Distinguishing Hepatic Metastasis From Hemangioma Using Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging:

Effectiveness of deep learning-based reconstruction for improvement of image quality and liver tumor detectability in the hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) in improving image quality and tumor detectability of isovoxel high-resolution breath-hold fat-suppressed T1-weighted imaging (HR-BH-FS-T1WI) in the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) of Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (Gd-EOB-MRI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective evaluated 42 patients with 98 liver tumors who underwent Gd-EOB-MRI between March 2023 and May 2023 using three techniques based on HBP imaging: isovoxel HR-BH-FS-T1WI reconstructed (1) with DLR (BH-DLR +) and (2) without DLR (BH-DLR -) and (3) HR-FS-T1WI scanned with a free-breathing technique using a navigator-echo-triggered technique and DLR (Navi-DLR +). The three techniques were qualitatively and quantitatively compared by the Friedman test and the Bonferroni post-hoc test. Tumor detectability was compared using the McNemar test.

RESULTS

BH-DLR + (3.85, average score of two radiologists) showed significantly better qualitative scores for image noise than BH-DLR - (2.84) and Navi-DLR + (3.37) (p < 0.0167), and Navi-DLR + showed significantly better scores than BH-DLR - (p < 0.0167). BH-DLR + (3.77) and BH-DLR - (3.77) showed significantly better qualitative scores for respiratory motion artifact than Navi-DLR + (2.75) (p < 0.0167), but there was no significant difference in scores between BH-DLR + and BH-DLR - (p > 0.0167). BH-DLR + (0.32) and Navi-DLR + (0.33) showed significantly higher lesion-to-nonlesion CR than BH-DLR - (0.29) (p < 0.0167), but there was no significant difference in lesion-to-nonlesion CR between BH-DLR + and Navi-DLR + (p > 0.0167). BH-DLR + (89.8%) showed significantly better tumor detectability than BH-DLR - (76.0%) and Navi-DLR + (77.6%) (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The use of DLR for isovoxel HR-BH-FS-T1WI was effective in improving image quality and tumor detectability.

Diagnostic ability of diffusion-weighted imaging using echo planar imaging with compressed SENSE (EPICS) for differentiating hepatic hemangioma and liver metastasis

PURPOSE

To assess the diagnostic abilities of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with parallel imaging (PI-DWI) and that with Compressed SENSE (EPICS-DWI) for differentiating hepatic hemangiomas (HHs) and liver metastases (LMs).

METHOD

This prospective study included 30 participants with HH and/or LM who underwent PI-DWI and EPICS-DWI. Two radiologists assessed the DWI images and assigned confidence scores for hepatic lesions conspicuity using 4-point scale. One of the radiologists additionally calculated the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and measured ADC value of the hepatic lesions. The conspicuity, CNR, and ADC values were compared between the two sequences. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic abilities of the two sequences for differentiating HHs and LMs.

RESULTS

The conspicuity of LMs was better in EPICS-DWI than in PI-DWI (P < .05 in both radiologists). The CNR of LMs was higher in EPICS-DWI than in PI-DWI (P = .008). No difference was found in the CNR of HHs (P = .52), ADC values for HHs (P = .79), and LMs (P = .29) between the two sequences. To differentiate between HHs and LMs, the cutoff ADC values were 1.38 × 10-3 mm2/s in PI-DWI and 1.37 × 10-3 mm2/s in EPICS-DWI. The area under the ROC curve (P = .86), sensitivity (P > .99), and specificity (P > .99) did not vary.

CONCLUSIONS

The LMs were more visible in EPICS-DWI than in PI-DWI. However, the cutoff ADC values and diagnostic abilities for differentiating HHs and LMs were almost comparable between the two sequences.

