Tenofovir coadministration is not associated with lower unboosted atazanavir plasma exposure in the clinical setting

Antiretroviral concentrations in the presence and absence of valproic acid

OBJECTIVES

An unexpected drug-drug interaction has been recently reported between dolutegravir, an HIV integrase inhibitor, and valproic acid. Despite there being several potential underlying mechanisms, plasma protein displacement has been suggested. The aim of this study was to assess plasma concentrations of several antiretrovirals when administered with or without valproic acid.

METHODS

We performed a therapeutic drug monitoring registry analysis and identified patients concomitantly taking antiretrovirals and valproic acid and without clinical affecting conditions or interacting drugs.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-four patients were identified. Median (IQR) age and BMI were 49.7 years (45-56) and 23.4 kg/m2 (20.8-26.3) and 78 were male (58.2%). Despite small groups, we observed no major effect on antiretroviral exposure, even when considering highly protein-bound compounds (such as etravirine), with the exception of dolutegravir trough concentrations [median (IQR) = 132 ng/mL (62-227) in individuals on valproic acid versus 760 ng/mL (333-1407) in those not receiving valproic acid].

CONCLUSIONS

Valproic acid does not have a major effect on antiretrovirals other than dolutegravir. The mechanism of this unexpected drug-drug interaction may be the combination of protein displacement, reduced absorption and CYP3A4 induction.

Efficacy and safety of "unboosting" atazanavir in a randomized controlled trial among HIV-infected patients receiving tenofovir DF

OBJECTIVES

To assess safety and efficacy of a switch to unboosted atazanavir (ATV) among HIV-infected adults receiving ATV/ritonavir (r) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF).

METHODS

HIV-infected adults with viral load (VL) <40 copies/mL at screening and <150 copies/mL consistently for ≥3 months while receiving a regimen including ATV/r and TDF were randomized to continue ATV/r 300/100 mg daily (control) or change to ATV 400 mg daily (switch), while maintaining their TDF backbone. The primary outcome was proportion of subjects without treatment failure (regimen switch or VL > 200 copies/mL twice consecutively) at 48 weeks.

RESULTS

Fifty participants (46 male, median age 47 years) were randomized, 25 to each arm. At week 48, treatment success occurred in 76% in the control arm and 92% in the switch arm (ITT, p = 0.25). ATV trough levels at week 9 were higher in controls (median 438 ng/mL) than in the switch arm (median 124 ng/mL) (p = 0.003), as was total bilirubin at week 48 (median 38 μmol/L and 28 μmol/L, respectively; p = 0.02). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decreased in the control arm (p = 0.007), but did not change in the switch arm. At week 48, eGFR was higher in the switch arm (median 96 mL/min) than in the control arm (median 85 mL/min) (p = 0.035), but the arms were similar with respect to fasting glucose, C-reactive protein, and lipid parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching from ATV/r to unboosted ATV appears to be safe and effective in selected virologically suppressed patients receiving TDF-containing regimens, and may have favorable effects on bilirubin and renal function.

Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of atazanavir (200mg twice daily) plus raltegravir (400mg twice daily) dual regimen in the clinical setting

BACKGROUND

Unboosted atazanavir with raltegravir has been investigated at 300mg twice daily showing frequent hyperbilirubinemia and selection of resistance-associated mutations.

OBJECTIVES

Atazanavir 200mg twice daily could increase tolerability and plasma exposure.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients on atazanavir/raltegravir (200/400 twice daily), with self-reported adherence >95% and no concomitant interacting drugs were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

