Partner Elicitation After Partner Services Interviews and Reinterviews Among Patients With Antimicrobial-Resistant Gonorrhea

Correlates of Neisseria gonorrhoeae antimicrobial resistance: cross-sectional results from an open cohort sentinel surveillance network in Québec, Canada, 2016-2019

OBJECTIVES

To examine correlates of Neisseria gonorrhoeae antimicrobial resistance (AMR) to first-line antimicrobials (azithromycin, cefixime and ceftriaxone).

DESIGN AND SETTING

The sentinel surveillance network is an open cohort of gonococcal infection cases from Québec, Canada. Cross-sectional results are reported herein.

PARTICIPANTS

Between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2019, data from 886 individuals accounting for 941 gonorrhoea cases were included.

METHODS

Epidemiological and clinical data were collected using an auto-administered questionnaire, direct case interviews and chart reviews. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the agar dilution method. Generalised estimating equations were used for regression.

RESULTS

The prevalence of azithromycin resistance with a minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ≥2 mg/L was 21.3%. In 2016, men who have sex with men were more likely to be infected with an azithromycin-resistant N. gonorrhoeae isolate (adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR)=4.73, 95% CI 1.48 to 15.19) or with an isolate with increased third-generation cephalosporin (3GC) MIC (aPR=5.32, 95% CI 1.17 to 24.11 for cefixime (MIC≥0.06 mg/L) and aPR=4.38, 95% CI 1.53 to 12.54 for ceftriaxone (MIC≥0.03 mg/L)). However, these associations were not maintained between 2017 and 2019, with increased MIC observed in men who have sex exclusively with women and women. Overall, azithromycin resistance was significantly more likely in cases who self-reported HIV infection (aPR=1.65, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.71). Cefixime increased MIC were more likely in individuals 25-34 years old (aPR=2.23, 95% CI 1.18 to 4.21). Cefixime and ceftriaxone increased MIC were both more likely in cases who reported ≥5 sexual partners (cefixime: aPR=2.10, 95% CI 1.34 to 3.27 and ceftriaxone: aPR=1.62, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.30).

CONCLUSION

Significant correlates of N. gonorrhoeae AMR to first-line antimicrobials were observed. Antimicrobial stewardship may be particularly important for 3GC. Active monitoring and interventions are critical for 3GC non-susceptible strains, especially considering the very low prevalence in Québec.

Application of Isothermal Signal Amplification Technique in the Etiological Diagnosis of Gonorrhea and Drug Resistance Gene Detection

Background: Isothermal signal amplification technique is developed based on the rolling ring amplification mechanism of cyclic DNA molecules in nature. This technique plays an extremely beneficial role in gonorrhea pathogen identification and drug resistance gene detection. Aims: This study analyzes the isothermal signal amplification techniques in the etiological diagnosis of gonorrhea and drug resistance gene detection. Materials and Methods: Urethral, cervical secretion, or prostatic fluid samples from 322 cases of gonorrhea collected from January 2018 to December 2021 at the STD clinic of our hospital dermatology department were selected for direct smear examination and gonococcal culture examination; DNA was extracted from urethral, cervical secretion, or prostatic fluid samples and then used for pathogen identification by SAT assay and rolling loop nucleic acid amplification technique, smear examination and pathogen culture examination methods, SAT assay, and isothermal signal amplification technique for comparative sensitivity and specificity analysis. Results: The highest rate of gonorrhea positivity was for the urine rolling loop nucleic acid amplification technique, followed by the swab rolling loop nucleic acid amplification technique, and the lowest rate of gonorrhea positivity was for the urine SAT test. The difference in the positivity rate between the two urine testing methods was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The highest sensitivity of the urine rolling loop nucleic acid amplification technique method for the detection of gonorrhea pathogens and the lowest sensitivity of the urine SAT method were statistically significant (P < 0.01). The differences in sensitivity and specificity between the swab rolling loop nucleic acid amplification technique and the swab SAT method were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). ROC curves were plotted based on sensitivity and specificity, with swab SAT assay (AUC = 0.998) > rolling loop nucleic acid amplification technique (AUC = 0.981). Comparing the negative rates of urine and swab rolling loop nucleic acid amplification technique and urine SAT assay, the differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The isothermal signal amplification technique improves the shortcomings of gonorrhea pathogen identification means and drug resistance gene detection methods, with good detection sensitivity and specificity, simple operation, low price, and easy promotion, which has obvious advantages in clinical applications and epidemiological studies.