Approaches to routine handling of basal cell carcinoma re-excision specimens: a survey of Australian histopathologists

Basal Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck-A Retrospective Single-Centre Comparison of the Recurrence Rate after R0 or R1 Resection

The treatment guidelines for basal cell carcinoma (BCC) postulate complete surgical excision using microscopically controlled resection (MOHS) as the gold standard. The need to obtain a small safety margin in the complex anatomical area of the head and neck is very challenging due to the individual characteristics (localization, histology, and size) of tumors and the fact that the postoperative loss of quality of life depends on the surgical defect size. The R1 status is histopathologically defined when the safety margin is less than 1 mm even if there are no tumor cells actually infiltrating the resection margin. Therefore, some studies have already favored a watch-and-wait-strategy in R1 situations. We aimed to evaluate the outcome and recurrence rate of resected BCCs of the head and neck, especially in a histologically proven R1 situation. The outcomes of all resected BCCs observed during a 5-year period (January 2009-December 2013) in a tertiary care center were analyzed. Our standard operating procedure was microscopically controlled surgical excision with reresections until an R0 situation was achieved. In selected patients, an R1 status has been accepted after at least two resections. From the included 191 BCCs, the R1 status was accepted as the final result in 46 (24.1%) cases which had surgically clear margins and were closely followed-up. From 54 patients in the R0 and 40 patients in the R1 group who completed the follow-up (2.4 ± 0.4 years), we observed 0 and 2 local recurrences, respectively (p = 0.19). In cases where frequent follow-up can be secured and the surgical area is delicate, a surgical closure at R1 status can be justified as the recurrence rate is not significantly higher compared with R0.

Pathological Sampling of Basal Cell Carcinoma Re-excision Specimens: How Much is Enough?

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common cutaneous malignancy, comprising approximately 75%-80% of all skin cancers. Surgical excision is the most common first line treatment modality, with the intent of obtaining clear margins. If the initial excision is incomplete or inadequate, a re-excision will often be performed in an attempt to achieve histological clearance. The pathological examination of these specimens requires a balance between the need for adequate assessment and efficient use of laboratory resources. In this study, we sought to systematically compare different approaches to the pathological sampling of these specimens in the hope of providing an evidential basis for a rational approach. Seventy-four BCC re-excision specimens were entirely sampled and retrospectively examined to determine the rate of detection of residual BCC which would have been achieved using different sampling methodologies. Residual BCC was identified in 37 specimens (50%). Limited transverse sections through the centre of the ellipse resulted in a sensitivity for detection of residual BCC of 78% (or 85% if only "significant" residual tumor is considered). By including the entire scar or the remainder of the specimen except the polar pieces, the sensitivity improved to 95% and 97%, respectively. Only one case showed residual tumor in the apical sections alone, with tumor extending to the new surgical margin in that case. We hope that this data may help laboratories develop sampling protocols appropriate to their own cost-benefit analyses and patient populations.