Conducting a Scoping Review in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

A scoping review on upper extremity prostheses: Satisfaction, barriers, and their implications in resource-limited countries

The rates of prosthetic abandonment are not extensively understood especially in resource-limited countries. A scoping review was conducted to examine the literature on the satisfaction with and barriers to using specifically upper limb prostheses. A systematic search of the literature identified 425 studies. After reviewing the articles using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 7 cross-sectional studies were included in the final review. Barriers to the use of upper limb prostheses include the characteristics of the prosthesis (type, comfort, weight, functionality, price, and availability) and individual patient factors (recent prosthetic user, level of amputation, congenital and accidental limb loss, pain, and duration between amputation and prosthetic fitting). Considering tailored prosthetic design and funding may result in improved prosthetic adherence.

Scoping Review: Reducing Musculoskeletal Injury Risk Factors for Adaptive Sport Athletes Through Prevention Programs

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this scoping review was to identify existing strategies to reduce modifiable risk factors for musculoskeletal (MSK) injury in adaptive athletes. Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL were searched. Inclusion criteria required studies written in English, samples of adaptive athletes, and evaluation of any injury prevention programs that would reduce risk factors associated with MSK injury. The literature search resulted in 785 unique articles. Thirty-two full text articles were screened for inclusion. Four studies of wheelchair basketball and wheelchair rugby injury prevention programs were included in the final analysis, and these studies demonstrated increase in shoulder range of motion, decreased shoulder pain, and decreased cumulative traumatic disorders; all of which was proposed to reduce risk of shoulder injury. However, these studies were small and did not include control groups. Future research is needed to implement programs that reduce risk factors of MSK injuries and reduce health disparities for adaptive athletes.

Conducting a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis in Rehabilitation

ABSTRACT

Systematic reviews are reviews of the literature using a step-by-step approach in a systematic way. Meta-analyses are systematic reviews that use statistical methods to combine the included studies to generate an effect estimate. In this article, we summarize 10 steps for conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the field of rehabilitation medicine: protocol, review team and funding, objectives and research question, literature search, study selection, risk of bias, data extraction, data analysis, reporting of results and conclusions, and publication and dissemination. There are currently 64,958 trials that contain the word "rehabilitation" in CENTRAL (the database of clinical trials in the Cochrane Library), only 1246 reviews, and 237 protocols. There is an urgent need for rehabilitation physicians to engage and conduct systematic reviews and meta-analysis of a variety of rehabilitation interventions. Systematic reviews have become the foundation of clinical practice guidelines, health technology assessments, formulary inclusion decisions and to guide funding additional research in that area.