102 patients [72.5% male, age 46.4 years (42-54), BMI 24kg/m² (22-26)] were included. CD4+ T lymphocytes were 417 cell/μL (302-704) and 76 patients (74.5%) had HIV-RNA <50 copies/ml. After 123 weeks 18.6% patients showed virological failure and 3.9% discontinued for intolerance. Available genotypes showed selection of major integrase (7/10 patients) and protease resistance-associated mutations (5/13 patients). In patients switching with dyslipidemia (n=67) total, LDL cholesterol and triglycerides significantly decreased. Patients switching with eCRCL<60ml/min (n=27) had no significant changes while patients with eCRCL >60ml/min showed significant decrease (-9.8ml/min, p=0.003) at 96-weeks. Atazanavir and raltegravir trough concentrations were 321ng/mL (147-720) and 412ng/mL (225-695). Self-reported non-adherence (n=4) was significantly associated with virological failure (p=0.02); patients with virological success had borderline longer previous virological control (33 vs. 18 months, p=0.07).

DISCUSSION

Switch to atazanavir/raltegravir was safe and well tolerated allowing optimal drugs' plasma exposure. However, a concerning rate (18.6%) failed with newly selected mutations and stopped ATV/RAL because of DDI and intolerance issues or were lost to follow-up. This regimen might be considered in selected patients, without history of protease inhibitors failure or HBV infection, showing optimal adherence and prolonged suppression.

Treatment response to unboosted atazanavir in combination with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and lamivudine in human immunodeficiency virus-1-infected patients who have achieved virological suppression: A therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacogenetic study

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Treatment response to switch regimens containing unboosted atazanavir and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)/lamivudine guided by therapeutic drug monitoring in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients is rarely investigated.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with plasma human immunodeficiency virus RNA load < 200 copies/mL switching to unboosted atazanavir plus zidovudine-lamivudine (coformulated), abacavir-lamivudine (coformulated), or TDF/lamivudine > 3 months were included for determinations of treatment response, plasma atazanavir concentrations, and single-nucleotide polymorphisms of MDR1, PXR, and UGT1A1 genes from 2010 to 2014. Treatment failure was defined as either discontinuation of atazanavir for any reason or plasma viral load ≥ 200 copies/mL within 96 weeks.

RESULTS

During the study period, 128 patients switched to unboosted atazanavir with TDF/lamivudine (TDF group) and 186 patients switched to unboosted atazanavir with two other nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (non-TDF group). There were no statistically significant differences in the distributions of single-nucleotide polymorphisms of MDR1 (2677 and 3435), PXR genotypes (63396), and UGT1A1*28 between the two groups. Recommended plasma atazanavir concentrations were achieved in 83.5% and 64.9% of the TDF group and non-TDF group, respectively (p < 0.01). After a median follow-up duration of 96.0 weeks, treatment failure occurred in 19 (14.9%) and 34 (18.3%) patients in the TDF group and non-TDF group, respectively (p = 0.60). Low-level viremia (40-200 copies/mL) before switch (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-4.01) and without therapeutic drug monitoring (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-3.73) were risk factors for treatment failure.

CONCLUSION

Switch to unboosted atazanavir with TDF/lamivudine achieves a similar treatment response to that with two other nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors in patients achieving virological suppression with the guidance of therapeutic drug monitoring.

Successful pharmacogenetics-based optimization of unboosted atazanavir plasma exposure in HIV-positive patients: a randomized, controlled, pilot study (the REYAGEN study)

BACKGROUND

Atazanavir without ritonavir, despite efficacy and tolerability, shows low plasma concentrations that warrant optimization.

METHODS

In a randomized, controlled, pilot trial, stable HIV-positive patients on atazanavir/ritonavir (with tenofovir/emtricitabine) were switched to atazanavir. In the standard-dose arm, atazanavir was administered as 400 mg once daily, while according to patients' genetics (PXR, ABCB1 and SLCO1B1), in the pharmacogenetic arm: patients with unfavourable genotypes received 200 mg of atazanavir twice daily. EudraCT number: 2009-014216-35.

