1
|
Li L, Jin X, Liu S, Fan H. Prenatal ultrasound findings and prenatal diagnosis of fetal skeletal dysplasia. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND : JCU 2024; 52:575-587. [PMID: 38561934 DOI: 10.1002/jcu.23673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2023] [Revised: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze the value of prenatal ultrasound and molecular testing in diagnosing fetal skeletal dysplasia (SD). METHODS Clinical data, prenatal ultrasound data, and molecular results of pregnant women with fetal SD were collected in the ultrasound department of our clinic from May 2019 to December 2021. RESULTS A total of 40 pregnant women with fetal SD were included, with 82.5% exhibiting short limb deformity, followed by 25.0% with central nervous system malformations, 17.50% with facial malformations, 15% with cardiac malformations, and 12.5% with urinary system malformations. The genetic testing positive rate was 70.0% (28/40), with 92.8% (26/28) being single-gene disorders due to mutations in FGFR3, COL1A1, COL1A2, EVC2, FLNB, LBR, and TRPV4 genes. The most common SD subtypes were osteogenesis imperfecta (OI), thanatophoric dysplasia (TD), and achondroplasia (ACH). The gestational age (GA) at initial diagnosis for TD, OI, and ACH was 16.6, 20.9, and 28.3 weeks, respectively (p < 0.05), with no significant difference in femoral shortening between the three groups (p > 0.05). Of the OI cases, 5 out of 12 had a family history. CONCLUSION Short limb deformity is the most prevalent phenotype of SD. When fetal SD is suspected, detailed ultrasound screening should be conducted, combined with GA at initial diagnosis, family history, and molecular evidence, to facilitate more accurate diagnosis and enhance prenatal counseling and perinatal management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lili Li
- Department of Ultrasound, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Xiaofei Jin
- Department of Ultrasound, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Suna Liu
- Department of Neonatal Disease Screening, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Hui Fan
- Department of Ultrasound, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mufti N, Aertsen M, Thomson D, De Vloo P, Demaerel P, Deprest J, Melbourne A, David AL. Longitudinal MRI in the context of in utero surgery for open spina bifida: A descriptive study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2024; 103:322-333. [PMID: 37984808 PMCID: PMC10823411 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 09/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Fetal surgery for open spina bifida (OSB) requires comprehensive preoperative assessment using imaging for appropriate patient selection and to evaluate postoperative efficacy and complications. We explored patient access and conduct of fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for prenatal assessment of OSB patients eligible for fetal surgery. We compared imaging acquisition and reporting to the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology MRI performance guidelines. MATERIAL AND METHODS We surveyed access to fetal MRI for OSB in referring fetal medicine units (FMUs) in the UK and Ireland, and two NHS England specialist commissioned fetal surgery centers (FSCs) at University College London Hospital, and University Hospitals KU Leuven Belgium. To study MRI acquisition protocols, we retrospectively analyzed fetal MRI images before and after fetal surgery for OSB. RESULTS MRI for fetal OSB was accessible with appropriate specialists available to supervise, perform, and report scans. The average time to arrange a fetal MRI appointment from request was 4 ± 3 days (range, 0-10), the average scan time available was 37 ± 16 min (range, 20-80 min), with 15 ± 11 min (range, 0-30 min) extra time to repeat sequences as required. Specific MRI acquisition protocols, and MRI reporting templates were available in only 32% and 18% of units, respectively. Satisfactory T2-weighted (T2W) brain imaging acquired in three orthogonal planes was achieved preoperatively in all centers, and 6 weeks postoperatively in 96% of FSCs and 78% of referring FMUs. However, for T2W spine image acquisition referring FMUs were less able to provide three orthogonal planes presurgery (98% FSC vs. 50% FMU, p < 0.001), and 6 weeks post-surgery (100% FSC vs. 48% FMU, p < 0.001). Other standard imaging recommendations such as T1-weighted (T1W), gradient echo (GE) or echoplanar fetal brain and spine imaging in one or two orthogonal planes were more likely available in FSCs compared to FMUs pre- and post-surgery (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS There was timely access to supervised MRI for OSB fetal surgery assessment. However, the provision of images of the fetal brain and spine in sufficient orthogonal planes, which are required for determining eligibility and to determine the reversal of hindbrain herniation after fetal surgery, were less frequently acquired. Our evidence suggests the need for specific guidance in relation to fetal MRI for OSB. We propose an example guidance for MRI acquisition and reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nada Mufti
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences (BMEIS)King's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Michael Aertsen
- Department of RadiologyUniversity Hospitals Katholieke Universiteit (KU)LeuvenBelgium
| | - Dominic Thomson
- Pediatric Neurosurgery DepartmentGreat Ormond Street Hospital for ChildrenLondonUK
| | - Phillippe De Vloo
- Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity Hospitals Katholieke Universiteit (KU)LeuvenBelgium
| | - Philippe Demaerel
- Department of RadiologyUniversity Hospitals Katholieke Universiteit (KU)LeuvenBelgium
| | - Jan Deprest
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Hospitals Katholieke Universiteit (KU)LeuvenBelgium
| | - Andrew Melbourne
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences (BMEIS)King's College LondonLondonUK
- Medical Physics and Biomedical EngineeringUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Anna L. David
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Hospitals Katholieke Universiteit (KU)LeuvenBelgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal musculoskeletal system. Pediatr Radiol 2020; 50:2009-2027. [PMID: 33252766 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-020-04769-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Revised: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Diagnosing musculoskeletal pathology requires understanding of the normal embryological development. Intrinsic errors of skeletal development are individually rare but are of paramount clinical importance because anomalies can greatly impact patients' lives. An accurate assessment of the fetal musculoskeletal system must be performed to provide optimal genetic counseling as well as to drive therapeutic management. This manuscript reviews the embryology of skeletal development and the appearance of the maturing musculoskeletal system on fetal MRI. In addition, it presents a comprehensive review of musculoskeletal fetal pathology along with postnatal imaging.
