Postoperative Low-Dose Follow-Up Computed Tomography for Patients With Stomach Cancer: Optimal Blending Ratio of Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction for Image Quality and Diagnostic Performance

Comparison of diagnostic performance between 1 millisievert CT enterography and half-standard dose CT enterography for evaluating active inflammation in patients with Crohn's disease

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic performance of CT enterography (CTE) images obtained at 1 millisievert (mSv) and reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) with those of half-dose CTE images for the evaluation of active inflammation in patients with Crohn's disease.

METHODS

Forty-six consecutive patients (mean age 29 years; range 15-59 years) with Crohn's disease underwent CTE which comprised a standard-dose scan at the enteric phase (45 s), a half-dose scan with ASIR at the portal venous phase (70 s), and 1 mSv scans with FBP and ASIR at the delayed phase (90 s) under a fixed 120 kVp and variable mAs. Two blinded readers independently recorded confidence scores for active inflammation in the ileum and terminal ileum, respectively. The diagnostic performance of each image set was compared by pairwise comparison of receiver operating characteristic curves. The established image findings on standard-dose scan and ileocolonoscopy served as the reference standard.

RESULTS

A total of 92 bowel segments were analyzed. For reader 1, the diagnostic performance was increased from 1 mSv CT with FBP and 1 mSv CT with ASIR to half-dose scan with ASIR (AUC, 0.759, 0.794, and 0.845; P = 0.1429, P = 0.0107, respectively). For reader 2, there was no significant difference among the three image sets (AUC, 0.848, 0.865, and 0.845; P > 0.05, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic performance of 1 mSv CTE may be comparable to that of half-dose CTE.

Low-Dose Scanning Technology Combined with Low-Concentration Contrast Material in Renal Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA): A Preliminary Study

Background

This study is to investigate the feasibility of low iodine concentration contrast material (CM) combined with low tube voltage and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) in renal computed tomography angiography (CTA).

Material/Methods

A total of 136 patients were enrolled in this prospective trial, and randomly divided into two groups: group A (n=68) and group B (n=68). Group A received 120-kVp and iopromide (370 mg/mL) with filtered back projection (FBP) reconstruction, and group B received 100-kVp and iodixanol (270 mg/mL) with ASIR 40% (ASIR₄₀). An equal iodine dose (300 mg/kg body weight) and the same iodine delivery rate (1,500 mg I/s) were given to all patients. Density, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured, and the image quality and visualization of renal arteries were scored. Dose-length product (DLP) and CT dose index volume (CTDIvol) were recorded, and effective doses (ED) were calculated.

Results

There was no significant difference in image noise between groups A and B (p>0.05). The vessel attenuation, SNR, and CNR were significantly higher in group B than group A (all p<0.05). The subjective image quality and visualization of renal artery branches were similar in these two groups (p>0.05). Compared with group A, the CTDIvol, DLP, and ED in group B were decreased by 38.58%, 37.24%, and 37.24%, respectively (p=0.000).

Conclusions

Compared with 120-kVp with FBP reconstruction, the protocol of 100-kVp with ASIRP₄₀ reconstruction provided high-quality renal CTA results, which allowed for reduced iodine concentration and decreased radiation dose.

Comparison of Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction, Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction, and Filtered Back Projection for Detecting Hepatic Metastases on Submillisievert Low-Dose Computed Tomography

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to compare the diagnostic performance of model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR), adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR), and filtered back projection (FBP) on submillisievert low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) for detecting hepatic metastases.

METHODS

Thirty-eight patients having hepatic metastases underwent abdomen CT. Computed tomography protocol consisted of routine standard-dose portal venous phase scan (120 kVp) and 90-second delayed low-dose scan (80 kVp). The LDCT images were reconstructed with FBP, ASIR, and MBIR, respectively. Two readers recorded the number of hepatic metastases on each image set.

RESULTS

A total of 105 metastatic lesions were analyzed. For reader 1, sensitivity for detecting metastases was stationary between FBP (49%) and ASIR (52%, P = 0.0697); however, sensitivity increased in MBIR (66%, P = 0.0035). For reader 2, it was stationary for all the following sets: FBP (65%), ASIR (68%), and MBIR (67%, P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The MBIR and ASIR showed a limited sensitivity for detecting hepatic metastases in submillisievert LDCT.