Patterns of Plastic Surgical Use after Gastric Bypass: Who Can Afford It and Who Will Return for More:

Out-of-Pocket Costs and Physician Payment Variations in Abdominal Contouring: Evidence From United States Claims Data

Background: Abdominal contouring after massive weight loss has positive impacts on quality of life. There are often cost and access barriers for patients who desire these procedures. Objectives: To examine levels of access to body contouring in the era of price transparency, this study aims to characterize the out-of-pocket expenses and physician/facility payments in abdominal contouring procedures. Setting: The IBM MarketScan Commercial Databases were queried to identify patients who underwent outpatient abdominal contouring surgeries in the United States in 2021. Methods: Financial variables of interest included gross payments to the provider (facility and/or physician) and out-of-pocket costs (total of coinsurance, deductible, and copayments). Univariate analysis and mixed-effects linear regression were utilized to study the variations in costs across regions, insurance plan types, and places of service. Results: A total of 1319 abdominal contouring episodes were identified. The average age was 44.7, and the majority of patients were female (91%) and in the South region (44%). Median out-of-pocket costs were low overall ($30, IQR $768) and median total physician/facility payments for abdominal contouring was $4982.47 (IQR $7392.46). Out-of-pocket costs were highest in the South ($105) and $0 in all other regions (P < .05). The highest physician/facility payments were in the Northeast ($6392) and the lowest was in the South ($3936). Conclusions: Patients undergoing abdominal contouring incur relatively low out-of-pocket costs overall, but there is a need for further reimbursement negotiation in regions where physician payments are lower and out-of-pocket costs are higher. Further study should explore reimbursement and payment gaps in procedural coverage.

Classification and Treatment Protocol of Post-bariatric Patients: An Anamnestic and Psychiatric Profiling

INTRODUCTION

Post-bariatric surgery is one of the fastest-growing subspecialties in plastic surgery. The increase in the number of surgical procedures has not been followed by an equivalent categorization of patients. Surgical innovations and technical refinements are widespread, while clear classification and objectification of surgical indications are lacking.

METHODS

A retrospective monocentric study was carried out. We included 135 patients operated in our department of plastic surgery between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019. Patients were adults with a history of bariatric surgery. We analyzed two major and two minor criteria before the reconstructive procedure was performed. We divided patients into three clusters (A, B and C) according to the number and nature of major criteria met. We then compared the incidence of postoperative complications and the percentage of body weight regained at 1 year after surgery between the groups. We also tested the impact of minor criteria in each cluster.

RESULTS

Our sample had a mean age of 48.5 years, a mean BMI of 27.68 kg/m2, 19 (14.1%) male patients, 116 (85.9%) female patients. We included 81 (60.0%) patients in cluster A; 44 (32.6%) patients in cluster B; and 10 (7.4%) patients in cluster C. Comparison between these groups shows us a higher incidence of postoperative complications in patients in clusters B and C. In addition, patients with diagnosed psychiatric disorders showed a 70% complication rate (p = 0.038) while we found no significant correlations with the other criteria analyzed.

CONCLUSION

The classification proposed based on our criteria may represent a first step toward classifying post-bariatric patients and reinforcing the surgical indication in these patients. It also enables us to identify the patients who are most at risk of complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Prevalence Patterns of Body Contouring Procedures Among Injectable Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Users

BACKGROUND

The introduction of injectable glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists such as Ozempic (Novo Nordisk, Plainsboro, NJ) and Wegovy (Novo Nordisk Inc.) has transformed weight loss in plastic surgery patients, often leading to excess skin and soft tissue amenable to body contouring procedures.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between injectable GLP-1 receptor agonist use and the growing need for body contouring surgeries, focusing on trunk and extremity procedures.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the PearlDiver database (PearlDiver, Inc., Colorado Springs, CO) was conducted, examining prescription data for Ozempic, Wegovy, and liraglutide, and correlating these with body contouring procedures across 30 US states from 2011 to 2022. Multimodal statistics were used to compare surgery rates and assess dosage and time interval patterns among GLP-1 receptor agonist users and nonusers.