Distinction Between Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Hypervascular Liver Metastases in Non-cirrhotic Patients Using Gadoxetate Disodium-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Purpose: This study aims to identify the hallmarks of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging distinguishing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from hypervascular liver metastases (HLMs). Methods: Between January 2008 and October 2020, among patients who underwent gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI, those who met the following criteria were retrospectively included: without chronic hepatitis or liver stiffness ≤ 2.5 kPa on magnetic resonance elastography or F0/F1 on pathological assessment. Two blinded radiologists reviewed the imaging findings to judge the presence or absence of the enhancing capsule, nonperipheral washout, corona enhancement, hypointensity in the transitional/hepatobiliary phase (HBP), hyperintensity on T2-weighted/diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), mosaic architecture, and blood products/fat in mass. The lesion-to-liver signal intensity ratios in HBP and DWI were also calculated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the imaging hallmarks distinguishing HCC from HLM. Interobserver agreement was calculated using kappa values and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results: The final study cohort comprised 72 lesions in 44 patients (mean age, 65.0±11.9 years). Univariate analysis revealed higher frequencies of the following features in HCC than in HLM (P < .10): nonperipheral washout, corona enhancement, transitional phase hypointensity, mosaic architecture, and fat in mass (P = .002-.073). Multivariate analysis revealed that nonperipheral washout and mosaic architecture favored the diagnosis of HCC over that of HLM with odds ratios of 7.66 and 14.6, respectively (P = .038 and .029, respectively). The interobserver agreement for each item was moderate or substantial (kappa or ICC = .447-.792). Conclusion: Peripheral washout and mosaic architecture may be reliable imaging hallmarks for distinguishing HCC from HLM.

Differentiating Liver Hemangioma from Metastatic Tumor Using T2-enhanced Spin-echo Imaging with a Time-reversed Gradient-echo Sequence in the Hepatobiliary Phase of Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MR Imaging

Purpose: To evaluate the utility of T2-enhanced spin-echo imaging using the time-reversed gradient echo sequence (T2FFE imaging) in the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (Gd-EOB-MRI) for differentiating hemangiomas from metastatic tumors.

Methods: A total of 61 patients with 133 liver lesions, including 37 hemangiomas and 96 metastatic tumors, were scanned by Gd-EOB-MRI. Four data sets were independently analyzed by two readers: (1) 3D fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging (FS-T2WI) alone; (2) the combination of 3D FS-T2WI and T2FFE imaging in the HBP of Gd-EOB-MRI; (3) the combination of 3D FS-T2WI, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with the b-value of 1000 s/mm² and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC); and (4) a dynamic study of Gd-EOB-MRI. After classifying the lesion sizes as ≤ 10 mm or > 10 mm, we conducted a receiver-operating characteristic analysis to compare diagnostic accuracies among the four data sets for differentiating hemangiomas from metastatic tumors.

Results: The areas under the curves (AUCs) of the four data sets of two readers were: (1) ≤ 10 mm (0.85 and 0.91) and > 10 mm (0.88 and 0.97), (2) ≤ 10 mm (0.94 and 0.94) and > 10 mm (0.96 and 0.95), (3) ≤ 10 mm (0.90 and 0.87) and > 10 mm (0.89 and 0.95), and (4) ≤ 10 mm (0.62 and 0.67) and > 10 mm (0.76 and 0.71), respectively. Data sets (2) and (3) showed no significant differences in AUCs, but both showed significantly higher AUCs compared to that of (4) regardless of the lesion size (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: The combination of 3D FS-T2WI and T2FFE imaging in the HBP of Gd-EOB-MRI achieved an accuracy equivalent to that of the combination of 3D FS-T2WI, DWI, and ADC and might be helpful in differentiating hemangiomas from metastatic tumors.

Quantitative analysis of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for the differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions: Comparison between estimated intralesional gadoxetic acid retention by T1 mapping and conventional processing methods

PURPOSE

To compare the estimated quantity of intratumor gadoxetic acid retention using T1 mapping of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) versus conventional processing methods for the differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions.

METHODS

Seventy patients with hepatic lesions (colorectal metastasis (CRM) [n = 28], hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [n = 20], hemangioma [n = 12], and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) [n = 10]) underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, including pre- and post-contrast T1-weighted imaging and T1 mapping. Quantitative analyses included the lesion-to-liver signal intensity ratio (SIR) on hepatobiliary phase images, the pre- and post-contrast lesion T1 value difference (ΔT1 [ms]), and the lesion retention index (LRI [%]), which was the estimated intralesional gadoxetic acid retention calculated on pre- and post-contrast T1 maps using a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model. Results were compared between the four subcategories of focal liver lesions using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by the post-hoc Dunn's test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to distinguish between pairs of the four lesion subcategories.

