NMDA Receptor Antagonists, Gabapentinoids, α-2 Agonists, and Dexamethasone and Other Non-Opioid Adjuvants: Do They Have a Role in Plastic Surgery?

A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Methylene Blue Injection for Costal Cartilage Harvest Postoperative Analgesia

BACKGROUND

In plastic surgery, costal cartilage is an excellent support material. However, postoperative pain from costal cartilage harvesting can impact patient recovery and satisfaction with the surgery. Recent reports have shown that methylene blue (MB) is an effective local analgesic in postoperative management.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of MB for pain relief in patients undergoing costal cartilage harvesting.

METHODS

A total of 106 patients undergoing costal cartilage harvesting surgery were selected from the plastic surgery department between December 2022 and March 2024. They were randomly divided into 2 groups: the MB group and the ropivacaine group, with 53 patients in each group. Pain levels were assessed with a numerical rating scale, the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), arm elevation angle, and postoperative satisfaction scales at 1 day, 3 days, 5 days, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Patients receiving MB exhibited a significant decrease in pain scores from 5 days to 1 month of treatment compared to the ropivacaine group. Additionally, in the MB group there was an improvement in ISI scores from 5 days to 1 month compared to the ropivacaine group. Furthermore, during the 3-month follow-up, the MB group had significant increases in satisfaction scores compared to the control group. Arm elevation angle in the MB group was significantly higher compared to the ropivacaine group at 5 days, 1week, and 1month. No serious adverse events were reported, with only 2 patients experiencing an allergic rash.

CONCLUSIONS

Methylene blue demonstrated significant pain reduction with minimal adverse effects.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 (THERAPEUTIC)

Transitioning to Opioid-free Anesthesia for Pediatric Supracondylar Fracture Repairs: A Patient Safety Report

Introduction

Supracondylar fractures are among the most common injuries in the pediatric population. Recently, there has been increased interest in developing opioid-free anesthetic protocols that achieve these same goals without the risks associated with opioid use, such as postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), delayed discharges, and respiratory depression.

Methods

Seattle Children's Hospital implemented opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) for pediatric supracondylar fracture repairs in January 2021. This patient safety report compares the clinical outcomes of these patients to those who received intraoperative opioids. Clinical effectiveness was measured using the maximum pain scores in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), postoperative opioid rescue rates in PACU and PONV rescue rate. PACU length of stay (LOS) was chosen as a clinical balancing measure.

Results

The opioid group (n = 464) had a mean maximum pain score of 3.39 compared with the OFA group (n = 816), which had a mean maximum of 3.70. The PACU IV opioid rescue rate for the opioid group was 38.82%, whereas the OFA group was 38.73%. The opioid group had a PONV rescue rate of 1.53%, compared with 0.23% in the OFA group. Mean LOS in the PACU was 79 minutes for the opioid group and 86 minutes for the OFA group.

Conclusions

The shift to OFA for intraoperative management of patients' supracondylar fracture repair resulted in similar postoperative analgesic outcomes when compared with an opioid-based approach, with a reduced PONV rate and minimal increase in LOS. Transitioning to OFA provided a safe and effective protocol for supracondylar repairs.

Effect of Parecoxib Sodium Combined with Dexmedetomidine on Analgesia and Postoperative Pain of Patients Undergoing Hysteromyomectomy

Background

Propofol combined with remifentanil is the most common anesthesia method in laparoscopic hysteromyomectomy. However, whether the combination of the two is helpful to patients undergoing hysteromyomectomy still requires unclear.

Objective

To determine the effect of parecoxib sodium combined with dexmedetomidine on analgesia and postoperative pain of patients undergoing hysteromyomectomy.

Methods

Altogether, 72 patients receiving hysteromyomectomy in our hospital from February 2017 to March 2019 were enrolled. Among them, 35 patients treated with parecoxib sodium were assigned to the control group, while the rest 37 patients treated with parecoxib sodium combined with dexmedetomidine were assigned to the research group. The following items of the two groups were evaluated: visual analog scale (VAS) score, mechanical pain threshold (MPT), Riker sedation-agitation scale (RSAS) score, and expression of serum cortisol and melatonin.

