An Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram Method Versus a Traditional 2-Dimensional Measurement Method for Identifying Non–Puerperal Mastitis From Breast Cancer at 3.0 T:

A hematological parameter-based model for distinguishing non-puerperal mastitis from invasive ductal carcinoma

PURPOSE

Non-puerperal mastitis (NPM) accounts for approximately 4-5% of all benign breast lesions. Ultrasound is the preferred method for screening breast diseases; however, similarities in imaging results can make it challenging to distinguish NPM from invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Our objective was to identify convenient and objective hematological markers to distinguish NPM from IDC.

METHODS

We recruited 89 patients with NPM, 88 with IDC, and 86 with fibroadenoma (FA), and compared their laboratory data at the time of admission. LASSO regression, univariate logistic regression, and multivariate logistic regression were used to screen the parameters for construction of diagnostic models. Receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration curves, and decision curves were constructed to evaluate the accuracy of this model.

RESULTS

We found significant differences in routine laboratory data between patients with NPM and IDC, and these indicators were candidate biomarkers for distinguishing between the two diseases. Additionally, we evaluated the ability of some classic hematological markers reported in previous studies to differentiate between NPM and IDC, and the results showed that these indicators are not ideal biomarkers. Furthermore, through rigorous LASSO and logistic regression, we selected age, white blood cell count, and thrombin time to construct a differential diagnostic model that exhibited a high level of discrimination, with an area under the curve of 0.912 in the training set and with 0.851 in the validation set. Furthermore, using the same selection method, we constructed a differential diagnostic model for NPM and FA, which also demonstrated good performance with an area under the curve of 0.862 in the training set and with 0.854 in the validation set. Both of these two models achieved AUCs higher than the AUCs of models built using machine learning methods such as random forest, decision tree, and SVM in both the training and validation sets.

CONCLUSION

Certain laboratory parameters on admission differed significantly between the NPM and IDC groups, and the constructed model was designated as a differential diagnostic marker. Our analysis showed that it has acceptable efficiency in distinguishing NPM from IDC and may be employed as an auxiliary diagnostic tool.

Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis or Breast Cancer? A Comparative MRI Study in Patients Presenting with Non-Mass Enhancement

OBJECTIVE

To compare and determine discriminative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of idiopathic granulomatous mastitis (IGM) and breast cancer (BC) that present as non-mass enhancement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study includes 68 IGM and 75 BC cases that presented with non-mass enhancement on breast MRI. All patients with a previous history of breast surgery, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy due to BC or a previous history of mastitis were excluded. On MRI images, presence of architectural distortion skin thickening, edema, hyperintense ducts containing protein, dilated fat-containing ducts and axillary adenopathies were noted. Cysts with enhancing walls, lesion size, lesion location, fistulas, distribution, internal enhancement pattern and kinetic features of non-mass enhancement were recorded. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were calculated. Pearson chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, independent t test and Mann-Whitney U test were used as needed for statistical analysis and comparison. Multivariate logistic regression model was used to determine the independent predictors.

RESULTS

IGM patients were significantly younger than BC patients (p < 0.001). Cysts with thin (p < 0.05) or thick walls (p = 0.001), multiple cystic lesions, (p < 0.001), cystic lesions draining to the skin (p < 0.001), and skin fistulas (p < 0.05) were detected more often in IGM. Central (p < 0.05) and periareolar (p < 0.001) location and focal skin thickening (p < 0.05) were significantly more common in IGM. Architectural distortion (p = 0.001) and diffuse skin thickening (p < 0.05) were associated with BC. Multiple regional distribution was more common in IGM, whereas diffuse distribution and clumped enhancement were more common in BC (p < 0.05). In kinetic analysis, persistent enhancement was more common in IGM, whereas plateau and wash-out types were more common in BC (p < 0.001). Independent predictors for BC were age, diffuse skin thickening and kinetic curve types. There was no significant difference in the diffusion characteristics. Based on these findings, MRI had a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 88%, 67.65%, and 78.32%, respectively, in differentiating IGM from BC.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, for non-mass enhancement, MRI can rule out malignancy with a considerably high sensitivity; however, specificity is still low, as many IGM patients have overlapping findings. Final diagnosis should be complemented with histopathology whenever necessary.

Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram Analysis for the Preoperative Evaluation of Ki-67 Expression in Pituitary Macroadenoma

PURPOSE

To explore the value of an apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram in predicting the Ki-67 proliferation index in pituitary macroadenomas.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed the pathological and imaging data of 102 patients with pathologically confirmed pituitary macroadenoma. Immunohistochemistry staining was used to assess Ki-67 expression in tumor tissue samples, and a high Ki-67 labeling index was defined as 3%. The ADC images of the maximum slice of tumors were selected and the region of interest (ROI) of each slice was delineated using the MaZda software (version 4.7, Technical University of Lodz, Institute of Electronics, Łódź, Poland) and analyzed by ADC histogram. Histogram characteristic parameters were compared between the high Ki-67 group (n = 42) and the low Ki-67 group (n = 60). The important parameters were further analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC).

RESULTS

The mean value, and the 1st, 10th, 50th, 90th, and 99th percentiles were found to be negatively correlated with Ki-67 expression (all P < 0.05), with correlation coefficients of -0.292, -0.352, -0.344, -0.289, -0.253 and -0.267, respectively. The mean ADC and the 1st, 10th, 50th, 90th, and 99th quantiles extracted from the histogram were significantly lower in the high Ki-67 group than in the low Ki-67 group (all P < 0.05). The area under the ROC curve was 0.699-0.720; however, there were no significant between-group differences in variance, skewness and kurtosis (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

An ADC histogram can be a reliable tool to predict the Ki-67 proliferation status in patients with pituitary macroadenomas.

An analysis of Ki-67 expression in stage 1 invasive ductal breast carcinoma using apparent diffusion coefficient histograms

Background

To investigate the value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histograms in differentiating Ki-67 expression in T1 stage invasive ductal breast carcinoma (IDC).

Methods

The records of 111 patients with pathologically confirmed T1 stage IDC who underwent magnetic resonance imaging prior to surgery were retrospectively reviewed. The expression of Ki-67 in tumor tissue samples from the patients was assessed using immunohistochemical (IHC) staining, with a cut-off value of 25% for high Ki-67 labeling index (LI). ADC images of the maximum lay of tumors were selected, and the region of interest (ROI) of each lay was delineated using the MaZda software and analyzed by histogram. The correlations between the histogram characteristic parameters and the Ki-67 LI were investigated. Additionally, the histogram characteristic parameters of the high Ki-67 group (n=54) and the low Ki-67 group (n=57) were statistically analyzed to determine the characteristic parameters with significant difference. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analyses were further performed for the significant parameters.

Results

The mean value, and the 1st, 10th, 50th, 90th, and 99th percentiles were found to be negatively correlated with the expression of Ki-67 (all P values <0.001), with a correlation coefficient of -0.624, -0.749, -0.717, -0.621, -0.500, and -0.410, respectively. In the high Ki-67 group, the mean value, and the 1st, 10th, 50th, 90th, and 99th percentiles extracted by the histogram were significantly lower (all P values <0.05) than that of the low Ki-67 group, with areas under the ROC curves ranging from 0.717-0.856. However, the variance, skewness, and kurtosis did not differ between the two groups (all P values >0.05).

Conclusions

Histogram-derived parameters for ADC images can serve as a reliable tool in the prediction of Ki-67 proliferation status in patients with T1 stage IDC. Among the significant ADC histogram values, the 1st and 10th percentiles showed the best predictive values.

Diagnostic performance of whole-lesion apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis metrics for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although whole-lesion apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram has been increasingly used for breast lesions, it has not been routinely used in clinical practice as an emergent promising imaging tool.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the performance of whole-lesion ADC histogram analysis metrics for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic PubMed/EMBASE/Cochrane electronic database search was performed for original diagnostic studies from 1 January 1970 to 2 January 2019. Summary estimates of diagnostic accuracy were generated and meta-regression was performed to explore sources of heterogeneity according to study and magnetic resonance imaging characteristics.