RESULTS

This study identified significant differences in the LRI of the four lesion subcategories (p <  0.01), without significant differences in ΔT1 or SIR. Post-hoc analysis demonstrated significant differences in CRM vs. hemangioma (p <  0.01), hemangioma vs. ICC (p <  0.01), and HCC vs. ICC (p =  0.047) for the LRI.

CONCLUSIONS

The quantity of intratumor gadoxetic acid retention estimated using pre- and post- contrast T1 mapping could distinguish focal liver lesions, unlike conventional processing methods, and captured unique lesion characteristics.

Combined gadoxetic acid and gadobenate dimeglumine enhanced liver MRI: a parameter optimization study

PURPOSE

To demonstrate the feasibility of combined delayed-phase gadoxetic acid (GA) and gadobenate dimeglumine (GD) enhanced liver MRI for improved detection of liver metastases, and to optimize contrast agent dose, timing, and flip angle (FA).

METHODS

Fourteen healthy volunteers underwent liver MRI at 3.0T at two visits during which they received two consecutive injections: 1. GA (Visit 1 = 0.025 mmol/kg; Visit 2 = 0.05 mmol/kg) and 2. GD (both visits = 0.1 mmol/kg) 20 min after GA administration. Two sub-studies were performed: Experiment-1 Eight subjects underwent multi-phase breath-held 3D-fat-saturated T1-weighted spoiled gradient echo (SGRE) imaging to determine the optimal imaging window for the combined GA + GD protocol to create a homogeneously hyperintense liver and vasculature ("plain-white-liver") with maximum contrast to muscle which served as a surrogate for metastatic lesions in both experiments. Experiment-2 Six subjects underwent breath-held 3D-fat-saturated T1-weighted SGRE imaging at three different FA to determine the optimal FA for best image contrast. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Experiment-1 The combined GA + GD protocol created a homogeneously hyperintense liver and vasculature with maximum CNR liver/muscle at approximately 60-120 s after automatic GD-bolus detection. Experiment-2 Flip angles between 25° and 35° at a dose of 0.025 mmol/kg GA provided the best combination that minimized liver/vasculature CNR, while maximizing liver/muscle CNR. CNR performance to achieve a "plain-white-liver" was superior with 0.025 mmol/kg GA compared to 0.05 mmol/kg.

CONCLUSION

Combined GA + GD enhanced T1-weighted MRI is feasible to achieve a homogeneously "plain-white-liver". Future studies need to confirm that this protocol can improve sensitivity of liver lesion detection in patients with metastatic liver disease.

Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for detecting colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To determine the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for detecting colorectal liver metastases.

METHODS

We performed comprehensive searches of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases to identify studies reporting the per-lesion diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for detecting colorectal liver metastases. Studies published between January 2003 and December 2018 with reference standards, including histopathology and intraoperative observation, and/or follow-up, were included. Sources of bias were assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. A linear mixed-effects regression model was used to determine sensitivity estimates.

RESULTS

Overall, 47 articles were included. The sensitivity estimates for contrast-enhanced ultrasound, diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for detecting colorectal liver metastases were 85.3%, 83.0%, and 90.1%, respectively. For lesions ≥10 mm in diameter, the sensitivities were 93.1%, 92.9%, and 94.5%, respectively. In 21 articles using histopathology as the only reference standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio for contrast-enhanced ultrasound/contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging were 86%/91%, 91%/95%, 9.2/16.6, 0.15/0.10, and 61/170, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS showed a diagnostic ability comparable to that of DWI and CEMRI, particularly for lesions ≥10 mm in diameter.

