A history of gonioscopy

Central Corneal Thickness and Glaucoma Risk: The Importance of Corneal Pachymetry in Screening Adults Over 50 and Glaucoma Suspects

Glaucoma is a leading cause of preventable blindness, yet nearly half of those affected are unaware of their diagnosis. Individuals with glaucoma may present with "normal" or "lower" intraocular pressure (IOP) compared to typical glaucoma thresholds, due in large part to many of these individuals having thin corneas. Conversely, many with elevated IOP and thicker corneas may not necessarily have glaucoma. In this article, we review the importance of central corneal thickness (CCT) and corneal pachymetry devices in eye care. Additionally, we review the role of corneal thickness as a risk factor for glaucoma and glaucoma progression. PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched for articles and reviews on corneal pachymetry and its use in glaucoma, corneal biomechanics and refractive surgery, and glaucoma screening. The results of this review revealed that CCT is a risk factor for development of glaucoma, and in eyes suspected of glaucoma, corneal pachymetry can be performed by trained technicians to provide important information related to the risk of acquiring glaucoma and/or having other ocular diseases. Additionally, a lower CCT is associated with an increased risk of progression and faster rates of visual field loss in eyes with glaucoma. This review will provide evidence regarding the importance of performing corneal pachymetry on all persons over the age of 50 as part of a comprehensive eye examination to better identify those patients who have glaucoma or are glaucoma suspects.

Genetic Aspects of Glaucoma: An Updated Review

Glaucoma is a group of diverse diseases characterized by cupping of the optic nerve head due to the loss of retinal ganglion cells. It is the most common cause of irreversible blindness throughout the world; therefore, its timely diagnosis and early detection through an ophthalmological examination are very important. We, herein, present the information on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical diagnosis, and treatment of glaucoma. We also emphasize the investigations of the last decades that have allowed identifying numerous genes and susceptibility genetic factors. We have also described in detail the genes whose mutations cause or contribute to the development of the disease.

Efficacy of Simulator-Based Slit Lamp Training for Medical Students: A Prospective, Randomized Trial

INTRODUCTION

Simulation training has an important role in medical education. In ophthalmology, simulation-based training has been shown to be significantly effective for surgical and diagnostic training in direct and indirect ophthalmoscopy. In this study, we analysed the effects of simulator-based slit lamp training.

METHODS

In this prospective controlled trial, medical students in their eighth semester at Saarland University Medical Center (n = 24) who had attended a 1-week ophthalmological internship were randomized into two groups: The traditional group (n = 12) was examined directly after the 1-week internship; the simulator group (n = 12) was trained with the slit lamp simulator before passing an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). A masked ophthalmological faculty trainer assessed the students' slit lamp skills (maximum total score 42 points [pts]): preparation (5 pts), clinical examination (9.5 pts), assessment of findings (9.5 pts), diagnosis (3 pts), commentary on the examination approach (8 pts), measurement of structures (2 pts) and recognition of five diagnoses (5 pts). All students completed post-assessment surveys. Examination grades and survey responses were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

The overall performance of the slit lamp OSCE was significantly better (p < 0.001) in the simulator group than in the traditional group (29.75 [7.88] vs. 17.00 [4.75]) with significantly higher scores for the preparation and assessment of slit lamp controls (5.0 [0.0] vs. 3.0 [3.5]; p = 0.008) and localization of relevant structures (6.75 [3.13] vs. 4.0 [1.5]; p = 0.008). Consistently higher scores, but not significant, were assigned for the description of structures found (4.5 [3.38] vs. 3.25 [2.13]; p = 0.09) and the correct diagnosis (3.0 [0.0] vs. 3.0 [0.0]; p = 0.48). Surveys reflected the students' subjectively perceived knowledge gain during the simulator training for slit lamp illumination techniques (p = 0.002), recognition (p < 0.001), and assessment of the correct localization of pathologies (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Slit lamp examination is an important diagnostic method in ophthalmology. Simulator-based training improved students' examination techniques for localizing anatomical structures and pathological lesions. The transfer of theoretical knowledge into practice can be achieved in a stress-free atmosphere.

Evaluation of the Anterior Chamber Angle Structures in Perinatal Infants Using a Wide-Field Digital Fundus Camera

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the ability of a digital fundus camera to observe the development of the anterior chamber angle (ACA) in premature infants.

METHODS

Forty-eight eyes of preterm infants (n=48) were examined by a digital fundus camera to observe the development of the ACA. ACA grading was performed based on the visualization of the anterior chamber structures according to the Scheie Angle Depth Evaluating System.

RESULTS

ACA images from all 48 infants were successfully acquired using RetCam3. The corrected gestational age ranged from 30 weeks to 49 weeks, which covered the period from 2 months preterm to >2 months post-term. As the corrected gestational age increased, the corrected gestational age grading was significantly decreased. The mean corrected gestational ages of the infants corresponding to the ACA classification from grade IV to grade 0 were 32.75±1.89, 37.20±1.30, 39.75±2.38, 40.56±2.24, and 44.23±2.14 weeks, respectively, which were all significantly different (P<0.05). The regression analysis showed a linear correlation between the grading of the ACA and the corrected gestational age (R²=0.724, P=0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The ACA of a full-term newborn can be fully detected and evaluated by a digital fundus camera. For premature infants, part of the ACA is not visible physiologically; however, it should not be misdiagnosed as angle closure or a narrow angle.