RESULTS

Five original articles involving 493 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of whole-lesion ADC histogram analysis were 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.81-0.89) and 0.79 (95% CI = 0.72-0.84) for distinguishing benign and malignant breast lesions, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.9178. No publication bias was detected (P = 0.51). In subgroup analysis, the summary sensitivity and specificity of 50th percentile ADC value were 0.81 (95% CI = 0.71-0.88) and 0.86 (95% CI = 0.74-0.94), respectively. Meta-regression analysis indicated no covariates were sources of heterogeneity (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Whole-lesion ADC histogram analysis demonstrated good diagnostic performance for differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions, with 50th percentile ADC value showing higher diagnostic accuracy than other histogram parameters. Given the limited number of studies included in the analysis, the findings from our meta-analysis will need further confirmation in future research.

Differentiation between idiopathic granulomatous mastitis and invasive breast carcinoma, both presenting with non-mass enhancement without rim-enhanced masses: The value of whole-lesion histogram and texture analysis using apparent diffusion coefficient

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate whether whole-lesion histogram and texture analysis using apparent diffusion coefficient can discriminate between idiopathic granulomatous mastitis (IGM) and invasive breast carcinoma (IBC), both of which appeared as non-mass enhancement lesions without rim-enhanced masses.

METHOD

This retrospective study included 58 pathology-proven female patients at two independent study sites (27 IGM patients and 31 IBC patients). Diffusion-weighted imaging (3b values, 50, 400 or 500, and 800 s/mm²) was performed using 1.5 T or 3 T MR scanners from the same vendor. Whole-lesions were segmented and 11 features were extracted. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to identify significant variables for differentiating IGM from IBC. Receiver operating characteristic curve was assessed. The interobserver reliability between two observers for the histogram and texture measurement was also reported.

RESULTS

The 5th percentile, difference entropy and entropy of apparent diffusion coefficient showed significant differences between the two groups. An area under the curve of 0.778 (95 % CI: 0.648, 0.908), accuracy of 79.3 %, and sensitivity of 87.1 % was achieved using these three significant features. No significant feature was found with the multivariate analysis. For the interobserver reliability, all apparent diffusion coefficient parameters except skewness and kurtosis indicated good or excellent agreement, while these two features showed moderate agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

Whole-lesion histogram and texture analysis using apparent diffusion coefficient provide a non-invasive analytical approach to the differentiation between IGM and IBC, both presenting with non-mass enhancement without rim-enhanced masses.

Can apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) distinguish breast cancer from benign breast findings? A meta-analysis based on 13 847 lesions

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present meta-analysis was to provide evident data about use of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) values for distinguishing malignant and benign breast lesions.

METHODS

MEDLINE library and SCOPUS database were screened for associations between ADC and malignancy/benignancy of breast lesions up to December 2018. Overall, 123 items were identified. The following data were extracted from the literature: authors, year of publication, study design, number of patients/lesions, lesion type, mean value and standard deviation of ADC, measure method, b values, and Tesla strength. The methodological quality of the 123 studies was checked according to the QUADAS-2 instrument. The meta-analysis was undertaken by using RevMan 5.3 software. DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models with inverse-variance weights were used without any further correction to account for the heterogeneity between the studies. Mean ADC values including 95% confidence intervals were calculated separately for benign and malign lesions.

RESULTS

The acquired 123 studies comprised 13,847 breast lesions. Malignant lesions were diagnosed in 10,622 cases (76.7%) and benign lesions in 3225 cases (23.3%). The mean ADC value of the malignant lesions was 1.03 × 10^- 3 mm²/s and the mean value of the benign lesions was 1.5 × 10^- 3 mm²/s. The calculated ADC values of benign lesions were over the value of 1.00 × 10^- 3 mm²/s. This result was independent on Tesla strength, choice of b values, and measure methods (whole lesion measure vs estimation of ADC in a single area).

CONCLUSION

An ADC threshold of 1.00 × 10^- 3 mm²/s can be recommended for distinguishing breast cancers from benign lesions.