Performance of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI for the diagnosis of LI-RADS 4 category hepatocellular carcinoma nodules with different diameters

In 2011, the American College of Radiology released a standardized reporting and data collection system, named Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS), to improve the consistency of diagnostic imaging examinations of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). When the LI-RADS guideline was updated in 2014, hepatobiliary contrast agents, including gadoxetate acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA), were incorporated into the system. However, the diagnostic performance of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for nodules of different diameters has not been addressed. In the present study, a total of 263 LI-RADS 4 category hepatic nodules were examined blindly and independently by two radiologists. All nodules were divided into two datasets: Set 1 (n=86) that included nodules with iso/hypo-intensity in the arterial phase (HCC, n=42; non-HCC, n=44) and set 2 (n=177) that included nodules with hyper-intensity in the arterial phase (HCC, n=131; non-HCC, n=46). The diagnostic performance of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI for evaluation of nodules with different diameters was evaluated. The present study revealed that the diagnostic performance of Gd-EOB-enhanced MRI of larger nodules (>2 cm) was higher compared with (<2 cm) smaller nodules. The FPR of large nodules (>2 cm) with a hypervascular pattern was lower compared with smaller nodules (<2 cm) with hypovascular pattern. In conclusion, Gd-EOB-enhanced MRI is useful for the diagnosis of HCC where hypervascular LI-RADS 4 nodules are >2 cm in diameter. However, Gd-EOB-enhanced MRI may be of limited use for the assessment of nodules that <20 mm due to low diagnostic performance and high FPR.

MRI characteristics for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant small solitary hypovascular hepatic nodules

PURPOSE

To compare the MRI findings of benign and malignant solitary hypovascular hepatic nodules and identify the differentiating features.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 135 patients with solitary hypovascular hepatic lesions up to 3 cm (mass forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, n=29; metastases, n=26; inflammatory pseudotumors and solitary necrotic nodule, n=48; and hemangioma, n=32) were assessed. MRI findings were analyzed, and lesions were scored for peripheral and intratumoral appearance and enhancement patterns.

RESULTS

Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that the most common findings for benign lesions were subcapsular, sharp margin, homogeneous, marked high signal on T2WI, mild hyperintensity on T2WI, increasing intensity of peripheral globular enhancement, and persistent central septum-like linear enhancement on delayed phase (P<0.05). An area under the curve of 0.955 was obtained for differentiating malignant from benign nodules using the combined imaging features of ill-defined margins, heterogeneity, decreasing intensity of peripheral rim-like enhancement, and central increasing intensity of patchy enhancement. Interobserver agreement was good, ranging from 0.72 to 1.00.

CONCLUSION

MRI may be a useful noninvasive method for determining whether hypovascular hepatic nodules are malignant or benign.

Combined gadoxetic acid and gadofosveset enhanced liver MRI for detection and characterization of liver metastases

PURPOSE

To compare gadoxetic acid alone and combined gadoxetic acid/gadofosveset trisodium-enhanced liver MRI for detection of metastases and differentiation of metastases from haemangiomas.

METHODS

Ninety-one patients underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI before and after additional injection of gadofosveset. First, two readers retrospectively identified metastases on gadoxetic acid alone enhanced delayed hepatobiliary phase T1-weighted images together with all other MR images (dynamic images, T2-weighted images, diffusion-weighted images). Second, readers assessed additional T1-weighted images obtained after administration of gadofosveset trisodium. For both interpretations, readers rated lesion conspicuity and confidence in differentiating metastases from haemangiomas. Results were compared using alternative free-response receiver-operating characteristic (AFROC) and conventional ROC methods. Histology and follow-up served as reference standard.

