1
|
Jónasdóttir ÁD, Hemmingsson P, Schwarz A, Söderberg M, Wernerson A, Qureshi AR, Antovic A, Gunnarsson I, Bruchfeld A. Urinary TWEAK reflects disease activity in ANCA-associated vasculitis. Clin Kidney J 2025; 18:sfaf086. [PMID: 40443963 PMCID: PMC12121554 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfaf086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/02/2025] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of the study was to investigate urinary and serum tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-like weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK) as potential biomarkers in a longitudinal cohort of patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). Methods Patients with active AAV were included in the study. The Birmingham Vasculitis Score 2003 (BVAS) was used for assessment of disease activity and C-reactive protein (CRP), creatinine, albuminuria, and serum (s) and urinary (u) TWEAK levels were measured at baseline and 6-month follow-up. sTWEAK was measured in population-based controls for comparison. Kidney biopsies from AAV patients were stained for TWEAK and its receptor fibroblast growth factor-inducible 14 (Fn14) using immunohistochemistry (IHC). Results sTWEAK was measured in 74 patients and uTWEAK in 69 patients, 42 of whom had kidney involvement. uTWEAK-to-creatinine ratio (uTWEAK/Cr) was significantly higher at baseline compared with follow-up (median 7.21 vs 4.94 ng/mmol, P < .0001). Patients with kidney involvement had higher uTWEAK/Cr levels compared with those without (P = .03). A correlation was found between uTWEAK/Cr and BVAS (P = .006), albuminuria (P = .022) and crescentic changes (P = .03). sTWEAK levels were higher in patients at inclusion than at follow-up (P = .009) but no difference was found when comparing patients and controls, nor did sTWEAK correlate with BVAS. IHC staining showed a clear expression of TWEAK but a fainter pattern of Fn14 in kidney biopsies from AAV patients. Conclusions uTWEAK/Cr correlated with BVAS, albuminuria and number of crescents in active AAV and may be a useful biomarker in assessing disease activity in patients with AAV, whereas sTWEAK level is not.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ásta Dögg Jónasdóttir
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Renal Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Landspitali - The National University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Peter Hemmingsson
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Renal Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Angelina Schwarz
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Renal Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Magnus Söderberg
- Pathology, Clinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Annika Wernerson
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Renal Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Abdul Rashid Qureshi
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Baxter Novum, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Aleksandra Antovic
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Unit of Rheumatology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Iva Gunnarsson
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Unit of Rheumatology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Annette Bruchfeld
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Renal Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Guo Q, Qiao P, Wang J, Zhao L, Guo Z, Li X, Fan X, Yu C, Zhang L. Investigating the value of urinary biomarkers in relation to lupus nephritis histopathology: present insights and future prospects. Front Pharmacol 2024; 15:1421657. [PMID: 39104393 PMCID: PMC11298450 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1421657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 07/02/2024] [Indexed: 08/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Lupus nephritis (LN), a leading cause of death in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) patients, presents significant diagnostic and prognostic challenges. Although renal pathology offers critical insights regarding the diagnosis, classification, and therapy for LN, its clinical utility is constrained by the invasive nature and limited reproducibility of renal biopsies. Moreover, the continuous monitoring of renal pathological changes through repeated biopsies is impractical. Consequently, there is a growing interest in exploring urine as a non-invasive, easily accessible, and dynamic "liquid biopsy" alternative to guide clinical management. This paper examines novel urinary biomarkers from a renal pathology perspective, encompassing cellular components, cytokines, adhesion molecules, auto-antibodies, soluble leukocyte markers, light chain fragments, proteins, small-molecule peptides, metabolomics, urinary exosomes, and ribonucleic acids. We also discuss the application of combined models comprising multiple biomarkers in assessing lupus activity. These innovative biomarkers and models offer insights into LN disease activity, acute and chronic renal indices, fibrosis, thrombotic microangiopathy, podocyte injury, and other pathological changes, potentially improving the diagnosis, management, and prognosis of LN. These urinary biomarkers or combined models may serve as viable alternatives to traditional renal pathology, potentially revolutionizing the method for future LN diagnosis and observation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qianyu Guo
- Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
- Department of Rheumatology, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Taiyuan, China
| | - Pengyan Qiao
- Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
- Department of Rheumatology, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Taiyuan, China
| | - Juanjuan Wang
- Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
- Stem Cell Translational Laboratory, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Taiyuan, China
| | - Li Zhao
- School of Pharmacy, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Zhiying Guo
- Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
