The State-of-the-Art of Interventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Part 1

Selective MR neurography-guided lumbosacral plexus perineural injections: techniques, targets, and territories

The T12 to S4 spinal nerves form the lumbosacral plexus in the retroperitoneum, providing sensory and motor innervation to the pelvis and lower extremities. The lumbosacral plexus has a wide range of anatomic variations and interchange of fibers between nerve anastomoses. Neuropathies of the lumbosacral plexus cause a broad spectrum of complex pelvic and lower extremity pain syndromes, which can be challenging to diagnose and treat successfully. In their workup, selective nerve blocks are employed to test the hypothesis that a lumbosacral plexus nerve contributes to a suspected pelvic and extremity pain syndrome, whereas therapeutic perineural injections aim to alleviate pain and paresthesia symptoms. While the sciatic and femoral nerves are large in caliber, the iliohypogastric and ilioinguinal, genitofemoral, lateral femoral cutaneous, anterior femoral cutaneous, posterior femoral cutaneous, obturator, and pudendal nerves are small, measuring a few millimeters in diameter and have a wide range of anatomic variants. Due to their minuteness, direct visualization of the smaller lumbosacral plexus branches can be difficult during selective nerve blocks, particularly in deeper pelvic locations or larger patients. In this setting, the high spatial and contrast resolution of interventional MR neurography guidance benefits nerve visualization and targeting, needle placement, and visualization of perineural injectant distribution, providing a highly accurate alternative to more commonly used ultrasonography, fluoroscopy, and computed tomography guidance for perineural injections. This article offers a practical guide for MR neurography-guided lumbosacral plexus perineural injections, including interventional setup, pulse sequence protocols, lumbosacral plexus MR neurography anatomy, anatomic variations, and injection targets.

MRI-guided sacroiliac joint injections in children and adults: current practice and future developments

Common etiologies of low back pain include degenerative arthrosis and inflammatory arthropathy of the sacroiliac joints. The diagnostic workup revolves around identifying and confirming the sacroiliac joints as a pain generator. Diagnostic sacroiliac joint injections often serve as functional additions to the diagnostic workup through eliciting a pain response that tests the hypothesis that the sacroiliac joints do or do not contribute to the patient's pain syndrome. Therapeutic sacroiliac joint injections aim to provide medium- to long-term relief of symptoms and reduce inflammatory activity and, ultimately, irreversible structural damage. Ultrasonography, fluoroscopy, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be used to guide sacroiliac joint injections. The populations that may benefit most from MRI-guided sacroiliac joint procedures include children, adolescents, adults of childbearing age, and patients receiving serial injections due to the ability of interventional MRI to avoid radiation exposure. Most clinical wide-bore MRI systems can be used for MRI-guided sacroiliac joint injections. Turbo spin echo pulse sequences optimized for interventional needle display visualize the needle tip with an error margin of < 1 mm or less. Published success rates of intra-articular sacroiliac joint drug delivery with MRI guidance range between 87 and 100%. The time required for MR-guided sacroiliac joint injections in adults range between 23-35 min and 40 min in children. In this article, we describe techniques for MRI-guided sacroiliac joint injections, share our practice of incorporating interventional MRI in the care of patients with sacroiliac joint mediated pain, discuss the rationales, benefits, and limitations of interventional MRI, and conclude with future developments.

Passive needle guide tracking with radial acquisition and phase-only cross-correlation

PURPOSE

Acceleration of a passive tracking sequence based on phase-only cross-correlation (POCC) using radial undersampling.

METHODS

The phase-only cross-correlation (POCC) algorithm allows passive tracking of interventional instruments in real-time. In a POCC sequence, two cross-sectional images of a needle guide with a positive MR contrast are continuously acquired from which the instrument trajectory is calculated. Conventional Cartesian imaging for tracking is very time consuming; here, a higher temporal resolution is achieved using a highly undersampled radial acquisition together with a modified POCC algorithm that incorporates the point-spread-function. Targeting and needle insertion is performed in two phantom experiments with 16 fiducial targets, each using 4 and 16 radial projections for passive tracking. Additionally, targeting of eight deep lying basivertebral veins in the lumbar spines is performed for in vivo proof-of-application with four radial projections for needle guide tracking.

RESULTS

The radially undersampled POCC sequence yielded in the phantom experiments a lateral targeting accuracy of 1.1 ± 0.4 mm and 1.0 ± 0.5 mm for 16 and 4 radial projections, respectively, without any statistically significant difference. In the in vivo application, a mean targeting duration of 62 ± 13 s was measured.

CONCLUSION

Radial undersampling can drastically reduce the acquisition time for passive tracking in a POCC sequences for MR-guided needle interventions without compromising the targeting accuracy.

GantryMate: A Modular MR-Compatible Assistance System for MR-Guided Needle Interventions

Percutaneous minimally invasive interventions are difficult to perform in closed-bore high-field magnetic resonance systems owing to the limited space between magnet and patient. To enable magnetic resonance–guided needle interventions, we combine a small, patient-mounted assistance system with a real-time instrument tracking sequence based on a phase-only cross-correlation algorithm for marker detection. The assistance system uses 2 movable plates to align an external passive marker with the anatomical target structure. The targeting accuracy is measured in phantom experiments, yielding a precision of 1.7 ± 1.0 mm for target depths up to 38 ± 13 mm. In in vivo experiments, the possibility to track and target static and moving structures is demonstrated.