RESULTS

There were 145 metastases and 16 haemangiomas. Both readers detected more metastases using combined gadoxetic acid/gadofosveset (reader 1 = 130; reader 2 = 124) compared to gadoxetic acid alone (reader 1 = 104; reader 2 = 103). Sensitivity of combined gadoxetic acid/gadofosveset (reader 1 = 90 %; reader 2 = 86 %) was higher than that of gadoxetic acid alone (reader 1 = 72 %; reader 2 = 71 %, both P < 0.01). AFROC-AUC was higher for the combined technique (0.92 vs. 0.86, P < 0.001). Sensitivity for correct differentiation of metastases from haemangiomas was higher for the combined technique (reader 1 = 98 %; reader 2 = 99 % vs. reader 1 = 86 %; reader 2 = 91 %, both P < 0.01). ROC-AUC was significantly higher for the combined technique (reader 1 = 1.00; reader 2 = 1.00 vs. reader 1 = 0.87; reader 2 = 0.92, both P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Combined gadoxetic acid/gadofosveset-enhanced MRI improves detection and characterization of liver metastases compared to gadoxetic acid alone.

KEY POINTS

• Combined gadoxetic acid and gadofosveset-enhanced liver MRI significantly improves detection of metastases. • The combined enhancement technique improves the accuracy to differentiate metastases from haemangiomas. • Prospective studies need to determine the clinical impact of the combined technique.

Gadoxetic acid: pearls and pitfalls

Gadoxetic acid is a hepatocyte-specific magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent with the ability to detect and characterize focal liver lesions and provide structural and functional information about the hepatobiliary system. Knowledge of the pharmacokinetics of gadoxetic acid is paramount to understanding imaging protocol and lesion appearance and facilitates identification and avoidance of undesired effects with use of this intravenous contrast agent. This article reviews the utility of gadoxetic acid in liver and biliary imaging, with emphasis on the hepatobiliary phase.

An Investigation of Transient Severe Motion Related to Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MR Imaging

PURPOSE

To investigate the cause of imaging artifacts observed during gadoxetic acid-enhanced arterial phase imaging of the liver.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the institutional review board. Data were collected prospectively at two sites (site A, United States; site B, Japan) from patients undergoing contrast material-enhanced MR imaging with gadoxetic acid (site A, n = 154, dose = 0.05 mmol/kg; site B, n = 130, 0.025 mmol/kg) or gadobenate dimeglumine (only site A, n = 1666) from January 2014 to September 2014 at site A and from November 2014 to January 2015 at site B. Detailed comparisons between the two agents were made in the patients with dynamic liver acquisitions (n = 372) and age-, sex-, and baseline oxygen saturation (Spo2)-matched pairs (n = 130) at site A. Acquired data included self-reported dyspnea after contrast agent injection, Spo2, and breath-hold fidelity monitored with respiratory bellows.

RESULTS

Self-reported dyspnea was more frequent with gadoxetic acid than with gadobenate dimeglumine (site A, 6.5% [10 of 154] vs 0.1% [two of 1666], P < .001; site B, 1.5% [two of 130]). In the matched-pair comparison, gadoxetic acid, as compared with gadobenate dimeglumine, had higher breath-hold failure rates (site A, 34.6% [45 of 130] vs 11.7% [15 of 130], P < .0001; site B, 16.2% [21 of 130]) and more severe artifacts during arterial phase imaging (site A, 7.7% [10 of 130] vs 0% [none of 130], P < .001; site B, 2.3% [three of 130]). Severe imaging artifacts in patients who received gadoxetic acid were significantly associated with male sex (P = .023), body mass index (P = .021), and breath-hold failure (P < .001) but not with dyspnea or Spo2 decrease.

CONCLUSION

Severe motion-related artifacts in the arterial phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MR imaging are associated with breath-hold failure but not with subjective feelings of dyspnea or a substantial decrease in blood Spo2. Subjective feelings of dyspnea are not necessarily associated with imaging artifacts. The phenomenon, albeit at a lower rate, was confirmed at a second site in Japan.

Combined gadoxetic acid and gadofosveset enhanced liver MRI: A feasibility and parameter optimization study

PURPOSE

Demonstration of feasibility and protocol optimization for the combined use of gadofosveset trisodium with gadoxetic acid for delayed T1-weighted liver MRI.

METHODS

Eleven healthy volunteers underwent hepatobiliary phase imaging at 3 Tesla (T) using gadoxetic acid. Multiple breathheld T1-weighted three-dimensional spoiled gradient echo sequences were performed at varying flip angles before and after injection of gadofosveset. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured to determine optimal T1-weighting. Examples of three patients with focal liver lesions were acquired.

