1
|
B OS, Ja GM, Jl AA, V SA. Unveilling the hidden skillset: exploring non-technical skills in surgical education across spanish medical universities. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2024; 24:376. [PMID: 38580994 PMCID: PMC10998365 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05362-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-Technical Skills (NTS) are cognitive, social, and personal resource skills that are crucial in complex and high-risk environments. The aims of our research are to determine the prevalence and content of NTS in the surgical rotation teaching guides of the Medicine Degree programs in Spanish Universities, to identify the most prevalent types and subtypes of NTS, and to analyze factors associated with the prevalence of surgical NTS in Medical Schools in Spain. METHODS Descriptive observational cross-sectional study involving the identification and collection of competencies outlined in the surgical rotation teaching guides of Spanish Medical Schools. Information regarding university performance was obtained from the Foundation for Knowledge and Development Ranking webpage. The "Non-Technical Skills for Surgeons" (NOTSS) system was used to classify each competency in the teaching guides as NTS (categories and elements) and technical skills. Disagreements were resolved through group consensus. RESULTS A total of 1,846 competencies were analyzed in surgical rotations of the Medicine Degree programs across 40 Spanish Universities, with 99 competencies identified as surgical NTS, accounting for 5% of the total. The most frequently identified surgical NTS were "Decision Making" (46%), "Communication & Teamwork" (25%), and "Leadership" (19%). Additionally, several NOTSS were not identified in any institution. Public universities and those including a greater number of competencies had a higher rate of surgical NTS competencies, and we did not find a correlation between surgical NTS competencies and quality indices of University Centers. CONCLUSIONS There is a limited presence of surgical NTS in the educational plans of Spanish Universities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oves-Suarez B
- School of Medicine, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - García-Marín Ja
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain.
| | - Aguayo-Albasini Jl
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain
| | - Soria-Aledo V
- Chief of Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moyal-Smith R, Etheridge JC, Turley N, Lim SR, Sonnay Y, Payne S, Smid-Nanninga H, Kothari R, Berry W, Havens J, Brindle ME. CheckPOINT: a simple tool to measure Surgical Safety Checklist implementation fidelity. BMJ Qual Saf 2024; 33:223-231. [PMID: 37734956 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) is a communication tool that improves teamwork and patient outcomes. SSC effectiveness is dependent on implementation fidelity. Administrative audits fail to capture most aspects of SSC implementation fidelity (ie, team communication and engagement). Existing research tools assess behaviours during checklist performance, but were not designed for routine quality assurance and improvement. We aimed to create a simple tool to assess SSC implementation fidelity, and to test its reliability using video simulations, and usability in clinical practice. METHODS The Checklist Performance Observation for Improvement (CheckPOINT) tool underwent two rounds of face validity testing with surgical safety experts, clinicians and quality improvement specialists. Four categories were developed: checklist adherence, communication effectiveness, attitude and engagement. We created a 90 min training programme, and four trained raters independently scored 37 video simulations using the tool. We calculated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) to assess inter-rater reliability (ICC>0.75 indicating excellent reliability). We then trained two observers, who tested the tool in the operating room. We interviewed the observers to determine tool usability. RESULTS The CheckPOINT tool had excellent inter-rater reliability across SSC phases. The ICC was 0.83 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.98) for the sign-in, 0.77 (95% CI 0.63 to 0.92) for the time-out and 0.79 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.99) for the sign-out. During field testing, observers reported CheckPOINT was easy to use. In 98 operating room observations, the total median (IQR) score was 25 (23-28), checklist adherence was 7 (6-7), communication effectiveness was 6 (6-7), attitude was 6 (6-7) and engagement was 6 (5-7). CONCLUSIONS CheckPOINT is a simple and reliable tool to assess SSC implementation fidelity and identify areas of focus for improvement efforts. Although CheckPOINT would benefit from further testing, it offers a low-resource alternative to existing research tools and captures elements of adherence and team behaviours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Moyal-Smith
- Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - James C Etheridge
- Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nathan Turley
- Department of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Shu Rong Lim
- Health Services Research Department, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Yves Sonnay
- Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sarah Payne
- Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Rishabh Kothari
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - William Berry
- Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Joaquim Havens
- Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mary E Brindle
- Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vervoort D, Hirji S. Non-technical skills for surgeons: challenges and opportunities for cardiothoracic surgery. J Thorac Dis 2020; 12:1112-1114. [PMID: 32274179 PMCID: PMC7138984 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2020.02.16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Dominique Vervoort
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Sameer Hirji
