1
|
Parri N, Giacalone M, Greco M, Aceti A, Lucenteforte E, Corsini I. Management of neonatal head injuries: A retrospective cohort study. Acta Paediatr 2025; 114:156-163. [PMID: 39310951 DOI: 10.1111/apa.17420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2024] [Revised: 07/30/2024] [Accepted: 09/03/2024] [Indexed: 12/10/2024]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this study is to describe circumstances, management and short-term outcomes of neonatal head trauma, and adherence to the Paediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) head trauma prediction rule for children under 2 years. METHODS Multicentre retrospective cohort study of neonates (<29 days) with head trauma across 25 emergency departments (ED) from January 2017 to June 2021. RESULTS A total of 492 neonates (median age 17 days, range 0-28 days) with non-trivial head trauma were enrolled. Falls were the most common injury mechanism (375/492, 76.2%). Imaging was performed in 150/492 (30.5%) neonates. Clinically important traumatic brain injury (ciTBI), defined as death, neurosurgery, prolonged intubation, or extended hospitalisation from injury, occurred in 7/492 (1.4%) cases. Notably, 286/492 (58.1%) neonates were managed by short-term observation (<48 h), and 126/492 (25.6%) were admitted. Among high-risk neonates per PECARN criteria, 17/21 (80.9%) did not undergo recommended head CT scans but were observed within ED short observation units or underwent alternative imaging, with no ciTBI diagnoses among those discharged without CT. CONCLUSION Severe neonatal head injuries are rare, and most neonatal head injuries have a favourable outcome, making observation a suitable approach, while remaining vigilant for signs of non-accidental injuries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Marco Greco
- Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy
| | - Arianna Aceti
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS AOU Bologna, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Ersilia Lucenteforte
- Department of statistics, Computer science, Applications, G. Parenti, University of Florence, Firenze, Italy
| | - Iuri Corsini
- Division of Neonatology, Careggi University Hospital of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moake MM, Klekowski N, Kusulas MP, Kharasch SJ, Teng D, Constantine E. The Current State of Advanced Pediatric Emergency Medicine Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) Training: Exploring Recent POCUS Fellowship Application Trends and Alternate Training Models. Pediatr Emerg Care 2024; 40:e221-e226. [PMID: 38718425 DOI: 10.1097/pec.0000000000003161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/30/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aims to assess the current state of advanced pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) training in North America, including trends in dedicated PEM POCUS fellowships and alternative advanced POCUS training pathways, to better guide future educational efforts within the field. METHODS We identified and surveyed 22 PEM POCUS fellowship directors across the United States and Canada regarding PEM POCUS fellowship application trends, potential barriers to pursuing additional POCUS training, and novel training models that meet the needs of the PEM POCUS workforce. RESULTS The past 5 years have seen a growth in both PEM POCUS fellowship program number and trainee positions available, with a general impression by fellowship directors of a high demand for faculty who have these training credentials. However, there was a discordant drop in fellowship applicants and corresponding match rate in 2022, the cause of which is not clear. A number of programs are offering alternative advanced training options including combined PEM/POCUS fellowships and POCUS tracks within PEM fellowship. CONCLUSION As POCUS use within PEM evolves, a growing number of advanced training options are being developed. Understanding the motivations and barriers for pursuing advanced POCUS training can help to shape these options going forward, to ensure the experience incorporated within each model meets the needs of trainees, the needs of PEM divisions, and the future needs of our field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew M Moake
- From the Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Nicole Klekowski
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Sigmund J Kharasch
- Divisions of Pediatric Emergency Medicine and Emergency Medicine Ultrasound, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | - Erika Constantine
- Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Hasbro Children's Hospital/Rhode Island Hospital, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Musolino AM, Tei M, De Rose C, Buonsenso D, Supino MC, Zampogna S, Staiano A, Raponi M, Amendolea A, Colacino V, Gori L, Manganaro A, Ricci R, D'Inzeo V, Grosso S, Villani A, Agostiniani R. Pediatric ultrasound practice in Italy: an exploratory survey. Ital J Pediatr 2024; 50:114. [PMID: 38853266 PMCID: PMC11163714 DOI: 10.1186/s13052-024-01680-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2024] [Accepted: 05/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this exploratory survey is to describe the current state of US (ultrasound) technique across different pediatric settings nationwide. METHODS A questionnaire was emailed to all members of the Italian Society of Pediatrics, including pediatric residents. The survey was open from December 2021 to March 2022. RESULTS There were 1098 respondents. Seven hundred and seven pediatricians (84.1%) reported any use of US, while 51 (44.3%) residents denied it. The majority of participants (n = 956, 87.1%) reported to have a US machine available within the department, mostly cart-based (n = 516, 66.9%) and provided from 1 to 5 years prior to the survey (n = 330, 42.8%). Lung and neonatal cerebral regions were the most frequently scanned (n = 289, 18.7% and n = 218, 14.1%, respectively). The suspicion of pneumonia or respiratory distress represented the main reasons for performing US in emergency room (n = 390, 78% and n = 330, 66%, respectively). The majority of family pediatricians reported to scan lung and kidney/urinary tract regions (n = 30, 16.9%, and n = 23,12.9%, respectively). Regarding US training, the majority of respondents (n = 358, 34.6%) declared an experience-based education, with a deficient certification enabling the use of US in 71.6% (n = 552) of cases. The most common barriers included the lack of a well-defined training program (n = 627, 57.1%), unavailability of the US machine (n = 196, 17.9%) and legal responsibility concern (n = 175, 15.9%). CONCLUSIONS Despite the growing interest on pediatric US nationally, significant barriers still limit widespread adoption. These obstacles may be addressed through the dissemination of a specific US education plan and providing additional resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Maria Musolino
- Unit of Emergency Pediatrics, Department of Emergency, Admission and General Pediatrics, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital (IRCCS), Rome, Italy
| | - Monica Tei
- Clinical Pediatrics, Department of Mother and Child, Siena University Hospital, Viale Bracci 16, Siena, 53100, Italy.
