Simulation and Active Learning Decreases Training Time of an Emergency Triage Assessment and Treatment Course in Pilot Study in Malawi: Implications for Increasing Efficiency and Workforce Capacity in Low-Resource Settings

Educational interventions to improve pediatric emergency care: A qualitative assessment of the perspectives of African healthcare workers

Pediatric emergency care (PEC) training for health care workers (HCWs) is commonly offered in the form of short courses. This study gathers the perspectives of HCWs from eight African countries on how to best deliver and implement short training courses in PEC. This is a qualitative study using semi-structured key informant (KI) interviews. Utilizing the African Federation for Emergency Medicine (AFEM) member list serve, we identified African HCWs who had previous experience participating in and/or delivering short training courses in PEC. From this cohort, four interviewers were selected. These interviewers all received training in qualitative interviewing and then each recruited five KIs in their respective settings using convenience sampling. All interviews were recorded, transcribed, translated as necessary, and coded using thematic analysis. A total of 20 interviews were completed. Most KIs (75%) were physicians. Several themes on short training courses in PEC emerged: there was strong motivation to participate in PEC trainings, interactive sessions were preferred over didactic sessions, the recommended course structure was a half-day format with longitudinal follow-up, and the ideal for course instructors was a mix of local trainers and visiting trainers. KIs reported several potential negative consequences of short training courses in PEC, including clinical staffing gaps during courses and PEC content taught that was incongruous with local protocols. Future curricular development and implementation of short training courses in PEC should incorporate the preferences and best practices identified by African HCWs, namely interactive sessions with longitudinal follow-up given by a mix of local and visiting trainers. Our study limitations include the number of participants and potential for selection bias.

Interventions to improve nurse-family communication in the emergency department: A scoping review

AIM

To determine and describe what interventions exist to improve nurse-family communication during the waiting period of an emergency department visit.

BACKGROUND

Communication between nurses and families is an area needing improvement. Good communication can improve patient outcomes, satisfaction with care and decrease patient and family anxiety.

DESIGN

Scoping Review.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institution methodology: (1) identify the research question, (2) define the inclusion criteria, (3) use a search strategy to identify relevant studies using a three-step approach, (4) select studies using a team approach, (5) data extraction, (6) data analysis, and (7) presentation of results.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsychInfo and grey literature were searched on 3 August 2022.

RESULTS

The search yielded 1771 articles from the databases, of which 20 were included. An additional seven articles were included from the grey literature. Paediatric and adult interventions were found targeting staff and family of which the general recommendations were summarised into communication models.

CONCLUSION

Future research should focus on evaluating the effectiveness of interventions using a standardised scale, understanding the specific needs of families, and exploring the communication models developed in this review.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

Communication models for triage nurses and all emergency department nurses were developed. These may guide nurses to improve their communication which will contribute to improving family satisfaction.

REPORTING METHOD

PRISMA-ScR.

TRIAL AND PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

Protocol has been registered with the Open Science Framework, registration number 10.17605/OSF.IO/ETSYB.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

A narrative review of course evaluation methods for continuing professional development: The case of paediatric and neonatal acute-care in-service courses in low and lower-middle income countries: BEME Guide No. 76

BACKGROUND

Training a skilled healthcare workforce is an essential part in reaching the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal to end preventable deaths in children and neonates. The greatest burden of mortality lies in low and lower-middle income countries (LLMIC). Short term, in-service courses have been implemented in many LLMIC to improve the quality of care delivered, but the evaluation methods of these courses are inconsistent.

METHOD

Studies describing evaluations of course and outcome measures were included if the course lasted seven days or less with postgraduate participants, included paediatric or neonatal acute or emergency training and was based in a LLMIC. This narrative review provides a detailed description of evaluation methods of course content, delivery and outcome measures based on 'Context, Input, Process and Product' (CIPP) and Kirkpatrick models.

RESULTS

5265 titles were screened with 93 articles included after full-text review and quality assessment. Evaluation methods are described: context, input, process, participant satisfaction, change in learning, behaviour, health system infrastructure and patient outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes, including mortality and morbidity, are rightly considered the fundamental aim of acute-care courses in LLMIC. Course evaluation can be difficult, especially with low resources, but this review outlines what can be done to guide future course organisers in providing well-conducted courses with consistent outcome measures for maximum sustainable impact.

Teaching Trauma in Resource-Limited Settings: A Scoping Review of Pediatric Trauma Courses

PURPOSE

Injury remains an important cause of death and disability globally, with 95% of all childhood injury deaths occurring in low- and lower-middle-income countries (LMICs). Pediatric trauma training, tailored to the resources in LMICs, represents an opportunity to improve such outcomes. We explored the nature of course offerings in pediatric trauma in resource-limited settings.

METHODS

Seven databases were interrogated up to June 12, 2020, to retrieve articles examining pediatric trauma training in LMICs, as defined by the World Bank, without language restrictions. Independent authors reviewed and selected abstracts based on set criteria. Data from included studies was extracted and analyzed. An adapted Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist designed for cohort studies was used to assess the risk of bias.

RESULTS

After screening 3960 articles for eligibility, 16 were included for final analysis. Course delivery methods included didactic modules, simulations, clinical mentorship, small group discussion, audits, assessments, and feedback. Knowledge acquisition was primarily assessed through pre/post-tests, clinical skills assessments, and self-assessment questionnaires. Twelve studies detailed course content, nine of which were based on the WHO Emergency Triage, Assessment and Treatment model, which is not specific to trauma. The other three studies involved locally developed pediatric trauma-focused training courses, including airway management, head trauma and cervical spine management, thoracic and abdominal trauma, orthopedic trauma, burn and wound management, and shock.

CONCLUSION

Despite being essential to decreasing pediatric trauma morbidity and mortality worldwide, educational programs in pediatric trauma are not a widespread reality in low-and-middle-income countries. The development of accessible and efficient pediatric trauma education programs is critical for improving pediatric trauma quality of care.

Smart triage: Development of a rapid pediatric triage algorithm for use in low-and-middle income countries

INTRODUCTION

Early and accurate recognition of children at risk of progressing to critical illness could contribute to improved patient outcomes and resource allocation. In resource limited settings digital triage tools can support decision making and improve healthcare delivery. We developed a model for rapid identification of critically ill children at triage.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study of acutely ill children presenting at Jinja Regional Referral Hospital in Eastern Uganda. Variables collected in the emergency department informed the development of a logistic model based on hospital admission using bootstrap stepwise regression. Low and high-risk thresholds for 90% minimum sensitivity and specificity, respectively generated three risk level categories. Performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis on a held-out test set generated by an 80:20 split with 10-fold cross validation. A risk stratification table informed clinical interpretation.

RESULTS

The model derivation cohort included 1,612 participants, with an admission rate of approximately 23%. The majority of admitted patients were under five years old and presenting with sepsis, malaria, or pneumonia. A 9-predictor triage model was derived: logit (p) = -32.888 + (0.252, square root of age) + (0.016, heart rate) + (0.819, temperature) + (-0.022, mid-upper arm circumference) + (0.048 transformed oxygen saturation) + (1.793, parent concern) + (1.012, difficulty breathing) + (1.814, oedema) + (1.506, pallor). The model afforded good discrimination, calibration, and risk stratification at the selected thresholds of 8% and 40%.

CONCLUSION

In a low income, pediatric population, we developed a nine variable triage model with high sensitivity and specificity to predict who should be admitted. The triage model can be integrated into any digital platform and used with minimal training to guide rapid identification of critically ill children at first contact. External validation and clinical implementation are in progress.