RESULTS

The addition of gadofosveset to the hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid renders vessels isointense to liver tissue at low flip angles due to increased vessel SNR (P < 0.001). The lowest CNR of liver relative to portal vein (CNR = 15; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -14-44) was observed at a 10º flip angle. The highest CNR of liver relative to muscle (CNR = 214; 95% CI: 191-237) was observed at a 20º flip angle. The combined enhancement leads to homogenously enhanced liver tissue and liver vasculature. Cysts were detected in three volunteers and metastases were detected in two patients. In these anecdotal cases the cysts and metastases stood out as conspicuous focal hypointensities on combined gadoxetic acid and gadofosveset enhanced images.

CONCLUSION

Combined gadoxetic acid and gadofosveset enhanced liver MRI is feasible, with low flip angles minimizing contrast between vessels and liver. Further clinical studies are needed to confirm that low flip angles provide an optimal combination of sensitivity and specificity for lesion detection in patients.

Evaluation of neuroendocrine liver metastases: a comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation between dynamic gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging parameters and specific uptake values (SUVs) derived from ¹⁸fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) and ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-Tyr(3)-octreotate (⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with liver metastases of neuroendocrine neoplasms.

METHODS

A total of 42 patients with hepatic metastases of neuroendocrine neoplasms were prospectively enrolled and underwent both dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and PET/CT, using either ¹⁸F-FDG or ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE as tracer. The DCE-MRI was performed at 3 T with gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid acquiring 48 slices every 2.2 seconds for 5 minutes. Three regions of interest (ROIs) representing the liver background and up to 3 ROIs representing metastatic liver tissue were coregistered in the PET/CT and in the DCE-MRI data sets. For each patient, a dedicated dual-inlet, 2-compartment uptake model was fitted to the enhancement curves of DCE-MRI ROIs and perfusion parameters were calculated. Lesion-to-background ratios of SUVs were correlated with corresponding lesion-to-background ratios of the perfusion parameters arterial plasma flow, venous plasma flow, total plasma flow, extracellular mean transit time, extracellular volume, arterial flow fraction, intracellular uptake rate, and hepatic uptake fraction using the Spearman coefficient.

RESULTS

Whereas the lesion-to-background ratios of arterial plasma flow and arterial flow fraction of liver metastases correlated negatively with the lesion-to-background ratios of SUV(mean) derived from ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT (r = -0.54, P < 0.001; r = -0.39, P < 0.001, respectively), they correlated positively with the lesion-to-background ratios of SUV(mean) derived from ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT (r = 0.51, P < 0.05; r = 0.68, P < 0.01, respectively). The lesion-to-background ratios of the DCE-MRI parameters extracellular mean transit time and extracellular volume correlated very weakly with the lesion-to-background ratios of SUV(mean) from ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT, whereas venous plasma flow, total plasma flow, hepatic uptake fraction, and intracellular uptake rate showed no correlation between DCE-MRI and PET/CT.

CONCLUSIONS

Both ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE and ¹⁸fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT partially correlate with MRI perfusion parameters from the dual-inlet, 2-compartment uptake model. The results indicate that the paired imaging methods deliver complementary functional information.

Liver-specific agents for contrast-enhanced MRI: role in oncological imaging

Liver-specific magnetic resonance (MR) contrast agents are increasingly used in evaluation of the liver. They are effective in detection and morphological characterization of lesions, and can be useful for evaluation of biliary tree anatomy and liver function. The typical appearances and imaging pitfalls of various tumours at MR imaging performed with these agents can be understood by the interplay of pharmacokinetics of these contrast agents and transporter expression of the tumour. This review focuses on the applications of these agents in oncological imaging.

MR imaging in patients with suspected liver metastases: value of liver-specific contrast agent gadoxetic acid

Objective

To compare the diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with that of triple-phase multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) in the detection of liver metastasis.

