A Practical Approach to Rhinoplasty

Use of Isotretinoin in Rhinoplasty: A Literature Review

This literature review explores the role of isotretinoin as an adjunct therapy in rhinoplasty, particularly in patients with thick nasal skin. Thick skin, often associated with excessive sebaceous activity, can obscure surgical refinements and compromise aesthetic outcomes. Isotretinoin, known for its ability to reduce sebaceous gland activity, improve skin elasticity, and regulate keratinization, has been investigated for its potential to enhance postoperative results in rhinoplasty patients. This review synthesizes existing studies, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), retrospective analysis, and ultrasonographic assessments, to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of isotretinoin in this context.

The Crooked Nose-Surgical Algorithm in Post-Traumatic Patient-Evaluation of Surgical Sequence

Background: A crooked nose is a challenge for a surgeon performing rhinoplasty. When performed correctly, rhinoseptoplasty aligns the nasal framework, restores nasal patency, and achieves facial symmetry. The key to this procedure is to dissect all the structures of the nasal framework, mobilize, reposition, and stabilize them. Aim: This study aims to discuss the quality of life after the rhinoseptoplasty and principles of treating a post-traumatic crooked nose with a view to improving the predictability and reliability of rhinoplasty procedures involving this challenging problem. Methods: The study compared the results of the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) and the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) through statistical analysis. Results: Considering the structural deformities that lead to a crooked nose, the open approach seems to be preferred during a rhinoseptoplasty of a post-traumatic, crooked nose. When reconstructing the nasal septum, it is always necessary to leave the required amount of cartilage to provide nasal support and to secure the septum to the nasal spine. Osteotomies are important for fixing a crooked nose. The preoperative values for ROE were significantly lower before surgery than after surgery (8.7 vs. 20.2), while for SCHNOS, the postoperative values were statistically significantly lower compared to the preoperative values (46.0 vs. 9.1). Conclusions: Properly planned and performed surgery improves the functional and aesthetic outcomes in patients after rhinoseptoplasty.

Finesse in Primary Open Rhinoplasty

SUMMARY

Rhinoplasty remains one of the most technically demanding operations in plastic surgery, and it continues to be one of the top 5 aesthetic surgical procedures performed. The focus of this article is open rhinoplasty, the central focus of the practice of the senior author (R.J.R.) over the past 3 decades. The authors provide a step-by-step video guide to the typical sequence of the senior author's technique.

TikTok Videos Related to Rhinoplasty in China: Characteristics and the Quality of the Information

BACKGROUND

There are numerous videos related to rhinoplasty on TikTok in China. The objective is to examine videos on Chinese TikTok regarding rhinoplasty surgery and evaluate the content quality of rhinoplasty-related videos on TikTok.

METHOD

We collected 184 Chinese video samples related to rhinoplasty and extracted basic information. We used the PEMAT-A/V tool to evaluate each video.

RESULTS

A total of 184 videos were included in the study. The sampled videos received approximately 4.8 million likes, 900,000 comments, and 300,000 favorites. Most of the videos (n = 130, 70.65%) were posted by certified plastic surgeons on the TikTok platform. This study found that 6 (3.26%) videos contained obvious errors or misleading information. Regarding the PEMAT-A/V, the median total score was 85.71 (n = 184, IQR = 78.57-92.45%). Videos created by plastic surgeons had the highest comprehension score (n = 130, median = 100%, IQR = 91.67-100%), while videos from news media (n = 16, median = 75%, IQR = 70.76-77.34%) had the lowest usability and PEMAT-A/V total scores. In terms of video content, the PEMAT-A/V total score for surgical risks/contraindications related content (n = 15, median = 92.86%, IQR = 83.48-92.86%) was the highest, while scores for complaint-related content (n = 20, median = 75, IQR = 71.43-78.57%) were the lowest.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first report in China to evaluate the quality of information in nose plastic surgery-related videos on TikTok. We found that the quality of videos created by plastic surgeons on the TikTok platform is generally high, while videos provided by news media have lower quality. We encourage healthcare professionals to share more high-quality information on TikTok and educate patients on how to properly handle misinformation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Assessment of Harms Reporting Quality in Randomized Controlled Trials of Aesthetic Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review

Background

Rhinoplasty is one of the most common aesthetic plastic surgery procedures. Complications can lead to both aesthetic and functional impairments. The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Harms statement was developed to promote improved reporting of harm across randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Objectives

The aim of this systematic review is to assess harms reporting quality across RCTs on aesthetic rhinoplasty.

Methods

A literature search was conducted in Ovid MEDLINE and Embase databases (January 1, 2005 to August 4, 2023). RCTs which compared 2 or more interventions in rhinoplasty with primarily aesthetic indications and assessed patient-important outcomes were included. The reporting quality was assessed by following a 40-item checklist endorsed by the 2022 CONSORT Harms Extension update.

Results

A total of 58 RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Fifteen RCTs addressed harms of treatment in some capacity. Overall, the reporting quality across RCTs was poor, with a median CONSORT Harms score of 33% (range, 16%-83%). A reporting adherence of ≥50% was met by only 8 studies. There was no significant difference in reporting adherence between studies based on journal endorsement of CONSORT or industry vs nonindustry funding sources (P > .05). A high journal impact factor was significantly associated with a higher reporting quality (P = .044).

Conclusions

CONSORT Harms reporting adherence was poor across the majority of included RCTs. Future trials on aesthetic rhinoplasty should aim to follow the reporting recommendations endorsed by the CONSORT Harms statement to increase transparency and minimize heterogeneity in harms reporting across studies.

Level of Evidence 1

Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil in nasal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Nasal surgeries, addressing anatomical variations for form and function, require careful anesthesia administration, including dexmedetomidine and remifentanil. This meta-analysis evaluates their safety and efficacy variations in nasal surgeries, emphasizing patient comfort and optimal outcomes.

METHODS

Four electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL Complete) were searched for records in English. Studies that measure the effect of dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil on patients underwent nasal surgery were included. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies. A random-effect model was preferred and statistical analysis was performed by Stata software version 17.

RESULTS

Out of an initial pool of 63 articles, five studies were selected for this analysis. All of these chosen studies were Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs). The meta-analysis involved a total of 302 participants, with 152 in the remifentanil group and 150 in the dexmedetomidine group. The analysis aimed to compare the effects of Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil on heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) during surgery. Both groups exhibited similar MAP and HR, with the exception of a slightly lower HR in the remifentanil group at the 15th minute of surgery (Standardized Mean Difference: -0.24 [-0.83, 0.34]). Furthermore, when evaluating the impact of these medications on post-surgery outcomes, including pain levels, the use of pain relief medications, patient-surgeon satisfaction, agitation scores, and recovery time, no significant differences were observed between the two medications in any of these aspects.

