Rehabilitation of a Marathon Runner with Guillain-Barré Syndrome

Exploring the Efficacy of Physiotherapy in Guillain-Barré Syndrome Through Virtual Reality-Based Rehabilitation: A Case Report

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) refers to a spectrum of acute immune-mediated polyradiculoneuropathies, among which is acute motor axonal neuropathy (AMAN), which is typified by predominant motor involvement and axonal degeneration. This case study describes the presentation, diagnosis, and physiotherapy management using virtual reality-based technology in a 29-year-old male patient with AMAN. Nerve conduction velocity testing was used to diagnose motor axonal neuropathy in the patient, who had weakness subsequent to gastrointestinal symptoms. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy was started, and a physiotherapy protocol was planned for eight weeks according to the patient's functional status. Physiotherapy plays an important role in the rehabilitation of patients with GBS, addressing the specific motor deficits and promoting recovery. The aim was to improve muscle strength, mobility, and functional independence through progressive exercises targeting specific motor deficits. Virtual reality-based training was also part of this rehabilitation process as an adjunct to conventional rehabilitation to improve dynamic balance and function of the upper and lower limbs, which showed significant improvement in the outcome measures.

Inpatient rehabilitation of a person with Guillain-Barré syndrome associated with COVID-19 infection: An expert interdisciplinary approach to a case study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Several cases of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) associated with a COVID-19 infection have been recently reported. Rehabilitation might be a key player in the recovery of these highly complex patients however, results are yet unknown. This case report aimed to describe the effects of an inpatient rehabilitation program, with an interdisciplinary team approach, in a patient with GBS in the context of a COVID-19 infection.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 58-year-old man with GBS after COVID-19 started an inpatient rehabilitation program focused on reducing dyspnea and fatigue symptoms; improving muscle strength, balance, aerobic and functional training; practicing activities of daily living and energy conservation techniques; swallowing training; emotional support and patient and family education about daily routines. An expert interdisciplinary team delivered the intervention, approximately 5 h/day, 5 days/week for 6 weeks.

OUTCOMES

Improvements were observed in dyspnea, fatigue, nocturnal ventilation, muscle strength, balance, walking capacity, functional status, and swallowing function.

CONCLUSION

This clinical case report illustrates the impact of a tailored and interdisciplinary rehabilitation program, on promoting recovery in multiple health domains of a patient with GBS associated with COVID-19 infection. Our experience might be useful to guide other inpatient rehabilitation programs to successfully manage these highly complex patients.

Influence of Exercise on Patients with Guillain-Barré Syndrome: A Systematic Review

Purpose: To evaluate the effects of exercise interventions on improving physical outcomes in patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). Methods: The PubMed database was searched for articles published up to and including February 2015. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case reports, and quasi-experimental and single-subject designs published in English-language, peer-reviewed journals that assessed the impact of physical exercise on patients with GBS were included; study quality was assessed using Sackett's rules of evidence. Data are presented qualitatively and quantitatively using numerical values and percentages. Results: Seven articles were included in the systematic review. One RCT showed that high-intensity relative to lower intensity exercise significantly reduced disability in patients with GBS, as measured with the FIM (p<0.005, r=0.71). Overall, various types of exercise programmes improve physical outcomes such as functional mobility, cardiopulmonary function, isokinetic muscle strength, and work rate and reduce fatigue in patients with GBS. Conclusion: Because of insufficient high-quality literature, making confident conclusions about the effects of exercise interventions on physical outcomes in patients with GBS is not possible. Future research should consider using higher quality study designs to confirm the results outlined in this article.

Guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in clinical practice--evidence-based approach from the Apheresis Applications Committee of the American Society for Apheresis

The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Apheresis Applications Committee is charged with a review and categorization of indications for therapeutic apheresis. Beginning with the 2007 ASFA Special Issue (fourth edition), the subcommittee has incorporated systematic review and evidence-based approach in the grading and categorization of indications. This Fifth ASFA Special Issue has further improved the process of using evidence-based medicine in the recommendations by refining the category definitions and by adding a grade of recommendation based on widely accepted GRADE system. The concept of a fact sheet was introduced in the Fourth edition and is only slightly modified in this current edition. The fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of therapeutic apheresis. The article consists of 59 fact sheets devoted to each disease entity currently categorized by the ASFA as category I through III. Category IV indications are also listed.

Multidisciplinary care for Guillain-Barré syndrome

BACKGROUND

Guillain-Barré syndrome is a significant cause of new long-term disability, which is thought to be amenable to multidisciplinary care, but the evidence base for its effectiveness is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of multidisciplinary care in adults with Guillain-Barré syndrome, especially the types of approaches that are effective (settings, intensity) and the outcomes that are affected.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register (20 May 2010), The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 2), MEDLINE (1966 to May 2010), EMBASE (1980 to May 2010), CINAHL (1982 to May 2010), AMED (1985 to May 2010), PEDro (1982 to May 2010) and LILACS (1982 to May 2010). We checked the bibliographies of papers identified and contacted their authors and known experts in the field seeking published and unpublished trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and controlled clinical trials that compared multidisciplinary care in Guillain-Barré syndrome with either routinely available local services or lower levels of intervention, or studies that compared multidisciplinary care in different settings or at different levels of intensity.Studies of 'other designs' (such as observational studies) were included only in the Discussion since such studies could only be of limited contribution to the best evidence synthesis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We performed a 'best evidence' synthesis based on methodological quality.

MAIN RESULTS

No randomised controlled trials or controlled clinical trials were identified. We summarised the results of three observational studies in the Discussion section of this review.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of randomised controlled trials or controlled clinical trials, the 'best' evidence to date comes from three 'very low quality' observational studies. These provide some support for improved disability in the short term (less than 6 months) with high intensity inpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitation; and for improved quality of life, as measured by a reduction in handicap (participation). These conclusions are tentative and the gap in current research should not be interpreted as proof that multidisciplinary care is ineffective. Further research is needed into appropriate study designs; outcome measurement; caregiver needs; and the evaluation of optimal settings, type, intensity or frequency and cost-effectiveness of multidisciplinary care in the Guillain-Barré syndrome population.