High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Overall Cognition in Patients With Poststroke Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Effectiveness of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Executive Function, Attention, and Memory in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an effective intervention for improving cognitive impairment in patients with stroke. However, its effectiveness in the subdomains of cognition is conflicting and not clearly established. This systematic review assessed the efficacy of TMS in improving executive function, attention, and memory in this population. Seven databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Cumulated Index in Nursing and Allied Health Literature, NeuroBITE, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, and OTseeker, were searched for indexed literature until July 2024 to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of this effect in stroke patients. This systematic review was performed by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and the Handbook of the Cochrane Library and evaluated the quality of evidence using the Risk of Bias 2 tools and grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) systems. Meta-analyses were performed using standardized mean difference (SMD) (Hedge's g) as the effect measure, and subgroups were performed to explore potential outcomes. The research included 13 RCTs involving 496 patients with stroke. The results indicated that TMS could affect executive function (six RCTs with SMD = 0.55; 95% confidence interval, CI = 0.04-1.05) and memory (nine RCTs with SMD = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.25-0.89) in patients with stroke. However, the effectiveness of TMS on attention (five RCTs with SMD = 0.32; 95% CI = -0.1 to 0.75) was not clear. The quality of the results varied between very low and low according to the GRADE approach. In conclusion, TMS may affect executive function and memory, but not attention. The quality of the evidence for the outcomes varied from very low to low owing to heterogeneity and bias; therefore, the results should be considered with caution, and more rigorous evidence is needed.

Effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on post-stroke cognitive impairment: a meta-analysis

Background

Previous studies have suggested that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) may be an effective and safe alternative treatment for post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI). Similarly, the application of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) during stroke rehabilitation has been shown to improve cognitive function in PSCI patients. However, there have been conflicting results from some studies. Therefore, this study aims to conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of tDCS and rTMS on PSCI.

Methods

The meta-analysis search for articles published from the initial availability date to 5 February 2024 in databases. The extracted study data were entered into STATA 12.0 software for statistical analysis.

Results

This meta-analysis provides evidence that both rTMS and tDCS have a positive impact on general cognitive function in PSCI patients [immediate effect of rTMS: standard mean difference (SMD) = 2.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.44 to 3.71; long-term effect of rTMS: SMD = 2.33, 95% CI = 0.87-3.78; immediate effect of tDCS: SMD = 2.22, 95% CI = 1.31-3.12]. Specifically, rTMS was found to significantly improve attention, language, memory, and visuospatial functions, while it did not show a significant therapeutic effect on executive function (attention: SMD = 3.77, 95% CI = 2.30-5.24; executive function: SMD = -0.52, 95% CI = -3.17-2.12; language: SMD = 3.43, 95% CI = 1.50-5.36; memory: SMD = 3.52, 95% CI = 1.74-5.30; visuospatial function: SMD = 4.71, 95% CI = 2.61-6.80). On the other hand, tDCS was found to significantly improve executive and visuospatial functions but did not show a significant improvement in attention function and memory (attention: SMD = 0.63, 95% CI = -0.30-1.55; executive function: SMD = 2.15, 95% CI = 0.87-3.43; memory: SMD = 0.99, 95% CI = -0.81-2.80; visuospatial function: SMD = 2.64, 95% CI = 1.04-4.23).

Conclusion

In conclusion, this meta-analysis demonstrates that both rTMS and tDCS are effective therapeutic techniques for improving cognitive function in PSCI. However, more large-scale studies are needed to further investigate the effects of these techniques on different cognitive domains in PSCI.

Quality-of-Life- and Cognitive-Oriented Rehabilitation Program through NeuronUP in Older People with Alzheimer's Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial

(1) Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder marked by cognitive decline and functional impairment. The NeuronUP platform is a computer program whose main function is cognitive stimulation through three types of activities that change so that the user does not manage to learn it. This program provides opportunities to work on various domains, including activities of daily living (ADLs), social skills, and cognitive functions. The main objective of this randomized clinical trial was to assess the impact of integrating the NeuronUP platform with conventional occupational therapy to enhance or maintain cognitive, perceptual, and quality of life (QoL) abilities in people with AD compared to a control group. (2) Methods: A randomized, single-blind clinical trial was conducted. The sample was randomized using a software program, OxMar, which allowed the separation of the sample into a control group (CG) that received their conventional occupational therapy sessions and an experimental group (EG) that received therapy with NeuronUP, in addition to their conventional occupational therapy sessions. An eighteen-week intervention was conducted. (3) Results: The study included 20 participants, and significant differences were observed in most variables analyzed, indicating improvements after the intervention, particularly in measures of QoL and cognitive status. (4) Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that an eighteen-week experimental protocol, incorporating the NeuronUP platform alongside conventional occupational therapy, led to improvements in cognitive status and QoL in older adults with AD. Thus, integrating the NeuronUP platform as a complementary tool to occupational therapy can be a valuable resource for enhancing the QoL of individuals with AD. However, due to the small sample size, further studies are needed to corroborate these findings.