CONCLUSION

In summary, the study compared Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil in nasal surgeries anesthesia. No significant differences were found in heart rate, blood pressure, satisfaction, pain, agitation, or recovery time. The study had limitations, and future research should establish standardized protocols and consider various surgical factors.

Clinical Practice Patterns and Evidence-Based Medicine in Rhinoplasty: A 10-Year Review of Continuous Certification Tracer Data from the American Board of Plastic Surgery

BACKGROUND

The American Board of Plastic Surgery (ABPS) has collected data on cosmetic surgery from member surgeons since 2003. These data offer valuable information on national trends in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES

The present study was performed to analyze trends in rhinoplasty over the last decade.

METHODS

Tracer data were compared between two cohorts 2012-2016 (early cohort "EC") and 2017-2021 (recent cohort "RC"). Data included patient demographics and surgical techniques. Results were considered in the context of current EBM-based guidance in the plastic surgery literature.

RESULTS

Data from 730 rhinoplasties (270 EC and 460 RC) were analyzed. The median age was 30 years, and the most common patient concern was the nasal dorsum (79%). In the RC group, fewer patients voiced concerns about tip projection (58% vs 43%, p = 0.0002) and more complained of functional airway problems (38% vs 49%, p = 0.004). An open approach was most common (83%). Septoplasty (47% vs 52%, p = 0.005), caudal septum repositioning (14% vs 23%, p = 0.002), and tip rotation maneuvers (32% vs 49%, p < 0.0001) became more popular. There was also an increase in the use of spreader grafts (35% vs 45%, p = 0.01) and columellar strut grafts (42% vs 50%, p = 0.04), while there has been a decrease in alar base resection (17% vs 10%, p = 0.007) and non-cartilaginous dorsum/radix augmentation (9% vs 4%, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

ABPS tracer data provide an excellent resource for the objective assessment of procedures in plastic surgery. The present study is the first to highlight evolving trends in rhinoplasty over the last 10 years.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Revision Rhinoplasty Finesse with Digital Osteotomies

SUMMARY

Revision rhinoplasty is a finesse procedure requiring careful consideration of all of its requisite steps. Lateral osteotomies are required in many cases and, in the setting of prior lateral osteotomies, can often be recreated with digital pressure alone, without the use of an osteotome. The advantages of doing so include decreased dead-space creation and preservation of attachments between the skeleton and overlying soft tissue.

Beyond Alar Base Resection: Contouring of the Alar Rim and Base

SUMMARY

Alar base surgery is approached with hesitancy and is often avoided by many surgeons because of inexperience and a lack of understanding. However, with a thorough knowledge of the anatomy and dynamic nature of the lower third of the nose, alar base resection can achieve favorable and reproducible results. Beyond correcting alar flare, an appropriately diagnosed and performed alar base procedure serves to contour both the alar rim and the alar base. The following article presents a case series of 436 consecutive rhinoplasties from a single surgeon, 214 of which underwent alar base surgery. The outcomes demonstrate that the procedure is safe and yields desirable results without a single revision being required. As the third in a series of three articles on alar base surgery by the senior author (R.J.R.), this article unifies the management of the alar base. An intuitive approach to the classification and management of alar flare and the implications of alar base surgery on contouring of the alar base and alar rim is presented.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Refinements in Component Dorsal Reshaping in Primary Rhinoplasty

SUMMARY

Dorsal reduction and reshaping is an essential part of many rhinoplasty procedures. The steps of component dorsal reduction have been well established. The authors describe refinement of the dorsal reshaping process to improve the quality and consistency of results.

Gender Considerations in Rhinoplasty

SUMMARY

Precise nasofacial analysis ahead of rhinoplasty is imperative. Features common to the White masculine nose are reviewed in a stepwise fashion and contrasted with those of the White feminine nose. A solid understanding of the cisgender male, masculine nose enables the plastic surgeon to determine the changes required for a successful facial feminizing rhinoplasty as a part of facial gender confirmation surgery.

Update on Rhinoplasty Research Trends: A Bibliometric Analysis

BACKGROUND

Rhinoplasty is one of the most commonly performed aesthetic surgical procedures. The current study aimed to use bibliometric analysis to qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate rhinoplasty research and determine the research trends and hotspots in this field.

METHODS

Publications on rhinoplasty research were extracted from the web of science core collection database. VOSviewer1.6.18 was used to analyze the co-authorship, co-occurrence, the citations of countries, institutions, authors, and hotspot keywords, and the journals in which the studies were published.

RESULTS

On April 8, 2022, 11,130 records of rhinoplasty research published between 1945 and 2021 were collected. Most of the retrieved studies were original research articles (n = 8309, 74.65%), and 1950 (17.52%) papers were available in an open-access format. The annual publication output increased annually. Research groups in the USA were the main contributors and had a strong academic reputation in this field. University of California System was the institution with the greatest contribution (4.17%, with 464 publications). Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (1248 publications, 11.21%) published the most research in this field and was also the most frequently co-cited journal (33,894 citations, total link strength [TLS]: 722,672). R. J. Rohrich (140 publications) was the most prolific author and the most frequently co-cited author (2562 citations, TLS: 56,624). The following rhinoplasty research hotspots were identified: cleft rhinoplasty, nasal reconstruction, nasal tip, revision rhinoplasty, septorhinoplasty, nasal prosthesis, hyaluronic acid, and preservation rhinoplasty.

CONCLUSION

Our results provide a general overview of the major directions in rhinoplasty research. Preservation rhinoplasty, rib graft, nonsurgical rhinoplasty, hyaluronic acid, FACE-Q, fillers, and three-dimensional technology may be future research hotspots.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

A Canadian Experience With Off-the-Shelf, Aseptically Processed, Costal Cartilage Segment Allografts in Complex Rhinoplasty

Background

Complex primary and secondary rhinoplasties usually necessitate grafting materials when native nasal cartilage is inadequate for reconstruction. Fresh frozen, aseptically processed, and nonterminally sterilized costal cartilage segment allografts (CCSAs) are a novel grafting material for such cases that avoid donor-site morbidity, improve operating efficiency, and mitigate the postoperative risks.