RESULTS

Eighty patients were enrolled with balanced baseline characteristics. The average atazanavir exposure was 253 ng/mL (150-542) in the pharmacogenetic arm versus 111 ng/mL (64-190) in the standard-dose arm (P < 0.001); 28 patients in the pharmacogenetic arm (75.7%) had atazanavir exposure >150 ng/mL versus 14 patients (38.9%) in the standard-dose arm (P = 0.001). Immunovirological and laboratory parameters had a favourable outcome throughout the study with non-significant differences between study arms.

CONCLUSIONS

Atazanavir plasma exposure is higher when the schedule is chosen according to the patient's genetic profile.

Impact of switching from lopinavir/ritonavir to boosted and un-boosted atazanavir on glucose metabolism: the ATAzanavir & GLUcose metabolism (ATAGLU) study

Previous studies have reported that protease inhibitors (PIs) can contribute to glycaemic alterations. However, there are few trials examining the direct effect of a single PI. The objective of the study was to evaluate the modifications of glucose and lipid profiles after a switch from lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) to atazanavir, used as ritonavir-boosted (ATV/r) or un-boosted. We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study on the effect of ATV/(r) on glycaemic metabolism (ATAGLU) in patients with undetectable levels of HIV-RNA who switched from LPV/r. In total, 235 patients treated for 48 weeks with LPV/r plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and with undetectable HIV-RNA were included: 134 continued LPV/r after the initial 48 weeks and 101 switched to ATV(/r) (18.3% to ATV; 24.7% to ATV/r). A significant decrease in mean glucose level and insulin resistance was observed in patients who switched to ATV(/r). The mean cholesterol triglyceride levels increased in the LPV/r group and decreased among the patients who switched. A significant increase of CD4 T cells with undetectable levels of HIV-RNA was observed in all groups. The long-term results obtained in this real-life study suggest that patients who have achieved initial suppression on a regimen including LPV/r + two NRTIs can switch to ATV/(r) + two NRTIs with an improvement in lipid and glycaemic metabolism.

Voriconazole and atazanavir: a CYP2C19-dependent manageable drug-drug interaction

AIM

To investigate the pharmacokinetics of voriconazole when administered to HIV-positive patients receiving treatment with atazanavir-containing therapies according to CYP2C19 genotype.

MATERIALS & METHODS

We describe four HIV-positive patients with pulmonary aspergillosis treated with voriconazole and atazanavir-based regimens (with or without ritonavir). They were managed by assessing their CYP2C19 genotype (CYP2C19*2, rs4244285, G>A, real-time PCR) and therapeutic drug monitoring (HPLC-based validation methods).

RESULTS & CONCLUSION

Voriconazole exposure was variable but Ctrough levels were above 1000 ng/ml in all patients; one CYP2C19 intermediate metabolizer required lower doses of voriconazole (50 mg twice daily) to obtain satisfactory drug concentrations. Atazanavir and ritonavir plasma levels were moderately reduced (area under the curve: -23 and -26%, respectively); raltegravir exposure seemed increased by voriconazole administration (area under the curve: 2.5-fold higher) in a single subject. Coadministration of atazanavir and voriconazole may be feasible in selected HIV-positive patients; therapeutic drug monitoring and CYP2C19 genotyping may optimize exposure of both drugs.

Pharmacologic boosting of atazanavir in maintenance HIV-1 therapy: the COREYA propensity-score adjusted study

Background

Among HIV-1 infected patients who achieved virologic suppression, the use of atazanavir without pharmacologic boosting is debated. We evaluated the efficacy and tolerance of maintenance therapy with unboosted atazanavir in clinical practice.

Methods and Results

This multicenter retrospective cohort study evaluated the efficacy of switching HIV-1-infected patients controlled on triple therapy to unboosted (ATV₀, n = 98) versus ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV/r, n = 254) +2 nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors. The primary endpoint was time to virologic failure (VF, >200 copies/mL). ATV groups were compared controlling for potential confounding bias by inverse probability weighted Cox analysis and propensity-score matching. Overall and adjusted VF rates were similar for both strategies. Both strategies improved dyslipidemia and creatininemia, with less jaundice in the ATV₀ group.

