Small-bowel obstruction after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009;33:369-375. [PMID: 19478629 DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31818803ac]

Surgery-confirmed internal hernia with or without Roux-en-Y anastomosis: diagnostic performance of six CT signs

PURPOSE

To assess the diagnostic performance and generalizability of established CT signs of internal hernias across a broad patient population including those with and without Roux-en Y anastomosis.

METHODS

Our institutional review board approved this retrospective study. CT scans of 21 patients (11 women, 10 men) with surgically confirmed internal hernia and 52 control patients (23 women, 29 men) in whom internal hernia was suspected on CT but subsequently excluded surgically were reviewed. Six CT signs were evaluated: non-duodenal small bowel (ND-SB) behind the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), right-sided jejunojejunal anastomosis in applicable patients, "swirl" sign, superior mesenteric vein compression, "mushroom" sign, and clustered small bowel (SB) loops. Sensitivity, specificity, and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each sign using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Logistic regression identified the "mushroom" sign, clustered SB, and ND-SB behind the SMA as significant independent predictors of internal hernia with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.746. The sensitivity, specificity, and odds ratio of the "mushroom" sign, clustered SB, and ND-SB behind the SMA were 38.1%, 86.5%, 3.96 (95% CI, 1.21-12.97), 47.6%, 75.0%, 2.73 (95% CI, 0.94-7.89), and 33.3%, 88.2%, 3.75 (95% CI, 1.08-13.02), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The "mushroom" sign, clustered SB, and ND-SB behind the SMA are valuable CT findings in diagnosing internal hernias irrespective of Roux-en-Y anastomosis. In particular, ND-SB behind the SMA and the "mushroom" sign are highly specific.

Incidence and management of internal hernia after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass without preventive closure of mesenteric defects: a single-center retrospective study

The rising prevalence of obesity has led to an increase in bariatric procedures, with laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) being one of the most commonly performed surgeries due to its efficacy and safety. However, internal hernia (IH) remains a significant complication post-LRYGB. The debate over preventive closure of mesenteric defects (MD) during LRYGB continues, with no consensus on the optimal technique. This study aims to document the incidence and management of symptomatic IH in patients undergoing LRYGB without preventive MD closure and compare findings with international literature. This retrospective study included patients undergoing LRYGB without preventive MD closure between January 2018 and December 2020. Demographic and clinical data were collected, and follow-up lasted approximately 3.5 years. Postoperative complications, including IH, were assessed. Among 261 patients who underwent LRYGB, 235 completed a minimal follow-up of 24 months. The incidence of IH was 5.9%, representing the most common cause of reoperation. Laparoscopic management successfully resolved 86% of IH cases, reaching 100% in early-diagnosed cases promptly referred to our surgical unit. Average surgical duration was 72 min, with a postoperative hospital stay of 48 h. Enhanced recovery protocols were employed for LRYGB patients. This study highlights the challenges in managing IH post-LRYGB without preventive MD closure. Although in our series IH incidence was lower than reported in many other studies, it still remains the most frequent complications following RYGB, suggesting that MD should be closed during primary surgery, when possible, as suggested by most recent studies. Standardized guidelines for MD closure are lacking, emphasizing the importance of appropriate surgical techniques. In our experience, laparoscopic management of IH was effective, especially in early-diagnosed cases.

Internal Hernia Through a Mesenteric Defect Following Esophagectomy and Reconstruction With a Stomach-Preserved Ileocolic Interposition

Esophagectomy is the standard treatment for esophageal cancer and often involves the stomach as a substitute organ for esophageal reconstruction. However, we actively perform stomach-preserved ileocolic interposition because of its advantages in gastrointestinal function and the prevention of reflux esophagitis. Despite its benefits, few facilities perform esophageal reconstruction with ileocolic interposition; hence, postoperative complications following this procedure have rarely been reported. We present the first case of internal hernia through a mesenteric defect following esophagectomy and reconstruction with a stomach-preserved ileocolic interposition. This type of internal hernia after esophageal cancer surgery is a rare complication following a common gastric pull-up reconstruction. A 66-year-old Japanese female underwent esophagectomy and reconstruction with stomach-preserved ileocolic interposition for stage I esophageal cancer. One month after surgery, the patient experienced abdominal pain and vomiting. CT showed a dilated small bowel and a suspected postoperative adhesive bowel obstruction. Despite conservative management, the patient experienced recurrent episodes that required hospitalization. Although an exact preoperative diagnosis was not made, we decided on a surgical exploration six months after the first symptoms appeared. Laparotomy revealed an internal herniation through a mesenteric defect between the transverse mesocolon and the ileum mesentery following ileocolic interposition. We then repositioned the fitted small intestine and closed the mesenteric defects. The patient recovered uneventfully without a hernia recurrence. Minimally invasive techniques for treating esophageal cancer are becoming more common. As survival rates improve, the number of internal hernia cases, such as those described in this report, will likely increase. Therefore, more cases are needed to determine whether closing mesenteric defects can effectively prevent herniation. However, immediate surgical treatment should be considered based on the symptoms, even when a preoperative diagnosis is difficult.

