-value methods. Implementation strategies can help to integrate high-value methods into particular contexts. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the evidence of implementation strategies aimed at improving high-value verification methods of NGT placement.

Methods

PubMed, ProQuest, and CINAHL were searched until June 2022. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care (EPOC) taxonomy was used to categorize implementation strategies.

Results

The initial search identified 1,623 records. Of these, 64 full-text studies were reviewed. Finally, 12 studies were included and used for qualitative synthesis. Eleven studies used an education component as an implementation strategy. Only one study based their implementation strategy on a barriers and facilitators assessment. None of the studies reported enough detail of the implementation strategy used in their studies. Seven studies were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Three of these seven studies revealed a significant improvement of the high-value method after strategy implementation. As heterogeneity was present in the high level, the pooled effect estimated was not calculated.

Conclusion

Most studies used an implementation strategy with an educational component. Unfortunately, no conclusion can be drawn about which strategy is most effective for improving high-value verification methods of NGT placement due to a high level of heterogeneity and a lack of studies. We recommend that future studies fully connect their implementation strategies to influencing factors and better report the details of implementation strategies.

Systematic review registration

[www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/], identifier [CRD42022349997].

Exploring the impact of workforce turnover on the sustainability of evidence-based programs: A scoping review

Background

Evidence-based programs (EBPs) are used across disciplines to integrate research into practice and improve outcomes at the individual and/or community level. Despite widespread development and implementation of EBPs, many programs are not sustained beyond the initial implementation period due to many factors, including workforce turnover. This scoping review summarizes research on the impact of workforce turnover on the sustainability of EBPs and recommendations for mitigating these impacts.

Methods

We searched 10 databases for articles that focused on an EBP and described an association between workforce turnover and the sustainment or sustainability of the program. We created a data abstraction tool to extract relevant information from each article and applied the data abstraction tool to all included articles to create the dataset. Data were mapped and analyzed using the program sustainability framework (PSF).

Results and Discussion

A total of 30 articles were included in this scoping review and mapped to the PSF. Twenty-nine articles described impacts of workforce turnover and 18 articles proposed recommendations to address the impacts. The most frequent impacts of workforce turnover included increased need for training, loss of organizational knowledge, lack of EBP fidelity, and financial stress. Recommendations to address the impact of workforce turnover included affordable and alternative training modalities, the use of champions or volunteers, increasing program alignment with organizational goals, and generating diverse funding portfolios.

Conclusion

The sustainment of EBPs is critical to ensure and maintain the short- and long-term benefits of the EBP for all participants and communities. Understanding the impacts of workforce turnover, a determinant of sustainability, can create awareness among EBP-implementing organizations and allow for proactive planning to increase the likelihood of program sustainability.

Health care professionals' perceptions and experience of initiating different modalities for home enteral feeding

BACKGROUND

With an aging population, there is a concomitant increase in number of patients with dysphagia; and hence increase in prevalence of enteral feeding. Health care professionals play a critical role in informing decisions of patients and caregivers on their choice of modality for long-term home enteral feeding.

AIMS

To explore the perceptions of health care professionals on different modalities for enteral feeding and their experiences in initiating long-term enteral feeding among adult patients.

METHODS

A qualitative explorative descriptive study design with purposive sampling approach was adopted. A total of four speech therapists, fifteen nurses and seven doctors who were ever involved in initiating long term home enteral tube feeding were recruited over a data collection period of August to December 2017. One to one interviews were conducted and audio-recorded. An inductive content analysis approach, with open coding, creation of categories and abstraction of data was adopted.

RESULTS

Four main themes were generated: (1) Naso-gastric Tube Feeding (NGT) is health care professionals' first choice of modality; (2) Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Feeding (PEG) is regarded as an alternative approach; (3) Perceived better outcomes with PEG; and (4) Identified barriers to promotion of PEG.

CONCLUSION

NGT remained as the modality of choice although health care professionals perceived that patients will have better outcomes with the use of PEG.

Gastric residual volume measurement in the intensive care unit: an international survey reporting nursing practice

BACKGROUND

Gastric residual volume measurement is routinely used to evaluate the feeding tolerance and gastro-oesophageal reflux in patients receiving enteral feeding therapy in the intensive care unit. However, little supportive evidence for this intervention is available as the usefulness of gastric residual volume measurements in patients receiving enteral feeding therapy in the intensive care is controversial.

AIM

The aim of this study was to assess the practice of intensive care unit nurses related to gastric residual volume measurement in patients receiving enteral nutrition.

METHODS

A survey was conducted among a sample of intensive care unit nurses (n = 832) from four hospitals in Turkey (n = 182) and attendees of the Annual Congress of the Flemish Society for Critical Care Nurses in Flanders, Belgium (n = 650). The survey instrument was developed by the researchers based on the related literature.

RESULTS

A total of 480 nurses completed the questionnaire (response rate = 73%). Gastric residual volume is measured by 98·0% of respondents, with wide variations in the frequency of measuring. A 50-200 mL gastric residual volume is considered problematic by 45·5% (n = 183) of the participants, and only 18·4% (n = 81) reported their practice to be based on a current guideline. Strikingly, more experienced intensive care unit nurses appear to perform gastric residual volume measurements more commonly than their less experienced colleagues (p = 0·004), while the practice is more often reported to be performed in Belgium than in Turkey (p < 0·001).

CONCLUSION

Gastric residual volume management could be improved by applying current evidence to daily nursing practice.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Our results show that increased awareness of these guidelines by nurses is needed to reduce inefficient use of working time and resources, streamline clinical practices and improve patient outcomes. Current gastric residual volume measurement guidelines and up-to-date, relevant training should be provided to nurses.

