Comprehensive Computed Tomography Imaging of Vessel-specific and Lesion-specific Myocardial Ischemia

Bodyweight-adjusted Contrast Media With Shortened Injection Duration for Step-and-Shoot Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography to Acquire Improved Image Quality

PURPOSE

Shortened injection durations are not recommended in step-and-shoot coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). We aimed to evaluate the image quality of CCTA performed using bodyweight-adjusted iodinated contrast media (ICM) with different injection durations to generate an optimized ICM administration protocol to acquire convincible image quality in step-and-shoot CCTA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 200 consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) were enrolled in group A (N=50, 350 mgI/mL, bodyweight×0.8 mL/kg with a 13-s injection duration), group B (N=50, 350 mgI/mL, bodyweight×0.9 mL/kg with a 13-s injection duration), group C (N=50, 350 mgI/mL, bodyweight×0.8 mL/kg with a 12-s injection duration), and group D (N=50, 320 mgI/mL, bodyweight×0.8 mL/kg with a 13-s injection duration). Patient characteristics, ICM administration protocols, quantitative computed tomography (CT) value measurements, and qualitative image scores were analyzed and compared among the groups.

RESULTS

Groups A and D achieved the lowest ICM volume, saline volume, injection flow rate, and total iodine and iodine injection rates among the groups. All the CT values of the coronary arteries in all groups were >300 HU. All the observers' average scores exceeded three points. In group A, the CT values showed significant positive correlation with the iodine injection rate ( r =0.226, P <0.001), whereas the signal-to-noise ratio ( r =-0.004, P =0.927) and contrast-to-noise ratio ( r =-0.006, P =0.893) values were not.

CONCLUSIONS

Bodyweight×0.8 mL/kg with a 13-second injection duration is a comprehensive option for step-and-shoot CCTA with improved image quality, and a 350 mgI/mL iodine concentration is preferred.

FFR CT and Static Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging for Therapeutic Decision-making and Prognosis in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of integrated evaluation of resting static computed tomography perfusion (CTP) and coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR CT ) on therapeutic decision-making and predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this post hoc analysis of a prospective trial of CCTA in patients assigned to either CCTA or CCTA plus FFR CT arms, 500 patients in the CCTA plus FFR CT arm were analyzed. Both resting static CTP and FFR CT were evaluated by using the conventional CCTA. Perfusion defects in the myocardial segments with ≥50% degree of stenosis in the supplying vessels were defined as resting static CTP positive, and any vessel with an FFR CT value of ≤0.80 was considered positive. Patients were divided into 3 groups: (1) negative CTP-FFR CT match group (resting static CTP-negative and FFR CT -negative group); (2) mismatch CTP-FFR CT group (resting static CTP-positive and FFR CT -negative or resting static CTP-negative and FFR CT -positive group); and (3) positive CTP-FFR CT match group (resting static CTP-positive and FFR CT -positive group). We compared the revascularization-to-invasive coronary angiography ratio and the MACE rate among 3 subgroups at 1- and 3-year follow-ups. The adjusted Cox hazard proportional model was used to assess the prognostic value of FFR CT and resting static CTP to determine patients at risk of MACE.

RESULTS

Patients in the positive CTP-FFR CT match group were more likely to undergo revascularization at the time of invasive coronary angiography compared with those in the mismatch CTP-FFR CT group (81.4% vs 57.7%, P =0.033) and the negative CTP-FFR CT match group (81.4% vs 33.3%, P= 0.001). At 1- and 3-year follow-ups, patients in the positive CTP-FFR CT match group were more likely to have MACE than those in the mismatch CTP-FFR CT group (10.5% vs 4.2%, P= 0.046; 35.6% vs 9.4%, P <0.001) and the negative CTP-FFR CT match group (10.5% vs 0.9%, P <0.001; 35.6% vs 5.4%, P <0.001). A positive CTP-FFR CT match was strongly related to MACE at 1-year (hazard ratio=8.06, P= 0.003) and 3-year (hazard ratio=6.23, P <0.001) follow-ups.

CONCLUSION

In patients with suspected coronary artery disease, the combination of FFR CT with resting static CTP could guide therapeutic decisions and have a better prognosis with fewer MACE in a real-world scenario.

Optimal Measurement Sites of Coronary-Computed Tomography Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve: The Insight From China CT-FFR Study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the optimal measurement site of coronary-computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR CT ) for the assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD) in the whole clinical routine practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study included 396 CAD patients who underwent coronary-computed tomography angiography, FFR CT , and invasive FFR. FFR CT was measured at 1 cm (FFR CT -1 cm), 2 cm (FFR CT -2 cm), 3 cm (FFR CT -3 cm), and 4 cm (FFR CT -4 cm) distal to coronary stenosis, respectively. FFR CT and invasive FFR ≤0.80 were defined as lesion-specific ischemia. The diagnostic performance of FFR CT to detect ischemia was obtained using invasive FFR as the reference standard. Reduced invasive coronary angiography rate and revascularization efficiency were calculated. After a median follow-up of 35 months in 267 patients for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), Cox hazard proportional models were performed with FFR CT values at each measurement site.

