1
|
Liu J, Chen C, Chen H, Xiang A, Zheng R, Hu S, Guo J, Qu L, Zhou J, Wu J. Patient-Reported Outcomes and Complication Profiles of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction in Patients With Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy. Ann Plast Surg 2024; 93:22-29. [PMID: 38885161 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000003974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/20/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aims to investigate the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and complications of distinct implant-based breast reconstruction modality for patients with postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). METHODS A retrospective review was conducted on breast cancer patients with stage II-III disease who performed implant-based breast reconstruction following with PMRT between September 2016 and April 2022. The patients were categorized into two matched groups: (1) patients receiving prepectoral breast reconstruction (PBR) or (2) subpectoral breast reconstruction (SBR) followed by PMRT. Following reconstruction, the patients were further compared for PMRT with the tissue expander (PMRT-TE) versus PMRT with permanent implant (PMRT-PI). PROs were measured with BREAST-Q questionnaire. Early and late complications were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS A total of 55 eligible patients were recruited. Patients who underwent PBR reported significantly higher satisfaction with breasts scores (P = 0.003) compared with the SBR group. The PMRT-TE group had higher satisfaction with breasts (P = 0.001) but lower physical well-being (P = 0.029) scores compared with PMRT-PI group. Moreover, patients in SBR cohort had a higher risk of capsular contracture (Baker grade III or IV) (20.5% vs 6.3%) and implant dislocation (48.7% vs 12.5%) than patients in PBR cohort. Patients in PMRT-PI group had a slightly higher rate of capsular contracture (Baker grade III or IV) than PMRT-TE group (20.8% vs 12.9%). CONCLUSIONS PBR was associated with lower rates of late complications, especially for implant dislocation, and higher satisfaction with breasts scores compared to SBR. In addition, compared to PMRT-TE with PMRT-PI, patients in PMRT-TE cohort reported superior PROs of satisfaction with breasts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Liu
- From the Department of Breast Surgery, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou
| | - Cong Chen
- From the Department of Breast Surgery, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou
| | - Honggang Chen
- From the Department of Breast Surgery, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou
| | - Aizhai Xiang
- From the Department of Breast Surgery, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou
| | - Ruzhen Zheng
- From the Department of Breast Surgery, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou
| | - Shufang Hu
- From the Department of Breast Surgery, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou
| | - Jufeng Guo
- From the Department of Breast Surgery, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou
| | - Li Qu
- From the Department of Breast Surgery, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou
| | - Jun Zhou
- From the Department of Breast Surgery, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou
| | - Jiong Wu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Plotsker EL, Graziano FD, Kim M, Boe LA, Tadros AB, Matros E, Azoury SC, Nelson JA. Social Determinants of Health and Patient-reported Outcomes Following Autologous Breast Reconstruction, Using Insurance as a Proxy. J Reconstr Microsurg 2024. [PMID: 38413009 DOI: 10.1055/a-2277-0236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Insurance type can serve as a surrogate marker for social determinants of health and can influence many aspects of the breast reconstruction experience. We aimed to examine the impact of insurance coverage on patients reported outcomes with the BREAST-Q (patient reported outcome measure for breast reconstruction patients, in patients receiving) in patients receiving deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. METHODS We retrospectively examined patients who received DIEP flaps at our institution from 2010 to 2019. Patients were divided into categories by insurance: commercial, Medicaid, or Medicare. Demographic factors, surgical factors, and complication data were recorded. Descriptive statistics, Fisher's exact, Kruskal-Wallis rank sum tests, and generalized estimating equations were performed to identify associations between insurance status and five domains of the BREAST-Q Reconstructive module. RESULTS A total of 1,285 patients were included, of which 1,011 (78.7%) had commercial, 89 (6.9%) had Medicaid, and 185 (14.4%) had Medicare insurances. Total flap loss rates were significantly higher in the Medicare and Medicaid patients as compared to commercial patients; however, commercial patients had a higher rate of wound dehiscence as compared to Medicare patients. With all other factors controlled for, patients with Medicare had lower Physical Well-being of the Chest (PWBC) than patients with commercial insurance (β = - 3.1, 95% confidence interval (CI): -5.0, -1.2, p = 0.002). There were no significant associations between insurance classification and other domains of the BREAST-Q. CONCLUSION Patients with government-issued insurance had lower success rates of autologous breast reconstruction. Further, patients with Medicare had lower PWBC than patients with commercial insurance regardless of other factors, while other BREAST-Q metrics did not differ. Further investigation as to the causes of such variation is warranted in larger, more diverse cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan L Plotsker
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Francis D Graziano
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Minji Kim
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Lillian A Boe
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Audree B Tadros