Common postbariatric surgery emergencies for the acute care surgeon: What you need to know

ABSTRACT

The field of bariatric and metabolic surgery has changed rapidly over the past two decades, with an exponential increase in case volumes being performed because of its proven efficacy for morbid obesity and obesity-related comorbidities. Although this increased volume of procedures has been accompanied by significant decrease in postoperative complication rates, there are numerous potential complications after bariatric surgery that may require urgent or emergent surgical evaluation or interventions. Many of these risks extend well beyond the early postoperative period and can present months to years after the index procedure. Acute care surgeons are increasingly covering most or all of the emergency general surgery services at many centers and must be familiar with the numerous bariatric surgical procedures being performed and their individual complication profile to provide optimal care for these frequently challenging patients. This article provides a focused and concise review of the common bariatric procedures being performed, their early and late complication profiles, and a practical guide to the optimal diagnostic evaluations, surgical interventions, and perioperative management options. The author group includes both acute care surgeons and bariatric surgeons with significant experience in the emergency management of the complicated postbariatric surgical patient.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Literature Synthesis and Expert Opinion; Level V.

Abdominal Pain After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Review

Importance

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) remains one of the most commonly performed operations for morbid obesity and is associated with significant long-term weight loss and comorbidity remission. However, health care utilization rates following RYGB are high and abdominal pain is reported as the most common presenting symptom for those seeking care.

Observations

Given the limitations of physical examination in patients with obesity, correct diagnosis of abdominal pain following RYGB depends on a careful history and appropriate use of radiologic, laboratory and endoscopic studies, as well as a clear understanding of post-RYGB anatomy. The most common etiologies of abdominal pain after RYGB are internal hernia, marginal ulcer, biliary disease (eg, cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis), and jejunojejunal anastomotic issues. Early identification of the etiology of the pain is essential, as some causes, such as internal hernia or perforated gastrojejunal ulcer, may require urgent or emergent intervention to avoid significant morbidity. While laboratory findings and imaging may prove useful, they remain imperfect, and clinical judgment should always be used to determine if surgical exploration is warranted.

Conclusions and Relevance

The etiologies of abdominal pain after RYGB range from the relatively benign to potentially life-threatening. This Review highlights the importance of understanding key anatomical and technical aspects of RYGB to guide appropriate workup, diagnosis, and treatment.

A Phytobezoar Causing Terminal Ileal Obstruction Following Revision Bariatric Surgery: A Case Report

Bezoars are a rare complication causing small bowel obstruction. A phytobezoar causing terminal ileum obstruction following a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is extremely rare. A middle-aged woman with post-sleeve gastrectomy weight regain, converted to RYGB, presented 17 months after surgery with obstructive symptoms due to an impacted phytobezoar in the terminal ileum. Diagnostic laparoscopy, enterotomy, and extraction of the large impacted phytobezoar from the terminal ileum relieved the obstruction. Swallowing improperly masticated food in altered gastrointestinal anatomy due to RYGB can cause a phytobezoar in any part of the gastrointestinal tract. These patients need proper nutritional counseling and psychological evaluation to prevent this rare complication.

Chyloperitoneum and Chylothorax Following Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review

Chyloperitoneum and chylothorax (ChP/ChT) are rare complications after bariatric surgery. This systematic review aims to evaluate the incidence, cause, treatment, and outcome of ChP and ChT after bariatric surgery. This review investigates published English language scientific literature systematically in an attempt to answer these questions. Our literature search revealed 66 studies, of which 23 were included. There were a total of 40 patients (38, ChP; 2, ChT). Eighteen of 40 (43.9%) patients were treated laparoscopically, and one patient (2.44%) underwent thoracoscopy and ligation of the thoracic duct. Both ChP and ChT are rare complications after bariatric surgery.

Intracorporeal bi-directional pouch jejunojejunostomy following Roux-en-Y anastomosis: a simple reconstruction technique using an endoscopic linear stapler

Introduction

Intracorporeal pouch jejunojejunostomy (JJ) is a technically challenging procedure during totally laparoscopic gastrectomy (TLG).

Aim

This study introduced a new method involving the construction of an intracorporeal bi-directional pouch JJ using an endoscopic linear stapler and analyzed the surgical outcomes of this method, including JJ complications.

Material and methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 168 patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy with intracorporeal bi-directional pouch JJ between November 2017 and October 2018 at Asan Medical Center.

Results

The construction of an intracorporeal bi-directional pouch JJ took an average of 10 min. No postoperative bleeding or anastomotic strictures related to JJ reconstruction occurred after this procedure. No mortality occurred during follow-up.

Conclusions

Intracorporeal bi-directional pouch JJ using an endoscopic linear stapler is a safe and simple procedure. It is a feasible option to reduce JJ stricture after TLG in patients with gastric cancer.

