(99m)Tc-pertechnetate scintigraphy and endoscopy in assessment of caustic-induced gastric mucosal injury

Gastric Accommodation Testing Using Hybrid Nuclear Imaging Volumetry and Combined High-Resolution Manometry-Nutrient Drink Test: A Pilot Study in Healthy Individuals

BACKGROUND

Gastric accommodation (GA) testing is gaining clinical recognition as novel and minimally invasive modalities emerge. We investigated the feasibility of hybrid nuclear imaging volumetry (SPECT/CT) and combined high-resolution manometry-nutrient drink test (HRM-NDT) to assess GA.

METHODS

In this non-randomized pilot study, [99mTc]NaTcO4 gastric SPECT/CT (250 mL protocol) and proximal gastric HRM-NDT (~60 mL/min protocol) were performed separately within 30 days using Ensure Gold test meal (1.05 kcal/mL; Abbott). GA parameters were measured, and their preliminary associations were examined using Spearman's ρ and Hoeffding's D correlation tests. Data were presented as median ± normalized median absolute deviation.

KEY RESULTS

Twenty healthy, asymptomatic individuals (11 females; 23.5 ± 2.2 years, 23.7 ± 2.2 kg/m2) completed both procedures without serious adverse events and interrupted sessions. The accommodation volume and postprandial-to-fasting volume ratio from SPECT/CT were 325.8 ± 28.5 mL and 5.31 ± 1.28, respectively. During HRM-NDT, the nadir-intragastric pressure (IGP) was -6.6 ± 3.6 mmHg at an ingested volume of 360.0 ± 177.9 mL, and the area-under-curve of IGP was -1566.0 ± 1596.8 mmHg·mL. The maximum tolerated volume for reaching satiety/maximum discomfort was 450.0 ± 177.9 mL, and the area-under-curve of satiation score was 900.0 ± 266.9 satiation-unit·mL. The area-under-curve of IGP showed significant associations with maximum tolerated volume (ρ: -0.702; D: 0.234) and the area-under-curve of satiation score (D: 0.119): all p < 0.01. No correlations were found between volumetric with manometric and subjective NDT GA parameters.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

SPECT/CT and HRM-NDT are feasible and tolerable techniques for measuring GA in healthy individuals. Thus, determining their diagnostic utility among patient populations requires further optimization and standardization.