Results

At 12 and 24 h after operation, the VAS score of the research group was lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05), and at 6, 12, and 24 h after operation, the MPT of the research group was notably higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). In addition, at 10 min after extubation, the research group got notably lower RSAS score than the control group (P < 0.05). Before extubation and at 20 min after extubation, the research group showed notably higher melatonin expression and notably lower serum cortisol expression than the control group (both P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Parecoxib sodium combined with dexmedetomidine can effectively control the postoperative pain of patients undergoing hysteromyomectomy, reduce the incidence of agitation, and effectively control serum cortisol and melatonin in them.

Multimodal Analgesia in the Aesthetic Plastic Surgery: Concepts and Strategies

Postoperative pain management is crucial for aesthetic plastic surgery procedures. Poorly controlled postoperative pain results in negative physiologic effects and can affect length of stay and patient satisfaction. In light of the growing opioid epidemic, plastic surgeons must be keenly familiar with opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia regimens to optimize postoperative pain control.

Methods

A review study based on multimodal analgesia was conducted.

Results

We present an overview of pain management strategies pertaining to aesthetic plastic surgery and offer a multimodal analgesia model for outpatient aesthetic surgery practices.

Conclusion

This review article presents an evidence-based approach to multimodal pain management for aesthetic plastic surgery.

Sickle cell disease: progress towards combination drug therapy

Dr. John Herrick described the first clinical case of sickle cell anaemia (SCA) in the United States in 1910. Subsequently, four decades later, Ingram and colleagues characterized the A to T substitution in DNA producing the GAG to GTG codon and replacement of glutamic acid with valine in the sixth position of the β^S -globin chain. The establishment of Comprehensive Sickle Cell Centers in the United States in the 1970s was an important milestone in the development of treatment strategies and describing the natural history of sickle cell disease (SCD) comprised of genotypes including homozygous haemoglobin SS (HbSS), HbSβ⁰ thalassaemia, HbSC and HbSβ⁺ thalassaemia, among others. Early drug studies demonstrating effective treatments of HbSS and HbSβ⁰ thalassaemia, stimulated clinical trials to develop disease-specific therapies to induce fetal haemoglobin due to its ability to block HbS polymerization. Subsequently, hydroxycarbamide proved efficacious in adults with SCA and was Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved in 1998. After two decades of hydroxycarbamide use for SCD, there continues to be limited clinical acceptance of this chemotherapy drug, providing the impetus for investigators and pharmaceutical companies to develop non-chemotherapy agents. Investigative efforts to determine the role of events downstream of deoxy-HbS polymerization, such as endothelial cell activation, cellular adhesion, chronic inflammation, intravascular haemolysis and nitric oxide scavenging, have expanded drug targets which reverse the pathophysiology of SCD. After two decades of slow progress in the field, since 2018 three new drugs were FDA-approved for SCA, but research efforts to develop treatments continue. Currently over 30 treatment intervention trials are in progress to investigate a wide range of agents acting by complementary mechanisms, providing the rationale for ushering in the age of effective and safe combination drug therapy for SCD. Parallel efforts to develop curative therapies using haematopoietic stem cell transplant and gene therapy provide individuals with SCD multiple treatment options. We will discuss progress made towards drug development and potential combination drug therapy for SCD with the standard of care hydroxycarbamide.

Safety of Postoperative Opioid Alternatives in Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review

With the growing opioid epidemic, plastic surgeons are being encouraged to transition away from reliance on postoperative opioids. However, many plastic surgeons hesitate to use nonopioid analgesics such as nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and local anesthetic blocks because of concerns about their safety, particularly bleeding. The goal of this systematic review is to assess the validity of risks associated with nonopioid analgesic alternatives. A comprehensive literature search of the PubMed and MEDLINE databases was conducted regarding the safety of opioid alternatives in plastic surgery. Inclusion and exclusion criteria yielded 34 relevant articles. A systematic review was performed because of the variation between study indications, interventions, and complications. Thirty-four articles were reviewed that analyzed the safety of ibuprofen, ketorolac, celecoxib, intravenous acetaminophen, ketamine, gabapentin, liposomal bupivacaine, and local and continuous nerve blocks after plastic surgery procedures. There were no articles that showed statistically significant bleeding associated with ibuprofen, celecoxib, or ketorolac. Similarly, acetaminophen administered intravenously, ketamine, gabapentin, and liposomal bupivacaine did not have any significant increased risk of adverse events. Nerve and infusion blocks have a low risk of pneumothorax. Limitations of this study include small sample sizes, different dosing and control groups, and more than one medication being studied. Larger studies of nonopioid analgesics would therefore be valuable and may strengthen the conclusions of this review. As a preliminary investigation, this review showed that several opioid alternatives have a potential role in postoperative analgesia. Plastic surgeons have the responsibility to lead the reduction of postoperative opioid use by further developing multimodal analgesia.