RESULTS

For discriminating lesion-specific ischemia, the areas under the curve of FFR CT -1 cm (0.91) as well as FFR CT -2 cm (0.91) were higher than those of FFR CT -3 cm (0.89) and FFR CT -4 cm (0.88), respectively (all P <0.05). The higher reduced invasive coronary angiography rate (81.6%) was found at FFR CT -1 cm than FFR CT -2 cm (81.6% vs. 62.6%, P <0.05). Revascularization efficiency did not differ between FFR CT -1 cm and FFR CT -2 cm (80.8% vs. 65.5%, P =0.019). In 12.4% (33/267) MACE occurred and only values of FFR CT -2 cm were independently predictive of MACE (hazard ratio: 0.957 [95% CI: 0.925-0.989]; P =0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates FFR CT -2 cm is the optimal measurement site with superior diagnostic performance and independent prognostic role.

Technical Considerations for Dynamic Myocardial Computed Tomography Perfusion as Part of a Comprehensive Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease Using Computed Tomography

Dynamic myocardial computed tomography perfusion (DM-CTP) has good diagnostic accuracy for identifying myocardial ischemia as compared with both invasive and noninvasive reference standards. However, DM-CTP has not yet been implemented in the routine clinical examination of patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease. An important hurdle in the clinical dissemination of the method is the development of the DM-CTP acquisition protocol and image analysis. Therefore, the aim of this article is to provide a review of critical parameters in the design and execution of DM-CTP to optimize each step of the examination and avoid common mistakes. We aim to support potential users in the successful implementation and performance of DM-CTP in daily practice. When performed appropriately, DM-CTP may support clinical decision making. In addition, when combined with coronary computed tomography angiography, it has the potential to shorten the time to diagnosis by providing immediate visualization of both coronary atherosclerosis and its functional relevance using one single modality.

Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve: An Expert Consensus Document of Chinese Society of Radiology

Invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) measured by a pressure wire is a reference standard for evaluating functional stenosis in coronary artery disease. Coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) uses advanced computational analysis methods to noninvasively obtain FFR results from a single conventional coronary computed tomography angiography data to evaluate the hemodynamic significance of coronary artery disease. More and more evidence has found good correlation between the results of noninvasive CT-FFR and invasive FFR. CT-FFR has proven its potential in optimizing patient management, improving risk stratification and prognosis, and reducing total health care costs. However, there is still a lack of standardized interpretation of CT-FFR technology in real-world clinical settings. This expert consensus introduces the principle, workflow, and interpretation of CT-FFR; summarizes the state-of-the-art application of CT-FFR; and provides suggestions and recommendations for the application of CT-FFR with the aim of promoting the standardized application of CT-FFR in clinical practice.

Comparison of Triple-Rule-Out Prospectively ECG-triggered Systolic and Diastolic Acquisition Protocol in Patients With Acute Chest Pain

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare image quality and coronary interpretability of triple-rule-out systolic and diastolic protocols in patients with acute chest pain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From March 2016 to October 2017 the authors prospectively enrolled patients with undifferentiated acute chest pain, who were at low to intermediate cardiovascular risk. Those with heart rate >75 bpm underwent a systolic prospectively triggered acquisition (systolic triggering [ST]), and in those with ≤75 bpm, end-diastolic triggering (DT) was instead performed. Examinations were evaluated for coronary artery disease, aortic dissection, and pulmonary embolism. Image quality was assessed using a Likert scale. Coronary arteries interpretability was evaluated both on a per-vessel and a per segment basis. The occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events was investigated.

RESULTS

The final study population was 189 patients. Fifty-two patients (27.5%) underwent systolic acquisition and 137 (72.5%) underwent diastolic acquisition. No significant differences in overall image quality were observed between DT and ST groups (median score 5 [interquartile ranges 4 to 5] vs. 4 [interquartile ranges 4 to 5], P =0.074). Although both DT and ST protocols showed low percentages of noninterpretable coronary arteries on a per-vessel (1.5% and 6.7%, respectively) and per-segment analysis (1% and 4.7%, respectively), these percentages resulted significantly higher for ST groups ( P <0.001). Obstructive coronary stenosis was observed in 18 patients. Only one case of pulmonary embolism was diagnosed and no cases of aortic dissection were found in our population. No death or major adverse cardiovascular events were observed during follow-up among the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Results showed that triple-rule-out computed tomography angiography is a reliable technique in patients with acute chest pain and that an ST acquisition protocol could be considered an alternative acquisition protocol in patients with higher heart rate, reaching a good image quality.