Postoperative pain treatment after spinal fusion surgery: a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses

Liposomal bupivacaine reduces postoperative pain and opioids consumption in spine surgery: a meta-analysis of 1,269 patients

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Postoperative pain management in spine surgery remains a challenge. Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) has emerged as an alternative or adjunct to opioid-based analgesia. However, existing studies evaluating LB efficacy in spine surgery yield conflicting results and a meta-analysis compiling the literature is lacking.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate pain outcomes, opioid use, and LOS following LB administration after spine surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis.

METHODS

Following the PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) were accessed and explored up to May 2024. Data on medical complications, postoperative pain, postoperative opioid consumption, and length of stay were extracted. Mean differences (MD) with 95% CI were used for continuous data, and odds ratios (OR) were calculated for dichotomous data.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis comprised eleven studies consisting of 1,269 patients (677 in the LB group, 592 in the control group). No statistically significant difference was observed in complication rates. The LB group exhibited significantly lower pain scores at postoperative day 2 (MD=-0.31; 95% CI: -0.52 to -0.09, p=.006), lower postoperative opioid consumption (MD=-0.42; 95% CI: -0.79 to -0.06, p=.02), and shorter length of stay (MD=-0.57; 95% CI: -0.94 to -0.20, p=.002).

CONCLUSION

In the immediate postoperative period after spine surgery, the utilization of liposomal bupivacaine was associated with improved pain outcomes, decreased opioid consumption, and shortened length of stay. Although further research is warranted, these findings suggest that LB may offer a valuable adjunct to pain management strategies in patients undergoing spine surgery.

The safety and efficacy of anti-inflammatory-impregnated gelatin sponge in spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of anti-inflammatory-impregnated gelatin sponges in spine surgeries. Gelatin sponges are increasingly used as delivery vehicles for anti-inflammatory and analgesic drugs during spine surgeries. However, concerns about their safety and efficacy persist. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify original research articles investigating the use of anti-inflammatory-impregnated gelatin sponges in spine surgeries from 2006 to 2024. Case reports, case series, animal studies, cadaveric studies, and abstract-only articles were excluded. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 (Cochrane, UK) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) for observational studies. Meta-analysis was performed using Cochrane Review Manager Web. Thirteen studies (six RCTs, six cohort studies, and one case-control study) were included. Pooled analysis revealed a significant decrease in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score for back pain (mean difference [MD], -0.62; 95% confidence intervals [CI], -0.78 to -0.46; p<0.00001), VAS score for leg pain (MD, -0.60; 95% CI, -0.87 to -0.34; p<0.00001), and length of hospital stay (MD, -0.99; 95% CI, -1.68 to -0.31; p=0.0004). Additionally, there was a significant increase in the Japanese Orthopedic Association score (MD, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.00 to 1.96; p=0.05). However, no significant difference was observed in the disability index (MD, -0.59; 95% CI, -1.88 to -0.70; p=0.37). The use of anti-inflammatory-impregnated gelatin sponges during spine surgeries decreases postoperative back pain and leg pain, reduces length of stay, and improves neurological function. Larger, prospective, randomized trials are required to obtain more robust evidence.

The efficacy and safety of ketorolac for postoperative pain management in lumbar spine surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Ketorolac is widely utilized for postoperative pain management, including back pain after lumbar spinal surgery. Several trials have assessed the efficacy of Ketorolac alone and in combination with other analgesics such as bupivacaine, morphine, epinephrine, paracetamol, and pregabalin. However, the effects and safety profile of ketorolac in these contexts remain controversial.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Ketorolac administration, both as a monotherapy and in combination with other analgesics, for managing postoperative pain in adults undergoing lumbar spinal surgery.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, EBSCO, CNKI, WanFang, VIP, and Cochrane library databases through July 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the analgesic efficacy of Ketorolac administration for postoperative pain of lumbar surgery. The meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statements. Data were extracted and analyzed using open-source meta-analysis software OpenMeta-Analyst, focusing on outcomes such as VAS pain scores, postoperative morphine requirements (PMR), length of hospital stay (LOS), and adverse effects, such as nausea, vomiting, pruritus, and constipation. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Jada scale.

