1
|
Adamczyk WM, Szikszay TM, Nahman-Averbuch H, Skalski J, Nastaj J, Gouverneur P, Luedtke K. To Calibrate or not to Calibrate? A Methodological Dilemma in Experimental Pain Research. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2022; 23:1823-1832. [PMID: 35918020 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2022.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Revised: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
To calibrate or not to calibrate? This question is raised by almost everyone designing an experimental pain study with supra-threshold stimulation. The dilemma is whether to individualize stimulus intensity to the pain threshold / supra-threshold pain level of each participant or whether to provide the noxious stimulus at a fixed intensity so that everyone receives the identical input. Each approach has unique pros and cons which need to be considered to i) accurately design an experiment, ii) enhance statistical inference in the given data and, iii) reduce bias and the influence of confounding factors in the individual study e.g., body composition, differences in energy absorption and previous experience. Individualization requires calibration, a procedure already irritating the nociceptive system but allowing to match the pain level across individuals. It leads to a higher variability of the stimulus intensity, thereby influencing the encoding of "noxiousness" by the central nervous system. Results might be less influenced by statistical phenomena such as ceiling/floor effects and the approach does not seem to rise ethical concerns. On the other hand, applying a fixed (standardized) intensity reduces the problem of intensity encoding leading to a large between-subjects variability in pain responses. Fixed stimulation intensities do not require pre-exposure. It can be proposed that one method is not preferable over another, however the choice depends on the study aim and the desired level of external validity. This paper discusses considerations for choosing the optimal approach for experimental pain studies and provides recommendations for different study designs. PERSPECTIVE: To calibrate pain or not? This dilemma is related to almost every experimental pain research. The decision is a trade-off between statistical power and greater control of stimulus encoding. The article decomposes both approaches and presents the pros and cons of either approach supported by data and simulation experiment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waclaw M Adamczyk
- Laboratory of Pain Research, Institute of Physiotherapy and Health Sciences, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education, Katowice, Poland; Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy, Pain & Exercise Research Luebeck (P.E.R.L.), University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
| | - Tibor M Szikszay
- Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy, Pain & Exercise Research Luebeck (P.E.R.L.), University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Hadas Nahman-Averbuch
- Washington University Pain Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Jacek Skalski
- Laboratory of Pain Research, Institute of Physiotherapy and Health Sciences, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education, Katowice, Poland
| | - Jakub Nastaj
- Laboratory of Pain Research, Institute of Physiotherapy and Health Sciences, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education, Katowice, Poland
| | - Philip Gouverneur
- Institute of Medical Informatics, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Kerstin Luedtke
- Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy, Pain & Exercise Research Luebeck (P.E.R.L.), University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany; Center of Brain, Behavior and Metabolism (CBBM), University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| |
Collapse
|