The effect of intermittent theta burst stimulation for cognitive dysfunction: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Growing evidence suggests that cognitive dysfunction significantly impacts patients' quality of life. Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) has emerged as a potential intervention for cognitive dysfunction. However, consensus on the iTBS protocol for cognitive impairment is lacking.

METHODS

We conducted searches in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, PubMed, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database and the Chongqing VIP Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database from their inception to January 2024. Random-effects meta-analyzes were used to calculate standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.

RESULTS

Twelve studies involving 506 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The analysis showed a trend toward improvement of total cognitive function, activities of daily living and P300 latency compared to sham stimulation in patients with cognitive dysfunction. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that these effects were restricted to patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment but not Alzheimer's disease or Parkinson's disease. Furthermore, subthreshold stimulation also exhibited a significant improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that iTBS may improve cognitive function in patients with cognitive dysfunction, although the quality of evidence remains low. Further studies with better methodological quality should explore the effects of iTBS on cognitive function.

Update on the mechanism of microglia involvement in post-stroke cognitive impairment

Post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) is a clinical syndrome characterized by cognitive deficits that manifest following a stroke and persist for up to 6 months post-event. This condition is grave, severely compromising patient quality of life and longevity, while also imposing substantial economic burdens on societies worldwide. Despite significant advancements in identifying risk factors for PSCI, research into its underlying mechanisms and therapeutic interventions remains inadequate. Microglia, the brain's primary immune effector cells, are pivotal in maintaining, nurturing, defending, and repairing neuronal function, a process intrinsically linked to PSCI's progression. Thus, investigating microglial activation and mechanisms in PSCI is crucial. This paper aims to foster new preventive and therapeutic approaches for PSCI by elucidating the roles, mechanisms, and characteristics of microglia in the condition.

Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in post-stroke cognitive impairment: an overview of systematic reviews

OBJECTIVE

The reliability of clinical evidence depends on high-quality meta-analyses/ systematic reviews (MAs/SRs). However, there has been no assessment of the quality of MAs/SRs for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI), both nationally and internationally. This article seeks to use radar plotting to visually present the quality of MAs/SRs on rTMS for improving cognitive function in PSCI, aiming to offer an intuitive foundation for clinical research.

METHODS

Eight Chinese or English databases were systematically searched to collect comprehensive literature, and the retrieval time ranged from inception to 26 March 2024. Literature ranking was calculated using six dimensions: publication year, design type, AMSTAR-2 score, PRISMA score, publication bias, and homogeneity. Finally, radar plots were drafted to present a multivariate literature evaluation. The GRADE tool assessed the strength of evidence for the outcome indicators included in the MAs/SRs.

RESULTS

The 17 articles included had average scores of 12.29, 17, 9.88, 9.71, 12.88, and 12.76 for each dimension. The radar plot showed that an article published in 2023 had the highest rank and a large radar plot area, while an article published in 2021 had the lowest rank and a small radar plot area. The GRADE tool evaluation revealed that 51 pieces of evidence were of very low quality, 67 were of low quality, 12 were of moderate quality, and only one was of high quality.

CONCLUSION

The average rank score of literature ranged from 8.50 to 17, with higher rankings indicating greater significance in literature reference. Variations in literature quality were attributed to inadequate study planning, irregular literature search and screening, insufficient description of inclusion criteria for studies, and inadequate consideration of bias risk in the included studies. Most MAs/SRs indicated that rTMS was more effective than the control group in enhancing the global cognitive function and activities of daily living in PSCI patients. However, the overall quality of the literature was generally low and needs validation from future high-quality evidence.Systematic review registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023491280.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for Alzheimer's disease: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis

Objective

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a prevalent neurodegenerative condition that significantly impacts both individuals and society. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as a treatment for AD by summarizing the evidence from systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs).

Methods

SRs/MAs of rTMS for AD were collected by searching Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed, CNKI, VIP, Sino-Med, and Wanfang databases. The search was conducted from database creation to January 23, 2024. Methodological quality, reporting quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Assessing Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2), Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews (ROBIS) tool and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). In addition, the quality of evidence for outcome measures was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).

Results

Eight SRs/MAs included in this study met the inclusion criteria. Based on the AMSTAR-2, 4 of the SRs/MA were classified as low quality, while the remaining 4 were deemed to be of very low quality. The PRISMA analysis revealed that out of the 27 items reporting, 16 achieved full reporting (100%). However, there were still some deficiencies in reporting, particularly related to protocol and registration, search strategy, risk of bias, and additional analysis. The ROBIS tool indicated that only 3 SRs/MAs had a low risk of bias. The GRADE assessment indicated that 6 outcomes were of moderate quality (18.75%), 16 were of low quality (50%), and 10 were classified as very low quality (31.25%).

Conclusion

Based on the evidence collected, rTMS appears to be effective in improving cognitive function in AD patients, although the methodological quality of the SRs/MAs reduces the reliability of the conclusions and the overall quality is low. However, based on the available results, we still support the value of rTMS as an intervention to improve cognitive function in AD. In future studies, it is necessary to confirm the efficacy of rTMS in AD patients and provide more reliable and scientific data to contribute to evidence-based medicine.