Prognostic and Goals-of-Care Communication in the PICU: A Systematic Review

Development of an Interprofessional Clinician Training in Pediatric Serious Illness Communication

Background: Early advance care planning (ACP) is associated with improved outcomes in pediatrics, yet few rigorously developed curricula exist to train interprofessional clinicians in ACP communication. Objectives: To develop, pilot and evaluate an evidence-based virtual clinician training in a pediatric serious illness communication program (PediSICP) to facilitate ACP. Primary outcomes were learner self-assessment of skills attainment and training program satisfaction. Methods: We developed an interactive, skills-based three-hour synchronous online clinician training program using Kern's Six-Step Curriculum Design, incorporating didactic and simulated patient encounters with a trained actor. Specific, measurable cognitive and behavioral learning objectives were to improve knowledge of the evidence-based benefits of ACP, to describe the PediSICP framework, and to improve practice by demonstrating a simulated ACP conversation using a goals and values approach. Sub-objectives include responding to emotion and sharing prognosis using "wish/worry" statements. Results: We conducted 10 virtual trainings from April to December 2021, each with 2-8 participants (n = 40), including 27 physicians, 7 nurse practitioners, 5 nurses, and 1 respiratory therapist from critical care, cardiology, pulmonary, and complex care; 62.5% reported no prior formal ACP communication training. Following training, 97% of participants were highly satisfied with training quality, and 100% endorsed that they would recommend it to colleagues. Additionally, clinician self-reported comfort discussing fundamental elements of ACP significantly increased following the training. Conclusion: Teaching ACP communication virtually to pediatric interprofessional clinicians is both feasible and acceptable, with improvements described in self-reported knowledge and comfort discussing elements of ACP. Future research will test the efficacy of PediSICP to facilitate longitudinal ACP.

Challenges of Families of Patients Hospitalized in the PICU: A Preplanned Secondary Analysis From the Navigate Dataset

OBJECTIVES

To describe challenges experienced by parents of children hospitalized in the PICU during PICU admission as reported by family navigators.

DESIGN

A preplanned secondary analysis of open-response data coded via inductive qualitative approach from the Navigate randomized controlled trial (RCT) dataset (ID NCT02333396).

SETTING

Two university-affiliated PICUs in the Midwestern United States as part of an RCT.

PATIENTS

Two hundred twenty-four parents of 190 PICU patients.

INTERVENTIONS

In 2015-2017, trained family navigators assessed and addressed parent needs, offered weekly family meetings, and provided post-PICU discharge parent check-ins as part of a study investigating the effectiveness of a communication support intervention ("PICU Supports").

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We analyzed qualitative data recorded by family navigators weekly across 338 encounters. Navigators described families' "biggest challenge," "communication challenges," and ways the team could better support the family. We used an inductive qualitative coding approach and a modified member-checking exercise. The most common difficulties included home life , hospitalization , and diagnosis distress (45.2%, 29.0%, and 17.2% of families, respectively). Navigators often identified that parents had co-occurring challenges. Communication was identified as a "biggest challenge" for 8% of families. Communication challenges included lack of information, team communication , and communication quality (7.0%, 4.8%, and 4.8% of families, respectively). Suggestions for improving care included better medical communication, listening, rapport, and resources.

CONCLUSIONS

This study describes families' experiences and challenges assessed throughout the PICU stay. Family navigators reported families frequently experience stressors both internal and external to the hospital environment, and communication challenges between families and providers may be additional sources of distress. Further research should develop and assess interventions aimed at improving provider-family communication and reducing stressors outside the hospitalization itself, such as home life difficulties.

Development of the perceived miscommunication measure in the pediatric intensive care unit

PURPOSE

Miscommunication between parents and healthcare providers in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) can affect family-provider relationships and outcomes. This paper reports on the development and psychometric testing of a measure for parent perceived miscommunication, defined as the failure to communicate clearly as perceived by relevant stakeholders in the PICU.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Miscommunication items were identified through a review of the literature with interdisciplinary experts. In a cross-sectional quantitative survey, the scale was tested with 200 parents of children discharged from a PICU at a large Northeastern Level 1 Pediatric hospital. The psychometric properties of a 6-item miscommunication measure were assessed using exploratory factor analysis and internal consistency reliability.

RESULTS

Exploratory factor analysis yielded one factor explaining 66.09% of the variance. Internal consistency reliability in the PICU sample was α = 0.89. As hypothesized, there was a significant correlation between parental stress, trust, and perceived miscommunication in the PICU (p < .001). Confirmatory factor analysis supported good fit indices in testing the measurement model (χ2/df = 2.57, Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) = 0.979, Confirmatory Fit Index (CFI) =0.993 and Standardized Mean Residual (SMR) = 0.0136).

CONCLUSIONS

This new six-item miscommunication measure shows promising psychometric properties including content and construct validity, which can be further tested and refined in future studies of miscommunication and outcomes in PICU.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Awareness of perceived miscommunication in the PICU can benefit stakeholders within the clinical environment by recognizing the importance of clear and effective communication and how language affects the parent-child-provider relationship.

The Effects of Expectation Setting and Bundle Consent on Acute Caregiver Stress in the PICU: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVES

Having a child admitted to the PICU is a stressful experience for parents and can have long-term negative mental health consequences. The objective was to determine if formalized expectation setting and bundled consent for invasive procedures upon admission impacts the acute stress burden on parents.

DESIGN

Prospective cluster randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Single-center, tertiary PICU.

SUBJECTS

Parents/guardians of patients, 0-18 years old, admitted to PICU.

INTERVENTIONS

During experimental weeks, all patients admitted to PICU were bundled-consented for common procedures and given a novel unit introductory letter and "Common Procedures Explained" document. During control weeks, all patients were consented for invasive procedures with separate consents for each procedure. Parents then completed a demographic survey and Stress Overload Scale-Short (SOS-S) 48-72 hours after their child's admission. For each participant, the SOS-S generates a Personal Vulnerability (PV) score and an Event Load (EL) score. Parents' perception of the life-threatening nature of their child's condition was also evaluated.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Over 73 weeks, 1,882 patients were screened and 261 consented to the SOS-S. Median PV score was 10.4 in the control group and 9.1 in the experimental group (p = 0.15). Median EL score was 11.3 for the control group and 10.5 in the experimental group (p = 0.42). Adjusting for demographic variables and severity of illness, there was no independent association between either PV or EL and bundled consent. However, a parent's perception of threat-to-life was significantly related to the allocated group (p = 0.036), which resulted in a decreased percentage of parents who rated their child's illness as "Extremely" life-threatening (experimental group, 17% vs control group, 26%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not demonstrate a decrease in stress when bundled consent was obtained. However, this intervention decreased the parents' perceived severity of illness. Further multicenter studies are needed to evaluate the effects of bundled consent on parents.