Clinical Effects of PET-CT Before Definite Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Unresectable Stage IIIA-IIIB Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lungs

Prognostic factors for survival in unresectable stage III EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma: impact of pre-CCRT PET-CT

PURPOSE

To assess the survival impact of pre-concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) staging with positron emission tomography-CT (PET-CT) in patients with unresectable epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with unresectable stage IIIA-IIIC EGFR mutation-positive adenocarcinoma undergoing definitive CCRT were divided into two groups: those who received PET-CT staging prior to CCRT and those with other staging methods. Survival outcomes were compared after propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Analysis of 11 856 patients (5928 in each group) showed that PET-CT staging was associated with improved survival (adjusted HR of all-cause mortality: 0.74, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.79). Other prognostic factors included male sex, age group, clinical stage, adjuvant treatment, smoking status, Charlson Comorbidity Index score and treatment setting.

CONCLUSION

Pre-CCRT staging with PET-CT in patients with unresectable EGFR mutation-positive adenocarcinoma of clinical stage IIIA-IIIC was associated with enhanced survival. Independent prognostic factors were also identified.

Establishment of a prognosis prediction model for lung squamous cell carcinoma related to PET/CT: basing on immunogenic cell death-related lncRNA

BACKGROUND

Immunogenic cell death (ICD) stimulates adaptive immunity and holds significant promise in cancer therapy. Nevertheless, the influence of ICD-associated long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) on the prognosis of patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) remains unexplored.

METHODS

We employed data from the The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)database to identify ICD-related lncRNAs associated with the prognosis of LUSC using univariate Cox regression analysis. Subsequently, we utilized the LOSS regression model to construct a predictive risk model for assessing the prognosis of LUSC patients based on ICD-related lncRNAs. Our study randomly allocated187 TCGA patients into a training group and 184 patients for testing the predictive model. Furthermore, we conducted quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analysis on 43 tumor tissues from LUSC patients to evaluate lncRNA expression levelsPearson correlation analysis was utilized to analyze the correlation of risk scores with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) parameters among LUSC patients.

RESULTS

The findings from the univariate Cox regression revealed 16 ICD-associated lncRNAs linked to LUSC prognosis, with 12 of these lncRNAs integrated into our risk model utilizing the LOSS regression. Survival analysis indicated a markedly higher overall survival time among patients in the low-risk group compared to those in the high-risk group. The area under the Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to differentiate high-risk and low-risk patients was 0.688. Additionally, the overall survival rate was superior in the low-risk group compared to the high-risk group. Correlation analysis demonstrated a positive association between the risk score calculated based on the ICD-lncRNA risk model and the maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) (r = 0.427, P = 0.0043) as well as metabolic volume (MTV)of PET-CT (r = 0.360, P = 0.0177) in 43 LUSC patients.

CONCLUSION

We have successfully developed a risk model founded on ICD-related lncRNAs that proves effective in predicting the overall survival of LUSC patients.