Nonvisualization of Sentinel Lymph Nodes by Lymphoscintigraphy in Primary Cutaneous Melanoma: Incidence, Risk Factors, and a Review of Management Options

Nonvisualized sentinel node on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in primary cutaneous melanoma: an 11-year retrospective survey

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in cutaneous melanoma patients evaluates the regional draining basin for occult micrometastatic disease. Occasionally, nonidentification of SLN impairs the acquisition of this important prognostic factor.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the outcomes of melanoma patients with negative lymphoscintigraphic findings and patients who underwent SLN biopsy from 2004 to 2015 ( n  = 1200) were retrospectively reviewed for tumor characteristics and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Patients with nonvisualized lymph nodes (NV group) who underwent only preoperative lymphoscintigraphy were separated and compared with a cohort drawn from all melanoma patients who completed the surgical procedure within the same period (V group).

RESULTS

A negative lymphoscintigraphic scan was observed in 38 cases (3.2% of all patients). The NV group showed a significantly older age (median 66.0 vs. 48.3 years; P  < 0.0001). Head and neck melanomas were more frequent in the NV group compared to the control group (25.1 vs. 7.8%; P  = 0.009). Tumor characteristics such as ulceration and Breslow thickness do not influence the lymphoscintigraphy result. No differences were found in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The nonvisualization of regional lymph nodes by lymphoscintigraphy is more frequent in older patients with head and neck melanomas. From the clinical point of view, no specific recommendation emerged for patients' management because the nonvisualization of the SLN did not show a significant influence on DFS and OS rates. However, lack of knowledge of lymph node status suggests performing a tighter follow-up eventually by ultrasound evaluation of all potential lymph node drainage basins.

Methods of Sentinel Lymph Node Identification in Auricular Melanoma

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is used to evaluate for micrometastasis in auricular melanoma. However, lymphatic drainage patterns of the ear are not well defined and predicting the location of sentinel nodes can be difficult. The goal of this study was to define the lymphatic drainage patterns of the ear and to compare multiple modalities of sentinel node identification.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database evaluated 80 patients with auricular melanoma who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy by comparing preoperative imaging with intraoperative identification of sentinel nodes. Patients were placed into two cohorts, based on the modality of preoperative imaging: (1) planar lymphoscintigraphy only (n = 63) and (2) single-photon emission computerized tomography combined with computerized tomography (SPECT-CT) only (n = 17). Sites of preoperative mapping and sites of intraoperative identification were recorded as parotid/preauricular, mastoid/postauricular, and/or cervical.

RESULTS

In patients that underwent planar lymphoscintigraphy preoperatively (n = 63), significantly more sentinel nodes were identified intraoperatively than were mapped preoperatively in both the parotid/preauricular (P = 0.0017) and mastoid/postauricular (P = 0.0047) regions. Thirty-two nodes were identified intraoperatively that were not mapped preoperatively in the planar lymphoscintigraphy group (n = 63), two of which were positive for micrometastatic disease. In contrast, there were no discrepancies between preoperative mapping and intraoperative identification of sentinel nodes in the SPECT-CT group (n = 17).

CONCLUSIONS

SPECT-CT is more accurate than planar lymphoscintigraphy for the preoperative identification of draining sentinel lymph nodes in auricular melanoma. If SPECT-CT is not available, planar lymphoscintigraphy can also be used safely, but careful intraoperative evaluation, even in basins not mapped by lymphoscintigraphy, must be performed to avoid missed sentinel nodes.

Extirpative Considerations of Melanoma of the Head and Neck

The incidence of melanoma is continuing to rise in the United States, and head and neck melanomas account for 25% of all cutaneous melanomas. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline recommendations for surgical margins and sentinel lymph node biopsy in head and neck melanomas are the same as cutaneous melanoma located in other regions, but require special considerations when performing wide local excision, sentinel lymph node biopsy, and completion lymph node dissection and reconstruction taking into account the location of the melanoma and structures involved in and around the suggested margins.

Prognostic Role of Non-Identification of Sentinel Lymph Node in Cutaneous Melanoma Patients: An Observational Retrospective Study

Simple Summary

Sentinel lymph node status is the most important prognostic factor for patients with cutaneous melanoma, but occasionally it is not possible to identify the sentinel lymph node. Little is known in cutaneous melanoma literature about the phenomenon of non-identification of sentinel lymph node and its prognostic implications. In this study we observed that not identifying the sentinel lymph node involves a worse nodal disease-free survival, but not a worse melanoma-specific survival than a negative sentinel lymph node. Potentially, patients with non-identified SLN should receive a follow-up schedule like that of patients with positive SLN.

Abstract

Background: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) status is recognized as the most important prognostic factor for patients with cutaneous melanoma. However, sometimes it is not possible to identify SLN. The phenomenon of non-identification of SLN and its prognostic role have not been thoroughly evaluated in melanoma literature. The objective of this study was to identify which patient or tumor variables may be associated to non-identification of SLN and to evaluate the prognostic role of non-identification of SLN. Methods: Observational retrospective study of 834 cutaneous melanoma patients who underwent SLN biopsy at Instituto Valenciano de Oncología. Results: Forty-two patients (5%) presented non-identification of SLN. Patients with age at diagnosis of ≥ 64 years, obesity (BMI ≥ 30), and head and neck localization were at higher risk of non-identification of SLN. Non-identified SLN patients had worse nodal disease-free survival with respect to negative SLN patients, but not worse melanoma-specific survival. Conclusions: Our findings suggest a need to follow-up patients with non-identified SLN in the same way as patients with positive SLN.

Lymphoscintigraphy for Sentinel Node Mapping in Head and Neck Cancer

The aim of this comprehensive review is to describe and analyze the role of the sentinel node mapping in head and neck cancers. For this purpose, head and neck neoplasms have been categorized in cutaneous malignancies and neoplasms of the upper aerodigestive tract. A concise description of lymphatic drainage will be the "prelude" for each section, as well as the description of the injection techniques, when specific. Concisely, the attention has been focused on detection rate of the sentinel node by lymphoscintigraphy for each cancer, and for those patients in which the sentinel lymph node has been identified, true-positives rates, false-negative rates, and overall accuracy has been pointed out. Overall, in cutaneous neoplasms of the head and neck, the detection rate is higher than 90%, however the false-negative rate is still an issue, in particular in melanoma, inducing the need for newer developments. In fact, new tracers and techniques are already available, while prospective multicenter trials exploring the outcome impact are needed in the near future. For the upper aerodigestive tract and in particular oral cavity and oropharynx, sentinel lymph node identification by lymphoscintigraphy allows avoiding unnecessary neck dissection and/or node irradiation. Even in this case, the main limit remains the risk of false-negative rates. While, for patients affected by laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers the data seem very limited and, although the feasibility has been demonstrated, performances of this lymphoscintigraphy still need to be confirmed by multicenter studies.