RESULTS

Significant correlations between GLP-1 receptor agonist use (881 Ozempic, 59 Wegovy, and 4655 liraglutide users) and increased body contouring surgeries were found. Ozempic showed weak correlations with brachioplasty (r = 0.23) and panniculectomy (r = 0.21), and Wegovy with breast procedures (r = 0.28), while liraglutide showed consistent correlations across surgeries. Time to surgery varied from 87 days (Wegovy) to 1018 days (liraglutide), with higher surgery rates among users (P < .01) and dose-related differences, especially in Ozempic and Wegovy users.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates a dose-dependent link between the use of GLP-1 receptor agonists and an increase in subsequent aesthetic body contouring surgeries, highlighting the need for surgeons to adapt to the merging of medicinal body transformation and aesthetic plastic surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Ethical Considerations and Outcomes in Body Contouring Surgeries Among Adolescents: A Comprehensive Narrative Review

BACKGROUND

Body contouring surgery (BCS) in adolescents, particularly following bariatric surgery, involves a complex array of ethical, psychological, and medical factors. This review focuses on adolescents who have experienced significant weight loss, often due to bariatric surgery, and subsequently require body contouring to address excess skin and soft tissue.

METHODS

A literature narrative review was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Relevant articles were screened and selected based on their discussion of post-bariatric and massive weight loss body contouring surgeries in adolescents, focusing on prevalence, outcomes, and ethical considerations.

RESULTS

The prevalence of BCS among adolescents is rising, influenced by social media and societal perceptions of beauty. However, the percentage of adolescents receiving BCS after bariatric surgery remains low. Adolescents undergoing BCS experience improvements in physical functioning, body image, and psychological well-being. Complications, although common, are mostly minor. Ethical considerations include ensuring informed consent, assessing emotional maturity, managing patient expectations, and involving adolescents in decision-making. Comparative analysis reveals similar outcomes in adults and adolescents, but adolescents face unique ethical challenges related to autonomy, long-term effects, and ongoing physical and emotional development.

CONCLUSION

BCS in adolescents following bariatric surgery can lead to improved physical and psychological outcomes. However, the decision to undergo BCS must be carefully considered, taking into account the adolescent's maturity, expectations, and long-term well-being. Ethical considerations are paramount, emphasizing the need for informed consent, realistic expectations, and a multidisciplinary approach. Further research is needed to assess long-term outcomes and the specific ethical implications of BCS in adolescents compared to adults.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The financial toxicity of postbariatric body contouring surgery: a survey study of an urban tertiary care center's patients

BACKGROUND

Patients with obesity who undergo bariatric surgery achieve sustained weight loss but are often left with excess skin folds that cause functional and psychological deficits. To remove excess skin, patients can undergo postbariatric BCS; however, cost and lack of insurance coverage present a significant barrier for many patients.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to characterize the financial impact of treatment on all patients who received bariatric surgery and to compare between those receiving only bariatric surgery and those with postbariatric BCS.

SETTING

Email-based survey study at an urban tertiary care center.

METHODS

Surveys that included the COST-FACIT were sent to patients with a history of bariatric surgery and/or post-bariatric BCS.

RESULTS

One hundred and five respondents completed the survey, of which 19 reported having postbariatric BCS. Patients with postbariatric BCS had slightly higher COST scores than those receiving bariatric surgery only, but this difference was not significant (15.6 versus 17.8, P = .23). Most patients (76%) did not have an awareness of BCS or BCS cost prior to bariatric surgery, and many (68%) had more loose skin than anticipated.

CONCLUSIONS

Financial toxicity was similar across all postbariatric surgery patients surveyed regardless of history of BCS. However, survey respondents noted a gap between patient education and expectations around loose skin and body contouring that can be addressed through improved presurgical counseling.

Body Contouring Surgery After Bariatric Surgery Improves Long-Term Health-Related Quality of Life and Satisfaction With Appearance: An International Longitudinal Cohort Study Using the BODY-Q

OBJECTIVE

To examine health-related quality of life (HRQL) and satisfaction with appearance in patients who have undergone bariatric surgery (BS) with or without subsequent body contouring surgery (BCS) in relation to the general population normative for the BODY-Q.

BACKGROUND

The long-term impact of BS with or without BCS has not been established using rigorously developed and validated patient-reported outcome measures. The BODY-Q is a patient-reported outcome measure developed to measure changes in HRQL and satisfaction with appearance in patients with BS and BCS.

