Bryk KN, Passalugo S, Shan Chou L, Reisman DS, Hafer JF, Semrau JA, Buckley TA. Increased Auditory Dual Task Cost During Gait Initiation in Adult Patients With Persistent Concussion Symptoms.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2024;
105:2262-2268. [PMID:
39187006 PMCID:
PMC11620944 DOI:
10.1016/j.apmr.2024.08.007]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2024] [Revised: 08/05/2024] [Accepted: 08/06/2024] [Indexed: 08/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To compare dual task cost (DTC) during gait initiation (GI) between a population of patients with persistent concussion symptoms (PCS) and age-matched healthy participants.
DESIGN
Cohort study.
SETTING
University research center.
PARTICIPANTS
A cohort sample including 15 participants with PCS (43.9±11.7y, 73.3% female) and 23 age-matched healthy participants (42.1±10.3y, 65.2% female) as controls.
INTERVENTIONS
Participants were tested on a single occasion where they performed 5 trials of single task and 5 trials of dual task GI with 12-camera motion capture and 3 force plates.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
The dependent variables of interest were the DTC for the center of pressure (COP) displacement and velocity during the anticipatory postural adjustment (APA) phase, the COP-center of mass (COP-COM) separation, and the response accuracy during the auditory cognitive tasks.
RESULTS
There were significant group differences with worse DTC for the PCS participants in anterior (A)/posterior (P) displacement (PCS, -37.5±22.1%; Control, -9.7±39.2%; P=.016, d=0.874), APA medial (M)/lateral (L) velocity (PCS, -34.8±28.8%; Control, -17.0±40.21%; P=.041, d=0.866), and the peak COP-COM separation (PCS, -7.3±6.7%; Control, 0.6±6.5%; P=.023, d=1.200). There were no significant group differences in the APA A/P velocity (PCS, -38.8±33.1%; Control, -19.8±43.9%; P=.094), APA M/L displacement (PCS, -34.8±21.8%; Control, -10.6±25.3%; P=.313), or cognitive task performance (PCS, -2.7±10.8%; Control, -0.2±4.3%; P=.321).
CONCLUSIONS
PCS participants had greater (worse) DTC during both the planning and execution of the task, with large effect sizes (d>0.80). PCS participants also used a posture-second strategy whereby attentional resources were inappropriately allocated to the cognitive task. These deficits may challenge a patient's ability to complete activities of daily living and limit their functional independence.
Collapse