- Breast Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Evan Matros
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Said C Azoury
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jonas A Nelson
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Catanuto G, Rocco N, Fichera CG, Cinquerrui A, Rapisarda M, Chiodini P, Magnoni F, Dorangricchia P, Sebri V, Pravettoni G, Nava MB, Caruso F. Easy Anthropometric Measurements Are Representative of Baseline Values of Breast Q Values in Asymptomatic Women. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:268. [PMID: 38275547 PMCID: PMC10815797 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12020268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2023] [Revised: 01/13/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Measurements of breast morphology are a determinant of the assessment of any surgical procedure, either reconstructive or cosmetic. This study aims to investigate the association between easy anthropometric measurements and values of quality of life assessed in a sample of asymptomatic women. METHODOLOGY Healthy asymptomatic women were admitted for this study. The following measurements were assessed: height, weight, nipple to sternal notch distance, areola to infra-mammary fold distance (right vs. left), right-left nipple distance. The Breast Q questionnaire (Italian translation V.1, pre-op breast conservation surgery) in the following domains: satisfaction with breasts; psycho-social satisfaction; physical satisfaction; sexual satisfaction, which was used to assess breast-related quality of life. RESULTS One hundred and forty-five women responded to the breast Q questionnaire. The mean age of the sample was 44.3 years; the medium BMI was 24.1; Spearman correlation coefficients revealed that all the investigated values were negatively correlated to the "satisfaction with breasts" domain. Psychosexual satisfaction was associated with age; BMI; nipple to sternal notch distance. After normalization for age values, we observed that "satisfaction with breast" was, once again, highly correlated to BMI; nipple to sternal notch distance; areola to IMF distance. In all cases, the higher the values, the lower the scores. CONCLUSIONS Distances between easy relevant anatomical landmarks are representative of patients' breast-related quality of life in a population of asymptomatic women. These findings allow us to identify an ideal anthropometric framework that can be used as a validated surgical endpoint for cosmetic and oncological procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Catanuto
- Institution Humanitas Istituto Clinico Catanese, 95045 Misterbianco, Italy; (G.C.); (M.R.); (F.C.)
- GReTA Fondazione ETS (Group for Reconstructive and Therapeutic Advancements), 80123 Naples, Italy;
| | - Nicola Rocco
- GReTA Fondazione ETS (Group for Reconstructive and Therapeutic Advancements), 80123 Naples, Italy;
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | | | - Ada Cinquerrui
- Institution Humanitas Istituto Clinico Catanese, 95045 Misterbianco, Italy; (G.C.); (M.R.); (F.C.)
| | - Martina Rapisarda
- Institution Humanitas Istituto Clinico Catanese, 95045 Misterbianco, Italy; (G.C.); (M.R.); (F.C.)
| | - Paolo Chiodini
- Medical Statistics Unit, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 81100 Caserta, Italy
| | - Francesca Magnoni
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Patrizia Dorangricchia
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy (V.S.); (G.P.)
| | - Valeria Sebri
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy (V.S.); (G.P.)
| | - Gabriella Pravettoni
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy (V.S.); (G.P.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Maurizio Bruno Nava
- GReTA Fondazione ETS (Group for Reconstructive and Therapeutic Advancements), 80123 Naples, Italy;
| | - Francesco Caruso
- Institution Humanitas Istituto Clinico Catanese, 95045 Misterbianco, Italy; (G.C.); (M.R.); (F.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Boe L, Vingan PS, Kim M, Zhang KK, Rochlin D, Matros E, Stern C, Nelson JA. Methods in regression analysis in surgical oncology research-best practice guidelines. J Surg Oncol 2024; 129:183-193. [PMID: 37990858 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Using real working examples, we provide strategies and address challenges in linear and logistic regression to demonstrate best practice guidelines and pitfalls of regression modeling in surgical oncology research. METHODS To demonstrate our best practices, we reviewed patients who underwent tissue expander breast reconstruction between 2019 and 2021. We assessed predictive factors that affect BREAST-Q Physical Well-Being of the Chest (PWB-C) scores at 2 weeks with linear regression modeling and overall complications and malrotation with logistic regression modeling. Model fit and performance were assessed. RESULTS The 1986 patients were included in the analysis. In linear regression, age [β = 0.18 (95% CI: 0.09, 0.28); p < 0.001], single marital status [β = 2.6 (0.31, 5.0); p = 0.026], and prepectoral pocket dissection [β = 4.6 (2.7, 6.5); p < 0.001] were significantly associated with PWB-C at 2 weeks. For logistic regression, BMI [OR = 1.06 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.08); p < 0.001], age [OR = 1.02 (1.01, 1.03); p = 0.002], bilateral reconstruction [OR = 1.39 (1.09, 1.79); p = 0.009], and prepectoral dissection [OR = 1.53 (1.21, 1.94); p < 0.001] were associated with increased likelihood of a complication. CONCLUSION We provide focused directives for successful application of regression techniques in surgical oncology research. We encourage researchers to select variables with clinical judgment, confirm appropriate model fitting, and consider clinical plausibility for interpretation when utilizing regression models in their research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lillian Boe
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Perri S Vingan