METHODS

Prospective BODY-Q data were collected from 6 European countries (Denmark, the Netherlands, Finland, Germany, Italy, and Poland) from June 2015 to February 2022 in a cohort of patients who underwent BS. Mixed-effects regression models were used to analyze changes in HRQL and appearance over time between patients who did and did not receive BCS and to examine the impact of patient-level covariates on outcomes.

RESULTS

This study included 24,604 assessments from 5620 patients. BS initially led to improved HRQL and appearance scores throughout the first postbariatric year, followed by a gradual decrease. Patients who underwent subsequent BCS after BS experienced a sustained improvement in HRQL and appearance or remained relatively stable for up to 10 years postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who underwent BCS maintained an improvement in HRQL and satisfaction with appearance in contrast to patients who only underwent BS, who reported a decline in scores 1 to 2 years postoperatively. Our results emphasize the pivotal role that BCS plays in the completion of the weight loss trajectory.

The Impact of Abdominoplasty vs Non-abdominoplasty on Weight Loss in Bariatric and Non-bariatric Malaysian Patients: A Multicentre Retrospective Study

Background and aims

Weight loss associated with abdominoplasty remains controversial as to whether it is contributed by the procedure alone, or if there are other patient factors. Therefore, we evaluated the relationship between weight loss in pre- and post-abdominoplasty and compared the weight loss of those who do not undergo abdominoplasty in bariatric and non-bariatric patients.

Methods

This study measured weight changes at designated time points in four different groups comprising 98 patients. The groups were abdominoplasty after bariatric surgery (group A), patients with abdominoplasty alone (B), bariatric surgery alone (group C), and diet alone (group D). Results are compared within and between the groups.

Results

Patients in groups A and B (patients who had abdominoplasty regardless with or without bariatric surgery) had a significant weight loss after six months (mean difference=10.70kg, 95% CI=4.05, 17.34, p<0.001) compared to pre abdominoplasty weight. Patients in group B were statistically significant (mean difference=4.01kg, 95% CI=0.92, 7.10, p=0.007) with 3.60kg weight reduction (4.59%). Patients in group A had clinically significant weight reduction (4.45kg, 5.14%) but it was not statistically significant (p>0.05) and had no significant additional weight reduction as compared to non-abdominoplasty (group C) patients (p=0.650). Patients in group C had a statistically significant difference from those in group D (F [1.00, 48.00] = 8.56, p=0.005) with an average weight loss of 3.60kg (4.59%) vs 2.56kg (2.8%) respectively.

Conclusions

All patients with abdominoplasty had significant weight loss after six months. Bariatric patients did not experience significant additional weight loss with abdominoplasty. Weight reduction after abdominoplasty alone was greater than diet alone. 

The PRS Rainbow Classification for Assessing Postbariatric Contour Deformities

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background:

There is a need for a reliable classification system to grade contour deformities and to inform reimbursement of body contouring surgery after massive weight loss. We developed the PRS Rainbow Classification, which uses select photographs to provide standardized references for evaluating patient photographs, to classify contour deformities in postbariatric patients. To assess the reliability of the PRS Rainbow Classification to classify contour deformities in massive weight loss patients.

Methods:

Ten independent experienced plastic surgeons, 7 experienced medical advisors of the healthcare insurance company, and 10 laypersons evaluated 50 photographs per anatomical region (arms, breast, abdomen, and medial thighs). Each participant rated the patient photographs on a scale of 1–3 in an online survey. The inter-observer and the intra-observer reliabilities were determined using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs). The ICC analyses were performed for each anatomical region.

Results:

Inter-observer reliability was moderate to good in the body regions “arms,” “abdomen,” “medial thighs,” with mean ICC values of 0.678 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.591–0.768], 0.685 (95% CI, 0.599–0.773), and 0.658 (95% CI, 0.569–0.751), respectively. Inter-observer reliability was comparable within the 3 different professional groups. Intra-observer reliability (test–retest reliability) was moderate to good, with a mean overall ICC value of 0.723 (95% CI, 0.572–0.874) for all groups and all 4 body regions.

Conclusions:

The moderate to good reliability found in this study validates the use of the PRS Rainbow Classification as a reproducible and reliable classification system to assess contour deformities after massive weight loss. It holds promise as a key part of instruments to classify body contour deformities and to assess reimbursement of body contouring surgery.