Small bowel obstruction following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: is it always necessary to operate? A 5-year, high volume center experience

PURPOSE

This study aims to describe the incidence, associated factors, etiology, and management of small bowel obstructions following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted between January 15 and December 19 using the surgery database of our hospital. Included LRYGB patients were those that evolved with a prolonged length of stay; readmission; emergency room consult; and re-intervention due to small bowel obstruction (SBO) related symptoms with compatible radiological or intraoperative findings. The LRYGB technique implied an antecolic alimentary limb reconstruction and systematic closure of mesenteric defects. Descriptive and analytical statistics were carried out, using a parametric or non-parametric approach as needed.

RESULTS

Nine hundred forty-one LRYGB were performed. 9.9% were revisional surgeries of patients with a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. During the study period, 36 SBOs occurred, representing 3.8% of operated patients, with no mortality. 58.3% had successful non-operative management, while 41.7% required surgical exploration, of which 73.3% were treated laparoscopically and 20% needed conversion to open surgery. Etiologies of SBO were jejuno-jejunostomy (JJO) related stenosis (22, 61.1%), internal hernias (6, 16.7%), adherences (3, 8.3%), and other diagnoses (5, 13.9%). Regarding JJO stenosis and internal hernias, median time to diagnosis was 8 days (IQR 7-11) and 12 months (IQR 8.7-16) respectively. Previous sleeve gastrectomy, age, or sex was not associated to the incidence of small bowel obstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

LRYGB is safe when performed by experienced surgeons. SBO due to internal hernias were scarce in this series. JJO stenosis could explain most cases of SBO; under this diagnosis, non-surgical management was successful frequently.

Retrograde intussusception post Roux-en-y gastric bypass

A 72-year-old female presented to the emergency department with a short history of abdominal pain and vomiting, having undergone laparoscopic Roux-en-y gastric bypass (RYGBP) 3 years earlier. Computed tomography imaging revealed intussusception causing small bowel obstruction, so she was taken emergently to theatre. Intra-operative findings were of a retrograde intussusception at the jejunojejunostomy. Retrograde intussusception in patients post RYGBP has a unique pathophysiology and management.

Safety of bariatric surgery in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The efficacy of bariatric surgery in achieving weight loss and preventing long-term comorbidities such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus and osteoarthritis is well established. Data regarding safety of bariatric surgery in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is scarce. We attempted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the complications following bariatric surgery in patients with IBD. The primary outcomes evaluated were wound infection, Clavien-Dindo grade > II complications and IBD exacerbation (within 1 year). Secondary outcomes evaluated included overall mortality, stricture, small bowel obstruction, acute kidney injury (AKI) and thromboembolism. Pooled outcomes (event rate) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using random effects model. A total of 14 studies (all observational) with 2608 patients were included. The rates of primary outcomes were: wound infection (4.1%, 95% CI: 0.9-7.2), Clavien-Dindo grade > II complications (2.0%, 95%: CI 0.6-3.5) and IBD exacerbation (4.3%, 95% CI: 0.7-7.9). The pooled rate for other outcomes was: mortality 0.1%, stricture 6.5%, small bowel obstruction 6.7%, AKI 2.2% and thromboembolism 0.1%. Bariatric surgery is relatively safe in patients with IBD and should be pursued to reduce comorbidities associated with obesity. Future comparative studies are needed to further assess the safety of bariatric surgery in population with and without IBD.

Type IV Hiatal Hernia Containing the Gastric Pouch and Proximal Roux Limb: A Rare Cause of Bowel Obstruction Following Roux-en-Y Bypass Surgery

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is considered the gold standard for weight loss surgery and is an effective, safe treatment for morbid obesity and associated metabolic derangements. Complications such as small bowel obstruction are rare with a reported incidence of 5%. Obstruction caused by hiatal herniation of the gastric pouch and alimentary limb occurs even less frequently. Prompt recognition and treatment are imperative as delayed intervention may result in significant morbidity. At the time of this manuscript there have only been four reported cases in the literature highlighting a paucity of clinical guidance for the recognition and management of this complication. Here we present a case of acute small bowel obstruction secondary to hiatal herniation of the gastric pouch and proximal Roux limb. Furthermore, we review the literature and discuss the key aspects for the management of this complication.

Pancreatitis following bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

The laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) is the second most performed bariatric surgical procedure. With the increasing number of patients undergoing bariatric surgery, the number of complications is also growing. Early diagnosis and treatment of the complications is crucial.

CASE PRESENTATION

A very unusual complication was met after an uneventful laparoscopic gastric bypass (LGBP) procedure due to an obstructing blood clot in the biliairy limb resulting in an acute pancreatitis and gastric distention, accompanied by an obstructing blood clot in the distal ileum causing small bowel obstruction. A review of the occurrence of these complications and the diagnosis and treatment is presented.

CONCLUSION

Post-bariatric acute pancreatitis is uncommon, but could be fatal. Blood clots should be considered as possible causes of small bowel obstruction, ileus or pancreatitis.