Objectives

To report the early experience using fresh frozen, aseptically processed, and nonterminally sterilized CCSAs used in complex primary and secondary rhinoplasties, in Canada.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 21 patients (17 female and 4 male patients) who underwent a primary or secondary rhinoplasty surgery using CCSAs from June 2019 to April 2022.

Results

The mean age was 39 years (range, 27-58 years), and the mean body mass index was 23.7 kg/m² (range, 24-40 kg/m²). Of the 21 procedures, 11 were primary (52.4%) and 10 were secondary (47.6%) rhinoplasties. The mean operative time was 185 min (range, 85-330 min), with a mean follow-up time of 15.0 months (range, 2.0-37.8 months). At follow-up, 19 patients (90.5%) reported being "very satisfied" with their aesthetic results, and only 2 (9.5%) underwent revision surgery. No serious complications were reported, and only 1 case showed evidence of graft resorption.

Conclusions

Based on early experience, this CCSA avoids donor-site morbidity and reduces operative time while maintaining a low complication rate, providing a viable alternative to the use of autologous costal cartilage when indicated in complex primary or secondary rhinoplasties with inadequate native nasal cartilage.

Level of Evidence 4

Optimizing the Use of Autografts, Allografts, and Alloplastic Materials in Rhinoplasty

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand the autologous graft options available to the rhinoplasty surgeon, including septal cartilage, auricular cartilage, costal cartilage, and bone. 2. Understand the autograft and allograft options available to the rhinoplasty surgeon, including cadaveric costal cartilage, silicone, Medpor, and Gore-Tex. 3. Identify the ideal situations to use each of these implant materials. 4. Understand the advantages and disadvantages of the different autografts, allografts, and implants in rhinoplasty.

SUMMARY

This review focuses on the graft options available to the modern rhinoplasty surgeon. Autologous options are varied in the quality of cartilage harvested and the morbidity of the donor site. In addition, surgeons should understand the allograft options should autologous grafting be unfeasible or undesirable. New technological advances in processing of allograft cartilage makes this an attractive secondary option.

An Overview of Maxillofacial Approaches to Smile Design

The oral and maxillofacial surgeon (OMS) has the knowledge and skills to make drastic skeletal changes in favor of a more cosmetic smile. OMS can alter intraoral and extraoral soft tissues to make subtle or significant changes in facial cosmesis. This article provides an overview of the scope of the OMS in smile design. The authors provide a cursory review of pertinent gross and surgical facial anatomy, discuss the role of orthognathic surgery and rhinoplasty in smile cosmesis, and describe the fundamentals of common cosmetic procedures ranging from gingivoplasty to lip lift and lip augmentation and the use of neurotoxins.

The Role of Nasal Sill Correction in Secondary Cleft Rhinoplasty

BACKGROUND

Evaluating outcomes after cleft rhinoplasty can be challenging because of the lack of objective measures that would lead to a more desirable outcome.

METHODS

This study is a 10-year retrospective review of 30 consecutive patients who underwent secondary unilateral cleft rhinoplasty performed by a single surgeon. Subjective ratings were made using the Unilateral Cleft Lip Surgical Outcomes Evaluation (UCL SOE), which rates 4 components (nose, cupid's bow, lateral lip, and free vermillion) with a score of 0 to 2. Multiple anthropometric measurements (nostril height ratio, width ratio, medial ¼ height ratio, sill ratio, nostril area ratio, columellar angle, tip projection ratio, and nasolabial angle) were taken using a free National Institutes of Health program, ImageJ. Standardized photographs were compared at T0 (preoperatively), T1 (<6 weeks postoperatively), and T2 (>6 weeks postoperatively).

RESULTS

There were 30 patients who met our inclusion criteria: 10 males (66.7%) and 20 females (66.7%). Of these patients, 26 (86.7%) had a complete cleft lip and 4 (13.3%) had an incomplete cleft lip. The patients' average age at time of surgery was 16.2 years with a mean follow-up of 17.9 months. Subjective scores in both nasal and overall UCL SOE ratings improved from T0 to T1, 0.7 to 1.2 (P ≤ 0.001) and 3.6 to 4.7 (P ≤ 0.001), respectively. Visual analog scores in nasal and overall UCL SOE ratings improved between T0 and T2, 0.7 to 0.9 (P = 0.023) and 3.6 to 4.8 (P = 0.002), respectively. Of all the objective measures, nasal sill ratio and cleft height to width ratio correlated with improved subjective ratings across multiple time points.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that objective measures such as nasal sill and nostril shape (cleft height to width ratio) correlate with improved subjective visual analog scale using the UCL SOE. The nasal sill is an often overlooked, yet essential, part of creating an aesthetically pleasing nose during cleft rhinoplasty.

Traditional Anthropometrics versus Computerized Photograph Manipulation in Rhinoplasty Planning

BACKGROUND

Rhinoplasty planning requires meticulous forethought and is a source of challenge to surgeons. Traditional anthropometric analyses aim to use measurements and ideal ratios to determine the appropriate changes in nasal measurements such as length and tip projection. More recently, computerized photograph manipulation has been adopted as a means to demonstrate to patients the planned changes in a rhinoplasty and improve communication and patient confidence. It remains undetermined if the changes recommended using traditional anthropometric rhinoplasty planning are similar to those done by an experienced rhinoplasty surgeon manipulating preoperative photographs to an aesthetic ideal.

METHODS

Preoperative photographs obtained for clinical use were analyzed from 97 consecutive patients seen in clinic for rhinoplasty or septorhinoplasty by the senior author (R.H.G.). Facial and nasal anthropometric measurements were performed on the preoperative photographs. The analysis prescribed by Byrd and Hobar was used to then calculate their prescribed "ideal" nasal anthropometrics. Separately, these patients had their preoperative photographs manipulated using computer manipulation software by the senior author, with an eye toward creating an aesthetically pleasing nose. Nasal anthropometrics were measured from the manipulated photographs. The changes prescribed in traditional anthropometrics were compared to those obtained from computer manipulation using univariate analyses.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 35.4 years, and the population was 68% female. Average nasal proportions from the computer manipulation were a nasal length 76.1% of the midfacial height, tip projection of 57.7% of nasal length, and radix projection of 24.3% of nasal length. Computerized manipulation minimally changed nasal length relative to Byrd's analysis which decreased nasal length on average (100.3% of the original nasal length versus 88.2%, p<0.01). It prescribed a greater decrease in tip projection than Byrd's analysis (97.7% of original projection versus 99.9% of original projection, p=0.05). Computer manipulation also prescribed a lesser increase in radix projection than Byrd's analysis (100.5% of original radix projection versus 109.3% of original radix projection, p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Byrd's analysis remains an excellent tool for guiding the changes in nasal dimensions in rhinoplasty. However, computerized manipulation may help patients and surgeons communicate a common goal. Their desired nasal dimensions may differ from those traditionally prescribed. Specifically, some patients may seek lesser decreases in nasal length or lesser increases in radix projection than Byrd's analysis prescribes. Further research in this topic is warranted, and ultimately the surgeon's judgment and patient goals should drive surgical planning.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors - www.springer.com/00266 .