Materials and Methods

Our institutional review board approved this retrospective study and waived informed consent. The study population consisted of 51 patients with hepatic metastases and 62 patients with benign hepatic lesions, who underwent triple-phase MDCT and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI within one month. Two radiologists independently and randomly reviewed MDCT and MRI images regarding the presence and probability of liver metastasis. In order to determine additional value of hepatobiliary-phase (HBP), the dynamic-MRI set alone and combined dynamic-and-HBP set were evaluated, respectively. The standard of reference was a combination of pathology diagnosis and follow-up imaging. For each reader, diagnostic accuracy was compared using the jackknife alternative free-response receiver-operating-characteristic (JAFROC).

Results

For both readers, average JAFROC figure-of-merit (FOM) was significantly higher on the MR image sets than on the MDCT images: average FOM was 0.582 on the MDCT, 0.788 on the dynamic-MRI set and 0.847 on the combined HBP set, respectively (p < 0.0001). The differences were more prominent for small (≤ 1 cm) lesions: average FOM values were 0.433 on MDCT, 0.711 on the dynamic-MRI set and 0.828 on the combined HBP set, respectively (p < 0.0001). Sensitivity increased significantly with the addition of HBP in gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI shows a better performance than triple-phase MDCT for the detection of hepatic metastasis, especially for small (≤ 1 cm) lesions.

Hepatic steatosis: effect on hepatocyte enhancement with gadoxetate disodium-enhanced liver MR imaging

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of hepatic steatosis on enhancement of liver parenchyma with gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MR imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MR images of 166 patients were analyzed. Liver-spleen contrast and liver-spleen relative enhancement ratio on three-dimensional gradient echo T1-weighted images with fat suppression 20 minutes after injection of gadoxetate disodium were evaluated in correlation with fat signal fraction using the Pearson correlation coefficient and also compared between patients with normal liver parenchyma (n = 115) and with liver steatosis (n = 51) using the Student t-test.

RESULTS

The liver-spleen contrast at hepatobiliary phase showed inverse correlations with the fat signal fraction (r = -0.36; P < 0.01), while the liver-spleen relative enhancement ratio showed no statistical correlation with the fat signal fraction (P = 0.80). The liver-spleen contrast in the group with steatotic liver was significantly lower than that in the group with normal livers (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the relative enhancement ratio between the two groups (P = 0.85).

CONCLUSION

Our results may suggest that hepatic steatosis does not affect the uptake of gadoxetate disodium into hepatocytes and are considered crucial as background knowledge in extending the use of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MR imaging to quantitate liver function.

Comparison of Dynamic and Liver-Specific Gadoxetic Acid Contrast-Enhanced MRI versus Apparent Diffusion Coefficients

Background

Hepatic lesions often present diagnostic connundrums with conventional MR techniques. Hepatobiliary phase contrast-enhanced imaging with gadoxetic acid can aid in the characterization of such lesions. However, quantitative measures describing late-phase enhancement must be assessed relative to their accuracy of hepatic lesion classification.

Purpose: To compare quantitative parameters in gadoxetic acid contrast-enhanced dynamic and hepatobiliary phase imaging versus apparent diffusion coefficients in hepatic lesion characterization.

Material and Methods

57 patients with focal hepatic lesions on gadoxetic acid MR were included. Lesion enhancement at standard post-contrast time points and in the hepatobiliary phase (HB; 15 and 25 minutes post-contrast) was assessed via calculation of contrast (CR) and enhancement ratios (ER). Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were also obtained. Values for these parameters were compared among lesions and ROC analyses performed.

Results: HB enhancement was greatest with FNH and adenomas. HB ER parameters but not HB CR could distinguish HCC from benign entities (0.9 ER ROC AUC versus 0.5 CR ROC AUC). There was no statistically significant difference found between the 15 and 25 minutes HB time points in detection of any lesion (p>0.4). ADC values were statistically significantly higher with hemangiomas (p<0.05) without greater accuracy in lesion detection relative to HB phase parameters.

Conclusion

Hepatobiliary phase gadoxetic acid contrast-enhanced MR characterizes focal hepatic lesions more accurately than ADC and conventional dynamic post-contrast time point enhancement parameters. ER values are generally superior to CR. No discernible benefit of 25 minute versus 15 minute delayed imaging is demonstrated.