The BAPRAS screening tool for reimbursement in a postbariatric population

INTRODUCTION

Reimbursement of body-contouring surgery (BCS) is a worldwide problem: there is no objective instrument to decide which postbariatric patients should qualify for reimbursement. The British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (BAPRAS) has developed a screening tool for this purpose. In this study, we used a modified version of this screening tool in a postbariatric population and describe which patients would qualify for reimbursement using this tool.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study postbariatric patients were asked to fill in an online questionnaire based on the BAPRAS screening tool with questions regarding complaints of overhanging skin and medical history. Weight loss data were extracted from a prospective database. The BODY-Q was added to assess patient-reported outcomes.

RESULTS

Patients who wanted to undergo BCS (n = 90) had higher screening tool scores and lower BODY-Q scores compared to patients who did not want BCS (n = 24). In total, 25 patients (26%) qualified for reimbursement, these patients had higher weight loss (33.5% versus 29.2%, p = 0.008), lower BMI (27.3 kg/m² versus 30.4 kg/m², p = 0.014) and more medical (4.0 versus 2.0, p = 0.004) and psychological complaints (88% versus 61%, p = 0.009). There was a significant, negative correlation between the screening tool scores and almost all BODY-Q scales.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a desire for BCS have more complaints of excess skin, which negatively impacts their well-being. With the modified BAPRAS screening tool, patients with the best weight (loss) and most medical and psychological complaints of excess skin qualified for referral and reimbursement of BCS.

Knowledge is power: Providing previsit insurance coverage information of body contouring procedures to improve understanding and satisfaction in the massive weight loss patient

INTRODUCTION

Because of the prevalence of obesity worldwide, the rates of bariatric surgery are increasing. Bariatric surgery is covered by insurance; however, often, a surgery to correct massive weight loss surgeries is not covered despite patient perception.

METHODS

One hundred patients were identified by their initial visit to the institutional Life After Weight Loss center. Fifty of them were randomized into receiving previsit educational materials about their individual insurance plans. All the patients were surveyed to assess whether this education improved their understanding and overall consultation experience.

RESULTS

Although a majority of patients believed "panniculectomy" would be covered by insurance, most subjects overestimated insurance coverage for other procedures. Nearly all respondents (93.8%) agreed that previsit educational material improved their understanding and the satisfaction of the visit.

CONCLUSION

Many patients believe body contouring procedures to be covered by insurance, although most are not. By providing patients with their individualized insurance plans, patients report improved understanding and overall satisfaction with the consultation.

A Review of National Insurance Coverage of Post-bariatric Upper Body Lift

INTRODUCTION

Recent years have seen an increased utilisation of upper body lift following massive weight loss. Although it is typically considered cosmetic, the recurrent skin conditions and decline in quality of life may warrant medical necessity. We evaluated current insurance coverage and characterised policy criteria for upper body lift in the post-bariatric population.

METHODS

We defined upper body lift as a combination of mastopexy and upper back excision (UBE) and conducted a cross-sectional analysis of US insurance policies. Insurance companies were selected based on their enrolment data and market share. A web-based search and telephone interviews were conducted to identify the policy. Criteria were abstracted from the publicly available policies that offered coverage.

RESULTS

Of the 56 insurance companies assessed, 5% would consider coverage of both procedures. Although fewer companies held established policies for UBE than mastopexy in the post-bariatric population (79% vs 96%, p = 0.0081), there were significantly more policies that offered pre-approval for UBE than for mastopexy (30% vs 5%, p = 0.0017). Three medical necessity criteria were common to both procedures: evidence of functional impairment, secondary skin conditions, and medical photographs.

CONCLUSION

Policy criteria for coverage of mastopexy or UBE differ greatly between companies. Further evaluation of medical necessity criteria for post-bariatric mastopexy and UBE with the establishment of a standardised guideline is needed. We propose a comprehensive list of reporting recommendations to help optimise authorisation of upper body lift in the post-bariatric population, and we urge plastic surgeons to challenge current definition of "cosmetic" by insurance companies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Body Contouring Surgery after Massive Weight Loss: Excess Skin, Body Satisfaction, and Qualification for Reimbursement in a Dutch Post-Bariatric Surgery Population

BACKGROUND

Body contouring surgery improves quality of life, weight loss, and body image after bariatric surgery. It is unclear why only a minority of the post-bariatric surgery population undergoes body contouring surgery. This study assesses overhanging skin, body satisfaction, and qualification for reimbursement of body contouring surgery in a Dutch post-bariatric surgery population.