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Minji Kim
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kevin K Zhang
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | - Carrie Stern
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jonas A Nelson
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Araújo Pereira Lisboa FC, Paulinelli RR, Campos Veras LP, Jubé Ribeiro LF, Pádua Oliveira LF, Sousa Rahal RM, Sousa AG, Freitas-Júnior R, Batista de Sousa J. Aesthetic results were more satisfactory after oncoplastic surgery than after total breast reconstruction according to patients and surgeons. Breast 2023; 71:47-53. [PMID: 37487426 PMCID: PMC10374858 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Revised: 07/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient satisfaction after breast cancer surgery has an impact on body image, sexual function, self-esteem, and quality of life and may differ from the perception of the attending physician. This study aimed to compare the aesthetic outcomes and satisfaction with conservative oncoplastic surgeries, mastectomies, and total breast reconstruction. METHODS We included 760 women diagnosed with invasive breast carcinoma or phyllodes tumors who returned at least 6 months after surgery or radiotherapy at two public hospitals and a private clinic between 2014 and 2022. Data was collected prospectively from patients and retrospectively from their medical records using a specific form after obtaining their informed consent. Aesthetic outcomes and quality of life were assessed using the BREAST-Q©, Harris Scale, and BCCT.core software. Data were evaluated using the SPSS statistical software. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. This study was approved by the hospital ethics committees. RESULTS A total of 405 (53.29%) partial and 355 (46.71%) total reconstructions were included. Patients who underwent partial reconstruction were older and had higher body mass index. Patients who underwent total reconstruction had larger tumors with advanced clinical and pathological stages. Clinical and surgical complications occurred more frequently in the total reconstruction group. A greater number of reparative surgeries and lipofilling procedures were required for total reconstruction. According to the BREAST-Q, the partial reconstruction group showed significantly higher levels of women's satisfaction with their breasts, the surgical outcomes, psychosocial and sexual well-being, provision of information, and the reconstructive surgeon. Only physical well-being was slightly higher in the total reconstruction group. In most cases, the results were rated good or excellent. Physicians considered partial reconstructions to have better results than total reconstructions, although this difference was not perceived by the BCCT.core software. CONCLUSION Women who underwent partial breast reconstruction had higher levels of satisfaction in several domains, lower frequency of complications, and required fewer surgeries to complete their reconstruction than women who underwent total reconstruction. Physicians were also more satisfied with the results of partial reconstructions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Régis Resende Paulinelli
- Mastology Program, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil; Breast and Gynecology Unit, Araújo Jorge Cancer Hospital, Goiás Cancer Combat Association, Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Rosemar Macedo Sousa Rahal
- Mastology Program, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil
| | | | - Ruffo Freitas-Júnior
- Mastology Program, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil; Breast and Gynecology Unit, Araújo Jorge Cancer Hospital, Goiás Cancer Combat Association, Brazil
| | - João Batista de Sousa
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Brasília - UnB, Distrito Federal, Brasília, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Haddock NT, Facchin F, Teotia SS. A clinical practice review on process efficiency in autologous breast reconstruction. Gland Surg 2023; 12:1007-1015. [PMID: 37727338 PMCID: PMC10506120 DOI: 10.21037/gs-22-680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
Autologous breast reconstruction is considered the gold standard technique for breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Thanks to recent refinements the main focus of surgery has shifted from flaps survival and donor site morbidity to optimal aesthetic outcomes and patients' satisfaction. However, prolonged operative time remains a limiting aspect for many patients and surgeons who aim in improving access to care and outcomes. Process mapping is a quality improvement strategy consisting of the creation of a visual representation of a process to recognize errors, minimize waste and optimize outcomes. It has been effectively applied in abdominal based autologous breast reconstruction in nine papers. The process segments and analysis varied between published papers, but all authors focused on intraoperative process mapping and reported reduced operative times. Additional preoperative and postoperative factors have been studied and are commonly applied to further optimize efficiency (such as preoperative CTA, co-surgery model, flap perfusion evaluation, postoperative monitoring, and ERAS protocol). Although shorter operative times are related to decrease surgical morbidity and faster recovery time, and safety, the aesthetic outcome should remain the main focus in autologous breast reconstruction. In fact, the true ultimate aim should be the achievement of high patient satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sumeet S. Teotia