ASPEN Safe Practices for Enteral Nutrition Therapy [Formula: see text]

Enteral nutrition (EN) is a valuable clinical intervention for patients of all ages in a variety of care settings. Along with its many outcome benefits come the potential for adverse effects. These safety issues are the result of clinical complications and of process-related errors. The latter can occur at any step from patient assessment, prescribing, and order review, to product selection, labeling, and administration. To maximize the benefits of EN while minimizing adverse events requires that a systematic approach of care be in place. This includes open communication, standardization, and incorporation of best practices into the EN process. This document provides recommendations based on the available evidence and expert consensus for safe practices, across each step of the process, for all those involved in caring for patients receiving EN.

Do we really know how much we are feeding our patients?

BACKGROUND

Nutrition support is important in critical illness, and accurate recording is particularly important to determine whether nutritional goals are met both from a caloric and volume perspective.

OBJECTIVE

To assess accuracy of enteral feeding records, to increase nursing education and to improve nutritional documentation.

METHODS

An uncontrolled, prospective, pre- and post-intervention study was completed as part of a quality improvement initiative. This study was performed in a 950-bed university hospital (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) and focused in a 25-bed, closed intensive care unit (ICU) with a multidisciplinary rounding team of intensivist, nurse, pharmacist, dietitian and respiratory therapist. Nurse researchers reviewed 188 patient electronic medical records (EMR) and compared the data to volume data saved on enteral feeding pump. Data analysis revealed inconsistencies between the pump readings and EMR. The need for a prospective intervention was recognized and implementation of this intervention included pump calibration and teaching modules aimed at improving enteral feeding protocols. During post-intervention, another 234 records were reviewed.

RESULTS

The intervention of an education program reduced the documented discrepancy between the pump readings and charted volumes from 44 to 33%. A correlation analysis also showed a tighter relationship post-intervention (rpost = 0.84 vs. rpre = 0.76, both had a p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the importance of accurate nutritional monitoring in the ICU and demonstrates that educational interventions can improve enteral feeding protocols. Pump calibrations, frequent interrogation and vigilant nutritional documentation can improve enteral nutrition delivery. Future studies are needed to determine if the effects are sustainable and if further education will further improve documentation and delivery.

Jordanian nurses' knowledge and responsibility for enteral nutrition in the critically ill

BACKGROUND

Poor nursing adherence to evidence-based guidelines has negative consequences leading to higher mortality rates, delayed recovery and longer length of stay. Evidence-based practice has the potential to minimize complications and discrepancies between nurses.

AIM

This study aimed to assess nurses' practice and perception of their knowledge and responsibility in relation to enteral nutrition (EN) in the critically ill.

DESIGN AND METHODS

This descriptive correlational design was applied to nurses working in intensive care units (ICUs) from three health care sectors in Jordan (Governmental, Military and Private sectors). Nurses were recruited using a stratified sampling technique. A pre-prepared questionnaire focusing on nurses' practice and perception towards EN was used.

RESULTS

A total of 253 ICU nurses completed the questionnaire. Nurses revealed a tendency to undertake nutritional care despite the recognition clinical nutrition is a secondary role. In terms of nursing processes, nurses showed greater levels of knowledge and responsibility for 'preventing complications' and 'evaluation' more than 'assessment' and 'identifying goals'. Nurses inadequately assess both gastric residuals and tube placement before feeding. Diarrhoea was the most frequent complication followed by abdominal pain, vomiting, tube dislodgment and weight loss. However, nurses realized that the incidences of complications is less likely when applying evidence-based protocol.

CONCLUSION

It is necessary to establish a preliminary assessment for patients' nutritional needs prior to using EN. Aspiration reduction measures are still deficient and need further attention. An evidence-based protocol for EN should be adopted in the critically ill.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

This article provides insight into the current practice of Jordanian intensive care nurses in different health care sectors. The study can contribute to redirect the perception of nurses towards nutrition in the critically ill in addition to enhance positive adherence to evidence base.

Blind insertion of feeding tubes in intensive care units: a national survey

BACKGROUND

Although most critically ill patients experience at least 1 blind insertion of a feeding tube during their stay in an intensive care unit, little is known about the types of health care personnel who perform these insertions or about methods used to determine proper positioning of the tubes.

OBJECTIVES

To describe results from a national survey of critical care nurses about feeding tube practices in their adult intensive care units. The questions asked included who performs blind insertions of feeding tubes and what methods are used to determine if the tubes are properly positioned.

METHODS

Data were collected from members of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses via pencil-and-paper and online surveys. Results from both forms were combined for data analysis and were compared with practice recommendations of national-level organizations.

RESULTS

A total of 2298 responses were obtained. Physicians perform more blind insertions of styleted feeding tubes than do nurses; in contrast, nurses place more nonstyleted tubes. Radiographic confirmation of correct position is mandated more often for blindly inserted styleted tubes (92.3%) than for nonstyleted tubes (57.5%). The 3 most commonly used bedside methods to determine tube location are auscultation for air injected via the tube, appearance of feeding tube aspirate, and observation for indications of respiratory distress.

CONCLUSIONS

Recommendations from multiple national-level organizations to obtain radiographic confirmation that each blindly inserted feeding tube is correctly positioned before the first use of the tube are not adequately implemented. Auscultation is widely used despite recommendations to the contrary.

An overview of intestine and multivisceral transplantation

Intestine transplantation remains a formidable clinical and immunologic challenge. With newer immunosuppressive agents and accumulated experience, the survival outcomes for these patients are improving. The relationship of recipient preexisting conditions with the risk of postoperative events clearly emphasize the necessity of early referral of patients with intestinal failure to expert transplant program before the onset of life-threatening complications.30 With increased awareness and knowledge regarding referral criteria, transplant criteria, optimal time for transplantation, and medication regiments, improved patient outcomes after intestine and multivisceral transplant will be achieved.