| | - Cristina De Rose
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Danilo Buonsenso
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Supino
- Unit of Emergency Pediatrics, Department of Emergency, Admission and General Pediatrics, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital (IRCCS), Rome, Italy
| | - Stefania Zampogna
- Department Pediatrics, Hospital of Crotone President of SIMEUP (Italian Society of Pediatric Emergency Medicine Urgency), Crotone, Italy
| | - Annamaria Staiano
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Section of Pediatrics, University of Naples "Federico II", President of SIP (Italian Society of Pediatric), Naples, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Raponi
- Management and Diagnostic Innovations and Clinical Pathways Research Area, Medical Directorate, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, 00165, Italy
| | | | | | - Laura Gori
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, Santa Chiara Hospital, University of Pisa, Pisa, 56100, Italy
| | - Alessandro Manganaro
- Pathology and Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital G. Martino, Messina, Italy
| | - Riccardo Ricci
- Professional Development, Continuing Education and Research, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital (IRCCS), Rome, Italy
| | - Victoria D'Inzeo
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Cardiology and Heart and Lung Transplant, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital (IRCCS), Rome, Italy
| | - Salvatore Grosso
- Clinical Pediatrics, Department of Mother and Child, Siena University Hospital, Viale Bracci 16, Siena, 53100, Italy
| | - Alberto Villani
- Unit of General Pediatrics, Department of Emergency, Admission and General Pediatrics, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital (IRCCS), Rome, Italy
| | - Rino Agostiniani
- Department of Pediatrics and Neonatology, San Jacopo Hospital, Via Ciliegiole 97, 51100, Pistoia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gillon JT, Liu EL, Dutreuil V, Cohen SG, Shah LA. Comparison of in-person versus virtual ultrasound instruction for pediatric residents. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2024; 24:203. [PMID: 38413943 PMCID: PMC10900688 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05196-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) instruction is prevalent in medical schools but not in pediatric residency programs, even though the majority of pediatric residents desire POCUS instruction. Virtual ultrasound instruction with affordable handheld ultrasound devices may help remedy this deficiency by allowing qualified instructors to circumvent geographic and financial limitations to reach this population. This study sought to determine if virtual ultrasound instruction is an effective alternative to traditional in-person instruction in a cohort of pediatric residents for the extended Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (eFAST) exam. METHODS Pediatric residents were randomized to receive either in-person or virtual instruction to learn the eFAST exam using a Sonosite Edge (Sonosite, Inc., Bothell, WA) or Butterfly iQ (Butterfly Network, Inc., Guilford, CT), respectively. After the instructional session, the participants completed a timed assessment in which all required images for the eFAST exam were obtained on the same anatomic model. The content and quality of the images were then scored by expert faculty. RESULTS There were no significant differences in assessment scores (65.8% and 61.8%, p = 0.349) and assessment duration (482.6 s and 432.6 s, p = 0.346) between pediatric residents who received in-person instruction and those who received virtual instruction. CONCLUSION Virtual ultrasound instruction appears to be an effective alternative to traditional in-person instruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason T Gillon
- Department of Pediatrics, LSU Health New Orleans School of Medicine, 200 Henry Clay Ave, 70118, New Orleans, LA, USA.
- Children's Hospital New Orleans LCMC Health, New Orleans, USA.
| | - E Liang Liu
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Valerie Dutreuil
- Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Biostatistics Core, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Stephanie G Cohen
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Lekha A Shah
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
A survey of barriers and facilitators to ultrasound use in low- and middle-income countries. Sci Rep 2023; 13:3322. [PMID: 36849625 PMCID: PMC9969046 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-30454-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Point-of-care ultrasound has the potential to help inform assessment, diagnosis, and management of illness in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). To better understand current ultrasound use, barriers and facilitators to use, and perceptions and practices in LMIC, we conducted an anonymous online global survey targeting healthcare providers training and using ultrasound in LMIC. A total of 241 respondents representing 62 countries participated and most were physicians working in publicly-funded urban tertiary hospitals in LMIC. Most had received ultrasound training (78%), reported expertise (65%) and confidence (90%) in ultrasound use, and had access to ultrasound (88%), utilizing ultrasound most commonly for procedures and for evaluations of lungs, heart, and trauma. Access to an ultrasound machine was reported as both the top barrier (17%) and top facilitator (53%); other common barriers included access to education and training, cost, and competition for use and other common facilitators included access to a probe, gel, and electricity, and acceptance by healthcare providers, administrators, and patients. Most (80%) noted ultrasound access was important and 96% agreed that ultrasound improves quality of care and patient outcomes. Improving access to low-cost ultrasound equipment is critical to increasing ultrasound use among those who are trained.
Collapse
|