[Angle-closure glaucoma]

Angle-closure glaucoma is a rare form of glaucoma characterized by a narrow or an occlusion of the anterior chamber angle and subsequently an obstruction of the outflow of aqueous humor resulting in an increase in intraocular pressure. Symptoms can include severe eye pain and/or headache, blurred vision, a medium-sized and rigid pupil, conjunctival hyperemia, and nausea. Treatment options include pressure-lowering topical and systemic medications as well as surgical interventions, especially cataract surgery and laser iridotomy. Besides parasympathomimetics (pilocarpine), all topical antiglaucoma medications can principally be used (beta-receptor antagonists, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, alpha‑2 selective adrenergic antagonists, prostaglandins and prostaglandin analogues). Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors and osmotic agents (e.g., mannitol) can be systemically used.

Deep learning-based classification of the anterior chamber angle in glaucoma gonioscopy

In the proposed network, the features were first extracted from the gonioscopically obtained anterior segment photographs using the densely-connected high-resolution network. Then the useful information is further strengthened using the hybrid attention module to improve the classification accuracy. Between October 30, 2020, and January 30, 2021, a total of 146 participants underwent glaucoma screening. One thousand seven hundred eighty original images of the ACA were obtained with the gonioscope and slit lamp microscope. After data augmentation, 4457 images are used for the training and validation of the HahrNet, and 497 images are used to evaluate our algorithm. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed HahrNet exhibits a good performance of 96.2% accuracy, 99.0% specificity, 96.4% sensitivity, and 0.996 area under the curve (AUC) in classifying the ACA test dataset. Compared with several deep learning-based classification methods and nine human readers of different levels, the HahrNet achieves better or more competitive performance in terms of accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity. Indeed, the proposed ACA classification method will provide an automatic and accurate technology for the grading of glaucoma.

What was Glaucoma Called Before the 20th Century?

Glaucoma involves a characteristic optic neuropathy, often with elevated intraocular pressure. Before 1850, poor vision with a normal eye appearance, as occurs in primary open-angle glaucoma, was termed amaurosis, gutta serena, or black cataract. Few observers noted palpable hardness of the eye in amaurosis. On the other hand, angle-closure glaucoma can produce a green or gray pupil, and therefore was called, variously, glaucoma (derived from the Greek for glaucous, a nonspecific term connoting blue, green, or light gray) and viriditate oculi. Angle closure, with palpable hardness of the eye, mydriasis, and anterior prominence of the lens, was described in greater detail in the 18th and 19th centuries. The introduction of the ophthalmoscope in 1850 permitted the visualization of the excavated optic neuropathy in eyes with a normal or with a dilated greenish-gray pupil. Physicians developed a better appreciation of the role of intraocular pressure in both conditions, which became subsumed under the rubric “glaucoma”.

The invention of gonioscopy by Alexios Trantas and his contribution to ophthalmology

Gonioscopy is a technique used to examine structures in the anterior chamber angle (the fluid filled space inside the eye between the iris and the innermost layer of the cornea, the endothelium). It is an essential tool in ophthalmic practice, particularly in the diagnosis of glaucoma. In 1899, the Greek ophthalmologist Alexios Trantas was the first to visualise the angle in vivo and coined the term ‘gonioscopy'. He made a number of other important contributions to ophthalmology.

Complete 360° circumferential gonioscopic optical coherence tomography imaging of the iridocorneal angle

Clinically, gonioscopy is used to provide en face views of the ocular angle. The angle has been imaged with optical coherence tomography (OCT) through the corneoscleral limbus but is currently unable to image the angle from within the ocular anterior chamber. We developed a novel gonioscopic OCT system that images the angle circumferentially from inside the eye through a custom, radially symmetric, gonioscopic contact lens. We present, to our knowledge, the first 360° circumferential volumes (two normal subjects, two subjects with pathology) of peripheral iris and iridocorneal angle structures obtained via an internal approach not typically available in the clinic.

Glaucoma diagnostics

This thesis addresses several aspects of glaucoma diagnostics from both a clinical and a screening perspective. New instruments for diagnosing glaucoma have been developed over the past years, but little information is available regarding their performance as screening methods and their usefulness in ordinary clinical practice. PURPOSE OF THE RESEARCH UNDERLYING THIS THESIS:  The objectives of this research were as follows: to compare the accuracy of results of analysis of the optic nerve head (ONH) achieved by computerized imaging using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) and by subjective assessment performed by physicians with different degrees of experience of glaucoma (paper III); to evaluate the effect of a continuous medical education (CME) lecture on subjective assessment of the ONH for diagnosis of glaucoma (paper II); to investigate subjective assessment of perimetric test results by physicians with varying knowledge of glaucoma with a trained artificial neural network (ANN) and to compare the certainty of the classifications (paper IV); and to compare the diagnostic performance of time-domain Stratus optical coherence tomography (OCT) with that of spectral-domain Cirrus OCT (paper I), frequency doubling technology (FDT) screening perimetry and scanning laser polarimetry with the GDx variable corneal compensator (VCC) in a random population-based sample and in patients with glaucoma of varying disease severity.