An Update on the Surgical Management of the Bulbous and Boxy Tip

SUMMARY

The bulbous and box tips are two common morphologies encountered in rhinoplasty. Nasal tip reshaping is a challenging aspect of rhinoplasty. Understanding the classifications of nasal tip morphologies aids when performing a nasal-facial analysis. The management algorithm for both tip morphologies shares various techniques. These techniques include but are not limited to cephalic trim, transdomal sutures, and interdomal sutures. A graduated approach to managing the variations in bulbous and boxy tips will help in achieving consistent results. New concepts applied to the management include supporting alar rims with alar contour grafts, closing dead space through a series of techniques, and managing the soft-tissue envelope, which is often in excess.

Preoperative Evaluation of the Rhinoplasty Patient

Requiring both high-level technical skills and artistic sense, rhinoplasty continues to be one of the most challenging procedures in plastic surgery despite its popularity. A thorough preoperative consultation of the rhinoplasty patient forms the foundation of a successful case. During the consultation, the physician should obtain a detailed medical and nasal history, understand the patient's areas of concern, conduct a nasal analysis, and evaluate the patient's candidacy for surgery. This article reviews the key functional, esthetic, and psychosocial considerations that should be taken into account during a preoperative consultation for a rhinoplasty patient.

Why Primary Rhinoplasty Fails

SUMMARY

Rhinoplasty remains one of the most challenging operations performed by plastic surgeons. The complexity lies in the ability to have a consistent and predictable aesthetic result. The unpredictability is mainly attributable to the interplay of manipulated internal structures and wound healing dynamics. In addition, setting realistic expectations with the patient is essential for achieving high postoperative patient satisfaction. An open rhinoplasty approach enables an accurate and in-depth evaluation and intervention. The authors provide a detailed analysis and discussion on why primary rhinoplasty fails, along with the surgical approach for preventing these failures.

Secondary Rhinoplasty for Unilateral Cleft Nasal Deformity

BACKGROUND

Secondary cleft rhinoplasty presents some of the most challenging cases of both cosmetic and functional nasal deformities. Understanding the anatomy and growth abnormality seen with the cleft nasal deformity helps to tailor surgical management. This article seeks to expand on the application of current concepts in secondary rhinoplasty for unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity.

METHODS

The authors review nasal analysis in the cleft rhinoplasty patient and provide the surgical management for each aspect in the secondary cleft rhinoplasty.

RESULTS

The secondary rhinoplasty was divided into seven areas: piriform hypoplasia, septal reconstruction, dorsal reshaping, tip reshaping, tip projection, alar reshaping, and alar repositioning. Surgical management for each is provided.

CONCLUSION

Secondary cleft rhinoplasty requires an understanding of the structural dysmorphology, and the use of cosmetic, functional, and secondary rhinoplasty techniques for its successful management.

Lateral Domal Translocation and Medial Crural Transection: A Reliable Method for Nasal Tip Deprojection

SUMMARY

Nasal tip deprojection is a common goal in rhinoplasty. Several techniques have been described, many of which require destructive techniques that compromise the intrinsic integrity and morphology of the lateral crura. Through lateral translocation of the domes and shortening of the medial crura, nasal tip deprojection can be achieved without disrupting the integrity of the lateral crura. The domes are recreated lateral to the intrinsic domes with a standard transdomal suture, and excess length of the middle and medial crura is managed through transection and shortening of the medial crura. This technique preserves the morphology of the nasal base without altering the position of the medial crural footplates. Deprojection of 4 to 5 mm can be readily achieved with this technique.

Zone-Dependent Architecture and Biochemical Composition of Decellularized Porcine Nasal Cartilage Modulate the Activity of Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells in Cartilage Regeneration

Previous anatomical studies have shown different functional zones in human nasal septal cartilage (NC). These zones differ in respect to histological architecture and biochemical composition. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of these zones on the fate of stem cells from a regenerative perspective. Therefore, decellularized porcine septal cartilage was prepared and subjected to histological assessment to demonstrate its equivalence to human cartilage. Decellularized porcine NC (DPNC) exposed distinct surfaces depending on two different histological zones: the outer surface (OS), which is equivalent to the superficial zone, and the inner surface (IS), which is equivalent to the central zone. Human adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ASCs) were isolated from the abdominal fat tissue of five female patients and were seeded on the IS and OS of DPNC, respectively. Cell seeding efficiency (CSE), vitality, proliferation, migration, the production of sulfated glycosaminoglycans (sGAG) and chondrogenic differentiation capacity were evaluated by histological staining (DAPI, Phalloidin, Live-Dead), biochemical assays (alamarBlue^®, PicoGreen^®, DMMB) and the quantification of gene expression (qPCR). Results show that cell vitality and CSE were not influenced by DPNC zones. ASCs, however, showed a significantly higher proliferation and elevated expression of early chondrogenic differentiation, as well as fibrocartilage markers, on the OS. On the contrary, there was a significantly higher upregulation of hypertrophy marker MMP13 (p < 0.0001) and GAG production (p = 0.0105) on the IS, whereas cell invasion into the three-dimensional DPNC was higher in comparison to the OS. We conclude that the zonal-dependent distinct architecture and composition of NC modulates activities of ASCs seeded on DPNC. These findings might be used for engineering of cartilage substitutes needed in facial reconstructive surgery that yield an equivalent histological and functional structure, such as native NC.