RESULTS

Thirteen RCTs comprising a total of 938 patients were included. The methodological quality of the studies was high, with three studies scoring 5, six studies scoring 4, and four studies scoring 3 on the Jadad scale. Ketorolac significantly reduced pain compared to controls at 0-6 h, with a mean difference (MD) of - 1.42 (95% CI: - 2.03 to - 0.80; P < 0.0001), exceeding the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) of 1.2 to 2.0 points on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), indicating clinically meaningful pain relief. During the 6-12-h period, the pain reduction was significant (MD =  - 0.58; 95% CI: - 0.80 to - 0.35; P < 0.0001), though below the MCID threshold. In the 12-24-h period, Ketorolac continued to show significant pain reduction (MD =  - 0.48; 95% CI: - 0.68 to - 0.28; P < 0.0001), but this reduction was also below the MCID. Heterogeneity was low in the 12-24-h period (I2 = 13%), indicating consistent results across studies. There was a significant reduction in PMR (SMD =  - 1.83; 95% CI =  - 3.42 to - 0.23; P < 0.0001), although with considerable heterogeneity among the studies (I2 = 93%, heterogeneity P < 0.01). Ketorolac administration also significantly reduced the LOS compared to controls (MD =  - 0.45 days; 95% CI =  - 0.74 to - 0.16; P = 0.0001), though this reduction, which is less than a full day (0.45 days), may have limited clinical significance. The findings suggest that Ketorolac effectively reduces pain and opioid use postoperatively, supporting its role in multimodal analgesia for lumbar spinal surgery. The significant reduction in PMR indicates a beneficial opioid-sparing effect, crucial in the context of reducing opioid-related complications. The observed reduction in LOS, while statistically significant, may not translate into substantial clinical benefit due to its limited magnitude. No significant increase in common adverse effects was noted, indicating Ketorolac's safety profile.

CONCLUSION

Ketorolac administration, either alone or in combination with other analgesics, effectively reduces postoperative pain and opioid consumption in adults following lumbar spinal surgery. And Ketorolac did not significantly increase the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting relative to other analgesics or placebos. While it also decreases LOS, the clinical relevance of this reduction is modest. However, the variability in study designs, dosages, and combination therapies contribute to significant heterogeneity in outcomes. Future research should focus on standardizing protocols and exploring optimal dosing strategies. Additionally, long-term safety and effectiveness studies are needed to better understand Ketorolac's role in postoperative pain management.

Opioid alternatives in spine surgeries

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The escalating opioid crisis has intensified the need to explore alternative pain management strategies for patients undergoing spine surgery. This review is timely and relevant as it synthesizes recent research on opioid alternatives for perioperative management, assessing their efficacy, side effects, and postoperative outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

A systematic search was conducted to capture articles from the past 18 months that examined opioid-sparing strategies. Findings indicate that multimodal analgesia, incorporating nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, lidocaine, gabapentinoids, N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists, dexmedetomidine, and emerging regional block techniques like the erector spinae block and TLIF (thoraco lumbar interfascial block), can significantly reduce opioid consumption without compromising pain relief. Additionally, these approaches reduce opioid-related side effects such as postoperative nausea, vomiting, and prolonged hospital stays.

SUMMARY

The use of multimodal analgesia aligns with current pain management guidelines and addresses public health concerns related to opioid misuse. While effective, these alternatives are not without side effects, and the ultimate outcome depends on balancing benefits and risks. Future research should focus on the long-term outcomes of opioid alternatives, their effectiveness across diverse populations, and further validation and optimization of these strategies.

Adding Ketamine to Epidural Morphine Does Not Prolong Postoperative Analgesia After Lumbar Laminectomy or Discectomy

BACKGROUND

Epidural opioids provide effective postoperative analgesia after lumbar spine surgery. Ketamine has been shown to reduce opioid-induced central sensitization and hyperalgesia. We hypothesized that adding ketamine to epidural opioids would prolong the duration of analgesia and enhance analgesic efficacy after lumbar spine surgery.