METHODS AND RESULTS

  In evaluation of the ONH, use of the HRT statistical tools, Moorfields regression analysis (MRA) and the Glaucoma Probability Score (GPS) was compared with subjective assessment performed by 45 physicians. Optic nerve head images and photographs from 138 healthy and 97 glaucoma subjects were included. The sensitivity of MRA was higher (87-94%) than that of the average physician (62-82%), considerably greater than that of ophthalmologists with subspecialties other than glaucoma (53-77%) and non-significantly better than that of glaucoma experts (72-88%). Sensitivity achieved by GPS (79-93%) was also greater than that of the average physician. MRA correctly classified all eyes with advanced glaucomatous visual field defects, a result that was not achieved by GPS or even by the glaucoma experts. In eyes with small discs, MRA sensitivity (88%) was comparable with that of glaucoma experts (85%) and much better than that of GPS (50%). Also, the group comprising all physicians provided specificity (75-92%) similar to that of both MRA (69 - 86%) and GPS (72-94%) (Andersson et al. 2011a). A 1-hr CME lecture on ONH assessment led to a significant improvement in sensitivity (from 70% to 80%) and a significant decrease in uncertain assessments (from 22% to 13%), whereas specificity remained unchanged (68%) (Andersson et al. 2011b). A rise in sensitivity was seen in all subgroups of physicians, including glaucoma experts. Thirty physicians assessing standard automated perimetry (SAP) test results as Humphrey Field Analyzer single-field analysis printouts with full StatPac information from 99 patients with glaucoma and 66 healthy subjects were compared with a trained ANN regarding diagnostic performance. ANN reached significantly higher sensitivity (93%) than the average physician (83%), whereas specificity was similar for these two groups (91% and 90%, respectively). Diagnostic accuracy was similar among the different groups of physicians and seemingly rather independent of experience. Sensitivity ranged from 82% in the subgroup of other subspecialists to 87% in the glaucoma expert group, and specificity ranged from 88% among general ophthalmologists to 91% for glaucoma experts. The ANN attained certainty of classification that was in parity with that provided by the glaucoma experts and did not make any completely incorrect classifications of the visual fields (i.e. erroneous classifications were in the borderline zone) (Andersson et al. 2012). From a population-based randomly selected sample (n=308) of older subjects (aged ≥ 50 years) living in southern Sweden, 170 subjects underwent a comprehensive examination that included Stratus OCT, Cirrus OCT, an FDT screening programme and the GDx VCC. The same test protocol was applied to 138 randomized clinical patients with different stages of glaucoma. In the population-based sample, both Stratus and Cirrus OCT showed high diagnostic accuracy with area under the receiver-operating curve (aROC) values close to 1.0 (Bengtsson et al. 2012). Both OCT instruments correctly classified all of the clinical glaucoma patients with advanced disease. FDT screening showed high sensitivity (91%) but erroneously gave normal test results for some eyes with advanced disease. GDx VCC had lower sensitivity (73-92%) and also led to a large proportion of examinations with an atypical retardation pattern that is known to affect the diagnostic efficiency of this instrument.

CONCLUSIONS

  The HRT MRA performed better than most physicians and was consistent with the glaucoma experts. These results suggest that MRA can be a valuable tool for diagnosing glaucoma in ordinary practice, particularly when only a few glaucoma experts are available. Even though MRA provided 100% sensitivity in eyes with advanced glaucoma, it probably does not offer sufficient specificity to make it suitable as a screening method. Continuing medical education on ONH analysis had a small, but positive effect on diagnostic accuracy for glaucoma. An ANN trained to classify visual fields seemed to perform at least as well as most of the participating physicians, whose performances were remarkably similar regardless of their level of experience. This indicates that available tools for interpreting SAP findings are helpful in assessments of visual field test results. However, SAP is associated with learning effects (Heijl et al. 1989) that may entail low specificity for untrained subjects, and hence, it is not an ideal screening method for glaucoma. By comparison, the screening test of FDT is rapid and easy, but it is probably less suitable for screening purpose, because some eyes with advanced glaucoma were missed in this investigation. GDx VCC images for a relatively large number of eyes could not be analysed and is thus not appropriate for screening. The OCT instruments offer both high sensitivity and high specificity, and all eyes with advanced disease were correctly classified as glaucomatous in this evaluation. However, these instruments are still expensive and require special operator skills. Additional development to obtain OCT instrument that is more compact, easier to use and less expensive might render such tomography suitable as a screening tool for glaucoma.