METHODS

Post-bariatric patients were selected from a prospective database. Electronic questionnaires evaluated demographics, desire for body contouring surgery, excess skin, and satisfaction with their body.

RESULTS

A total of 590 patients were included: 368 patients (62.4 percent) desired body contouring surgery, 157 (26.6 percent) did not and 65 (11.0 percent) had undergone body contouring surgery. There were no significant differences between the groups regarding the percentage of patients who met the qualifications for reimbursement. Patients who desired body contouring surgery had more body parts affected by overhanging skin and more often rated the overhanging skin with a Pittsburgh Rating Scale grade 3 compared with patients without a desire to undergo body contouring surgery. The plastic surgeon was never consulted by 39.1 percent of the "desire" population; 44.1 percent of these patients met the weight criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-bariatric patients who desired body contouring surgery had more excess skin than patients without a desire and were less satisfied with their body. Almost half of these patients never consulted a plastic surgeon, partly because of incorrect assumptions regarding reimbursement. Plastic surgeons (together with bariatric teams) should better inform these patients about body contouring surgery possibilities.

Body image dissatisfaction and depression in postbariatric patients is associated with less weight loss and a desire for body contouring surgery

BACKGROUND

Overhanging skin in postbariatric patients leads to a negative body image. In patients with obesity, negative body image is related to more depressive symptoms and a higher weight. This relationship might also be important in postbariatric patients, because improvement of body image via body contouring surgery (BCS) could lead to better weight loss results.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the relationship between body image, depressive symptoms, and weight loss in a postbariatric population, focusing on desire for BCS.

SETTING

Outpatient clinic.

METHODS

One thousand twenty-four primary bariatric surgery patients were contacted, and 590 patients agreed to participate and filled in online questionnaires regarding body image (Body Shape Questionnaire and Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire-Appearance Scales) and depression (Beck Depression Inventory-II). Differences between patients who had BCS, patients who desired BCS, and patients who did not desire BCS were studied. The mediating role of body image in the association between percentage total weight loss and depressive symptoms was assessed via a 2-mediator model.

RESULTS

There was a desire for BCS in 368 patients (62.4%); these patients had significantly lower scores on appearance evaluation and body image satisfaction scales and showed more depressive symptoms. Patients without a desire (n = 157, 26.6%) had lowest rates of depressive symptoms and a more positive body image. Sixty-five patients (11.0%) had undergone BCS. In the patients who desired BCS, percentage total weight loss was negatively affected by depressive symptoms via appearance evaluation and body-area satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

There are striking differences regarding body image satisfaction and depressive symptoms when comparing postbariatric patients and without desire for BCS. Body image satisfaction is associated with less depressive symptoms in all postbariatric patients. In patients who desired BCS, body image is one of the mediators of the relationship between percentage total weight loss and depressive symptoms. Therefore, body image should be taken seriously and be part of outcome assessment in postbariatric patients.

Body Contouring Surgery and the Maintenance of Weight-Loss Following Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery leads to significant weight loss with reduced morbidity and mortality. However, excess skin as a consequence of weight loss represents a major problem, impacting upon patient's functionality with potential negative effects on weight loss.

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the effect of body-contouring surgery on weight-loss maintenance following bariatric surgery.

METHODS

We undertook a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) +/- body-contouring surgery (BC). The control group (n = 61) received RYGB, the test group (n = 30) received RYGB+BC 12 to 18 months after bariatric surgery. Each RYGB+BC patient was matched to two control patients for age, sex, glycaemic status, and weight on day of surgery. Per cent weight loss (%WL) was calculated at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months post-RYGB for both groups.

RESULTS

The %WL was similar at 3, 6, and 12 months post-RYGB. At 24 months, %WL was 35.6% in the RYGB+BC group and 30.0% in the RYGB group (P < 0.05). At 36 months, the RYGB+BC group maintained their weight loss (%WL 33.0%), in contrast, the RYGB gained weight (%WL = 27.3%, P < 0.05). This trend continued (RYGB+BC vs RYGB) at 48 months (%WL 30.8% vs 27.0%) and at 60 months (%WL 32.2% vs 22.7%, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest patients who undergo body contouring after bariatric surgery are able to lose significantly more weight and maintain weight loss at five years of follow up compared to those undergoing bariatric surgery alone.