Gabapentin Decreases Narcotic Usage: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Pathway in Free Autologous Breast Reconstruction

The opioid crisis is public health emergency, in part due to physician prescribing practices. As a result, there is an increased interest in reducing narcotic use in the postsurgical setting.

Naturopathic Treatment and Complementary Medicine in Surgical Practice

BACKGROUND

Many patients in Germany use naturopathic treatments and complementary medicine. Surveys have shown that many also use them as a concomitant treatment to surgery.

METHODS

Multiple databases were systematically searched for systematic reviews, controlled trials, and experimental studies concerning the use of naturopathic treatments and complementary medicine in the management of typical post-operative problems (PROSPERO CRD42018095330).

RESULTS

Of the 387 publications identified by the search, 76 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In patients with abnormal gastrointestinal activity, acupuncture can improve motility, ease the passing of flatus, and lead to earlier defecation. Acupuncture and acupressure can reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting, as well as pain. More-over,aromatherapy and music therapy seem to reduce pain, stress and anxiety and to improve sleep. Further studies are needed to determine whether phytotherapeutic treatments are effective for the improvement of gastrointestinal function or the reduction of stress. It also remains unclear whether surgical patients can benefit from the methods of mind body medicine.

CONCLUSION

Certain naturopathic treatments and complementary medical methods may be useful in postoperative care and deserve more intensive study. In the publications consulted for this review, no serious side effects were reported.

Persistent Opioid Use and High-Risk Prescribing in Body Contouring Patients

BACKGROUND

Opioid misuse occurs commonly among obese patients and after bariatric surgery. However, the risk of new persistent use following postbariatric body contouring procedures remains unknown.

METHODS

The authors examined insurance claims from Clinformatics Data Mart (OptumInsight, Eden Prairie, Minn.) between 2001 and 2015 for opioid-naive patients undergoing five body contouring procedures: abdominoplasty/panniculectomy, breast reduction, mastopexy, brachioplasty, and thighplasty (n = 11,257). Their primary outcomes included both new persistent opioid use, defined as continued prescription fills between 90 and 180 days after surgery, and the prevalence of high-risk prescribing. They used multilevel logistic regression to assess the risk of new persistent use, adjusting for relevant covariates.

RESULTS

In this cohort, 6.1 percent of previously opioid-naive patients developed new persistent use, and 12.9 percent were exposed to high-risk prescribing. New persistent use was higher in patients with high-risk prescribing (9.2 percent). New persistent use was highest after thighplasty (17.7 percent; 95 percent CI, 0.03 to 0.33). Increasing Charlson comorbidity indices (OR, 1.11; 95 percent CI, 1.05 to 1.17), mood disorders (OR, 1.27; 95 percent CI, 1.05 to 1.54), anxiety (OR, 1.41; 95 percent CI, 1.16 to 1.73), tobacco use (OR, 1.22; 95 percent CI, 1.00 to 1.49), neck pain (OR, 1.23; 95 percent CI, 1.04 to 1.46), arthritis (OR, 1.30; 95 percent CI, 1.08 to 1.58), and other pain disorders (OR, 1.36; 95 percent CI, 1.16 to 1.60) were independently associated with persistent use.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar to other elective procedures, 6 percent of opioid-naive patients developed persistent use, and 12 percent were exposed to high-risk prescribing practices. Plastic surgeons should remain aware of risk factors and offer opioid alternatives.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

Hilaire H, Stalder M, Tessler O. American Society of Plastic Surgeons Member Post-Operative Opioid Prescribing Patterns

INTRODUCTION

Despite the widespread use of opioids in pain management, there are currently no evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of postoperative pain with opioids. Although other surgical specialties have begun researching their pain prescribing patterns, there has yet to be an investigation to unravel opioid prescribing patterns among plastic surgeons.