Internal hernia after gastrectomy for gastric cancer in minimally invasive surgery era

BACKGROUND

The incidence and clinical presentation of internal hernia after gastrectomy have been changing in the minimally invasive surgery era. This study aimed to analyze the clinical features and risk factors for internal hernia after gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed internal hernia after gastrectomy for gastric cancer in 6474 patients between January 2003 and December 2016 at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate risk factors.

RESULTS

Internal hernias identified by computed tomography or surgical exploration were 111/6474 (1.7%) and the median interval time was 450 days after gastrectomy. Fourteen (0.9%) of the 1510 patients who underwent open gastrectomy and 97 (2.0%) of the 4964 patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy developed internal hernia. Of the 6474 patients, internal hernia developed in 0 (0%), 9 (1.1%), 40 (3.1%), 56 (3.3%), 6 (2.3%), and 0 (0%) patients who underwent Billroth I, Billroth II, Roux-en-Y, uncut Roux-en-Y, double tract, and esophagogastrostomy reconstructions, respectively. Fifty-nine (53.2%) of 111 patients with symptomatic hernia underwent surgery. Of the 59 internal hernias, treated surgically, 32 (53.2%), 27 (45.8%), and 0 (0%) were identified in jejunojejunostomy mesenteric, Petersen's, and transverse colon mesenteric defects, respectively. In multivariate analysis, non-closure of mesenteric defects (P < 0.01), laparoscopic approach (P < 0.01), and totally laparoscopic approach (P = 0.03) were independent risk factors for internal hernia.

CONCLUSIONS

The potential spaces such as Petersen's, jejunojejunostomy mesenteric, and transverse colon mesenteric defects should be closed to prevent internal hernia after gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Feasibility and Importance of Enteroscopy after Gastric Bypass

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery has increased in popularity, with Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) being one of the most frequently performed. This leads to many cases in which the stomach is removed from routine gastroscopy access, sometimes being a major source of concern. Performing enteroscopy in these patients is technically difficult. We present our experience with 24 cases in which the aim was to access the detached stomach.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis on RYGB enteroscopy procedures aimed to access the detached stomach. Data recorded: demographic parameters, indication, gas insufflation, time to bypass stomach, total procedure and recovery times, and endoscopic and pathological findings.

RESULTS

This study included 24 patients who underwent RYGB in the previous 3-36 months. Indications were chronic abdominal pain, refractory anemia, or unexplainable weight loss. Detached stomach was accessed in 79% of patients. Access time ranged from 25 to 55 min. Recovery time for all procedures was 86.66 min on average and shorter with CO₂ insufflation (42.5 min). All detached stomachs showed macroscopic gastritis; four of them were Helicobacter pylori positive. Significant findings included three patients with jejunojejunostomy stenosis and one patient with a marginal gastrojejunal ulcer, which was later diagnosed with Signet ring cell carcinoma of the proximal anastomosis.

CONCLUSIONS

We present the feasibility and importance of enteroscopy of the detached stomach and believe that this procedure should be performed more frequently. A high index of suspicion is needed for postoperative symptoms in order to exclude significant pathologies and reassure symptomatic patients that there is no abnormality in the bypassed stomach.

Petersen hernia after open gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction: a report of two cases and literature review

Petersen hernia is a rare internal hernia that occurs after Roux-en-Y (R-Y) reconstruction. To our knowledge, there are a few reports on internal hernia, especially Petersen hernia after open gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Two rare cases of Petersen hernia are presented in this report. A man in his 70s was referred to our hospital due to a complaint of postprandial sudden abdominal pain. He had a history of open total gastrectomy with R-Y jejunal reconstruction through the antecolic route for gastric corpus cancer. On computed tomography (CT), bowel obstruction and strangulation of the small intestine were suspected. Emergency laparotomy was done, and an internal herniation of the small intestine through Petersen space was observed. A man in his 50s was referred to our hospital due to a complaint of severe sudden abdominal pain. He had a history of open gastrectomy and abdominal/lower intrathoracic esophageal resection with R-Y jejunal reconstruction of an antecolic jejunal limb for esophagogastric junction carcinoma. On CT, internal herniation of the small intestine was suspected. During emergency laparotomy, an internal herniation of the bowel through the Petersen space was observed. Though history of R-Y reconstruction surgery may be helpful, preoperative diagnosis of Petersen hernia is difficult to establish. Here we present two rare cases of this type of internal hernia.

Primary non-closure of mesenteric defects in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: reoperations and intraoperative findings in 146 patients

BACKGROUND

Internal hernias (IH) after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) have been reported with an incidence of 11 %. IH can lead to bowel incarceration and potentially bowel necrosis. The aim of this study was to analyze reoperations and intraoperative findings in a cohort of patients with unclosed mesenteric defects.

METHODS

From a prospective database of patients with LRYGB, we selected as primary cohort patients with non-closure of mesenteric defects and abdominal reoperation for analysis. The data included pre-, intra- and post-operative findings, computed tomogram results and laboratory test results. This group underwent a very very long limb LRYGB, at that time the institutional standard technique. Additionally, a more recently operated cohort with primary closure of mesenteric defects was also analyzed.

