1
|
Lyne SA, Yip K, Vasiliou VS, Katz DA, Richards P, Tieu J, Black RJ, Bridgewater S, Palmowski A, Beaton D, Maxwell LJ, Robson JC, Mackie SL, Goodman SM, Hill CL. Consensus of the definitions of the OMERACT glucocorticoid impact core domain set for people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2024; 64:152338. [PMID: 38134623 DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2023.152338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Glucocorticoid (GC) Impact Working Group has been working to develop a core domain set to measure the impact of GCs on patients living with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. The mandatory domains previously identified for inclusion in all clinical trials measuring the GC effects include infection, bone fragility, mood disturbance, hypertension, diabetes, weight, fatigue, and mortality. Before progressing to instrument selection, the Working Group sought to establish precise definitions of all mandatory domains within the core domain set. METHODS OMERACT methodology was applied with the use of evidence and consensus-based decision making of all stakeholder groups (patient research partners, health care professionals, clinician researchers, industry members and methodologists) to develop detailed definitions for the broad domain, target domain and domain components, taking into consideration sources of variability that could affect measurement of the domain. The working group synthesized prior qualitative studies, quantitative work, and results from Delphi rounds, to develop a rich definition of 'what' is to be measured. RESULTS Between 2021 and 2023, the OMERACT Working Group on GC Impact conducted virtual meetings to establish domain definitions. First, we mapped each domain onto an OMERACT Core Area. All domains were primarily represented within the Pathophysiological Manifestations Core Area, except from Fatigue which was primarily Life Impact and Weight which spanned both Core Areas. Sources of variability included cultural factors, age, gender, education level, socioeconomic status, personal experiences, emotional state, and language barriers. The domain definitions will form the foundation for instrument selection and the initial step of domain / concept match and content validity in the OMERACT pillar of 'truth' before moving on to feasibility and discrimination. CONCLUSION The OMERACT GC Impact Working Group has developed and agreed upon detailed domain definitions for core domains. Future steps of the working group are to select instruments and develop the core outcome measurement set for clinical trials measuring the impact of GC on patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suellen A Lyne
- Rheumatology Unit, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia; Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Kevin Yip
- Division of Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Joanna Tieu
- Rheumatology Unit, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia; Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Rachel J Black
- Rheumatology Unit, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia; Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Susan Bridgewater
- Rheumatology Research, Centre for Health and Clinical Research, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - Andriko Palmowski
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany; Section for Biostatistics and Evidence-based Research, the Parker Institute, Frederiksberg and Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - Dorcas Beaton
- Institute for Work & Health, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Lara J Maxwell
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Joanna C Robson
- Rheumatology Research, Centre for Health and Clinical Research, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK; Rheumatology Department, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Sarah L Mackie
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Susan M Goodman
- Division of Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Catherine L Hill
- Rheumatology Unit, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia; Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bridgewater S, Shepherd MA, Dawson J, Richards P, Silverthorne C, Ndosi M, Almeida C, Black RJ, Cheah JTL, Dures E, Ghosh N, Hoon EA, Lyne S, Navarro-Millan I, Pearce-Fisher D, Ruediger C, Tieu J, Yip K, Mackie SL, Goodman S, Hill C, Robson JC. Measuring the impact of steroid therapy on health-related quality of life in patients with rheumatic diseases: international development of a glucocorticoid treatment-specific patient-reported outcome measure. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2023; 62:3565-3575. [PMID: 36840642 PMCID: PMC10629780 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Glucocorticoids (GCs) ('steroids') are used to treat rheumatic diseases but adverse effects are common. We aimed to explore the impact of GC therapy on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), to inform the development of a treatment-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for use in clinical trials and practice. METHODS Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with patients from the UK, USA and Australia, treated for a rheumatic condition with GCs in the last 2 years. Purposive sampling was used to select participants with a range of demographic and disease features. An initial conceptual framework informed interview prompts and cues. Interviews elicited GC-related physical and psychological symptoms and salient aspects of HRQoL in relation to GC therapy. Interview data were analysed inductively to develop initial individual themes and domains. Candidate questionnaire items were developed and refined. RESULTS Sixty semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted (UK n = 34, USA n = 10, Australia n = 16). The mean age was 58 years; 39/60 were female; and 18 rheumatic diseases were represented. Some 126 individual themes were identified and organized into six domains: physical symptoms; psychological symptoms; psychological impact of steroids; impact of steroids on participation; impact of steroids on relationships; and benefits of steroids. Candidate questionnaire items were tested and refined by piloting with patient research partners, iterative rounds of cognitive interviews and linguistic translatability assessment, informing a draft questionnaire. CONCLUSION We describe an international qualitative study to develop candidate items for a treatment-specific PROM for patients with rheumatic diseases. A future survey will enable the validation of a final version of the PROM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Bridgewater
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England—UWE Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Academic Rheumatology Department, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Michael A Shepherd
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England—UWE Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Academic Rheumatology Department, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Jill Dawson
- Department of Population Health (HSRU), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Pamela Richards
- Academic Rheumatology Department, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Christine Silverthorne
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England—UWE Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Academic Rheumatology Department, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Mwidimi Ndosi
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England—UWE Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Academic Rheumatology Department, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Celia Almeida
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England—UWE Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Academic Rheumatology Department, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Rachel J Black
- Discipline of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Rheumatology Department, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
- Department of Rheumatology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Jonathan T L Cheah
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Emma Dures
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England—UWE Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Academic Rheumatology Department, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Nilasha Ghosh
- Division of Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Hoon
- Discipline of General Practice, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Suellen Lyne
- Discipline of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Department of Rheumatology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Iris Navarro-Millan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Diyu Pearce-Fisher
- Division of Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carlee Ruediger
- Department of Rheumatology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Joanna Tieu
- Department of Rheumatology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
- Rheumatology Unit, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Kevin Yip
- Division of Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sarah L Mackie
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Susan Goodman
- Division of Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Catherine Hill
- Discipline of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Rheumatology Department, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
- Department of Rheumatology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Joanna C Robson
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England—UWE Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Academic Rheumatology Department, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Crawshaw H, Janagan S, Austin K, Baker C, Day J, Robson JC. Patient-reported outcomes in vasculitis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2023; 37:101829. [PMID: 37277246 DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2023.101829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Systemic vasculitis encompasses a group of multisystem disorders; both the diseases and the treatment strategies can have a significant impact on a patient's health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) to evaluate the patient's view of their condition, treatments, and healthcare journey is essential to the patient-centered care approach. In this paper, we discuss the use of generic, disease-specific, and treatment-specific PROMs and PREMs in systemic vasculitis and future research goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena Crawshaw
- Rheumatology Department Gloucestershire Royal Hospital NHS Trust, Great Western Road, Gloucester, Gloucestershire, GL1 3NN, UK.
