1
|
Li J, Greytak SR, Guan P, Engel KB, Goerlitz DS, Islam M, Varghese RS, Moore HM, Ressom HW. Formalin Fixation, Delay to Fixation, and Time in Fixative Adversely Impact Copy Number Variation Analysis by aCGH. Biopreserv Biobank 2023; 21:407-416. [PMID: 36169416 PMCID: PMC10460690 DOI: 10.1089/bio.2022.0036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Although molecular profiling of DNA isolated from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor specimens has become more common in recent years, it remains unclear how discrete FFPE processing variables may affect detection of copy number variation (CNV). To better understand such effects, array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) profiles of FFPE renal cell carcinoma specimens that experienced different delays to fixation (DTFs; 1, 2, 3, and 12 hours) and times in fixative (TIFs; 6, 12, 23, and 72 hours) were compared to snap-frozen tumor and blood specimens from the same patients. A greater number of regions containing CNVs relative to commercial reference DNA were detected in DNA from FFPE tumor specimens than snap-frozen tumor specimens even though they originated from the same tumor blocks. Extended DTF and TIF affected the number of DNA segments with a copy number status that differed between FFPE and frozen tumor specimens; a DTF ≥3 hours led to more segments, while a TIF of 72 hours led to fewer segments. Importantly, effects were not random as a higher guanine-cytosine (GC) content and/or a higher percentage of repeats were observed among stable regions. While limiting aCGH analysis to FFPE specimens with a DTF <3 hours and a TIF <72 hours may circumvent some effects, results from FFPE specimens should be validated against fresh or frozen specimens whenever possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Li
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | | | - Ping Guan
- Biorepositories & Biospecimen Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | | | - David S. Goerlitz
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Md Islam
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Rency S. Varghese
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Helen M. Moore
- Biorepositories & Biospecimen Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Habtom W. Ressom
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Agrawal L, Engel KB, Greytak SR, Moore HM. Understanding preanalytical variables and their effects on clinical biomarkers of oncology and immunotherapy. Semin Cancer Biol 2017; 52:26-38. [PMID: 29258857 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2017.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2017] [Revised: 12/07/2017] [Accepted: 12/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Identifying a suitable course of immunotherapy treatment for a given patient as well as monitoring treatment response is heavily reliant on biomarkers detected and quantified in blood and tissue biospecimens. Suboptimal or variable biospecimen collection, processing, and storage practices have the potential to alter clinically relevant biomarkers, including those used in cancer immunotherapy. In the present review, we summarize effects reported for immunologically relevant biomarkers and highlight preanalytical factors associated with specific analytical platforms and assays used to predict and gauge immunotherapy response. Given that many of the effects introduced by preanalytical variability are gene-, transcript-, and protein-specific, biospecimen practices should be standardized and validated for each biomarker and assay to ensure accurate results and facilitate clinical implementation of newly identified immunotherapy approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lokesh Agrawal
- Biorepositories and Biospecimen Research Branch (BBRB), Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | - Helen M Moore
- Biorepositories and Biospecimen Research Branch (BBRB), Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shao W, Ge Y, Ma G, Du M, Chu H, Qiang F, Zhang Z, Wang M. Evaluation of genome-wide genotyping concordance between tumor tissues and peripheral blood. Genomics 2017; 109:108-112. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2017.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2016] [Revised: 01/04/2017] [Accepted: 01/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
4
|
Jung HS, Lefferts JA, Tsongalis GJ. Utilization of the oncoscan microarray assay in cancer diagnostics. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017. [DOI: 10.1186/s41241-016-0007-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
|
5
|
Greytak SR, Engel KB, Bass BP, Moore HM. Accuracy of Molecular Data Generated with FFPE Biospecimens: Lessons from the Literature. Cancer Res 2015; 75:1541-7. [PMID: 25836717 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-14-2378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2014] [Accepted: 12/22/2014] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue biospecimens are a valuable resource for molecular cancer research. Although much can be gained from their use, it remains unclear whether the genomic and expression profiles obtained from FFPE biospecimens accurately reflect the physiologic condition of the patient from which they were procured, or if such profiles are confounded by biologic effects from formalin fixation and processing. To assess the physiologic accuracy of genomic and expression data generated