Pathogenesis of contact lens-associated microbial keratitis

Prevention of Progression in Myopia: A Systematic Review

The prevalence of myopia has increased worldwide in recent decades and now is endemic over the entire industrial world. This increase is mainly caused by changes in lifestyle and behavior. In particular, the amount of outdoor activities and near work would display an important role in the pathogenesis of the disease. Several strategies have been reported as effective. Spectacles and contact lenses have shown only slight results in the prevention of myopia and similarly ortokerathology should not be considered as a first-line strategy, given the high risk of infectious keratitis and the relatively low compliance for the patients. Thus, to date, atropine ophthalmic drops seem to be the most effective treatment for slowing the progression of myopia, although the exact mechanism of the effect of treatment is still uncertain. In particular, low-dose atropine (0.01%) was proven to be an effective and safe treatment in the long term due to the lowest rebound effect with negligible side effects.

Risk Factors for Contact Lens-Related Microbial Keratitis: A Case-Control Multicenter Study

PURPOSE

The most feared complication of contact lens (CL) wear is microbial keratitis (MK), even though its incidence remains low. This study aimed to identify the risk factors of CL-related MK in a large, prospective, multicenter case-control study.

METHODS

A multicenter case-control study was designed. The CL-related MK subpopulation (Case) was compared with healthy CL wearers (Control) using a 52-item anonymous questionnaire designed to determine subject demographics and lens wear history. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to compare both groups.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 499 cases and 508 controls. The risk factors associated with the greatest increased odds of CL-related MK were as follows: using disinfecting solution more than 3 months (odds ratio [OR]=1.94), cosmetic CL wear and use of multipurpose disinfection solution (1.37 each), overnight wear, and soft lens use (OR=1.24 each). The protective factors associated with the greatest reduction in OR were fitting by an ophthalmologist (OR=0.73) and hyperopia versus myopia (OR=0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

The infectious determinants were linked to the type of lenses, hygiene routine, CL handling, disinfecting solution, and storage case. This study aimed to highlight the increasingly CL-related MK, which likely occurs because of lack of patient information regarding basic rules of hygiene and CL care and handling.

A proof-of-concept model for the identification of the key events in the infection process with specific reference to Pseudomonas aeruginosa in corneal infections

BACKGROUND

It is a common medical practice to characterise an infection based on the causative agent and to adopt therapeutic and prevention strategies targeting the agent itself. However, from an epidemiological perspective, exposure to a microbe can be harmless to a host as a result of low-level exposure or due to host immune response, with opportunistic infection only occurring as a result of changes in the host, pathogen, or surrounding environment.

METHODS

We have attempted to review systematically the key host, pathogen, and environmental factors that may significantly impact clinical outcomes of exposure to a pathogen, using Pseudomonas aeruginosa eye infection as a case study.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Extended contact lens wearing and compromised hygiene may predispose users to microbial keratitis, which can be a severe and vision-threatening infection. P. aeruginosa has a wide array of virulence-associated genes and sensing systems to initiate and maintain cell populations at the corneal surface and beyond. We have adapted the well-known concept of the epidemiological triangle in combination with the classic risk assessment framework (hazard identification, characterisation, and exposure) to develop a conceptual pathway-based model that demonstrates the overlapping relationships between the host, the pathogen, and the environment; and to illustrate the key events in P. aeruginosa eye infection.

CONCLUSION

This strategy differs from traditional approaches that consider potential risk factors in isolation, and hopefully will aid the identification of data and models to inform preventive and therapeutic measures in addition to risk assessment. Furthermore, this may facilitate the identification of knowledge gaps to direct research in areas of greatest impact to avert or mitigate adverse outcomes of infection.

Microbial analyses of contact lens-associated microbial keratitis

PURPOSE

To investigate the utility of additional microbial analyses to detect the causative microorganism of microbial keratitis and to determine the strength of association between clinical variables.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 125 eyes of 123 people presenting with presumed infectious keratitis associated with contact lens wear, and examined between January 2001 and November 2011.

RESULTS

Sixty-three male and 60 female patients with a mean age of 24.14 ( ±6.7) and 26.7 (±10.0) years, respectively, were included in the study. Among the samples tested, 38 (40%) corneal cultures, 85 (92%) contact lens cultures, and 49 (80%) contact lens case cultures yielded positive results. In the samples for which all microbial investigations were performed and corneal culture was positive, cultures of contact lenses and corneas yielded the same microbes in 94% of cases, and for contact lens case and corneal cultures 77% of cases yielded the same microbes. Importantly, these were monocultures of the same microbe isolated from the cornea in the contact lens and lens case cultures. The odds of having a positive corneal culture was 37 times higher (p = 0.008) when patients presented to the clinic 2 weeks after the onset of symptoms. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the predominant organism isolated, and most isolates were susceptible to commonly used antimicrobials.

CONCLUSIONS

Contact lens culture might be an effective test to perform to detect and determine the causative microorganism when corneal cultures are unavailable or yield no microorganisms upon culture. A longer duration of symptoms before presenting to the clinic was significantly associated with obtaining a positive corneal culture.

Resistance and growth of Fusarium species in contact lens disinfectant solutions

PURPOSE

To compare the biocidal efficacy of contact lens care solutions against clinical isolates and the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) 36031 reference strain of Fusarium species and to determine the ability of the organism to survive and grow in such systems.

METHODS

The ISO 14729 reference method to assess biocidal efficacy was applied to the purified conidial form of 10 strains of Fusarium species. Six multipurpose disinfectant solutions (MPDSs), a one-step hydrogen peroxide (Per-1) system, a hydrogen peroxide-sodium chlorite (Per-2) system, and a one-step povidone iodine (PI) system were compared. Challenge organism viability was determined at various intervals, including the manufacturers' recommended disinfection time for the products (4 to 6 hours) and thereafter to 21 days.

RESULTS

All MPDSs achieved a 3- to 4-log10 reduction in viability of ATCC 36031 within the recommended disinfection time of 6 hours. For the clinical strains, MPDS-1 (PQ-1 + alexidine) and MPDS-2 (PQ-1 + PHMB) produced 3 to 5 log₁₀ kill after 6 hours. Multipurpose disinfectant solution 3 (PQ-1 + Aldox 0.0006%), MPDS-4 (PQ-1 + Aldox 0.0005% + C-9 ED3A), and MPDS-5 (PQ-1 + Aldox 0.0005%) showed reduced efficacy for the same two strains, with 0.6 to 1.7 log₁₀ kill. Multipurpose disinfectant solution 6 (PHMB) gave 1.6 log₁₀ for one strain and 3 to 4 log₁₀ for the remainder. Growth in all the MPDS was not detected up to 21 days incubation. Per-1 showed less than 1 log₁₀ kill at 6 hours for six of 10 strains, including ATCC 36031, and growth (1.2 to 2.7 log₁₀) occurred with three of 10 strains by 7 days. Per-2 gave less than or equal to 0.5 log₁₀ kill after 6- or 24-hour exposure without growth. The PI system showed 4 to 5 log₁₀ kill for all strains tested by the first time point of 4 hours. However, with the exception of ATCC 36031, growth (1.7 to 4.0 log₁₀) occurred with all strains by 7 days in PI.

CONCLUSIONS

All MPDSs were effective against the ATCC 36031 reference strain of Fusarium solani. However, reduced efficacy was found for some MPDSs against the clinical isolates. Unlike MPDSs, peroxide- and povidone iodine-based systems have no continued antimicrobial presence once neutralized, and this can allow growth of surviving Fusarium in the solution. Accordingly, lenses should be subject to fresh disinfection if stored in such solutions for extended periods.