| | - Shalini Janagan
- Rheumatology Department, Bristol Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Marlborough Street, Bristol, BS1 3NU, UK.
| | - Keziah Austin
- Rheumatology Department, Bristol Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Marlborough Street, Bristol, BS1 3NU, UK; Rheumatology Department, Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Combe Park, Bath, BA1 3NG, UK.
| | - Charlotte Baker
- Rheumatology Department, Bristol Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Marlborough Street, Bristol, BS1 3NU, UK.
| | - Julia Day
- Rheumatology Department, Bristol Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Marlborough Street, Bristol, BS1 3NU, UK.
| | - Joanna C Robson
- Centre for Health and Clinical Research, University of the West of England, Bristol, Room 5-054, Rheumatology Research B502, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, BS2 8HW, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Smith EMD, Gorst SL, Al-Abadi E, Hawley DP, Leone V, Pilkington C, Ramanan AV, Rangaraj S, Sridhar A, Beresford MW, Young B. 'It is good to have a target in mind': qualitative views of patients and parents informing a treat to target clinical trial in juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 60:5630-5641. [PMID: 33629109 PMCID: PMC8645274 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2020] [Revised: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We sought to explore patient and parental views on treatment targets, outcome measures and study designs being considered for a future JSLE treat-to-target (T2T) study. METHODS We conducted topic-guided, semistructured interviews with JSLE patients and parents and analysed the audio recorded interviews using thematic approaches. RESULTS Patients and parents differed regarding symptoms they felt would be tolerable, representing 'low disease activity'. Patients often classed symptoms that they had previously experienced, were 'invisible' or had minimal disruption on their life as signs of low disease activity. Parents were more accepting of visible signs but were concerned about potential organ involvement and symptom severity. Overall, patients and parents preferred that children were entirely asymptomatic, with no ongoing treatment side effects. They regarded fatigue as particularly challenging, requiring proper monitoring using a fatigue patient-reported outcome measure. Most families felt that reducing corticosteroids would also be a good treatment target. Overall, families liked the concept of T2T, commenting that it could help to improve disease control, help structure treatment and improve communication with clinicians and treatment compliance. They were concerned that T2T might increase the frequency of hospital visits, thus impacting upon schooling, parental employment and finances. Families made suggestions on how to modify the future trial design to mitigate such effects. CONCLUSION This study provides guidance from patients and parents on T2T targets and study designs. Complementary quantitative studies assessing the achievability and impact of different targets (e.g. lupus low disease activity state or remission) are now warranted to inform an international consensus process to develop treatment targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eve M D Smith
- Institute of Life Course and Medical Science, University of Liverpool
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Sarah L Gorst
- Department of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool
| | - Eslam Al-Abadi
- Department of Rheumatology, Birmingham Children’s Hospital, Birmingham
| | - Daniel P Hawley
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Sheffield Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield
| | - Valentina Leone
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds
| | | | - Athimalaipet V Ramanan
- Bristol Royal Hospital for Children & Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol
| | - Satyapal Rangaraj
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham
| | - Arani Sridhar
- Leicester Children’s Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester
| | - Michael W Beresford
- Institute of Life Course and Medical Science, University of Liverpool
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Bridget Young
- Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Monitoring disease activity and damage in adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathy. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2020; 32:553-561. [PMID: 32890032 DOI: 10.1097/bor.0000000000000749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW We have reviewed the literature to identify significant advances related to disease activity and damage in the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) from January 2019 to July 2020. RECENT FINDINGS New observations in the field from 2019 to 2020 have resulted in a better understanding of the clinical association and pathogenic origins of IIM. The use of patient-reported outcome measures and perspectives, identifying biomarkers and making better use of autoantibody testing are summarized. Basic sciences have led to an improved understanding of the role of NETosis in calcinosis, and of interferon type 1, in IIM. Preliminary insights are offered into Covid-19 in the setting of IIM, and the use of potential tools for monitoring disease remotely, which may assume larger importance for optimal disease management during a global pandemic. The wider exploration of newer imaging modalities and the use of nailfold capillaroscopy is a further step in better management of the condition. SUMMARY The summarized research in IIM is a step forward in being able to further define, and to distinguish disease activity from damage, in order to potentially aid future clinical diagnosis and management in this challenging disease.
Collapse
|