METHODS

Survey Monkey was used to sample the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) members regarding their opioid prescribing practice patterns. The survey was sent randomly to 50% of ASPS members. Respondents were randomized to 1 of 3 different common elective procedures in plastic surgery: breast augmentation, breast reduction, and abdominoplasty.

RESULTS

Of the 5,770 overall active ASPS members, 298 responses (12% response rate) were received with the following procedure randomization results: 106 for breast augmentation, 99 for breast reduction, and 95 for abdominoplasty. Overall, 80% (N = 240) of respondents used nonnarcotic adjuncts to manage postoperative pain, with 75.4% (N = 181) using nonnarcotics adjuncts >75% of the time. The most commonly prescribed narcotics were Hydrocodone with Acetaminophen (Lortab, Norco) and Oxycodone with Acetaminophen (Percocet, Oxycocet) at 42.5% (N = 116) and 38.1% (N = 104), respectively. The most common dosage was 5 mg (80.4%; N = 176), with 48.9% (N = 107) mostly dispensing 20-30 tablets, and the majority did not give refills (94.5%; N = 207).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, plastic surgeons seem to be in compliance with proposed American College of Surgeon's opioid prescription guidelines. However, there remains a lack of evidence regarding appropriate opioid prescribing patterns for plastic surgeons.

Optimal Pain Control in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction

Lack of physician familiarity with alternative pain control strategies is a major reason why opioids remain the most commonly used first-line treatment for pain after surgery. This is perhaps most problematic in abdominal wall reconstruction, where opioids may delay ambulation and return of bowel function, while negatively affecting mental status. In this article, we discuss multimodal strategies for optimal pain control in abdominal wall reconstruction. These strategies are straightforward and are proven to improve pain control while minimizing opioid-associated side effects.

Preoperative Multimodal Analgesia Decreases Postanesthesia Care Unit Narcotic Use and Pain Scores in Outpatient Breast Surgery

BACKGROUND

The opioid epidemic demands changes in perioperative pain management. Of the 33,000 deaths attributable to opioid overdose in 2015, half received prescription opioids. Multimodal analgesia is a practice-altering evolution that reduces reliance on opioid medications. Ambulatory breast surgery is an ideal opportunity to implement these strategies.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 560 patients undergoing outpatient breast procedures was conducted. Patients received (1) no preoperative analgesia (n = 333); (2) intraoperative intravenous acetaminophen (n = 78); (3) preoperative oral acetaminophen and gabapentin (n = 95); or (4) preoperative oral acetaminophen, gabapentin and celecoxib (n = 54). Outcomes included postanesthesia care unit narcotic use, pain scores, postanesthesia care unit length of stay, rescue antiemetic use, and 30-day complications.

RESULTS

Both oral multimodal analgesia regimens significantly reduced postanesthesia care unit narcotic use (oral acetaminophen and gabapentin, 14.3 ± 1.7; oral gabapentin, acetaminophen, and celecoxib, 11.9 ± 2.2; versus no drug, 19.2 ± 1.1 mg oral morphine equivalents; p = 0.0006), initial pain scores (oral acetaminophen and gabapentin, 3.9 ± 0.4; oral gabapentin, acetaminophen, and celecoxib, 3.4 ± 0.7; versus no drug, 5.3 ± 0.3 on a 1 to 10 scale, p = 0.0002) and maximum pain scores (oral acetaminophen and gabapentin, 4.3 ± 0.4; oral gabapentin, acetaminophen, and celecoxib, 3.6 ± 0.7; versus no drug, 5.9 ± 0.3 on a 1 to 10 scale; p < 0.0001). Both oral regimens were better than no medications or intravenous acetaminophen alone in multivariate models after controlling for age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, length of surgery, prior narcotic prescription availability, and intraoperative local anesthetic. Postanesthesia care unit length of stay, antiemetic use, and 30-day complications were not different.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative oral multimodal analgesia reduces narcotic use and pain scores in outpatient breast plastic surgery. These regimens are inexpensive, improve pain control, and contribute to narcotic-sparing clinical practice in the setting of a national opioid epidemic.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Pregabalin and dexmedetomidine conscious sedation for flexible bronchoscopy: a randomized double-blind controlled study