Characterizing Breast Deformities After Massive Weight Loss: Utilizing the Pittsburgh Rating Scale to Examine Factors Affecting Severity Score and Surgical Decision Making in a Retrospective Series

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Massive weight loss (MWL) can result in variable contour deformities of the breasts. The Pittsburgh Rating Scale (PRS) was designed to describe the multitude of deformities after MWL and recommends operations to consider for surgical improvement. We present the first comprehensive description of breast deformities in a large sample of MWL patients, examine factors affecting the severity of deformities, and report the correlation between PRS score and surgical decision making.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all MWL patients presenting for breast surgery at our institution's Life After Weight Loss program from 2004 to 2015 was performed. Information including demographics, body mass indices (BMIs), method of weight loss, and type of surgical intervention was collected. Preoperative breast photographs were blinded and scored according to the PRS.

RESULTS

A total of 204 MWL patients were identified; 26% (53) scored 1, 34% (69) scored 2, and 40% (82) scored 3 on the PRS. Greater deformities were seen after weight loss from bariatric surgery versus diet and exercise alone (P = 0.031), in mastopexy versus augmentation/mastopexy (P = 0.001), and in breast reduction versus augmentation/mastopexy patients (P > 0.0001). Patients who underwent reduction mammaplasty had the greatest maximum BMI compared with other procedures (P = 0.016). The PRS scores were positively correlated to maximum BMI (P < 0.001), delta BMI (P < 0.001), and current BMI (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Massive weight loss patients have variable, and often severe, breast deformities, and the PRS remains a valuable classification tool. Severity scores correlate with BMI, procedure, and weight loss mechanism. Similar scores between mastopexy-only and reduction mammaplasty patients may reflect a composite of personal cosmetic expectations and cost. The PRS scale should also be expanded to include breast reduction as a surgical remedy for PRS grade 3 breast deformities. Understanding breast deformities in this unique population has applications in both preoperative planning and surgical expectations for this unique patient population.

What Is Known About the Correlates and Impact of Excess Skin After Bariatric Surgery: a Scoping Review

Although bariatric surgery (BS) improves health among adults with severe obesity, it results in excess skin in more than 70% of adults. The purpose of this study was to synthesize current knowledge on (1) the impact of excess skin experienced by adults after BS and (2) the correlates of excess skin quantity and inconveniences. PubMed, PsyArticles, and CINAHL databases were searched in May 2016 for relevant studies. Titles, abstracts, and full texts of studies retrieved were screened independently by two reviewers against inclusion criteria: (1) peer-reviewed primary research studies, (2) samples with adults who underwent BS, and (3) studies reporting the impact of excess skin and/or excess skin correlates. Thirteen quantitative and eleven qualitative studies met inclusion criteria. Negative physical, psychosocial, and daily life impacts of excess skin were reported in 67, 75, and 83% of studies, respectively. Women reported more excess skin and greater inconveniences of excess skin than did men. Based on the quantitative studies, pre-BS BMI, time since BS, and type of BS were not significantly associated with inconveniences of excess skin; findings were inconclusive for other correlates found (e.g. age, weight loss, BMI). Excess skin may adversely impact adults' physical and psychosocial functioning, as well as their activities of daily life after BS. However, evidence is lacking to determine which adults may be at heightened risk of developing or being negatively impacted by excess skin. More research on correlates of excess skill is needed to inform the development of tailored interventions in those more vulnerable to developing excess skin after BS to mitigate adverse consequences.

Long-Term Results of Incisional Hernia Repair with Concomitant Abdominoplasty in Postbariatric Patients

The aim of the study was evaluation of long-term results after simultaneous incisional hernia repair and abdominoplasty in patients following RYGB (Roux-en-Y Gastric By-pass) and estimation of quality of life before and after this complex operation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyzed long-term results in 18 patients who underwent complex anterior abdominal wall surgery after massive weight loss, following previous RYGB. The patients were followed-up for at least 8 years. We compared the quality of life before and after hernia repair combined with abdominoplasty.

