Injuries of Adjacent Organs by the Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Grafts in the Venoplasty of Middle Hepatic Veins in Living-Donor Liver Transplantation: Computed Tomographic Findings and Possible Risk Factors

Complications of e-PTFE Grafts in LDLT; Evaluation of Case Series

BACKGROUND

The expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) grafts are used to drain anterior sector veins during the living donor liver transplantation procedure. We aimed to analyze the potentially life-threatening complications, such as the infection and migration of ePTFE grafts.

METHODS

A total of 1264 liver transplantations (LTs) were performed for 1097 adult and 167 pediatric liver failure cases. In total, 1169 living and 95 cadaveric liver transplantation procedures were performed between 2011 and 2021. Right liver transplantation was performed in 1016 cases, including 1002 living donors and 14 cadaveric split right livers. Cadaveric LT was performed in 81 cases.

RESULTS

For 1002 right living liver grafts, 905 vascular grafts were used during the backtable for anterior sector outflow venoplasty. The most commonly drained segments were 5 and 8 (472 cases); there were isolated (5 or 8) and multiple drained segments. Vascular graft migration was described in 7 of 905 (0.77%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Although complication rates regarding ePTFE grafts are low, there are serious life-threatening causes of morbidity and mortality. We recommend cushioning the vascular graft with the omentum, which is effective in preventing graft migration.

Asymptomatic synthetic vascular graft migration to duodenum after living donor liver transplantation: report of two cases

BACKGROUND

In this study, we present the results of two patients with vascular graft migration to the duodenum after liver transplantation.

METHODS

The results of two patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation and vascular graft to the duodenum were evaluated.

RESULTS

In our center, 201 liver transplants were performed, including 154 a right lobe living donor liver transplant. A synthetic graft was used to reconstruct segment 5 and 8 hepatic veins in 78 of the 154 LDLT. During the mean follow-up 19.6 ± 12.1 months (1-44 months), graft migrated to the duodenum in two patients who were present in this study. Contrary to the literature, it was followed nonoperatively. No problem was observed in the follow-up process.

CONCLUSION

In patients with vascular graft migration to the duodenum after living liver transplantation, non-operative follow-up can be performed in appropriate patients.

Parietal Peritoneum as a Novel Substitute for Middle Hepatic Vein Reconstruction During Living Donor Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Although autologous, cryopreserved, or artificial vascular grafts can be used as interpositional vascular substitutes for middle hepatic vein (MHV) reconstruction during living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), they are not always available, are limited in size and length, and are associated with risks of infection. This study aimed to evaluate the parietal peritoneum as a novel substitute for MHV reconstruction during LDLT.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data of 15 patients who underwent LDLT using the right liver with reconstruction of MHV using the recipients' own parietal peritoneum graft were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-mo patency rates were 57.1%, 57.1%, 57.1%, and 28.6%, respectively. Among the 15 cases assessed, the most recent 6 cases showed patent graft flow until discharge with 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-mo patency rates of 80.0%, 80.0%, 80.0%, and 20.0%, respectively. All patients survived with tolerable liver function tests. There were no significant congestion-related problems, except for 1 patient who experienced MHV thrombosis requiring aspiration thrombectomy and stent insertion. There were no infection-related complications. All patients survived to the final follow-up, with a minimum follow-up duration of 8 mo. When comparing the latter 6 cases of peritoneal grafts and the recent 28 cases of conventional polytetrafluorethylene graft, the overall patency rate of the polytetrafluorethylene group was higher (P = 0.002). There were no major differences other than long-term patency rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Parietal peritoneum may be a novel autologous substitute for MHV reconstruction during LDLT.

Venous outflow reconstruction using a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) graft in right lobe living donor liver transplantation: A single center study

BACKGROUND

Venous outflow reconstruction is very important especially in right lobe living donor liver transplantation without middle hepatic vein. Various interposition (venous or synthetic) grafts have been recommended for reconstruction of anterior sector tributaries.