A historical overview of magnetic resonance imaging, focusing on technological innovations

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has now been used clinically for more than 30 years. Today, MRI serves as the primary diagnostic modality for many clinical problems. In this article, historical developments in the field of MRI will be discussed with a focus on technological innovations. Topics include the initial discoveries in nuclear magnetic resonance that allowed for the advent of MRI as well as the development of whole-body, high field strength, and open MRI systems. Dedicated imaging coils, basic pulse sequences, contrast-enhanced, and functional imaging techniques will also be discussed in a historical context. This article describes important technological innovations in the field of MRI, together with their clinical applicability today, providing critical insights into future developments.

Meta-analysis of gadoxetic acid disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of liver metastases

Objective

To determine the accuracy of MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA for the detection of liver metastases.

Materials and Methods

PUBMED, EMBASE, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for original articles published prior to February 2012. The criteria for the inclusion of articles were as follows: reported in the English language; MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA was performed to detect liver metastases; histopathologic analysis (surgery, biopsy), intraoperative observation (manual palpatation, intraoperative ultrasonography), and/or follow-up US was the reference standard; and data were sufficient for the calculation of true-positive or false-negative values. The methodological quality was assessed by using the quality assessment of diagnostic studies instrument. The data were extracted to calculate sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, diagnostic odds ratio, and areas under hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curve to perform heterogeneity test and threshold effect test, as well as publication bias analysis and subgroup analyses.

Results

From 229 citations, 13 were included in the meta-analysis with a total of 1900 lesions. We detected heterogeneity between studies and evidence of publication bias. The methodological quality was moderate. The pooled weighted sensitivity with a corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90, 0. 95), the specificity was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91, 0.97), the positive likelihood ratio was 18.07 (95% CI: 10.52, 31.04), the negative likelihood ratio was 0.07 (95% CI: 0.05, 0.10), and the diagnostic odds ratio was 249.81 (95% CI: 125.12, 498.74). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96, 0.99).

Conclusion

MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA is a reliable, non-invasive, and no-radiation-exposure imaging modality with a high sensitivity and specificity for detection of liver metastases. Nonetheless, it should be applied cautiously, and large scale, well-designed trials are necessary to assess its clinical value.

Diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity of diffusion-weighted and of gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3-T MR imaging alone or in combination in the detection of small liver metastasis (≤ 1.5 cm in diameter)

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity of combined gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with each imaging approach alone for detecting small hepatic metastases (≤ 1.5 cm).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Institutional review board approved this retrospective study and waived informed patient consent. Eighty-six patients with 179 liver metastases underwent liver MRI including unenhanced and gadoxetic acid-enhanced imaging and DWI at 3.0 T. Three image sets including unenhanced images-gadoxetic acid set (early dynamic and hepatocyte phase), DWI set, and the combined set-were analyzed independently and in consensus by 2 observers for detecting liver metastases using receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

There was a tendency toward an increased diagnostic accuracy for the combined set (mean, 0.965) compared with that for each image set alone (mean, 0.911 for gadoxetic acid set; 0.926 for DWI set). The combined set showed better sensitivity (mean, 97.47%/95.0%: values on per-lesion/per-patient basis) than each imaging set alone (mean, 90.7%/83.7% for gadoxetic acid set; 91.6%/83.0% for DWI set) (P < 0.05) on both per-lesion basis and per-patient basis. All image sets showed similar positive predictive values.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and DWI yielded better diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity in the detection of small liver metastasis than each magnetic resonance scan sequence alone.

[Malignant focal liver lesions]

Focal liver lesions are a very common occurrence. The detection and differentiation of such lesions is particularly important for the management of oncology patients and is a core task for radiology. The early and conclusive detection of malignant liver processes in a cost-efficient manner and with a low radiation dose for the patient requires systematic and skillful use of the various radiological methods. This review explains the application of current radiological methods for the detection and differentiation of malignant liver lesions and the typical appearance of the most commonly found liver malignancies.