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Buljac-Samardzic M, Doekhie KD, van Wijngaarden JDH. Interventions to improve team effectiveness within health care: a systematic review of the past decade. HUMAN RESOURCES FOR HEALTH 2020; 18:2. [PMID: 31915007 PMCID: PMC6950792 DOI: 10.1186/s12960-019-0411-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 145] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2019] [Accepted: 09/05/2019] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A high variety of team interventions aims to improve team performance outcomes. In 2008, we conducted a systematic review to provide an overview of the scientific studies focused on these interventions. However, over the past decade, the literature on team interventions has rapidly evolved. An updated overview is therefore required, and it will focus on all possible team interventions without restrictions to a type of intervention, setting, or research design. OBJECTIVES To review the literature from the past decade on interventions with the goal of improving team effectiveness within healthcare organizations and identify the "evidence base" levels of the research. METHODS Seven major databases were systematically searched for relevant articles published between 2008 and July 2018. Of the original search yield of 6025 studies, 297 studies met the inclusion criteria according to three independent authors and were subsequently included for analysis. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Scale was used to assess the level of empirical evidence. RESULTS Three types of interventions were distinguished: (1) Training, which is sub-divided into training that is based on predefined principles (i.e. CRM: crew resource management and TeamSTEPPS: Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety), on a specific method (i.e. simulation), or on general team training. (2) Tools covers tools that structure (i.e. SBAR: Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation, (de)briefing checklists, and rounds), facilitate (through communication technology), or trigger (through monitoring and feedback) teamwork. (3) Organizational (re)design is about (re)designing structures to stimulate team processes and team functioning. (4) A programme is a combination of the previous types. The majority of studies evaluated a training focused on the (acute) hospital care setting. Most of the evaluated interventions focused on improving non-technical skills and provided evidence of improvements. CONCLUSION Over the last decade, the number of studies on team interventions has increased exponentially. At the same time, research tends to focus on certain interventions, settings, and/or outcomes. Principle-based training (i.e. CRM and TeamSTEPPS) and simulation-based training seem to provide the greatest opportunities for reaching the improvement goals in team functioning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Buljac-Samardzic
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Bayle building, p.o. box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kirti D. Doekhie
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Bayle building, p.o. box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen D. H. van Wijngaarden
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Bayle building, p.o. box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gillespie BM, Harbeck EL, Lavin J, Hamilton K, Gardiner T, Withers TK, Marshall AP. Evaluation of a patient safety programme on Surgical Safety Checklist Compliance: a prospective longitudinal study. BMJ Open Qual 2018; 7:e000362. [PMID: 30057963 PMCID: PMC6059267 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2018] [Revised: 06/02/2018] [Accepted: 06/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical Safety Checklists (SSC) have been implemented widely across 132 countries since 2008. Yet, despite associated reductions in postoperative complications and death rates, implementation of checklists in surgery remains a challenge. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a patient safety programme over time on SSC use and incidence of clinical errors. DESIGN A prospective longitudinal design over three time points and a retrospective secondary analysis of clinical incident data was undertaken. METHODS We implemented a patient safety programme over 4 weeks to improve surgical teams' use of the SSC. We undertook structured observations to assess surgical teams' checklist use before and after programme implementation and conducted a retrospective audit of clinical incident data 12 months before and 12 months following implementation of the programme. RESULTS There were significant improvements in the observed use of the SSC across all phases, particularly in sign-out where completion rates ranged from 79.3% to 94.5% (p<0.0001) following programme implementation. Across clinical incident audit periods, 33 019 surgical procedures were performed. Based on a subsample of 64 cases, clinical incidents occurred in 22/16 264 (0.13%) before implementation and 42/16 755 (0.25%) cases after implementation. The most predominant incident after programme implementation was inadequate tissue specimen labelling (23/42, 54.8%). Clinical incidents resulted in minimal or no harm to the patient. CONCLUSIONS The benefit in using a surgical checklist lies in the potential to enhance team communications and the promotion of a team culture in which safety is the priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brigid M Gillespie
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
- Nursing & Midwifery Research & Education Unit, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
- National Centre of Research Excellence in Nursing, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Emma L Harbeck
- National Centre of Research Excellence in Nursing, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Joanne Lavin
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Kyra Hamilton
- School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Mt Gravatt Campus, Mount Gravatt, Queensland, Australia
| | - Therese Gardiner
- Nursing and Midwifery Education and Research Unit, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Teresa K Withers
- Surgical and Procedural Services, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Andrea P Marshall
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
- Nursing & Midwifery Research & Education Unit, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
- National Centre of Research Excellence in Nursing, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|