METHODS

We aimed to describe our surgical technique and analyze anterior sector venous reconstruction using expanded polytetrafluroethylene graft. Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data for 760 primary right lobe living donor liver transplantations performed at our institute between December 2011 and June 2018. Reconstruction of anterior sector: expanded polytetrafluroethylene (group A, n = 705) and autologous vein (group B, n = 55).

RESULTS

Pretransplant characteristics were comparable among both groups. Group A has significantly lower cold ischemia time (68.7 ± .3.5 minutes vs 127.8 ± 7.2 minutes; P < .001) and anhepatic time (116.3 ± 5.5 minutes vs 190.81 ± 9.35 minutes; P < .001) compared with group B. There was no difference in recovery pattern of liver functions, morbidity, and mortality between the 2 groups. One- and 6-month patency rates of interposition grafts were 97.6% and 84.4% (group A) and 96.4% and 78.1% (group B), respectively.

CONCLUSION

In centers with limited access to homologous or autologous vascular grafts, use of expanded polytetrafluroethylene graft for anterior sector venous outflow reconstruction in right lobe living donor liver transplantation is a viable option with excellent patency and patient outcomes.

Complications of polytetrafluoroethylene graft use in middle hepatic vein reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation: a retrospective, single-centre, long-term, real-world experience

In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) of the right lobe, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts may be used for anterior drainage. This study aimed to determine the risk factors of PTFE graft-associated complications. Data from patients who underwent LDLT of the right lobe with middle hepatic vein reconstruction using PTFE grafts between January 2005 and December 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Among 360 patients, PTFE graft-associated complications occurred in 17 patients (group B) (4.7%); recipients without these complications comprised group A (95.3%). The 1-, 6- and 12-month patency rates were significantly lower in group B (P < 0.001, P = 0.002 and P = 0.007). In group B, eight patients (47.1%) required surgical intervention, three patients (17.6%) suffered from infectious complications, and 14 patients (82.4%) experienced PTFE graft migration into the adjacent organs, namely the common bile duct (n = 3, 17.6%), stomach (n = 1, 5.9%), duodenum (n = 5, 29.4%) and jejunum (n = 5, 29.4%). The proportion of recipients who underwent hepaticojejunostomy, had abdominal adhesions and received interventions in/around the liver after LDLT was higher in group B (P < 0.001). Although the incidence of PTFE graft-associated complication is low, close long-term follow-up is needed, especially in patients with risk factors.

Artificial vascular graft migration into hollow viscus organs in patients who underwent right lobe living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

To share our experience with hollow viscus migration of artificial vascular grafts (AVG) used for venous reconstruction of the right anterior sector in living donor liver transplantations (LDLT).

METHODS

Clinical, radiological, and endoscopic data of 13 right lobe LDLT patients (range: 26-67 years) with a diagnosis of postoperative AVG migration into adjacent hollow viscus were analyzed.

RESULTS

Biliary complications were detected in 12 patients. A median of four times endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures were performed in 11 patients prior to AVG migration diagnosis. A median of 2.5 times various percutaneous radiological interventional procedures were performed in eight patients prior to AVG migration diagnosis. The site of migration was the duodenum in eight patients, gastric antrum in four, and Roux limb in the remaining one patient. The migrated AVS were made of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) in 10 patients and polyethylene terephthalate (Dacron) in three. The migrated AVGs were endoscopically removed in seven patients and surgically removed in six. Only one patient died due to sepsis unrelated to AVG migration.

CONCLUSION

AVG migration into the adjacent hollow viscus following right lobe LDLT is a rare and serious complication. Repetitive ERCP, interventional radiological procedures, infection related to biliary leakage, and thrombosis of AVGs are among the possible risk factors.