Versatile Approach to Septonasal Deformity: Skyscraper Construction Based on an Old Relic

INTRODUCTION

Severely deformed noses usually harbor a combination of both bony pyramid and septal deformities. In this retrospective study, the authors aimed to evaluate our results of repair in patients with severe nasal deformities and importance of a versatile approach in these cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 32 cases with congenital or acquired (traumas or surgeries) severe nasal deformity were included in this retrospective study. Gender, age, etiology, reconstruction methods, complications, and results were recorded. Preoperative and postoperative pictures were compared; additionally, patients' reviews on the esthetic and functional outcomes were noted. Open approach, weak L-strut template preparation attached to a strong keystone skeleton and reconstruction with a stable L- or T-strut on this template were carried out in all cases. In addition, glabellar flaps were used in 2 cases to restore the contracted skin envelope and wide-angle L-shape cartilage grafts in 7 cases for extensive alar cartilage reconstruction.

RESULTS

Favorable esthetic and functional results were obtained in most of the patients. The postoperative problems were recorded as intranasal synechiae; costochondral graft displacement; residual external deviation; nostril asymmetry; residual alar, columellar and tip problems; and prolonged edema.

CONCLUSIONS

Sufficient sizes and amounts of skin, mucosa, cartilage, and bone tissue must be available to plan versatile repair using flaps and grafts according to the needs of each patient. Preserved stability of the keylock area is substantial. The authors advocate construction of a new structure based on the native weakened skeleton free from the extrinsic and intrinsic forces is an effective method.EBM LEVEL 4.

Evidence-Based Performance Measures for Rhinoplasty: A Multidisciplinary Performance Measure Set

SUMMARY

The American Society of Plastic Surgeons, the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery commissioned the multidisciplinary Rhinoplasty Performance Measure Development Work Group to identify and draft quality measures for the care of patients undergoing both functional and aesthetic rhinoplasty. One outcome measure and three process measures were identified. The outcome looked at patient satisfaction with rhinoplasty procedures. The process measures look at motivations and expectations of the procedure, airway assessment, and nonnarcotic shared decision-making strategies for pain management. All measures in this report were approved by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons Quality and Performance Measures Work Group and Executive Committee, and the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Rhinoplasty Society, and the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. The Work Group recommends the use of these measures for quality initiatives, Continuing Medical Education, Maintenance of Certification, Qualified Clinical Data Registry reporting, and national quality reporting programs.

Tip Droop Prevention in Rhinoplasty: Dynamic Effect of Strut Graft on Smiling versus Depressor Muscle Release

Background:

Aesthetic rhinoplasty is one of the most challenging procedures performed by aesthetic surgeons. Tip droop, especially on smiling, may not be noted by the surgeon postoperatively but can be concerning to patients. Our aim was to determine if the division of the depressor septi nasi or its combination with a columellar strut graft during rhinoplasty produce a measurable reduction in nasal tip droop on smiling.

Methods:

A retrospective casenote and photograph review was conducted on patients who had undergone aesthetic endonasal rhinoplasty, performed by a single surgeon between 2015 and 2019. In total, 29 patients had release of the depressor septi nasi muscle, whilst 11 had release of the muscle along with a strut graft. Lateral smiling photographs were taken postoperatively. Tip droop was measured as a variation of the nasolabial angle from rest to smiling using the Frankfurt line.

Results:

Photographs were taken at a mean of 14 months postoperatively. In the group who had muscle release only, a mean increase in nasolabial angle of 3.66 degrees was seen when smiling when compared with rest. In the group who had muscle release combined with strut graft, a mean increase of 2.27 degrees was seen. When using a columellar strut along with muscle release, tip droop on smiling was reduced.

Conclusions:

This study demonstrates that columellar strut grafting in combination with muscle release can alleviate drooping of the tip better than muscle division alone after rhinoplasty. The columellar strut graft provides tip stability and can therefore be used to enhance dynamic outcomes after rhinoplasty.

Experimental approach to nasal septal cartilage regeneration with adipose tissue-derived stem cells and decellularized porcine septal cartilage

BACKGROUND

Cartilage shortage is a major problem in facial reconstructive surgery. Prior studies have shown that decellularized porcine nasal septal cartilage (DPNC) seeded with primary human nasal chondrocytes enabled cartilage regeneration and showed potential as a replacement material for nasal cartilage. Since adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ASCs) are easily accessible and almost abundantly available, they appear to be a promising alternative to limited chondrocytes making the combination of DPNC and ASCs a feasible approach towards clinical translation. Thus, this study was intended to investigate the interactions between ASCs and DPNC in an in vitro model.

METHODS

DPNCs were seeded and 3D-cultured with primary human ASCs that were priorly characterized with trilineage differentiation and flow cytometry. Cell vitality and proliferation were evaluated by Live-Dead, alamarBlue, and PicoGreen assays. Chondrogenic differentiation was examined by DMMB assay and cryosectioning-based histology. Cell invasion within DPNC was visualized and quantified by fluorescent histology (DAPI, Phalloidin).

RESULTS

ASCs showed good adherence to DPNC and Live-Dead assay proved their viability over 2 weeks. AlamarBlueassay showed an increase in metabolic activity compared to 2D cultures, and PicoGreen assay demonstrated an increase of cell number within DPNC over time. Biochemical assays and histology added evidence of chondrogenic differentiation of 3D-cultured ASCs under the influence of chondrogenic induction medium. Fluorescent image analysis showed a significant increase of cell-occupied areas of scaffolds over time (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

DPNC scaffolds provided a suitable environment for ASCs that allowed good cell vitality, high proliferation, and chondrogenic differentiation. Thus, the use of ASCs and DPNC yields a promising alternative to the use of primary human chondrocytes. For facial cartilage tissue engineering, we regard ASCs as an attractive alternative to human nasal chondrocytes due to their better accessibility and availability. Further research will be necessary to determine long-term effects and in vivo outcomes of ASCs and DPNC in cartilage regeneration of the face.

Systematic Surgical Approach to Alar Base Surgery in Rhinoplasty

In an era with smartphone photography and social media (specifically, "selfies"), basal view aesthetics is becoming increasingly important. Achieving balance between the nasal base and the remainder of the nose and face while preserving or restoring external valve function are essential to a successful rhinoplasty. Without a systematic approach to the nasal base, it is more difficult to achieve an ideal outcome from both aesthetic and functional standpoints. This article outlines an organized and systematic approach to the nasal base, beginning with comprehensive nasofacial analysis. The authors continue by describing idealized basal view aesthetics and provide a treatment algorithm for common deformities that include alar flaring and a wide nasal base. The authors attempt to provide a comprehensive approach to the treatment of the nasal base by discussing the implications of treating columellar deformities, tip positioning, or alar-columellar discrepancies on the overall aesthetics of the lower third of the nose. Furthermore, technical considerations are given for common surgical maneuvers addressing the alar base to help guide treatment and prevent complications such as poor scarring, notching, nostril asymmetry or stenosis (external valve obstruction), and alar deformities ("parenthesis" or "bowling pin"), to name a few.