RESULTS

We identified 146 patients with primary non-closure and reoperation, mean age of 43.8 years. The main indication for reoperation was unclear abdominal pain in 119 patients with 27 patients undergoing a reoperation for other reasons (weight regain, prophylactic surgical inspection of mesenteric defects). Median time and mean excess weight loss from RYGB to reoperation were 41.1 months and 62.7 %, respectively. The incidence of IH was 14.4 %, with all patients with an IH being symptomatic. Conversion rate from laparoscopic to open surgery was 5.5 %, mortality 0.7 % and morbidity 3.4 %. Thirty-one patients underwent a second re-look laparoscopy. Eleven patients had recurrent open mesenteric defects. Three hundred and sixteen patients who underwent primary closure of the mesenteric defects had a reoperation rate of 13.6 % and an IH rate of 0.6 %.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of IH in patients without closure of mesenteric defects and reoperation is high and substantially higher compared to patients with primary closure of mesenteric defects. Patients with or without closure of mesenteric defects following LRYGB with acute, chronic or recurrent pain should be referred to a bariatric surgeon for diagnostic laparoscopy.

Beyond the "B": a new concept of the surgical staple enabling miniature staplers

Background

Surgical staplers currently all rely on the same staple form—the “B” which necessitates a high delivery profile (12 mm). A novel “D” shape staple allows for an extremely low profile of the applicator. The acute and long-term efficacy of a D-shaped staple (Cardica, Redwood City, CA, USA) was compared to conventional B-form staples (Covidien, Norwalk, CN, USA) in an animal model for intestinal transections and anastomoses.

Methods

Jejunojejunal anastomoses (JJ) were performed via mini-laparotomy in a swine model. White & blue D- and B-shaped staples were studied in three groups (planned survival 14–84 days). Intraoperative assessment included completeness of staple line, hemostasis, and need for intervention. Postoperatively, animals were evaluated for complications. At the time of sacrifice, gross pathological and histological assessments were performed.

Results

Twenty-three animals had 40 anastomoses (23 “D” and 17 “B” staple anastomoses) with no intraoperative mortalities. One “D” staple application required a manual extension of the cut. Acute hemostasis was 100 %. Group 1 (n = 5) compared white staples in JJs (D staple n = 5; B staple n = 5; 14-day survival = 100 %). Group 2 (n = 12) compared white staples in JJs (D staple n = 12; B staple n = 6; 34-day survival = 92 %). One animal died on day 4 for a non-staple related cause. Group 3 (n = 6) compared blue staples in JJs (D staple n = 6; B staple n = 6; 84 day survival = 84 %). One animal died on day 18 due to an obstruction at the B staple JJ caused by stricture. There were no other bleeding, leaks or strictures in any of the groups. Gross pathology and histology were unremarkable in all JJs.

Conclusions

This study showed no difference in intraoperative performance and the chronic healing response in JJs between D- and B-shaped staples. Based on these findings, the D-shaped staple elicits a normal healing response in jejunostomies and offers the possibility of clinical use of this advance in staple design.

Evaluating the Effect of Drain Site on Abdominal Pain after Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Surgery for Morbid Obesity: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Most morbidly obese patients complain of abdominal pain after laparoscopic gastric bypass (LGBP) surgery. In this study, the relationship between the prevalence and severity of pain and the drain site was assessed. Methods: Fifty morbidly obese patients undergoing LGBP surgery were selected, and a drain was randomly inserted postoperatively to the left 5 mm port in 25 cases and to the right in the other 25. All patients filled out a questionnaire, including a visual analog scale for the quality and quantity of pain, exacerbating and alleviating factors and its relation to patient's positioning, in the first 24 hours, first week, and first month after the operation. Result: In both groups, all patients had abdominal pain 24 hours after the operation. However, in the right-sided drain group, most patients (52%) experienced mild pain, whereas most patients (56%) in the left-sided drain group had severe pain (p=0.028). At weeks 1 and 4, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of severity of pain (p=0.068 and 0.875, respectively, for both times). After the first 24 hours and first week, the mean pain score was significantly lower in the right-sited drain group compared to the left-sited drain group (p=0.012 and 0.006). Conclusion: Early abdominal pain after LGBP surgery is significantly reduced in the right-sided drain group.

Meta-analysis of internal herniation after gastric bypass surgery

Background

The aim of this study was to provide a systematic and quantitative summary of the association between laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and the reported incidence of internal herniation (IH). The route of the Roux limb and closure of mesenteric and/or mesocolonic defects are described as factors of influence.

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched for relevant literature, references and citations according to the PRISMA statement. Two independent reviewers selected studies that evaluated incidence of IH after LRYGB and possible techniques for prevention. Data were pooled by route of the Roux limb and closure/non-closure of the mesenteric and/or mesocolonic defects.