BACKGROUND

Conscious sedation is usually required during flexible bronchoscopy. Sedation should be achieved without respiratory depression or loss of consciousness. The present study was designed to evaluate the effect of pregabalin premedication on reducing the amount of sedatives and to show its advantages for patients undergoing flexible bronchoscopy with dexmedetomidine.

METHODS

Seventy patients undergoing elective flexible bronchoscopy were randomly divided into two groups of 35 patients each. All patients received premedication one hour before the procedure. PG group received 150 mg pregabalin and C group received placebo. All patients were sedated with dexmedetomidine infusion to achieve optimum sedation. During the procedure peripheral oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, hemodynamics, Ramsay sedation Score, cough score, and total amount of dexmedetomidine used were recoded. After the procedure patients' and pulmonologists' satisfaction were compared.

RESULTS

The total amount of dexmedetomidine used in PG was less compared to C group (P=0.01). Sedation score was higher in PG group at the time of theatre admission (P<0.001). Cough score was higher, but insignificant in group C (P=0.08). Patients' and pulmonologists' satisfaction scores were higher in group PG (P=0.007 and 0.001 respectively). The heart rate and mean arterial pressure were lower in the C group (P=0.02 and 0.03 respectively). Postoperative care unit stay was less in group PG with less analgesic requirements.

CONCLUSIONS

Conscious sedation facilitates flexible bronchoscopy. Premedication with pregabalin can reduce the amount of sedatives. Dexmedetomidine with pregabalin premedication has many advantages over dexmedetomidine alone.

An Update on Nonopioids: Intravenous or Oral Analgesics for Perioperative Pain Management

Despite an appreciation for many unwanted physiologic effects from inadequate postoperative pain relief, moderate to severe postoperative pain remains commonplace. Although treatment options have evolved in recent years, the use of nonopioid analgesics agents can reduce acute pain-associated morbidity and mortality. This review focuses on the importance of effective postoperative nonopioid analgesic agents, such as acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, gabapentinoid agents, NMDA antagonists, alpha 2 agonists, and steroids, in opioid sparing and enhancing recovery. A careful literature review focusing on these treatment options, potential benefits, and side effects associated with these strategies is emphasized in this review.

Evaluating the Implementation of a Preemptive, Multimodal Analgesia Protocol in a Plastic Surgery Office

Many patients undergoing plastic surgery experience significant pain postoperatively. The use of preemptive, multimodal analgesia techniques to reduce postoperative pain has been widely described in the literature. This quality improvement project evaluated the implementation of a preemptive, multimodal analgesia protocol in an office-based plastic surgery facility to decrease postoperative pain, decrease postoperative opioid consumption, decrease postanesthesia care time, and increase patient satisfaction. The project included adult patients undergoing surgical procedures at an outpatient plastic and cosmetic surgery office, and the protocol consisted of oral acetaminophen 1,000 mg and gabapentin 1,200 mg. Using a pre-/postintervention design, data were collected from patient medical records and telephone interviews of patients receiving the standard preoperative analgesia regimen (preintervention group: n = 24) and the evidence-based preemptive, multimodal analgesia protocol (postintervention group: n = 23). Results indicated no significant differences between the pre- and postintervention groups for any of the outcomes measured. However, results showed that patients in both groups experienced moderate to severe pain postoperatively. In addition, adverse side effects such as dizziness and drowsiness were higher in the postintervention group than in the preintervention group. Although this quality improvement project did not meet the goals it set out to achieve for patients undergoing plastic surgery, it did illustrate the substantial presence of pain after surgical procedures. Thus, clinicians need to continue to focus on identifying targeted treatment plans that use multimodal, non-opioid-based strategies to manage and prevent postoperative pain.