The Role of Skin Thickness in the Choice of a Rhinoplasty Technique for Thin-Skinned Patients: Analysis of Long-Term Results and Patient Satisfaction

INTRODUCTION

This randomized controlled study aimed to analyse the long-term results of thin-skinned patients who underwent rhinoplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All the included study patients had the following characteristics: underwent primary rhinoplasty for functional and/or cosmetic problems, were thin-skinned, had been followed for almost 2 years, underwent both standard pre- and post-operative photography, had a good understanding of the Italian language, and had signed a consent form for inclusion in the study. The patients were randomly divided into 4 groups as follows: group 1, camouflage of the dorsum by diced cartilage; group 2, camouflage of the dorsum with lipofilling; group 3, camouflage of the dorsum by a temporal fascia graft; and group 4 (control group), without camouflage of the dorsum. Patients answered the Italian version of the FACE-Q rhinoplasty module. The Obagi skin pinch test was used to measure nasal skin thickness. We compared pre- and post-operative patient satisfaction with the appearance of their nose between the 4 patient groups by the Chi-squared test for unpaired data. Two plastic surgeons reviewed all the post-operative photographs of the study patients and rated the photographs on a scale of 1 to 5.

RESULTS

A total of 101 patients who underwent primary rhinoplasty between January 2016 and March 2018 in our department of plastic surgery and satisfied the inclusion criteria were enrolled in this study. The mean patient age was 38.5 years. The mean follow-up time was 2.5 years. The differences between the preoperative and post-operative FACE-Q values for group 1 were significant (P < 0.01), whereas the differences between the preoperative and post-operative FACE-Q values for the other groups were not significant. The results for group 1 patients remained stable over the long-term follow-up compared with the results for other groups (P < 0.01). Groups 2 and 4 underwent more secondary procedures than groups 1 and 3 (P < 0.01). The 2 reviewers determined that patient groups 1 and 3 obtained more satisfactory outcomes than groups 1 and 4 (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This was the first randomized study to demonstrate that diced cartilage grafts used for thin-skinned patients was the best approach for obtaining a satisfactory long-term outcome and durable natural appearance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Nasal Obstruction and Rhinoplasty: A Focused Literature Review

BACKGROUND

There is a significant variation in the assessment, treatment, and outcomes of nasal airway obstruction and management in the published literature. This study aimed to: (1) define key components of the nasal airway, (2) identify frequent causes of nasal obstruction, and (3) review existing treatment methods.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed, and 135 studies were included via the following criteria: English, human subjects, and a primary endpoint of nasal airway improvement. Exclusion criteria were: abstract only, no airway data, pediatric patients, cleft rhinoplasty, sleep apnea, isolated traumatic nasal reconstruction, and cadaveric-only or animal studies.

RESULTS

The relevant obstructive sites include the ENV, septum, inferior turbinates, INV, and nasal bones. Addressing the alar rim alone may be insufficient, and inspection of the lateral wall and crura may be indicated. Correction of septal deviation involves attention to the bony base. Mucosal sparing treatment of inferior turbinates improves outcomes. INVs are a major source of nasal obstruction, and treatment includes spreader grafts. The bony nasal vault can contribute to nasal obstruction, including due to surgical osteotomies.

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomic causes of airway obstruction include the alar rims and lateral nasal walls, deviated nasal septum, inferior turbinate hypertrophy, decreased INV angle, and narrowed nasal bones. Treatments include graft placement; septoplasty; mucosal sparing turbinectomy; and lateral wall support. Pitfalls include failing to address the bony septum, over-resection of inferior turbinates, and narrowing of the nasal vault. Appreciation of airway management during rhinoplasty will improve functional outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Effects of Rhinoplasty on Smile Esthetic and Gingival Appearance

Rhinoplasty alone or combined with septoplasty is one of the cornerstone management techniques in facial esthetic surgery. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effects of rhinoplasty maneuvers on facial and smile esthetics. The study included a total of 27 adult patients. Measurements of gingival length (GL), right and left maxillary incisor-upper lip distance (MIULD), right and left inter-lip distance (ILD), and right and left gingival pocket depth (GPD) were performed and rounded to the nearest millimeter in full smile and at rest. All measurements were obtained at baseline and at the postoperative 1st and 6th months by the same clinician. As compared with the baseline values, significant decreases were determined in the left and right GLs in full smile, left and right MIULD, and left ILD at the postoperative 1st month and in the GL, left and right MIULD, and left and right ILD at the postoperative 6th month. In conclusion, rhinoplasty maneuvers can improve smile esthetics by changing the GL thereby increase patient satisfaction.

Rhinoplasty Combined With Centrofacial Lipofilling to Optimize Facial Proportions

Background

The perceived appearance of the nose is influenced by its foundations (ie, malar areas, lip, and chin). The association of nasal hump and centrofacial volume deficiency is not uncommon.

Objectives

We evaluated and analyzed the role of centrofacial lipofilling simultaneously to rhinoplasty to sculpt facial proportions and shapes all in one procedure.

Methods

Volumes and placement of fat graft were determined preoperatively. Centrofacial microfat grafting was performed concomitantly to the rhinoplasty. Treated areas were malar, upper lip, pyriform aperture, and chin.

Results

From January 2016 to January 2019, concurrent lipofilling was performed in 23 rhinoplasties. Fat graft volumes ranged from 2 to 31 mL.

Conclusions

Centrofacial lipofilling is a simple and effective tool that can easily be associated with rhinoplasty techniques to optimize the results and may even influence the procedure towards a more conservative approach.

Level of Evidence: 4

Developing Consistency in Rhinoplasty

This invited Special Topic article outlines the authors' evolution and technique to optimize consistent results in rhinoplasty.

Male Rhinoplasty: Update

Male rhinoplasty is unique in that it requires precise preoperative planning to achieve a successful result. Better communication and clarity are paramount with male rhinoplasty patients because the patients may be less attentive. It is important for the surgeon to screen the patients for any psychosocial disorders. Through a series of cases, male rhinoplasty techniques are highlighted. Masculine features should be preserved, and the nose should not be feminized or oversculpted. Another key component in any rhinoplasty case is proper skin care, especially during the postoperative period. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Therapeutic, V.