Results

Forty-five articles included data on 31 320 patients. Lowest IH incidence was in the antecolic group, with closure of all defects (1 per cent; P &lt; 0·001), followed by the antecolic group, with all defects left open and the retrocolic group with closure of the mesenteric and mesocolonic defect (both 2 per cent; P &lt; 0·001). The incidence of IH was highest in the antecolic group, with closure of the jejunal defect, and in the retrocolic group, with closure of all defects (both 3 per cent).

Conclusion

The present systematic review includes a random-effects meta-analysis. The antecolic procedure, with closure of both the mesenteric and Petersen defects, has the lowest internal herniation incidence following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Does the closure of mesenteric defects during laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery cause complications?

BACKGROUND

A well-known complication of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (LRYGB) is bowel obstruction due to internal herniation (IH). Evidence suggests that mesenteric defects should be closed during LRYGB to reduce the risk of IH. Therefore, surgeons are now closing mesenteric defects during LRYGB using sutures, clips, or fibrin glue. However, it has been reported that complications may arise due to the closure of mesenteric defects. The aim of this review was to summarize the reported possible complications associated with the closure of mesenteric defects during LRYGB.

METHODS

A literature search of PubMed and EMBASE was performed to identify studies related to the closure of mesenteric defects during LRYGB. The studies were screened for the listing of possible complications associated with the closure of mesenteric defects. This systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis recommendations.

RESULTS

Thirty studies complied with the inclusion criteria for our analysis, which included 21,789 patients. Reported complications related to closure of the mesenteric defects were: small bowel obstruction because of IH, kinking, and adhesions. IH occurred because of incomplete closure of the mesenteric defects in 1.4% of all patients, 1.2% by the antecolic approach, and 1.9% by the retrocolic approach, respectively. Kinking of the small bowel occurred in .2% of 1630 patients after closure of the mesenteric defects with clips and adhesion formation was found among 4.6% of 152 patients after closure of the mesenteric defects with nonabsorbable sutures.

CONCLUSIONS

The reported risk of complications caused by closure of the mesenteric defects during LRYGB seems low.

A rare cause of gastro-intestinal hemorrhage in a patient with a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

This case illustrates a rare cause of gastro-intestinal bleeding following bariatric surgery. Though it is essential to rule out common causes of variceal formation accompanied by intermittent, profuse bleeding, there should be a high degree of suspicion of this rare etiology in patients who have previously undergone alteration of their anatomy, especially Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). The case emphasizes the need for a multidisciplinary medical-surgical team in evaluating and treating patients who present with complex intra-abdominal pathology.

Imaging of complications of common bariatric surgical procedures

Several techniques for the surgical management of obesity are available to bariatric surgeons. These interventions are performed more frequently with worsening of the obesity epidemic. Radiologists should be familiar with the surgical techniques, normal postoperative appearances, and potential complications for which imaging may be employed to establish a diagnosis to optimize patient care.

Functional abdominal pain syndrome in morbidly obese patients following laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery

Background:

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (RYGBP) is one of the most common bariatric surgeries, which is being performed using various techniques like gastrojejunostomy by hand swen, linear or circular stapler. Abdominal pain is a common complaint following laparoscopic gastric bypass procedure (LGBP), which has different aetiologies, such as overeating, adhesion, internal herniation, bile reflux and many more. In this study LGBP was performed in an ante-colic ante-gastric pattern in a double loop manner and the prevalence and distribution of pain in morbidly obese patients undergoing LGBP was assessed.

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to analyze the distribution and frequency of post LGBP pain in morbidly obese patients.

Patients and Methods:

This study was performed on 190 morbidly obese patients referred to Hazrat Rasoul Hospital in Tehran. After LGBP, pain was measured in the following intervals: 24 hours, one week and one month after the operation. Before the operation onset, 2 mg Keflin and 5000 IU subcutaneous heparin were administered as prophylaxis. LGBP was performed using five ports including: one 11 mm port was placed 15-20 cm far from the xiphoid, one 12-mm port in mid-clavicular line at the level of camera port, one 5-mm port in subcostal area in ante-axillary region in the left, another 5-mm port in the right mid-clavicular area and a 5-mm port in sub-xyphoid. All operations were done by the same team. Staple was used for all anastomoses and hand sewn technique to close the staple insertion site. The mesenteric defect was left open and no effort was made to repair it.

Results:

The results of this study showed that 99.94 % of the patients had complains of pain in the first 24 hours of post operation, about 60% after one week and 29.5 % still had pain after one month. In addition, left upper quadrant (LUQ) was found to be the most prevalent site for the pain in 53.7% of the patients in the first 24 hours, 59.6% after one week and 16.8% after one month (except for obscure pain) with a significance of < 0.05.

Conclusions:

In this study, the authors analyzed the location and disturbance level of pain after LGBP, which could serve as a cornerstone for further researches. The authors suggest that long-term follow-up (for more than a year after operation) should be considered in future studies and also the relationship between the drainage site and pain should be investigated.

