1
|
Buchta C, Gidske G, Henriksen GM, Badrick T. The European Organisation of External Quality Assurance Providers in Laboratory Medicine (EQALM) Statement: guidelines for publishing about interlaboratory comparison studies (PubILC). Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 2024; 61:588-598. [PMID: 38572824 DOI: 10.1080/10408363.2024.2335202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Revised: 03/09/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
Data and results from interlaboratory comparison (ILC) studies, external quality assessment (EQA) and proficiency testing (PT) activities are important and valuable contributions both to the further development of all disciplines of medical laboratory diagnostics, and to the evaluation and comparison of in vitro diagnostic assays. So far, however, there are no recommendations as to which essential items should be addressed in publications on interlaboratory comparisons. The European Organization of External Quality Assurance Providers in Laboratory Medicine (EQALM) recognized the need for such recommendations, and these were developed by a group of experts. The result of this endeavor is the EQALM Statement on items recommended to be addressed in publications on interlaboratory comparison activities (PubILC), in conjunction with a user-friendly checklist. Once adopted by authors and journals, the EQALM Statement will ensure essential information and/or study-related facts are included within publications on EQA/PT activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Buchta
- Austrian Association for Quality Assurance and Standardization of Medical and Diagnostic Tests (ÖQUASTA), Vienna, Austria
| | - Gro Gidske
- The Norwegian Organization for Quality Improvement of Laboratory Examinations (Noklus), Haraldsplass Deaconess Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Gitte M Henriksen
- Danish Institute for External Quality Assurance for Laboratories in the Health Sector (DEKS), Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Tony Badrick
- Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Programs (RCPAQAP), St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Elkhamisy FAA, Eesa AN, Elnady OM, Elnaghi KAEA, Foda AAM. Reduced expression of SOX11 in colorectal adenocarcinoma is associated with mucinous and signet ring cell types, poor survival, and lower ALK expression. Pathol Res Pract 2024; 260:155450. [PMID: 38986363 DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2024.155450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2024] [Revised: 06/22/2024] [Accepted: 07/05/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mucinous and signet ring cell colorectal carcinoma (m/srCRC) are challenging colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC) types with poor prognosis. This study aimed to investigate SOX11 and ALK immunohistochemical expression in the m/srCRC group, comparing the results to those of nonmucinous CRC (nmCRC) and studying their association with different clinicopathological CRC features to better understand their significance and role. Besides, the study assesses which marker has a better predictive value for clinical practice. METHODS Tissue microarrays were prepared from 150 CRC blocks distributed equally between the m/srCRC and nmCRC groups. SOX11 and ALK immunohistochemical expressions were compared between both groups. In addition, their association with CRC clinicopathological data and survival was investigated. The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve analysis examined the predictive ability of SOX11 and ALK IHC expression for CRC mortality. RESULTS Both SOX11 and ALK expression were significantly reduced in m/srCRC compared to nmCRC. SOX11 is significantly associated with other prognostic clinicopathological factors (tumor size, lymph node status, overall TNM stage, grade, lymphovascular and perineural invasion) and overall survival. SOX11 significantly positively correlates with ALK expression. Using the ROC analysis, SOX11 is superior to ALK in survival prediction. CONCLUSION SOX11 can be used as a prognostic marker and is a suggested therapeutic target in mucinous and signet ring cell colorectal carcinoma through upregulation modulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ahmed Naeem Eesa
- Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
| | - Ola Mousa Elnady
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Egypt
| | - Khaled Abd Elaziz Ahmed Elnaghi
- Oncology Centre, Medical Oncology unit, Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt; Medical Oncology Department, Oncology Center King Abdullah Medical City, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abd AlRahman Mohammad Foda
- Anatomic Pathology department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Egypt; Department of Pathology, General Medicine Practice Program, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah 21442, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Elkhamisy FAA, Aboelkomsan EA, Sallam MK, Eesa AN. Cytoplasmic PPARγ Significantly Correlates With P53 Immunohistochemical Expression and Tumor Size in Localized Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor. Cureus 2024; 16:e60377. [PMID: 38882990 PMCID: PMC11178509 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.60377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is a monoarticular fibrohistiocytic benign or locally aggressive soft tissue tumor that originates from the synovium of joints, bursae, and tendon sheaths. It has an inflammatory neoplastic nature, with a clinical presentation ranging from pain, swelling, stiffness, and limited range of movement to joint instability and blockage. Its uncommon incidence leads to a poorly understood pathogenesis. Localized forms of TGCT (LTGCT) can cause significant morbidity, interfere with daily patient activities, and decrease the patient's quality of life in challenging cases. This study aimed to investigate the immunohistochemical expression of PPARγ (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma) and P53 in LTGCT to understand the disease better and offer potential therapeutic targets. METHODS The study is cross-sectional, in which 27 LTGCT cases were collected from the Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. Solitary and multiple LTGCT cases retrieved between January 2018 and December 2022 were included, and immunohistochemically stained with anti-PPARγ and P53 antibodies. The TGCT samples were excluded if they were insufficient for sectioning, processing, and interpretation, over-fixed, had process artifacts, or were of the diffuse TGCT type. Scoring of stain expression was performed by ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) analysis using the threshold method and was expressed in percent area/high power field. Clinicopathological