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Xu C, Lu P, Pfob A, Pusic AL, Hamill JB, Sidey-Gibbons C. Physical well-being recovery trajectories by reconstruction modality in women undergoing mastectomy and breast reconstruction: Significant predictors and health-related quality of life outcomes. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0289182. [PMID: 37506093 PMCID: PMC10381031 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We sought to identify trajectories of patient-reported outcomes, specifically physical well-being of the chest (PWBC), in patients who underwent postmastectomy breast reconstruction, and further assessed its significant predictors, and its relationship with health-related quality of life (HRQOL). METHODS We used data collected as part of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium study within a 2-year follow-up in 2012-2017, with 1422, 1218,1199, and 1417 repeated measures at assessment timepoints of 0,3,12, and 24 months, respectively. We performed latent class growth analysis (LCGA) in the implant group (IMPG) and autologous group (AUTOG) to identify longitudinal change trajectories, and then assessed its significant predictors, and its relationship with HRQOL by conducting multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS Of the included 1424 patients, 843 were in IMPG, and 581 were in AUTOG. Both groups experienced reduced PWBC at follow-up. LCGA identified four distinct PWBC trajectories (χ2 = 1019.91, p<0.001): low vs medium high vs medium low vs high baseline PWBC that was restored vs. not-restored after 2 years. In 76.63%(n = 646) of patients in IMPG and 62.99% (n = 366) in AUTOG, PWBC was restored after two years. Patients in IMPG exhibited worse PWBC at 3 months post-surgery than that in AUTOG. Patients with low baseline PWBC that did not improve at 2-year follow up (n = 28, 4.82% for AUTOG) were characterized by radiation following reconstruction and non-white ethnicity. In IMPG, patients with medium low-restored trajectory were more likely to experience improved breast satisfaction, while patients developing high-restored trajectories were less likely to have worsened psychosocial well-being. CONCLUSION Although more women in IMPG experienced restored PWBC after 2 years, those in AUTOG exhibited a more favorable postoperative trajectory of change in PWBC. This finding can inform clinical treatment decisions, help manage patient expectations for recovery, and develop rehabilitation interventions contributing to enhancing the postoperative quality of life for breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cai Xu
- Division of Internal Medicine, Section of Patient Centered Analytics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
- MD Anderson Center for INSPiRED Cancer Care (Integrated Systems for Patient-Reported Data), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Peiyi Lu
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - André Pfob
- MD Anderson Center for INSPiRED Cancer Care (Integrated Systems for Patient-Reported Data), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andrea L Pusic
- Department of Surgery, Patient-Reported Outcome Value & Experience (PROVE) Center, Harvard Medical School & Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Jennifer B Hamill
- The Department of Surgery, Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
| | - Chris Sidey-Gibbons
- Division of Internal Medicine, Section of Patient Centered Analytics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
- MD Anderson Center for INSPiRED Cancer Care (Integrated Systems for Patient-Reported Data), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Saiga M, Nakagiri R, Mukai Y, Matsumoto H, Kimata Y. Trends and issues in clinical research on satisfaction and quality of life after mastectomy and breast reconstruction: a 5-year scoping review. Int J Clin Oncol 2023:10.1007/s10147-023-02347-5. [PMID: 37160493 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-023-02347-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
Breast reconstruction (BR) aims to improve the satisfaction and quality of life (QOL) of breast cancer survivors. Clinical studies using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) can therefore provide relevant information to the patients and support decision-making. This scoping review was conducted to analyze recent trends in world regions, methods used, and factors investigated. The literature search was conducted in August 2022. Databases of PubMed, MEDLINE, and CINAHL were searched for relevant English-language studies published from 2017 to 2022. Studies involving women with breast cancer who underwent BR after mastectomy and investigated PROs after BR using BR-specific scales were included. Data on the country, publication year, study design, PRO measures (PROMs) used, time points of surveys, and research themes were collected. In total, 147 articles met the inclusion criteria. BREAST-Q was the most widely used, contributing to the increase in the number and diversification of studies in this area. Such research has been conducted mainly in North America and Europe and is still developing in Asia and other regions. The research themes involved a wide range of clinical and patient factors in addition to surgery, which could be influenced by research methods, time since surgery, and even cultural differences. Recent BR-specific PROMs have led to a worldwide development of research on factors that affect satisfaction and QOL after BR. PRO after BR may be influenced by local cultural and social features, and it would be necessary to accumulate data in each region to draw clinically useful conclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miho Saiga
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Okayama University Hospital, 2-5-1, Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama City, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
| | - Ryoko Nakagiri
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Okayama University Hospital, 2-5-1, Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama City, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Yuko Mukai
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Okayama Rosai Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Matsumoto
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Kimata
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|