Blood bezoar causing obstruction after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

INTRODUCTION

Bowel obstruction is a known complication after bariatric surgery especially Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The known etiologies include internal hernia, jejunojejunostomy stricture, ileus, intussusceptions, superior mesenteric artery syndrome, incarcerated port site hernia, and adhesions. Blood bezoar is a rare cause of small intestinal obstruction after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

We are going to present two cases of small bowel obstruction after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass due to blood bezoar.

DISCUSSION

Blood clot as the etiology of small bowel obstruction after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is an unusual event. In the presence of postoperative small intestinal obstruction an obstructive blood bezoar should be in differential diagnosis. As any other etiology of postoperative obstruction it should be treated immediately to prevent its adverse lethal complications.

CONCLUSION

The best way for prevention of blood bezoar is prevention of bleeding at staple line and doing hemostasis at stapler line.

Surgical treatment of retrograde peristalsis following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Reverse peristaltic activity is a rare complication of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Symptoms may be nonspecific. This condition should be considered in the differential diagnosis of complicated postoperative gastric bypass patients.

Background:

Retrograde Roux limb peristalsis following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is a rare complication that can be difficult to identify. It may present as persistent nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, or even gastrointestinal bleeding related to an anastomotic ulcer. Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) series is an important diagnostic modality to identify this motility disorder; however, it may not be readily identifiable without specific delayed imaging. The etiology of this phenomenon is unclear, but attributing factors include the presence of ectopic pacemaker cells, variable lengths of the Roux limb and misconstructions. When this problem is identified, revisional surgery is indicated.

Case Description:

A 51-y-old female with morbid obesity presented with persistent nausea and vomiting following a laparoscopic gastric bypass. A CT scan showed a dilated Roux limb. Reverse peristalsis from the jejunojejunostomy toward the gastric pouch was identified on a UGI. Two laparoscopic revisions of the jejunojunostomy were attempted to correct this dysfunction.

Discussion:

An attempt at widening and relaxing the anastomosis was unsuccessful at providing relief of symptoms. A second revision with an anastomosis between the Roux limb and common channel provided long-term improvement. Identifying complications of gastric bypass surgery can be challenging. Imaging studies may be limited, and often diagnostic and revisional surgery is indicated.

Treatment option in patient presenting with small bowel obstruction from phytobezoar at the jejunojejunal anastomosis after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Bezoar is a rare cause of small bowel obstruction after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). We report the case of a 34-year-old man who developed small bowel obstruction secondary to a phytobezoar at the jejunojejunal anastomosis, 5½ years after the patient underwent RYGB for morbid obesity. The phytobezoar developed in the background of recurring abdominal pain. Imaging studies suggested complete obstruction of the alimentary limb. Laparoscopic exploration demonstrated complete obstruction of the alimentary and biliopancreatic limb. Patient had successful treatment with laparoscopic enterototomy. Six months after the laparoscopic removal of phytobezoar, patient remained asymptomatic. Phytobezoar formation must be considered in the differential diagnosis when postgastric bypass patients present late with obstructive symptoms. We believe that this is the first report of a phytobezoar obstructing at the jejunojejunal anastomosis after RYGB.

Acute liver failure complicating jejunojejunal intussusception presentation in a gastric bypass patient

Over 200 000 weight loss procedures are performed annually in the United States. Physicians must therefore be cognizant of the unique array of complications associated with these procedures. We describe a case of jejunojejunal intussusception in a gastric bypass patient who presented with acute liver failure (ALF) due to acetaminophen (APAP) toxicity. Our patient is a 29 year-old female who had undergone Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery seven years prior. She was evaluated in the emergency department for confusion. Her family reported a 3-wk history of progressive abdominal pain and vomiting, for which she had ingested 40 acetaminophen/oxycodone tablets over the past 2 d. Physical examination showed icteric sclerae, a distended abdomen, and grade I encephalopathy. She fulfilled the criteria for ALF and was listed for liver transplantation. Abdominal computed tomography scan revealed a jejunojejunal intussusception. She underwent emergent exploratory laparotomy and resection of the infarcted intussusceptum and the previous jejunojejunostomy. She had rapid clinical improvement, with decreasing liver enzymes and improved hepatic synthetic function. She had complete resolution of coagulopathy and encephalopathy, and was removed from the liver transplant list. She was discharged home 20 d after hospitalization with normal liver tests. This case demonstrates that acute abdominal catastrophes can potentiate liver injury in the setting of acetaminophen toxicity. Encephalopathy may obscure history and physical exam findings. This case also exemplifies the pitfalls in the management of the bariatric surgery patient and the importance of multispecialty collaboration in patients presenting with organ failure.

What every hospitalist should know about the post-bariatric surgery patient

Obesity is a growing worldwide epidemic, increasingly addressed through surgical options for weight loss. Benefits of these operations, such as weight loss and improvement or reversal of obesity-related comorbidities, are well established; however, postoperative complications do occur. This article will evaluate common causes for hospital admissions in the post-bariatric surgery population as they relate to the hospitalist who is often responsible for their care. Here we provide an overview of the most common bariatric procedures currently performed, early postoperative complications, late medical complications (ie, abdominal complaints, weight fluctuations, nutritional deficiencies, and metabolic bone disease), and late surgical complications that often affect these patients and result in hospital admissions. Special attention will be paid to radiologic pearls that can assist in the initial evaluation and diagnosis of these patients.

