Developing Strategies for Targeted Improvement of Perioperative Education for Postbariatric Surgery Body-Contouring Patients

Online patient education in body contouring: A comparison between Google and ChatGPT

Appropriate patient education and preparation prior to surgery represent a fundamental step in managing expectations, avoiding unnecessary encounters and eventually achieving optimal outcomes. Thus, the objective of this study is to evaluate ChatGPT's potential as a viable source for patient education by comparing its responses and provided references to frequently asked questions on body contouring, with Google's. A Google search was conducted on July 15th, 2023, using the search term "body contouring surgery". The first 15 questions under the "People also ask" section and answers provided by Google were recorded. The 15 questions were then asked to ChatGPT-3.5. Four plastic surgeons evaluated the answers from 1 to 5 according to the Global Quality Scale. The mean score for responses given by Google was 2.55 ± 1.29, indicating poor quality but some information present, of very limited use to patients. The mean score for responses produced by ChatGPT was 4.38 ± 0.67, suggesting that the content was of good quality, useful to patients, and encompassed the most important topics. The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.001). Deficiencies in providing references represent one of the most evident weaknesses of ChatGPT. However, ChatGPT did not appear to spread misinformation, and the content of the generated responses was deemed of good quality and useful to patients. The integration of AI technology as a source for patient education has the potential to optimize patient queries on body contouring questions.

Improving Perioperative Preparation for Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment for Distal Radius Fractures

We aimed to review common patient concerns after surgical repair of distal radius fracture (DRF) to identify potential interventions to improve the gap between expectation and education for DRF patients.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 100 consecutive patients who underwent surgical repair of DRF at a level I trauma center. Patient-initiated communication notes were reviewed with thematic analysis to identify the common reasons patients required additional information. We used the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool to score the available educational resources for DRF patients for the understandability and actionability of the educational materials provided to the patients.

Results

Of 165 patient communication episodes, 88.5% occurred postoperatively. The most common concerns were pain (30, 15.4%) and surgical site changes (24, 12.3%). Most communications (171, 83.4%) were resolved with patient education through instruction or reassurance. The reviewed materials did not address pain or surgical site changes. No reviewed materials provided actionable steps patients could take to facilitate recovery.

Conclusions

Pain management and normal wound healing were the most common surgical concerns of DRF patients. We identify opportunities to improve expectation-setting in online materials and during face-to-face education to create a more patient-centered perioperative experience.

Health Literacy in Plastic Surgery: A Scoping Review

Health literacy of plastic surgery patients may affect surgical decision-making and perioperative outcomes. In addition to consulting a plastic surgeon, patients often refer to online-based resources to learn about surgical options. The aim of this scoping review was to identify evidence detailing the state of health literacy of plastic surgery patients and available resources to highlight areas of improvement for clinical practice and future research.

Methods

Utilizing PubMed and Web of Science databases, 46 eligible studies that analyzed health literacy in plastic surgery patients and readability of plastic surgery resources were included. Extracted characteristics from eligible studies included study size, type of analysis, findings, and conclusions.

Results

Regardless of plastic surgery procedure or subspecialty, resources presenting plastic surgery information to patients exceeded the American Medical Association and National Institutes of Health recommended sixth- to eighth-grade reading level. Plastic surgery patients demonstrated greater knowledge of preoperative indications and surgical benefits compared with postoperative outcomes and surgical risks.

Conclusions

Most health literacy research in plastic surgery focuses on readability of written internet-based resources as opposed to direct assessment of health literacy in plastic surgery patients. Plastic surgery resources exceed the recommended mean reading grade level. Dedicated efforts to recognize and accommodate a patient's level of health literacy in plastic surgery should be considered.