RESULTS

Observed wide postoperative scar in 4 persons, permanent dysesthesia in one, and flaccidity of the anterior abdominal wall in three cases. Estimation of the quality of life revealed significant improvement in functional, aesthetic and psychological aspects after complex surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

1. Simultaneous incisional hernia repair and abdominoplasty resulted in satisfactory long-term postoperative results, which confirms the efficiency of complex anterior abdominal wall surgery in patients following RYGB after massive weight loss. 2. Surgery in patients afflicted with disfigurements of the anterior abdominal wall contributed to significant improvement in their life quality in functional, aesthetic and psychological aspects, as compared with preoperative estimations. 3. All persons confirmed positive influence of abdominal wall surgery on their possibility to take challenges in life, and fulfill plans. 4. Surgery of the anterior abdominal wall deformities, if needed after massive weight loss, should become an integral part of complex multidisciplinary treatment in postbariatric individuals.

Body Contouring After Bariatric Surgery

Individuals who undergo bariatric surgery generally experience rapid and dramatic weight loss. While the weight loss typically confers significant health benefits, an undesirable consequence is often excessive quantities of hanging, surplus skin. Some patients undergo body-contouring surgery (BCS) in order to improve health, mobility, appearance and psychological adjustment. While the majority of post-bariatric patients desire BCS in one or more body regions, a small percentage of patients receive such surgeries. Lack of knowledge about procedures, cost and (in the USA and several other countries) difficulty obtaining insurance reimbursement likely prevents many patients from undergoing BCS. Those who do undergo BCS appear to be at heightened risk for wound-healing complications. Despite these complications, the majority of patients report satisfactory BCS outcomes. The extant literature in this area provides a great deal of information about these issues; nevertheless, additional research is needed to further inform clinical management and improve patient outcomes.

Classifying severity of abdominal contour deformities after weight loss to aid in patient counseling: a review of 1006 cases

BACKGROUND

Abdominal contour deformities after massive weight loss are highly variable, ranging from a mild upper protuberance to multiple rolls. Correction of these deformities is challenging and may require advanced surgical techniques. Evaluating the incidence of patients presenting with various abdominal deformities and the factors influencing these deformities could aid patients undergoing weight loss.

METHODS

All massive weight loss patients presenting for abdominal contouring from 2002 to 2012 were reviewed, and abdomens were graded using a modified Pittsburgh Rating Scale. Data collected for each patient included body mass indices, history of bariatric surgery, and type of abdominal contouring surgery.

RESULTS

One thousand six patients were evaluated, with a mean age of 44.2 ± 10.5 years. The mean maximum body mass index was 51.7 ± 9.6 kg/m2, mean current body mass index was 30.0 ± 6.4 kg/m2, and mean change in body mass index was 21.7 ± 7.0 kg/m2. Sixty-four percent had a high-grade deformity. Patients with a larger change in body mass index had higher deformity grades (p < 0.001). Patients with higher deformity grades were more likely to undergo a fleur-de-lis abdominoplasty (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients presenting for body contouring after massive weight loss have high-grade abdominal deformities with multiple rolls. Change in body mass index is positively correlated with deformity grade and more aggressive contouring procedures. Patients interested in massive weight loss should be counseled that, depending on desire for eventual outcomes, more complex procedures may be required to correct the resultant abdominal deformity.

Body contouring surgery after bariatric surgery: a study of cost as a barrier and impact on psychological well-being

BACKGROUND

Body-contouring surgery can be a solution to excess skin folds following bariatric surgery. Many patients desire body-contouring surgery, but the cost of the procedure may be a limiting factor. This study aims to examine barriers to access and to compare socioeconomic variables and psychological variables between bariatric surgery patients who have undergone body contouring and those who have not.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, a questionnaire packet was administered to (1) patients who underwent bariatric but not body-contouring surgery and (2) patients who underwent both. The questionnaire included perceived barriers to body-contouring surgery, socioeconomic barriers, measures of anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder seven-item scale), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire nine-item scale), and quality of life (Short Form-36).

RESULTS

Among the 58 study participants, 93.1 percent reported having excess skin folds. Of this sample, 95.4 percent desired body-contouring surgery, and the majority (87.8 percent) of this subsample identified cost as the major barrier to access. Mean scores on the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (6.08 ± 5.97 versus 3.50 ± 3.10; p = 0.030) and the Patient Health Questionnaire (6.40 ± 6.77 versus 2.40 ± 2.37; p = 0.002) were significantly higher for the bariatric surgery group versus bariatric surgery plus body contouring group. Patients in the latter group had significantly higher Short Form-36 physical health component scores (56.80 ± 4.88 versus 49.57 ± 8.25; p = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

Bariatric surgery patients who desire body-contouring surgery perceive cost as a major barrier. Patients undergoing body-contouring surgery may experience improved physical quality of life but not mental quality of life; however, body-contouring surgery may improve aspects of depression and anxiety.