METHODS

American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I to II patients aged between 18 and 70 years with normal renal function undergoing lumbar laminectomy were recruited into this single-center randomized trial. Patients were randomized to receive either single-dose epidural morphine (group A) or epidural morphine and ketamine (group B) for postoperative analgesia. The primary objective was to compare the duration of analgesia as measured by time to the first postoperative analgesic request. Secondary objectives were the comparison of pain scores at rest and movement, systemic hemodynamics, and the incidence of side effects during the first 24 hours after surgery.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were recruited (25 in each group), of which data from 48 were available for analysis. The mean±SD duration of analgesia was 20±6 and 23±3 hours in group A and group B, respectively ( P =0.07). There were 12/24 (50%) patients in group A and 17/24 (71%) patients in group B who did not receive rescue analgesia during the first 24-hour postoperative period ( P =0.07). Pain scores at rest and movement, systemic hemodynamics, and postoperative complications were comparable between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of ketamine to epidural morphine did not prolong the duration of analgesia after lumbar laminectomy.

Postoperative analgesic options after spine surgery: finding the optimal treatment strategies

INTRODUCTION

Spine surgery is one of the most common types of surgeries performed in the United States; however, managing postoperative pain following spine surgery has proven to be challenging. Patients with spine pathologies have higher incidences of chronic pain and resultant opioid use and potential for tolerance. Implementing a multimodal plan for postoperative analgesia after spine surgery can lead to enhanced recovery and outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

This review presents several options for analgesia following spine surgery with an emphasis on multimodal techniques to best aid this specific patient population. In addition to traditional therapeutics, such as acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, and opioids, we discuss intrathecal morphine administration and emerging regional anesthesia techniques.

EXPERT OPINION

Several adjuncts to improve analgesia following spine surgery are efficacious in the postoperative period. Intrathecal morphine provides sustained analgesia and can be instilled intraoperatively by the surgical team under direct visualization. Local anesthetics deposited under ultrasound guidance by an anesthesiologist trained in regional techniques also provide the opportunity for single injections or continuous analgesia via an indwelling catheter.

Effects of Pain Beliefs on Postoperative Pain and Analgesic Consumption in Spine Surgery Patients

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study evaluates the impact of pain belief on postoperative pain and analgesic consumption in patients undergoing spine surgery. METHODS: This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted on 71 patients undergoing spine surgery, who were admitted to the neurosurgery department of a university hospital between January 2021 and April 2022. Descriptive information form, Pain Beliefs Questionnaire, visual analog scale, pain evaluation form, and verbal category scale were used for data collection. RESULTS: Participant mean age was 53 years, and 40.8% underwent spinal disc surgery. A total of 60.2% of the participants experienced moderate postoperative pain, and severe pain was noted during the second postoperative hour, after rest and coughing, which decreased significantly during consecutive hours. Besides, 70.4% of the participants expressed that the level of pain decreased, 43.7% had pain as they expected, 69.0% had intermittent pain, and 53.5% experienced pain at the surgical site. The mean scores obtained from the Organic and Psychological Beliefs subscales of the Pain Beliefs Questionnaire were 4.25 and 4.21, respectively. There was a statistically significant relationship between the Psychological Beliefs and visual analog scale scores after coughing measured in the postoperative 24th and 36th hours. There was also a significant relationship between organic beliefs and working status. There was no statistically significant relationship between analgesic consumption and pain belief. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing spine surgery experienced moderate pain and had a relatively high level of pain beliefs. Regular evaluation of pain levels and beliefs is required for effective pain management.

Perioperative Analgesia in Spine Surgery: A Review of Current Data Supporting Future Direction

This Clinical Research discusses the diverse nature of spine surgery procedures and the use of multimodal analgesia within enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols to improve patient outcomes. Spine surgeries range from minor decompressions to extensive tumor resections, performed by neurosurgeons or orthopedic spine surgeons on adults and children. To manage perioperative pain effectively, various methods have been employed, including multimodal analgesia within ERAS protocols. Incorporating ERAS protocols into spine surgery has shown benefits such as reduced pain scores, decreased opioid use, shorter hospital stays, and improved functionality. ERAS protocols help to enhance patient outcomes, focusing on deconstructing these protocols for surgeons and anesthesiologists.

Dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to ropivacaine do not prolong analgesia in wound infiltration for lumbar spinal fusion: a prospective randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Local anesthetics (LAs) are widely used to infiltrate into surgical wounds for postoperative analgesia. Different adjuvants like dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine, when added to LA agents, could improve and prolong analgesia. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and opioid-sparing properties of dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine when added to ropivacaine for wound infiltration in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).

METHODS

We conducted a controlled study among 68 adult patients undergoing TLIF, which was prospective, randomized and double-blind in nature. The participants were divided into four equal groups at random. Group R was given 150 mg of 1% ropivacaine (15 mL) and 15 mL of normal saline. Group R + DXM received 150 mg of 1% ropivacaine (15 mL) and 10 mg of dexamethasone (15 mL). Group R + DEX received 150 mg of 1% ropivacaine (15 mL) and 1 µg/kg of dexmedetomidine (15 mL). Lastly, group R + DXM + DEX was given 150 mg of 1% ropivacaine (15 mL), 10 mg of dexamethasone and 1 µg/kg of dexmedetomidine (15 mL). The primary focus was on the length of pain relief provided. Additionally, secondary evaluations included the amount of hydromorphone taken after surgery, the numerical rating scale and safety assessments within 48 h after the operation.

RESULTS

Based on the p value (P > 0.05), there was no significant variance in the duration of pain relief or the total usage of hydromorphone after surgery across the four groups. Similarly, the numerical rating scale scores at rest and during activity at 6-, 12-, 24- and 48-h post-surgery for all four groups showed no difference (P > 0.05). However, the incidence of delayed anesthesia recovery was slightly higher in group R + DEX and group R + DXM + DEX when compared to group R or group R + DXM. Furthermore, there were no significant differences between the four groups in terms of vomiting, nausea, dizziness or delayed anesthesia recovery.

CONCLUSION

For wound infiltration in TLIF, the addition of dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine did not result in any clinically significant reduction in pain or opioid consumption and could prompt some side effects.

Recent Advancements in Epidural Etanercept for Pain Management in Radiculopathy: A Literature Review

The most common etiology of low back and neck pain is associated with spinal cord pathologies. Regardless of origin, low back and neck pain are some of the most common causes of disability worldwide. Mechanical compression due to spinal cord diseases, such as degenerative disc disorders, can lead to radiculopathy, which manifests as numbness or tingling and can progress to loss of muscle function. Conservative management, such as physical therapy, has not been proven effective in treating radiculopathy, and surgical treatments have more risks than benefits for most patients. Epidural disease-modifying medications, such as Etanercept, have been recently explored due to their minimal invasiveness and direct effects on inhibiting tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). Therefore, this literature review aims to evaluate epidural Etanercept's effect on radiculopathy caused by degenerative disc diseases. Epidural Etanercept has been shown to improve radiculopathy in patients with lumbar disc degeneration, spinal stenosis, and sciatica. Further research is needed to compare the effectiveness of Etanercept with commonly used treatments such as steroids and analgesia.

Opioid Sparing Analgesics in Spine Surgery

Combinations of various nonopioid analgesics have been used to decrease pain and opioid consumption postoperatively allowing for faster recovery, improved patient satisfaction, and decreased morbidity. These opioid alternatives include acetaminophen, NSAIDs, COX-2 specific inhibitors, gabapentinoids, local anesthetics, dexamethasone, and ketamine. Each of these drugs presents its own advantages and disadvantages which can make it difficult to implement universally. In addition, ambiguous administration guidelines for these nonopioid analgesics lead to a difficult implementation of standardization protocols in spine surgery. A focus on the efficacy of different pain modalities specifically within spine surgery was implemented to assist with this standardized protocol endeavor and to educate surgeons on limiting opioid prescribing in the postoperative period. The purpose of this review article is to investigate the various opioid sparing medications that have been used to decrease morbidity in spine surgery and better assist surgeons in managing postoperative pain. Methods. A narrative review of published literature was conducted using the search function in Google scholar and PubMed was used to narrow down search criteria. The keywords “analgesics,” “spine,” and “pain” were used.