Offering a choice of daily and event-driven preexposure prophylaxis for men who have sex with men in the Netherlands: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Interest in event-driven PrEP among men who have sex with men using daily PrEP in Mexico in 2019-2020: a cross-sectional assessment in a large-scale demonstration project

This study aimed to evaluate the interest in event-driven PrEP (ED-PrEP) among men who have sex with men (MSM) using daily PrEP in Mexico's PrEP demonstration project between 2019 and 2020. We compared participants interested or not in ED-PrEP during their first-month visit and identified associated factors. Of 1,021 MSM attending their first-month visit, 7% had previous knowledge of ED-PrEP, but 40% were interested in ED-PrEP. However, over 50% perceived the scheme as less protective than daily PrEP. Having doubts about ED-PrEP's level of protection was related to less interest in the scheme (aOR = 0.11; CI = 0.07-0.18), just like reporting perceived barriers such as having frequent sex (aOR = 0.06; CI = 0.03-0.14), unplanned sex (aOR = 0.17; CI = 0.11-0.27), forgetting the medicine (aOR = 0.06; CI = 0.03-0.12), or difficulty carrying the medicine (aOR =   0.13; CI = 0.07-0.25). Finally, reporting not taking PrEP for >20 days in the last month (aOR = 0.05; CI = 0.01-0.27) diminished interest in ED-PrEP. In conclusion, few MSM daily PrEP users knew about ED-PrEP yet many were interested in it, suggesting the importance of awareness campaigns regarding ED-PrEP's effectiveness. The lack of interest in ED-PrEP among participants with poor adherence to daily PrEP indicates that they might prefer long-acting PrEP or HIV prevention strategies without medication.

Understanding how PrEP is made successful: Implementation science needs an evidence-making approach

After a decade of oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), the next generation of PrEP is being anticipated, including long-acting pills, injections, and implants. The unevenness of international PrEP implementation is increasingly recognised, with successful rollout in some settings and failure in others. There is a need to better understand conditions of PrEP implementation, and its localised (and sometimes unanticipated) effects. Implementation science explores how contexts and health systems shape the successful translation of health interventions. In this essay, we consider how PrEP is evolving and argue for an 'evidence-making' approach in relation to evidence and intervention translations. This approach emphasises how both interventions and their implementation contexts are co-constituted and evolve together. Unsettling the assumed universality of an intervention's effects and potential in relation to its implementation contexts helps to harness the localised possibilities for what PrEP might become. As the next generation of PrEP offers renewed promise, we must explore how PrEP is put to use and made to work in relation to its evolving situations. We urge implementation science to consider implementation processes as 'evidence-making events' in which evidence, intervention and context evolve together.