with FFPE specimens, we surveyed the literature for articles investigating genomic and expression endpoints in case-matched FFPE and fresh or frozen human biospecimens using the National Cancer Institute's Biospecimen Research Database (http://biospecimens.cancer.gov/brd). Results of the survey revealed that the level of concordance between differentially preserved biospecimens varied among analytical parameters and platforms but also among reports, genes/transcripts of interest, and tumor status. The identified analytical techniques and parameters that resulted in strong correlations between FFPE and frozen biospecimens may provide guidance when optimizing molecular protocols for FFPE use; however, discrepancies reported for similar assays also illustrate the importance of validating protocols optimized for use with FFPE specimens with a case-matched fresh or frozen cohort for each platform, gene or transcript, and FFPE processing regime. On the basis of evidence published to date, validation of analytical parameters with a properly handled frozen cohort is necessary to ensure a high degree of concordance and confidence in the results obtained with FFPE biospecimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Helen M Moore
- Biorepositories and Biospecimen Research Branch, Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Han T, Chang CW, Kwekel JC, Chen Y, Ge Y, Martinez-Murillo F, Roscoe D, Težak Z, Philip R, Bijwaard K, Fuscoe JC. Characterization of whole genome amplified (WGA) DNA for use in genotyping assay development. BMC Genomics 2012; 13:217. [PMID: 22655855 PMCID: PMC3403925 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2012] [Accepted: 06/01/2012] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Genotyping assays often require substantial amounts of DNA. To overcome the problem of limiting amounts of available DNA, Whole Genome Amplification (WGA) methods have been developed. The multiple displacement amplification (MDA) method using Φ29 polymerase has become the preferred choice due to its high processivity and low error rate. However, the uniformity and fidelity of the amplification process across the genome has not been extensively characterized. Results To assess amplification uniformity, we used array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) to evaluate DNA copy number variations (CNVs) in DNAs amplified by two MDA kits: GenomiPhi and REPLI-g. The Agilent Human CGH array containing nearly one million probes was used in this study together with DNAs from a normal subject and 2 cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. Each DNA sample was amplified 4 independent times and compared to its native unamplified DNA. Komogorov distances and Phi correlations showed a high consistency within each sample group. Less than 2% of the probes showed more than 2-fold CNV introduced by the amplification process. The two amplification kits, REPLI-g and GenomiPhi, generate very similar amplified DNA samples despite the differences between the unamplified and amplified DNA samples. The results from aCGH analysis indicated that there were no obvious CNVs in the CFTR gene region due to WGA when compared to unamplified DNA. This was confirmed by quantitative real-time PCR copy number assays at 10 locations within the CFTR gene. DNA sequencing analysis of a 2-kb region within the CFTR gene showed no mutations introduced by WGA. Conclusion The relatively high uniformity and consistency of the WGA process, coupled with the low replication error rate, suggests that WGA DNA may be suitable for accurate genotyping. Regions of the genome that were consistently under-amplified were found to contain higher than average GC content. Because of the consistent differences between the WGA DNA and the native unamplified DNA, characterization of the genomic region of interest, as described here, will be necessary to ensure the reliability of genotyping results from WGA DNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao Han
- Division of Systems Biology, National Center for Toxicological Research, FDA, Jefferson, AR 72079, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Formalin is the most commonly used tissue fixative worldwide. While it offers excellent morphological preservation for routine histology, it has detrimental effects on nucleic acids. Most studies of nucleic acids have therefore used fresh frozen tissue, the collection and storage of which is resource intensive. The ability to use modern genomic, transcriptomic and epigenomic methods with nucleic acids derived from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues would allow enormous archives of routinely stored tissues (usually with well-annotated clinical data) to be used for translational research. This paper outlines the effects of formalin on nucleic acids, describes ways of minimizing nucleic acid degradation and optimizing extraction, and reviews recent studies that have used contemporary techniques to analyse FFPE-derived nucleic acids (with a focus on malignant tissue sources). Simple tips are also offered to ensure the utility of your institution's samples for future studies, and broadly applicable guidelines are listed for those contemplating their own study using FFPE-derived material.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Frankel
- University of Queensland, Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba,Brisbane, Qld 4102, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|