A Third-Generation Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction for Contrast-Enhanced 4-Dimensional Dual-Energy Computed Tomography for Pancreatic Cancer

Comparison of radiation exposure from dual- and single-energy CT imaging protocols resulting in equivalent contrast-to-noise ratio of lesions for adults and children: a phantom study

OBJECTIVES

To compare the radiation exposure from single-energy CT (SECT) against rapid kV-switching dual-energy CT (DECT) imaging in both adults and children when resulting image data offer equivalent lesion identification power.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Lesions in an adult and a 10-year-old-child body phantom were imitated using iodine solutions of different concentrations. Phantoms were subjected to several SECT and DECT thoracic and abdominal scans using a rapid kV-switching DECT scanner. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of each lesion was measured on resulting SECT images and virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) available from DECT. The SECT scans that resulted in CNR values similar to the maximum CNR observed in VMIs derived from corresponding DECT scans were identified. SECT and DECT scans with equivalent lesion-discriminating power were compared regarding the associated radiation dose burden. Doses to the lung, breast, and esophagus from thoracic imaging and doses to the liver, kidneys, and stomach from abdominal imaging were determined through Monte Carlo simulations of SECT and DECT exposures.

RESULTS

Compared to SECT imaging of the adult body phantom, organ doses from DECT were found to be 5-11% lower in thoracic imaging and 44-45% lower in abdominal imaging. Compared to SECT imaging of the 10-year-old body phantom, organ doses from DECT were found to be 2.8-3.4 times higher in thoracic imaging and 1.5-1.6 times higher in abdominal imaging.

CONCLUSION

The use of rapid kV-switching DECT instead of SECT imaging may be associated with a similar or lower dose burden in adults but a noticeably higher dose burden in children.

KEY POINTS

Question How does the radiation exposure from single-energy and dual-energy CT imaging compare when both techniques provide equivalent lesion identification power? Findings Rapid kV-switching dual-energy CT compared to single-energy CT may result in a similar or lower radiation dose in adults, but higher radiation dose in children. Clinical relevance Rapid kV-switching dual-energy CT imaging in children should be preferred over single-energy CT imaging only in cases where the additional information provided is crucial for an effective diagnosis.

Low keV portal venous phase as a surrogate for pancreatic phase in a pancreatic protocol dual-energy CT: feasibility, image quality, and lesion conspicuity

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility of a proposed pancreatic protocol CT generated from portal-venous phase (PVP) dual-energy CT (DECT) acquisition and its impact on image quality, lesion conspicuity, and arterial visualization/involvement.

METHODS

We included 111 patients (mean age, 66.8 years) who underwent pancreatic protocol DECT (pancreatic phase, PP, and PVP). The original DECT acquisition was used to create two data sets-standard protocol (50 keV PP/65 keV PVP) and proposed protocol (40 keV/65 keV PVP). Three reviewers evaluated the two data sets for image quality, lesion conspicuity, and arterial visualization/involvement using a 5-point scale. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of pancreas and lesion-to-pancreas contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated. Qualitative scores, quantitative parameters, and dose-length product (DLP) were compared between standard and proposed protocols.

RESULTS

The image quality, SNR of pancreas, and lesion-to-pancreas CNR of the standard and proposed protocol were comparable (p = 0.11-1.00). Lesion conspicuity was comparable between the standard and proposed protocols for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (p = 0.55) and pancreatic cysts (p = 0.28). The visualization of larger arteries and arterial involvement were comparable between the two protocols (p = 0.056-1.00) while the scores were higher for smaller vessels in the standard protocol (p < 0.0001-0.0015). DLP of the proposed protocol (670.4 mGy·cm) showed a projected 42% reduction than the standard protocol (1145.9 mGy·cm) (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Pancreatic protocol CT generated from a single PVP DECT acquisition is feasible and could potentially be an alternative to the standard pancreatic protocol with PP and PVP.

KEY POINTS

• The lesion conspicuity for focal pancreatic lesions was comparable between the proposed protocol and standard dual-phase pancreatic protocol CT. • Qualitative and quantitative image assessments were almost comparable between two protocols. • The radiation dose of a proposed protocol showed a projected 42% reduction from the conventional protocol.

Comparison of image quality and radiation dose using different pre-ASiR-V and post-ASiR-V levels in coronary computed tomography angiography

OBJECTIVE

To determine the optimal pre-adaptive and post-adaptive level statistical iterative reconstruction V (ASiR-V) for improving image quality and reducing radiation dose in coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA).

METHODS

The study was divided into two parts. In part I, 150 patients for CCTA were prospectively enrolled and randomly divided into 5 groups (A, B, C, D, and E) with progressive scanning from 40% to 80% pre-ASiR-V with 10% intervals and reconstructing with 70% post-ASiR-V. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. Subjective image quality was assessed using a 5-point scale. The CT dose index volume (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP) of each patient were recorded and the effective radiation dose (ED) was calculated after statistical analysis by optimizing for the best pre-ASiR-V value with the lowest radiation dose while maintaining overall image quality. In part II, the images were reconstructed with the recommended optimal pre-ASiR-V values in part I (D group) and 40%-90% of post-ASiR-V. The reconstruction group (D group) was divided into 6 subgroups (interval 10%, D0:40% post-ASiR-V, D1:50% post - ASiR-V, D2:60% post-ASiR-V, D3:70% post-ASiR-V, D4:80% post-ASiR-V, and D5:90% post-ASiR-V).The SNR and CNR of D0-D5 subgroups were calculated and analyzed using one-way analysis of variance, and the consistency of the subjective scores used the k test.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the SNRs, CNRs, and image quality scores among A, B, C, and D groups (P > 0.05). The SNR, CNR, and image quality scores of the E group were lower than those of the A, B, C, and D groups (P < 0.05). The mean EDs in the B, C, and D groups were reduced by 7.01%, 13.37%, and 18.87%, respectively, when compared with that of the A group. The SNR and CNR of the D4-D5 subgroups were higher than the D0-D3 subgroups, and the image quality scores of the D4 subgroups were higher than the other subgroups (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The wide-detector combined with 70% pre-ASiR-V and 80% post-ASiR-V significantly reduces the radiation dose of CCTA while maintaining overall image quality as compared with the manufacture's recommendation of 40% pre-ASiR-V.