Conclusion

In previously well-suppressed patients, within an observational cohort setting, ATV₀–based triple-therapy appeared as effective as ATV/r- based triple-therapy to maintain virologic suppression, even if co-administered with TDF, but was better tolerated.

Unboosted atazanavir for treatment of HIV infection: rationale and recommendations for use

Atazanavir (Reyataz®) is a protease inhibitor (PI) for the treatment of HIV infection. Several trials have demonstrated the good efficacy and toxicity profile of atazanavir boosted by ritonavir (atazanavir/r). However, several toxicity events and pharmacokinetic issues due to drug-to-drug interactions (partly related to ritonavir) may complicate atazanavir/r therapy. This is why regimens with unboosted atazanavir have been experimented with and are used in clinical practice. The aim of this article is to identify the clinical settings in which unboosted atazanavir may be a safe and effective option for the long-term control of HIV replication. Despite the fact that a favourable lipid profile and good gastrointestinal tolerability have been reported in comparative trials, unboosted atazanavir should not be considered an optimal choice for treatment-naive patients. In fact, boosting with ritonavir produces higher atazanavir plasma levels, which are beneficial in terms of efficacy, especially in untreated patients with high plasma HIV RNA. Clinical data indicate that, in patients with sustained undetectable HIV RNA and without previous virological failure or HIV drug resistance-associated mutations, a switch to unboosted atazanavir-based regimens is a feasible option to control and prevent toxicity events, especially in patients who cannot tolerate ritonavir and in those with severe hyperbilirubinaemia on atazanavir/r. Moreover, while unboosted atazanavir must not be used in pregnant women, it is a recommended option in special populations, such as patients with moderate liver insufficiency. Lastly, unboosted atazanavir in combination with raltegravir may allow the construction of a well tolerated and effective regimen without nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in patients for whom these drugs are contraindicated. In conclusion, there is a good rationale, significant clinical interest and accumulating clinical experience with unboosted atazanavir-based regimens, although this formulation should be used only in specific situations and as a maintenance strategy. Moreover, therapeutic drug monitoring could be useful in specific circumstances (such as in patients with liver impairment or in case of potential drug-drug interactions).

Population pharmacokinetic modeling of the association between 63396C->T pregnane X receptor polymorphism and unboosted atazanavir clearance

Atazanavir (ATV) plasma concentrations are influenced by CYP3A4 and ABCB1, which are regulated by the pregnane X receptor (PXR; NR1I2). PXR expression is correlated with CYP3A4 in liver in the absence of enzyme inducers. The PXR single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) 63396C→T (rs2472677) alters PXR expression and CYP3A4 activity in vitro, and we previously showed an association of this polymorphism with unboosted ATV plasma concentrations. The aim of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic analysis to quantify the impact of 63396C→T and diurnal variation on ATV clearance. A population analysis was performed with 323 plasma samples from 182 randomly selected patients receiving unboosted ATV. Two hundred fifty-nine of the blood samples were collected at random time points, and 11 patients had a full concentration-time profile at steady state. Nonlinear mixed effects modeling was applied to explore the effects of PXR 63396C→T, patient demographics, and diurnal variation. A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and lag time best described the data. Population clearance was 19.7 liters/h with interpatient variability or coefficient of variation (CV) of 21.5%. Homozygosity for the T allele for PXR 63396 was associated with a 17.0% higher clearance that was statistically significant. Evening dosing was associated with 34% higher bioavailability than morning dosing. Patient demographic factors had no effect on ATV clearance. These data show an association of PXR 63396C→T and diurnal variation on unboosted ATV clearance. The association is likely to be mediated through an effect on hepatic PXR expression and therefore expression of its target genes (e.g., CYP3A4, SLCO1B1, and ABCB1), which are known to be involved in ATV clearance.