Evidence-based Nasal Analysis for Rhinoplasty: The 10-7-5 Method

Rhinoplasty is one of the top 5 aesthetic surgical procedures performed in plastic surgery. A methodical evaluation based on solid and up-to-date scientific evidence in different key areas of nasal and facial analysis is presented, the 10-7-5 method. This represents the most important preoperative step for a successful rhinoplasty. The 10-7-5 method for nasal analysis is a useful instrument that provides the rhinoplasty surgeon a deep comprehension of nasal anatomy. Understanding the nasal structures’ main relationships and consequences of each surgical maneuver on nasal framework assists on establishing the appropriate surgical goals for each patient, both in primary and secondary rhinoplasty cases. This systematic analysis of patient’s frontal, lateral, and basal nasal views provides a background to identify changes to ideal aesthetic proportions and how to surgically restore them while maintaining gender and ethnic congruency.

Primary Open Rhinoplasty

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article and viewing the videos, the participant should be able to: 1. Describe the operative technique necessary to perform open rhinoplasty. 2. Summarize the steps necessary in performing a component dorsal reduction. 3. Develop a surgical plan for nasal tip shaping and cephalic rotation of the nasal tip. 4. Identify the need for aesthetic improvement of the alar base, and perform successful alar base surgery. 5. Demonstrate consistency, safety, and predictability in rhinoplasty.

SUMMARY

Rhinoplasty remains one of the most challenging procedures in plastic surgery, and continues to be one of the top five aesthetic surgical procedures, with over 223,000 performed in 2016. Rhinoplasty may be performed by means of the "open" or the "closed" approach, and each approach has its advantages and disadvantages. This article focuses on the open approach, and the principles and techniques necessary to achieve consistent and gratifying results. As with all plastic surgery procedures, successful rhinoplasty begins with a thorough clinical analysis, definition of the goals, meticulous preoperative planning, precise operative execution, vigilant postoperative management, and a critical analysis of one's results.

Nasal Analysis: Considerations for Ethnic Variation

As the United States continues to be more ethnically and racially diverse, it is important for the rhinoplasty surgeon to have an appreciation and understanding of nasal variations that exist to plan for and execute ethnically congruent results. The nasal analysis is a critical component of the patient evaluation, which has been used as a tool by surgeons to identify deviations from anatomical norms or canons. In this article, the authors describe common nasal anatomical variations that exist between ethnic groups as a guide for nasal analysis. Understanding these variations will facilitate and help define important cultural aesthetics, which can be used to plan for rhinoplasties in a diverse patient population.

Shaping the nasal dorsum

Shaping a proper dorsum must constitute an essential part of rhinoplasty. This article addresses the main current concepts that play a significant role in dorsal modifications: proper exposure at the keystone, component separation and incremental reduction, straightening the septum and positioning it in the midline, mobilizing and reshaping the nasal bones by osteotomies and osteoplasties, and finally reconstituting a barrel vault of appropriate width and proper contour. The importance of power tools and piezoelectric instrumentation is highlighted, as well as the relevance of simulation and computed tomography (CT) imaging as key to bone and septal work. Finally, the key principles of rebuilding the dorsum in revision rhinoplasty are detailed.

Chest and facial surgery for the transgender patient

In conjunction with social transition, hormones, and counseling, gender-affirming surgery (GAS) is a key component in the treatment gender dysphoria. Gender affirming surgeries can be divided into genital surgery (phalloplasty, metoidioplasty, oophorectomy, vaginoplasty, and orchiectomy) and non-genital surgeries. The non-genital surgeries for transmasculine individuals include chest masculinization and body contouring. For transfeminine individuals, they include breast augmentation, and facial feminization. Chest masculinization eliminates the need for binding and improves overall confidence and quality of life. Choice of technique depends on body habitus and patient preference. For transfeminine individuals, some breast growth can be achieved with the use of estrogen over the course of 1-2 years, but many still require breast augmentation for breasts that are proportionate to their frame. Facial surgery for transfeminine patients is highly effective in changing classic masculine anatomic features to feminine norms. The most common of these procedures include forehead contouring, rhinoplasty, lip lift, mandible angle reduction, genioplasty and chondrolaryngoplasty. These non-genital surgeries are critical to treating gender dysphoria in transgender and gender non-binary individuals. Further research with standardized and validated assessments of patient reported outcomes is needed to fully understand long term effects on quality of life and gender dysphoria.

Does skin thickness affect satisfaction post rhinoplasty? Middle Eastern population as an example

Objectives:

To determine the mean nasal skin thickness in the Middle Eastern population and to assess the effect of skin thickness on patients’ satisfaction following rhinoplasty surgeries.

Methods:

Radiological measurements of skin thickness at the 3 vertical thirds of the nasal dorsum were taken. A total of 154 patients (80 females and 74 males) who were scheduled for computed tomography scan for the paranasal sinuses were included in the study. The patients were then categorized into 3 groups: thick, medium, and thin nasal skin. A scale from 10% to 100% was used to assess patient satisfaction following rhinoplasty. Satisfaction and skin thickness were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test.

Results:

Nasal skin thickness for males was 6.13, 2.76 millimeter (mm) from the upper and 3.70 mm to the lower third. For females, it was 5.34, 2.13 mm from the upper and 3.21 mm to the lower third. There was no statistically significant difference in patient satisfaction among the 3 skin thickness groups (p=0.089).

Conclusion:

This study provides baseline results of nasal skin thickness in the Middle Eastern population. The results also show that nasal skin thickness may not be a strong factor affecting patient satisfaction.

In-House Manufacture of Sterilizable, Scaled, Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Models for Rhinoplasty

BACKGROUND

Rhinoplasty relies on clear patient communication and precise execution of a three-dimensional (3D) plan to achieve optimal results. As 3D imaging and printing continue to grow in popularity within the medical field, rhinoplasty surgeons have begun to leverage these resources as an aid to preoperative planning, patient communication, and the technical performance of this challenging operation.

OBJECTIVES

Utilizing departmentally available resources and open-access 3D imaging platforms, we have developed an affordable, reproducible protocol for rapid in-house virtual surgical planning (VSP) and subsequent manufacture of 3D-printed rhinoplasty models.