The four different types of internal hernia occurring after laparascopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass performed for morbid obesity: are there any multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) features permitting their distinction?

BACKGROUND

Four different types of internal hernias (IH) are known to occur after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) performed for morbid obesity. We evaluate multidetector row helical computed tomography (MDCT) features for their differentiation.

METHODS

From a prospectively collected database including 349 patients with LRYGBP, 34 acutely symptomatic patients (28 women, mean age 32.6), operated on for IH immediately after undergoing MDCT, were selected. Surgery confirmed 4 (11.6%) patients with transmesocolic, 10 (29.4%) with Petersen's, 15 (44.2%) with mesojejunal, and 5 (14.8%) with jejunojejunal IH. In consensus, 2 radiologists analyzed 13 MDCT features to distinguish the four types of IH. Statistical significance was calculated (p<0.05, Fisher's exact test, chi-square test).

RESULTS

MDCT features of small bowel obstruction (SBO) (n=25, 73.5%), volvulus (n=22, 64.7%), or a cluster of small bowel loops (SBL) (n=27, 79.4%) were inconsistently present and overlapped between the four IH. The following features allowed for IH differentiation: left upper quadrant clustered small bowel loops (p<0.0001) and a mesocolic hernial orifice (p=0.0003) suggested transmesocolic IH. SBL abutting onto the left abdominal wall (p=0.0021) and left abdominal shift of the superior mesenteric vessels (SMV) (p=0.0045) suggested Petersen's hernia. The SMV predominantly shifted towards the right anterior abdominal wall in mesojejunal hernia (p=0.0033). Location of the hernial orifice near the distal anastomosis (p=0.0431) and jejunojejunal suture widening (p=0.0005) indicated jejunojejunal hernia.

CONCLUSIONS

None of the four IH seems associated with a higher risk of SBO. Certain MDCT features, such as the position of clustered SBL and hernial orifice, help distinguish between the four IH and may permit straightforward surgery.

Abdominal pain after gastric bypass: suspects and solutions

BACKGROUND

Gastric bypass remains the mainstay of surgical therapy for obesity. Abdominal pain after gastric bypass is common and accounts for up to half of all postoperative complaints and emergency room visits. This article reviews the most important causes of abdominal pain specific to gastric bypass and discusses management considerations.

METHODS

The current surgical literature was reviewed using PubMed, with a focus on abdominal pain after gastric bypass and the known pathologies that underlie its pathogenesis.

RESULTS

The etiologies of abdominal pain after gastric bypass are diverse. A thorough understanding of their pathogenesis impacts favorably on clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The differential diagnosis for abdominal pain after gastric bypass is large and includes benign and life-threatening entities. Its diverse causes require a broad evaluation that should be directed by history and clinical presentation. In the absence of a clear diagnosis, the threshold for surgical exploration in patients with abdominal pain after gastric bypass should be low.

Closure of mesenteric defect can lead to decrease in internal hernias after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BACKGROUND

Although most surgeons believe that internal hernia (IH) defects should be closed, no general consensus has yet been reached. The published studies have reported conflicting obstruction incidence estimates and variations in location. Some have also argued that closed hernia sites recur.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 2079 Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedures performed by 1 surgeon from 2001 to 2009 was conducted. Chi-square analysis compared those performed from 2001 to August 2003 (group 1) with those from September 2003 to 2009 (group 2) for the incidence of IH. Since September 2003, the jejunojejunal anastomotic mesenteric defect has been closed with a running, permanent suture. In contrast, before September 2003, the defect was not closed.

RESULTS

A total of 37 patients presented with symptomatic IH from 2001 to 2009. A significant difference was found in the proportion of those patients who experienced IH in group 1 (n = 36) compared with those who did so in group 2 (n = 1; P <.001). Group 1 developed 35 IHs (10%) at the jejunojejunal anastomotic mesenteric defect and 6 (1.7%) at Petersen's defect. The median interval to presentation was 20 months (range 5-34). Of the 35 patients, 5 (1.4%) presented acutely with pain or bowel obstruction. Group 2 developed no IHs at the mesenteric defect (0%) and 1 at Petersen's defect (.1%). The interval to presentation was 9 months.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of IH after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass can be reduced with closure of mesenteric defects. IHs can present either acutely with pain and obstructive symptoms or chronically with vague, intermittent postprandial pain.

Taxonomy and imaging spectrum of small bowel obstruction after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery

OBJECTIVE

For most patients with morbid obesity, bariatric surgery is the only effective method to achieve sustainable weight loss. Small bowel obstruction (SBO) after bariatric surgery is a major complication that affects postoperative course and management. Knowledge of the types of and imaging findings for SBO is essential to prompt diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

We discuss different types of SBO and a taxonomic schemata of bowel obstruction (ABC classification) and present a review of imaging findings that facilitates optimal patient management.