- Department of Rheumatology, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Taiyuan, China
| | - Xiaochen Li
- Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
- Department of Rheumatology, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Taiyuan, China
| | - Xiuying Fan
- Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
- Office of Drug Clinical Trial Institution, Taiyuan, China
| | - Chong Yu
- Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
- Department of Rheumatology, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Taiyuan, China
| | - Liyun Zhang
- Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
- Department of Rheumatology, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Taiyuan, China
- Stem Cell Translational Laboratory, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Taiyuan, China
- Office of Drug Clinical Trial Institution, Taiyuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Catanese L, Rupprecht H, Huber TB, Lindenmeyer MT, Hengel FE, Amann K, Wendt R, Siwy J, Mischak H, Beige J. Non-Invasive Biomarkers for Diagnosis, Risk Prediction, and Therapy Guidance of Glomerular Kidney Diseases: A Comprehensive Review. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:3519. [PMID: 38542491 PMCID: PMC10970781 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25063519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2025] Open
Abstract
Effective management of glomerular kidney disease, one of the main categories of chronic kidney disease (CKD), requires accurate diagnosis, prognosis of progression, assessment of therapeutic efficacy, and, ideally, prediction of drug response. Multiple biomarkers and algorithms for the assessment of specific aspects of glomerular diseases have been reported in the literature. Though, the vast majority of these have not been implemented in clinical practice or are not available on a global scale due to limited access, missing medical infrastructure, or economical as well as political reasons. The aim of this review is to compile all currently available information on the diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers currently available for the management of glomerular diseases, and provide guidance on the application of these biomarkers. As a result of the compiled evidence for the different biomarkers available, we present a decision tree for a non-invasive, biomarker-guided diagnostic path. The data currently available demonstrate that for the large majority of patients with glomerular diseases, valid biomarkers are available. However, despite the obvious disadvantages of kidney biopsy, being invasive and not applicable for monitoring, especially in the context of rare CKD etiologies, kidney biopsy still cannot be replaced by non-invasive strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Catanese
- Department of Nephrology, Angiology and Rheumatology, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, 95445 Bayreuth, Germany; (L.C.); (H.R.)
- Kuratorium for Dialysis and Transplantation (KfH) Bayreuth, 95445 Bayreuth, Germany
- Department of Nephrology, Medizincampus Oberfranken, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Harald Rupprecht
- Department of Nephrology, Angiology and Rheumatology, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, 95445 Bayreuth, Germany; (L.C.); (H.R.)
- Kuratorium for Dialysis and Transplantation (KfH) Bayreuth, 95445 Bayreuth, Germany
- Department of Nephrology, Medizincampus Oberfranken, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Tobias B. Huber
- III Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany; (T.B.H.); (M.T.L.); (F.E.H.)
| | - Maja T. Lindenmeyer
- III Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany; (T.B.H.); (M.T.L.); (F.E.H.)
| | - Felicitas E. Hengel
- III Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany; (T.B.H.); (M.T.L.); (F.E.H.)
| | - Kerstin Amann
- Department of Nephropathology, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany;
| | - Ralph Wendt
- Division of Nephrology, St. Georg Hospital, 04129 Leipzig, Germany;
| | - Justyna Siwy
- Mosaiques Diagnostics GmbH, 30659 Hannover, Germany; (J.S.); (H.M.)
| | - Harald Mischak
- Mosaiques Diagnostics GmbH, 30659 Hannover, Germany; (J.S.); (H.M.)
| | - Joachim Beige
- Division of Nephrology, St. Georg Hospital, 04129 Leipzig, Germany;
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, 06108 Halle, Germany
- Kuratorium for Dialysis and Transplantation (KfH) Leipzig, 04129 Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Alduraibi FK, Tsokos GC. Lupus Nephritis Biomarkers: A Critical Review. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:805. [PMID: 38255879 PMCID: PMC10815779 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25020805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Revised: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Lupus nephritis (LN), a major complication in individuals diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus, substantially increases morbidity and mortality. Despite marked improvements in the survival of patients with severe LN over the past 50 years, complete clinical remission after immunosuppressive therapy is achieved in only half of the patients. Therefore, timely detection of LN is vital for initiating prompt therapeutic interventions and improving patient outcomes. Biomarkers have emerged as valuable tools for LN detection and monitoring; however, the complex role of these biomarkers in LN pathogenesis remains unclear. Renal biopsy remains the gold standard for the identification of the histological phenotypes of LN and guides disease management. However, the molecular pathophysiology of specific renal lesions remains poorly understood. In this review, we provide a critical, up-to-date overview of the latest developments in the field of LN biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatima K. Alduraibi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Teaching Hospital, Boston, MA 02215, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh 11564, Saudi Arabia
| | - George C. Tsokos
- Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Teaching Hospital, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| |
Collapse
|