Predictors of acute symptomatic seizures after intracranial hemorrhage in infants

Neonatal brain MRI and short-term outcomes after acute provoked seizures

OBJECTIVE

We investigated how diagnosis and injury location on neonatal brain MRI following onset of acute provoked seizures was associated with short term outcome.

STUDY DESIGN

A multicenter cohort of neonates with acute provoked seizures enrolled in the Neonatal Seizure Registry. MRIs were centrally evaluated by a neuroradiologist for location of injury and radiologic diagnosis. Clinical outcomes were determined by chart review. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the association between MRI findings and outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 236 newborns with MRI at median age 4 days (IQR 3-8), 91% had abnormal MRI. Radiologic diagnoses of intracranial hemorrhage (OR 3.2 [1.6-6.5], p < 0.001) and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (OR 2.7 [1.4-5.4], p < 0.003) were associated with high seizure burden. Radiologic signs of intracranial infection were associated with abnormal neurologic examination at discharge (OR 3.9 [1.3-11.6], p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Findings on initial MRI can help with expectant counseling on short-term outcomes following acute provoked neonatal seizures.

Closing the Gap in Pediatric Hemorrhagic Stroke: A Systematic Review

Pediatric hemorrhagic stroke (HS) accounts for a large proportion of childhood strokes, 1 of the top 10 causes of pediatric deaths. Morbidity and mortality lead to significant socio-economic and psychosocial burdens. To understand published data on recognizing and managing children with HS, we conducted a systematic review of the literature presented here. We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library databases limited to English language and included 174 studies, most conducted in the USA (52%). Terminology used interchangeably for HS included intraparenchymal/intracranial hemorrhage, spontaneous ICH, and cerebrovascular accident (CVA). Key assessments informing prognosis and management included clinical scoring (Glasgow coma scale), and neuroimaging. HS etiologies reported were systemic coagulopathy (genetic, acquired pathologic, or iatrogenic), or focal cerebrovascular lesions (brain arteriovenous malformations, cavernous malformations, aneurysms, or tumor vascularity). Several scales were used to measure outcome: Glasgow outcome score (GOS), Kings outcome score for head injury (KOSCHI), modified Rankin scale (mRS) and pediatric stroke outcome measure (PSOM). Most studies described treatments of at-risk lesions. Few studies described neurocritical care management including raised ICP, seizures, vasospasm, or blood pressure. Predictors of poor outcome included ethnicity, comorbidity, location of bleed, and hematoma &gt;2% of total brain volume. Motor and cognitive outcomes followed independent patterns. Few studies reported on cognitive outcomes, rehabilitation, and transition of care models. Interdisciplinary approach to managing HS is urgently needed, informed by larger cohort studies targeting key clinical question (eg development of a field-guide for the clinician managing patients with HS that is reproducible internationally).

The management of pediatric severe traumatic brain injury: Italian Guidelines

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the work was to update the "Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury" published in 2012, to reflect the new available evidence, and develop the Italian national guideline for the management of severe pediatric head injuries to reduce variation in practice and ensure optimal care to patients.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from January 2009 to October 2017. Inclusion criteria were English language, pediatric populations (0-18 years) or mixed populations (pediatric/adult) with available age subgroup analyses. The guideline development process was started by the Promoting Group that composed a multidisciplinary panel of experts, with the representatives of the Scientific Societies, the independent expert specialists and a representative of the Patient Associations. The panel selected the clinical questions, discussed the evidence and formulated the text of the recommendations. The documentarists of the University of Florence oversaw the bibliographic research strategy. A group of literature reviewers evaluated the selected literature and compiled the table of evidence for each clinical question.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The search strategies identified 4254 articles. We selected 3227 abstract (first screening) and, finally included 67 articles (second screening) to update the guideline. This Italian update includes 25 evidence-based recommendations and 5 research recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

In recent years, progress has been made on the understanding of severe pediatric brain injury, as well as on that concerning all major traumatic pathology. This has led to a progressive improvement in the clinical outcome, although the quantity and quality of evidence remains particularly low.

Neonatal Seizures: Impact on Neurodevelopmental Outcomes

Neonatal period is the most vulnerable time for the occurrence of seizures, and neonatal seizures often pose a clinical challenge both for their acute management and frequency of associated long-term co-morbidities. Etiologies of neonatal seizures are known to play a primary role in the anti-epileptic drug responsiveness and the long-term sequelae. Recent studies have suggested that burden of acute recurrent seizures in neonates may also impact chronic outcomes independent of the etiology. However, not many studies, either clinical or pre-clinical, have addressed the long-term outcomes of neonatal seizures in an etiology-specific manner. In this review, we briefly review the available clinical and pre-clinical research for long-term outcomes following neonatal seizures. As the most frequent cause of acquired neonatal seizures, we focus on the studies evaluating long-term effects of HIE-seizures with the goal to evaluate (1) what parameters evaluated during acute stages of neonatal seizures can reliably be used to predict long-term outcomes? and (2) what available clinical and pre-clinical data are available help determine importance of etiology vs. seizure burdens in long-term sequelae.