Self-reported problems and wishes for plastic surgery after bariatric surgery

In the affluent part of the world, there is an increasing occurrence of obesity with Body Mass Index (BMI) above 40, which has resulted in an increasing number of operations such as gastric bypass (GB). After massive weight loss there will often be a need for subsequent plastic surgical correction, since some of the patients will experience problems due to excess skin. Foreign studies estimate that ∼30% of all bariatric surgery patients will at some point seek plastic surgical correction of excess skin. The aim of this study is to investigate to what extent the GB patients themselves consider plastic surgery for removal of excess skin, and their reasons and motivations for this. The investigation was performed as an anonymous questionnaire handed out to 150 patients at the 1-year standard consultation for GB patients at a private hospital. The questionnaire contained information about demographic data, patient habits, earlier or present comorbidity, physical problems, psychological problems, and cosmetic problems due to excess skin. Also, it contained information about what anatomical area bothered the patient the most. One hundred and thirty-eight patients responded to the questionnaire, and the investigation showed that 89.9% of the patients had a wish for plastic surgery for several different reasons. This patient demand showed to have no correlation to age, gender, smoking habits, or earlier comorbidity.

Prevalence and desire for body contouring surgery in postbariatric patients in saudi arabia

Background:

Morbid obesity has become a common problem worldwide and as a result the demand for bariatric surgery has increased as well. Most patients develop skin redundancy and sagging at many body parts after major weight loss procedures which increased the demand for body contouring procedures.

Aims:

The study was to address the prevalence and patient's desire for body contouring procedures.

Materials and Methods:

A cross-sectional study targeting the postbariatric patients from April 2011 to October 2011 was conducted at our hospital. Questionnaire was administered in order to measure frequency and patients desire to undergo body contouring surgery after massive weight loss.

Results:

The total number of patients was 128 patients. The mean age of our patients was 37-year old (range 18-56 year). The percentage of the desire for body contouring surgery after bariatric surgery was 78.1%. There was very pronounced desire to body contouring surgery after those who underwent gastric bypass surgery with P-value 0.001. Only 18 patients (14%) have underwent body contouring surgery, with a total of 29 procedures, in which abdominoplasty considered the most commonly procedure performed (57%).

Conclusion:

With the increasing number of weight loss surgery, there is higher number of patients that desire a body contouring surgery, which create huge disparity between demand and accessibility.

Fleur-de-lis panniculectomy after bariatric surgery: our experience

BACKGROUND

Plastic surgeons are faced with increasing numbers of patients presenting for insurance-covered skin excision procedures following bariatric surgery. Panniculectomy for symptomatic relief of rashes is commonly performed, but an isolated infraumbilical amputation-type panniculectomy is a highly unaesthetic procedure, leaving many patients deeply dissatisfied. It may be also fraught with complications due to large incisions and potential for dead-space. In these patients, many surgeons avoid the fleur-de-lis panniculectomy, despite the body contour aesthetic advantage, because of increased time, more scarring, and a perceived increase in complications.

METHODS

This is a retrospective chart review of 130 consecutive postbariatric surgery patients who had panniculectomy over a 2-year period at our institution.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients underwent a traditional panniculectomy and 100 patients had a fleur-de-lis panniculectomy. Mean weight loss from bariatric surgery to panniculectomy was 58.2 kg, with an average body mass index (BMI) of 30. Fifty-seven patients had additional procedures performed at the time of panniculectomy. Twenty-two patients (17%) had complications, with 5 in the traditional group (17%) and 17 in the fleur-de-lis group (17%) (P = 1.0). Six males (40%) had more complications compared with 18 females (15.7%) (P = 0.034). Patients with BMI <30 had 10 complications compared with patients with BMI ≥30 had 15 complications.

CONCLUSIONS

There are many benefits of fleur-de-lis over traditional panniculectomy, even for medical necessity cases. There is limited undermining of tissue which minimizes/eliminates skin necrosis. Our experience with primarily fleur-de-lis panniculectomies shows a complication rate lower than most published data. Fleur-de-lis potentially creates a better symptom correction and cosmetic outcome by resecting maximal skin in both vertical and horizontal directions. These findings must be balanced against a potentially longer operation.