Collapse
|
4
|
Aertsen M, Diogo MC, Dymarkowski S, Deprest J, Prayer D. Fetal MRI for dummies: what the fetal medicine specialist should know about acquisitions and sequences. Prenat Diagn 2020; 40:6-17. [PMID: 31618472 DOI: 10.1002/pd.5579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2019] [Revised: 09/16/2019] [Accepted: 09/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Fetal MRI is an increasingly used tool in the field of prenatal diagnosis. While US remains the first line screening tool, as an adjuvant imaging tool, MRI has been proven to increase diagnostic accuracy and change patient counseling. Further, there are instances when US may not be sufficient for diagnosis. As a multidisciplinary field, it is important that every person involved in the referral, diagnosis, counseling and treatment of the patients is familiar with the basic principles, indications and findings of fetal MRI. The purpose of the current paper is to equip radiologists and non-radiologists with basic MRI principles and essential topics in patient preparation and provide illustrative examples of when fetal MRI may be used. This aims to aid the referring clinician in better selecting and improve patient counseling prior to arrival in the radiology department and, ultimately, patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Aertsen
- Department of Imaging and Pathology, Clinical Department of Radiology, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Mariana C Diogo
- Department of Image Guided Therapy, University Clinic for Neuroradiology and Musculoskeletal Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Steven Dymarkowski
- Department of Imaging and Pathology, Clinical Department of Radiology, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan Deprest
- Academic Department of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Woman and Child, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Daniela Prayer
- Department of Image Guided Therapy, University Clinic for Neuroradiology and Musculoskeletal Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Alrabai HM, Farr A, Bettelheim D, Weber M, Farr S. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital upper limb differences: a current concept review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016; 30:2557-2563. [PMID: 27809626 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1256989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Congenital upper limb differences are frequently associated with complex syndromes. Ultrasonography is considered as the first-line diagnostic modality, and fetal MRI can be useful to further evaluate ill-defined areas. Genetic and non-invasive prenatal testing help to identify the underlying genetic disorder. The diagnostic assessment is a multidisciplinary task that should involve early prenatal consultations with specialists involved in case management and treatment planning. Obstetricians, geneticists, radiologists, psychologists and dedicated surgeons are needed to provide good parental education, prenatal and postnatal care, and successful outcomes. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the clinicopathologic background, current diagnostic and imaging procedures in affected fetuses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamza M Alrabai
- a Department of Orthopaedics , King Saud University , Riyadh , Saudi Arabia
| | - Alex Farr
- b Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology , Division of Obstetrics and Feto-Maternal Medicine, Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria , and
| | - Dieter Bettelheim
- b Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology , Division of Obstetrics and Feto-Maternal Medicine, Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria , and
| | - Myriam Weber
- b Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology , Division of Obstetrics and Feto-Maternal Medicine, Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria , and
| | - Sebastian Farr
- c Department of Pediatric Orthopaedics and Adult Foot and Ankle Surgery , Orthopaedic Hospital Speising , Vienna , Austria
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
D'Ambrosio V, Pasquali G, Squarcella A, Marcoccia E, De Filippis A, Gatto S, Camilla A, Pizzuti A, La Torre R, Giancotti A. Prenatal diagnosis of proximal focal femoral deficiency: Literature review of prenatal sonographic findings. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND : JCU 2016; 44:252-259. [PMID: 26408260 DOI: 10.1002/jcu.22306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2015] [Accepted: 08/16/2015] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
Proximal focal femoral deficiency (PFFD) is a rare musculoskeletal malformation that occurs in 0.11-0.2 per 10,000 live births. This congenital anomaly involves the pelvis and proximal femur with widely variable manifestations, from mild femoral shortening and hypoplasia to the absence of any functional femur and acetabular aplasia. Prenatal diagnosis of PFFD is still a challenge, but early recognition of this malformation could provide useful information to both parents and physicians concerning management and therapeutic planning. For this review, we analyzed all the cases of prenatally diagnosed PFFD that were reported in the literature from 1990 to 2014 and provide a description of the most common prenatal sonographic findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina D'Ambrosio
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Sapienza", Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Gaia Pasquali
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Urologic Sciences, University of Rome "Sapienza", Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonia Squarcella
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Urologic Sciences, University of Rome "Sapienza", Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Eleonora Marcoccia
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Urologic Sciences, University of Rome "Sapienza", Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Angela De Filippis
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Urologic Sciences, University of Rome "Sapienza", Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Gatto
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Urologic Sciences, University of Rome "Sapienza", Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Aliberti Camilla
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Urologic Sciences, University of Rome "Sapienza", Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Pizzuti
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Sapienza", Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Renato La Torre
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Urologic Sciences, University of Rome "Sapienza", Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonella Giancotti
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Urologic Sciences, University of Rome "Sapienza", Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Ultrasonography is a safe, cost-effective tool used to prenatally detect common musculoskeletal conditions, including clubfoot, skeletal dysplasias, limb-length discrepancies, spinal abnormalities, and hand and other upper extremity deformities. With increased detection of such abnormalities, prenatal parental counseling by orthopaedic surgeons is being requested more frequently. Counseling is important for family education on prognosis and treatment options. A thorough understanding of the common musculoskeletal conditions diagnosed on prenatal ultrasonography, classification of these conditions, and the correlations of these classifications to postnatal severity allows the orthopaedic surgeon to conduct well-informed counseling sessions with families. Accurate information and counseling aids parents in understanding their child's diagnosis, assists clinicians in planning treatment algorithms, and optimizes family preparedness.
Collapse
|