Analysis of Risk Factors Affecting the Development of Infection in Artificial Vascular Grafts Used for Reconstruction of Middle Hepatic Vein Tributaries in Living Donor Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

To analyze the risk factors affecting the development of infection in artificial vascular grafts (AVGs) used for reconstruction of middle hepatic vein (MHV) tributaries in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

METHODS

Between January 2009 and January 2018, 1253 right lobe LDLTs were performed at our Transplant Institute, and MHV tributaries of the 640 right lobe liver grafts were reconstructed with AVG. Reconstructed MHV tributaries were removed due to AVG infection in 25 of these patients (case group; n = 25). To determine risk factors for AVG infection, right lobe LDLT patients without AVG infections were selected as control group (n = 615). Both groups were compared about demographic parameter, transcystic catheter usage, bile leakage, type of biliary anastomosis (duct-to-duct, telescopic duct-to-duct), number of graft biliary duct (=1 versus >1), number of biliary anastomosis (=1 versus >1), AVG thrombosis, AVG types (Dacron versus polytetrafluoroethylene). Univariate analyses were used for comparison of different variables, and variables with P ≤ 0.20 were taken into logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis shows that statistically significant differences were found between groups regarding bile leakage (P < 0.001), graft thrombosis (P = 0.002), transcystic catheter (P = 0.049), and AVG types (P = 0.013). Variables with P ≤ 0.20 were taken into logistic regression model. Multivariate analysis shows that bile leakage (odds ratio, 13.3) and AVG thrombosis (odds ratio, 9.8) were determined as independent and strong risk factors for development of AVG infection.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that bile leakage and graft thrombosis are independent and strong risk factors for infections of AVGs used for anterior sector drainage reconstruction.

Assessing the Safety of Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Synthetic Grafts in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Graft Migration Into Hollow Viscous Organs - Diagnosis and Treatment Options

Background

Our recent studies have highlighted the importance and safety of backtable venoplasty for middle hepatic vein (MHV) and inferior right hepatic veins (IRHV) reconstruction using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) vascular grafts. In this study, we aim to analyze the complications associated with ePTFE graft use and discuss the management of the rare, but, potentially life threatening complications directly related to ePTFE conduits.

Material/Methods

From January 2012 to October 2015 a total of 397 patients underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The ePTFE vascular grafts were used during the backtable venoplasty for outflow reconstruction in 262 of the liver allografts. Recipients who developed ePTFE-related complications were analyzed.

Results

ePTFE-related complications developed in 1.52% (4/262) of the patients. One patient (0.38%) developed complete thrombosis with sepsis at 24 months post-transplantation and died due to multiorgan failure. Three patients (1.1%) developed graft migration into the second portion of the duodenum, without overt peritonitis. Surgical exploration and ePTFE graft removal was done in all the patients. One patient died due to overwhelming sepsis.

Conclusions

ePTFE graft migration into the duodenum causing perforation is a new set of complications that has been recently described in LDLT and can be treated effectively by surgical removal of the infected vascular graft and duodenal perforation closure. Despite of such complications, in our experience, ePTFE use in LDLT continues to have wide safety margin, with a complication rate of only 1.52%.

Duodenal Penetration by the Ringed Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Graft for Middle Hepatic Vein Reconstruction During Living-Donor Liver Transplant: A Case Report

Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts are widely used for middle hepatic vein reconstruction during living-donor liver transplant because they have comparable patency to autologous or cryopreserved vessels. Mechanical complications like gastric or duodenal penetration by expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts have been infrequently reported. We recently experienced a case of duodenal penetration by the expanded polytetrafluoroethylene graft. The patient was a 57-year-old man who had undergone a living-donor liver transplant for cryptogenic liver cirrhosis. At an annual follow-up computed tomography scan performed 3 years after transplant, the expanded polytetrafluoroethylene graft appeared to have penetrated into the first to the second portion of the duodenum, and abnormal air shadow and partial thrombus were identified within the expanded polytetrafluoroethylene graft. The patient underwent exploratory laparotomy, the expanded polytetrafluoroethylene graft was removed, and the perforated duodenum was repaired. Pyloric exclusion with gastrojejunostomy and feeding jejunostomy was additionally performed because of a wide defect in the duodenum. Adjacent organ injuries such as duodenal or gastric penetration by the expanded polytetrafluoroethylene graft after living-donor liver transplant is rare but not uncommon. Because the use of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts is essential when an adequate vessel allograft is unavailable, we can consider transposition of the omental flap between the expanded polytetrafluoroethylene graft and the stomach or duodenum to reduce this unexpected complication.