Interleukine-2 Therapy Does Not Increase the Risk of Hodgkin or Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma in HIV-Infected Patients: Results From FHDH ANRS CO4

HIV-1-related Hodgkin lymphoma in the era of combination antiretroviral therapy: incidence and evolution of CD4⁺ T-cell lymphocytes

The risk of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is increased in patients infected with HIV-1. We studied the incidence and outcomes of HL, and compared CD4⁺ T-cell trajectories in HL patients and controls matched for duration of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). A total of 40 168 adult HIV-1-infected patients (median age, 36 years; 70% male; median CD4 cell count, 234 cells/μL) from 16 European cohorts were observed during 159 133 person-years; 78 patients developed HL. The incidence was 49.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 39.3-61.2) per 100,000 person-years, and similar on cART and not on cART (P = .96). The risk of HL declined as the most recent (time-updated) CD4 count increased: the adjusted hazard ratio comparing more than 350 with less than 50 cells/μL was 0.27 (95% CI, 0.08-0.86). Sixty-one HL cases diagnosed on cART were matched to 1652 controls: during the year before diagnosis, cases lost 98 CD4 cells (95% CI, -159 to -36 cells), whereas controls gained 35 cells (95% CI, 24-46 cells; P < .0001). The incidence of HL is not reduced by cART, and patients whose CD4 cell counts decline despite suppression of HIV-1 replication on cART may harbor HL.

IL-2 therapy: potential impact of the CD4 cell count at initiation on clinical efficacy--results from the ANRS CO4 cohort

OBJECTIVES

We investigated why, despite its beneficial effect on the CD4 cell count, IL-2 therapy had no clinical benefit as shown in the ESPRIT and SILCAAT trials. We focused on subgroups of patients defined according to CD4 cell counts at baseline and over time to assess the threshold above which IL-2 therapy was no longer beneficial in a large cohort of HIV-1 infected patients.

METHODS

Within the French Hospital Database on HIV, a total of 953 IL-2-treated patients were compared with 27 750 IL-2-untreated patients, matched for the date of enrolment, sex, age, and the baseline CD4 cell count and plasma HIV-1 RNA level. The risk of clinical progression, defined as the occurrence of a new AIDS-defining event or death, was studied with multivariable Cox proportional hazards models and Poisson regression models.

RESULTS

We found no clinical benefit in patients starting IL-2 with CD4 count ≥200 cells/mm(3) [hazard ratio (HR) =1.13; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.81-1.57], while a benefit was observed in patients with CD4 count <200 cells/mm(3) (HR=0.64; 95% CI, 0.48-0.86). The observed benefit was due to the risk reduction in the 100-350/mm(3) stratum of updated CD4 cell counts (relative rate=0.30; 95% CI, 0.09-1.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher CD4 cell counts at enrolment and shorter follow-up with low to intermediate CD4 cell counts may explain why IL-2 therapy had no observed clinical benefit in the SILCAAT study. Our findings suggest that the benefit of IL-2 is restricted to a narrow range of CD4 cell counts, arguing against the use of IL-2 in HIV infection to reduce the risk of clinical events.

Cancer risk in HIV-infected persons: influence of CD4(+) count

Persons infected with HIV are at increased risk for all cancers known or suspected to have an infectious cause, an effect believed to be primarily mediated by lowered host immunity via the depletion of CD4(+) cells. Whereas Kaposi sarcoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma were recognised as AIDS-defining illnesses early in the HIV epidemic, the influence of declining CD4(+) count on other infection-related cancers has taken longer to establish, undoubtedly because the association is weaker and the dose-response relationship is less steep. However, following improved survival made possible by combined antiretroviral therapy, declining CD4(+) count starts showing an impact on the natural history of various carcinogenic infections and on the risk for an increasingly wide range of cancers, including Hodgkin lymphoma, cervical, anal and liver cancers.

Immunological success is predicted by enfuvirtide but not interleukin-2 therapy in immunodepressed patients

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of adding interleukin-2 (IL-2) to an optimized background treatment in HIV-1 patients with advanced failure.

DESIGN

Randomized, open-label, multicentre controlled trial.

METHODS

Patients with CD4 T-cell count of less than 200 cells/microl, plasma HIV-1 RNA of more than 10 000 copies/ml and a genotypic sensitivity score showing two or less active drugs were randomized to either eight IL-2 cycles with optimized background treatment or optimized background treatment alone. Optimization was made according to genotypic sensitivity score. Enfuvirtide was added in enfuvirtide-naive patients. Evaluation was performed at week 52 on the proportions of patients with CD4 cell count of at least 200 cells/microl (primary outcome), of patients with a CD4 cell count increase of at least 50 cells/microl from week 0, on plasma HIV-1 RNA and HIV-related events.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients were analysed. Median age was 43 years, 61% were at Center for Disease Control and Prevention stage C, 43% had a genotypic sensitivity score of 0, median baseline CD4 cell count and plasma HIV-1 RNA values were 64 cells/microl and 4.9 log10 copies/ml, respectively. Treatment could be optimized in 23 patients. At week 52, in the IL-2 and control groups, the proportion of patients with CD4 cell count of at least 200 cells/microl (14 and 18%) or a CD4 cell count increase of at least 50 cells/microl (25 and 32%) and median plasma HIV-1 RNA were not significantly different. In multivariate analysis, optimization with enfuvirtide and baseline CD4 cell count were statistically associated with CD4 cell count of at least 200 cells/microl at week 52 (P = 0.003 and P = 0.01). Optimization with enfuvirtide was the only factor associated with a CD4 cell count gain of at least 50 cells/microl (P < 0.001). There was no difference in the rate of AIDS events between groups.

CONCLUSION

IL-2 failed to increase CD4 cell count in immunocompromised patients with multiple therapeutic failures. Enfuvirtide use was highly associated with success.

Hodgkin lymphoma in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) risk is elevated among persons infected with HIV (PHIV) and has been suggested to have increased in the era of combined antiretroviral therapy (cART). Among 14,606 PHIV followed more than 20 years in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study (SHCS), determinants of HL were investigated using 2 different approaches, namely, a cohort and nested case-control study, estimating hazard ratios (HRs) and matched odds ratios, respectively. Forty-seven incident HL cases occurred during 84,611 person-years of SHCS follow-up. HL risk was significantly higher among men having sex with men (HR vs intravenous drug users = 2.44, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-5.24) but did not vary by calendar period (HR for 2002-2007 vs 1995 or earlier = 0.65, 95% CI, 0.29-1.44) or cART use (HR vs nonusers = 1.02, 95% CI, 0.53-1.94). HL risk tended to increase with declining CD4(+) cell counts, but these differences were not significant. A lower CD4(+)/CD8(+) ratio at SHCS enrollment or 1 to 2 years before HL diagnosis, however, was significantly associated with increased HL risk. In conclusion, HL risk does not appear to be increasing in recent years or among PHIV using cART in Switzerland, and there was no evidence that HL risk should be increased in the setting of improved immunity.