METHODS

Preoperative 3D photographic images underwent virtual rhinoplasty using a freely available 3D imaging and sculpting program (BlenderTM [Version 2.78, Amsterdam, The Netherlands]). Once the ideal postoperative result was digitally achieved, scaled, sterilizable, and patient-specific 3D models of the preoperative and ideal postoperative result were manufactured in-house using a departmentally owned 3D printer.

RESULTS

3D-printed models have successfully been manufactured and employed for 12 patients undergoing rhinoplasty. The average time to prepare a set of pre- and postoperative models was 3 hours, while the printing process required 18 to 24 hours per model. Each set of surgical models can be manufactured at a total materials cost of approximately $5.00.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe an affordable means to construct sterilizable, scaled, patient-specific 3D-printed models for rhinoplasty. This technique may become of increasing interest to academic and cosmetic centers as hardware costs of 3D printers continue to fall.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

In vivo evaluation of a regenerative approach to nasal dorsum augmentation with a polycaprolactone-based implant

Background

Alternative techniques for nasal dorsum augmentation are of paramount importance in reconstructive and plastic surgery. In contrast to autologous cartilage grafts, tissue-engineered grafts can be created de novo and yield low–none donor site morbidity as compared to autologous grafts like rib or ear cartilage. To address this demand, this study investigated the in vivo regenerative potential of polycaprolactone-based implants as an alternative to autologous cartilage grafting during rhinoplasty.

Methods

Implants were placed at the nasal dorsum in two groups of minipigs and kept in situ for 2 and 6 months, respectively. Subsequently, the implants were harvested and examined by histology (hematoxylin–eosin, alcian blue, and safranin O) and immunostaining (collagen I and collagen II). Further analysis was performed to measure diameter and distance of polycaprolactone struts.

Results

Histological examination revealed a persistent formation of connective tissue with some spots resembling a cartilaginous-like matrix after 6 months. In such areas, cells of chondrocyte appearance could be identified. There was a significant decrease in strut diameter but a non-significant difference in strut distance.

Conclusion

Our results indicated that the investigated polycaprolactone-based implants have shown a regenerative and stable nasal dorsum augmentation after 6 months in vivo. Thus, we believe that customized polycaprolactone-based implants could become an alternative technique for nasal dorsum augmentation without the need for autologous cartilage grafts.

The Public Face of Rhinoplasty: Impact on Perceived Attractiveness and Personality

BACKGROUND

The authors assess the impact of rhinoplasty on public perception of a patient's appearance and personality.

METHODS

A survey was created using standardized before-and-after photographs of 10 Caucasian women who had undergone primary rhinoplasty. Photographs of two additional women who had not undergone facial surgery were randomly included as controls, for a total of 12 survey items. Preoperative and postoperative photographs were placed side by side. The survey was administered by means of crowd-sourcing. Respondents were asked to evaluate which photograph better represented 11 traits of appearance or personality, according to a seven-point Likert scale. A score of 1 meant the preoperative photograph was much better, 7 meant the postoperative photograph was much better, and 4 meant no difference. T tests and analyses of variance were used to evaluate rating changes for each trait and differences between demographic groups.

RESULTS

There were 264 responses received. Averaged scores across the 10 survey patients produced a value for each appearance or personality trait. In 10 of 11 categories (i.e., symmetry, youthfulness, facial harmony, likeability, trustworthiness, confidence, femininity, attractiveness, approachability, and intelligence), the postoperative photograph was significantly favorable compared with the preoperative photograph (p < 0.00001). The preoperative photograph was rated higher only in aggressiveness (p < 0.001). The same scores were calculated for the controls; no significant difference in any category was seen except confidence, where the right image was viewed as more confident (mean, 4.19; p < 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Aesthetic rhinoplasty improves the public perception of a person's appearance and personality in multiple aspects.

Middle Eastern Rhinoplasty: Update

Middle Eastern rhinoplasty requires especially precise preoperative planning to achieve a successful result. Among all aesthetic surgery procedures, there is a higher demand for rhinoplasty among Middle Eastern cultures. The key is to maintain the ethnicity of the patients while meeting their goals. In this brief overview, common features in Middle Eastern patients and Middle Eastern rhinoplasty techniques in men and women are highlighted.

Assessment of Functional Rhinoplasty with Spreader Grafting Using Acoustic Rhinomanometry and Validated Outcome Measurements

BACKGROUND

Rhinoplasty is 1 of the most common aesthetic and reconstructive plastic surgical procedures performed within the United States. Yet, data on functional reconstructive open and closed rhinoplasty procedures with or without spreader graft placement are not definitive as only a few studies have examined both validated measurable objective and subjective outcomes of spreader grafting during rhinoplasty. The aim of this study was to utilize previously validated measures to assess objective, functional outcomes in patients who underwent open and closed rhinoplasty with spreader grafting.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of consecutive rhinoplasty patients. Patients with internal nasal valve insufficiency who underwent an open and closed approach rhinoplasty between 2007 and 2016 were studied. The Cottle test and Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation survey was used to assess nasal obstruction. Patient-reported symptoms were recorded. Acoustic rhinometry was performed pre- and postoperatively. Average minimal cross-sectional area of the nose was measured.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-eight patients were reviewed over a period of 8 years. Thirty-eight patients were included in this study. Of those, 30 patients underwent closed rhinoplasty and 8 open rhinoplasty. Mean age was 36.9 ± 18.4 years. The average cross-sectional area in closed and open rhinoplasty patients increased significantly (P = 0.019). There was a functional improvement in all presented cases using the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scale evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

Closed rhinoplasty with spreader grafting may play a significant role in the treatment of nasal valve collapse. A closed approach rhinoplasty including spreader grafting is a viable option in select cases with objective and validated functional improvement.

Evidence-Based Medicine: Current Practices in Rhinoplasty

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Perform aesthetic and functional nasal analysis to guide septorhinoplasty. 2. Recognize common complications associated with rhinoplasty. 3. Select appropriate septorhinoplasty techniques to refine nasal aesthetics and treat nasal airway obstruction. 4. Identify factors leading to poor patient satisfaction following rhinoplasty.

SUMMARY

Septorhinoplasty is among the most technically challenging procedures in the realm of plastic and reconstructive surgery. Moreover, it is a constantly evolving topic with extensive background literature. Surgeons must be comfortable with the traditional knowledge base and the current practices in the field. This article reviews the latest thinking on patient selection, functional indications, aesthetic analysis, and operative techniques in septorhinoplasty, with an emphasis on key cartilage grafting and tip suture techniques.