correlations were analyzed. RESULTS All the 27 collected LTGCT cases were located in the small joints of patients' hands. Cases with solitary LGTCTs constituted 55.6% (n = 15), while 44.4% (n = 12) had multiple LTGCTs related to one affected site/case (e.g., multiple tumors in one finger). PPARγ was expressed in the cytoplasm of mononuclear and multinucleated tumor cells and foamy histiocytes, while P53 expression was mainly in mononuclear cells' nuclei. PPARγ significantly correlated with P53 expression (r = 0.9 and P = 0.000). PPARγ (r = 0.4 and P = 0.02) and P53 (r = 0.5 and P = 0.01) were positively correlated with tumor size. Only P53 expression was positively correlated with tumor multiplicity (r = 0.4 and P = 0.03). Using the receiver operating characteristic curve test, the P53 cutoff score detecting the multiplicity of TGCTs was ≥20.5%, with a 75% sensitivity and 80% specificity. CONCLUSION PPARγ and P53 have a significant role in LTGCT growth, while P53 plays a role in tumor multiplicity. They can be possible targets in LTGCTs unfit for excision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Marwa K Sallam
- Medical Microbiology and Immunology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, EGY
| | - Ahmed N Eesa
- Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, EGY
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tarantino P, Viale G, Press MF, Hu X, Penault-Llorca F, Bardia A, Batistatou A, Burstein HJ, Carey LA, Cortes J, Denkert C, Diéras V, Jacot W, Koutras AK, Lebeau A, Loibl S, Modi S, Mosele MF, Provenzano E, Pruneri G, Reis-Filho JS, Rojo F, Salgado R, Schmid P, Schnitt SJ, Tolaney SM, Trapani D, Vincent-Salomon A, Wolff AC, Pentheroudakis G, André F, Curigliano G. ESMO expert consensus statements (ECS) on the definition, diagnosis, and management of HER2-low breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:645-659. [PMID: 37269905 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 133] [Impact Index Per Article: 66.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2023] [Revised: 05/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer has recently emerged as a targetable subset of breast tumors, based on the evidence from clinical trials of novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates. This evolution has raised several biological and clinical questions, warranting the establishment of consensus to optimally treat patients with HER2-low breast tumors. Between 2022 and 2023, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) held a virtual consensus-building process focused on HER2-low breast cancer. The consensus included a multidisciplinary panel of 32 leading experts in the management of breast cancer from nine different countries. The aim of the consensus was to develop statements on topics that are not covered in detail in the current ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline. The main topics identified for discussion were (i) biology of HER2-low breast cancer; (ii) pathologic diagnosis of HER2-low breast cancer; (iii) clinical management of HER2-low metastatic breast cancer; and (iv) clinical trial design for HER2-low breast cancer. The expert panel was divided into four working groups to address questions relating to one of the four topics outlined above. A review of the relevant scientific literature was conducted in advance. Consensus statements were developed by the working groups and then presented to the entire panel for further discussion and amendment before voting. This article presents the developed statements, including findings from the expert panel discussions, expert opinion, and a summary of evidence supporting each statement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Tarantino
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan
| | - G Viale
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - M F Press
- Department of Pathology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - X Hu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - F Penault-Llorca
- Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Centre Jean PERRIN, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - A Bardia
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - A Batistatou
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - H J Burstein
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - L A Carey
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - J Cortes
- International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Pangaea Oncology, Quironsalud Group, Barcelona; Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - C Denkert
- Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - V Diéras
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes
| | - W Jacot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier University, INSERM U1194, Montpellier, France
| | - A K Koutras
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital of Patras, Greece
| | - A Lebeau
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg
| | - S Loibl
- German Breast Group/GBG Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg; Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - S Modi
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - M F Mosele
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - E Provenzano
- Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University NHS Foundation Trust and NIH Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - G Pruneri
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan; Department of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - J S Reis-Filho
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - F Rojo
- Department of Pathology, IIS-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz University Hospital-CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Salgado
- Department of Pathology, ZAS, Antwerp, Belgium; Division of Research, Peter Mac Callum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - P Schmid
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
| | - S J Schnitt
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | - S M Tolaney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - D Trapani
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan; European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - A Vincent-Salomon
- Department of Pathology, Diagnostic and Theranostic Medicine Division, Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France
| | - A C Wolff
- The Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, USA
| | | | - F André
- INSERM U981 - Molecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, PRISM Center for Precision Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - G Curigliano
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan; European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|