Significant Reduction in Length of Stay in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction With Implementation of Multimodal ERAS Protocol

[Prophylactic breast surgery: The role of DIEP (Deep Inferior Epigastric)]

In France, breast cancer is the most common cancer among women, with 5 to 10% of cases being genetic. Frequently involved genes include BRCA1 and BRCA2, PALB2, TP53, CDH1, and PTEN, among others. Approximately, two in 1000 women carry a BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation. The National Cancer Institute (INCa) provides guidelines for screening and risk-reduction treatments. Prophylactic surgery, including bilateral mastectomy, is a preventive option for high-risk women. Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR), particularly using the DIEP flap technique, helps mitigate the psychological impact of mastectomy, and is part of the gold standard to be offered to patients. This technique uses excess of skin and fat from the lower abdomen and requires micro-surgical skills. Despite logistical challenges, this method is favored for its durability and natural outcome. INCa and other organizations are working to improve access and information for these treatments.

Quality of plastic surgery Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) studies: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

In effort to improve post-operative outcomes, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have gained popularity. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the reporting and methodological quality of plastic surgery ERAS studies.

METHODS

All plastic surgery ERAS implementation studies, published between January 1, 2020, to November 20, 2023, were included. The primary outcome was reporting quality based on "The Reporting on ERAS Compliance, Outcomes, and Elements Research (RECOvER) checklist" (40 points). Secondary outcomes included methodology quality as per ERAS® Society endorsed guidelines (Breast 18 points; Head and Neck (H&N) 24 points).

RESULTS

Fifty ERAS studies were included (breast reconstruction: 29, 58%; head and neck: 7, 14%; craniofacial: 6, 12%; aesthetic: 5, 10%; other: 3, 6%). Average reporting quality was 22.6/40 (56.7%). ERAS protocol elements least adhered to included: patient warming strategy (8/50, 16%), management of post-operative fluids (14/50, 28%), and post-discharge outcome tracking (14/50, 28%). Evaluation of breast methodological quality revealed average compliance of 9.2/18 (51.3%). The least complied with elements included preoperative computed tomography angiography (4/23, 17.4%), intraoperative warming (6/23, 26.1%), and post-operative wound management (2/23, 8.7%). For head and neck studies, average compliance was 9.1/23 (39.6%). The least complied with elements included pre-anesthesia pain medications (1/7, 14.3%), post-operative wound care (0/7, 0%), and urinary catheterization removal (1/7, 14.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

ERAS implementation studies in plastic surgery are highly variable, with overall low reporting and methodology quality. Plastic surgeons should be cautious when adopting published ERAS protocols that do not adhere to the recommended and official ERAS® Society guidelines.

Effect of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in Morbidly Obese Patients Undergoing Free Flap Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

 Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have been widely implemented across many surgical practices, including autologous breast reconstruction. However, the benefits of ERAS in the morbidly obese population have yet to be defined.

METHODS

 A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction at our institution from 2017 to 2022 was performed. Length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) utilization, opioid usage, cost, and flap outcomes were analyzed in patients with body mass index greater than 35 before and after ERAS implementation.

RESULTS

 Thirty-five morbidly obese patients receiving DIEP flap breast reconstruction were identified before ERAS and 18 after ERAS. There were no differences in unilateral versus bilateral or immediate versus delayed reconstruction. LOS decreased with ERAS (3.43 vs. 2.06 days, p < 0.0000001). ICU utilization decreased with ERAS (0.94 vs. 0.0 days, p < 0.0001). Daily and total opioid usage decreased with ERAS (41.8 vs. 17.9 morphine milligram equivalent [MME], p < 0.0001; 190.5 vs. 54.7 MME, p < 0.0001). Financial metrics improved with ERAS, including decreased total cost ($33,454 vs. $25,079, p = 0.0002) and increased cost margin ($4,458 vs. -$8,306, p = 0.004). There were no differences in donor or recipient site outcomes including flap loss, deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, hernia/bulge, delayed wound healing, revisions, and blood loss.

CONCLUSION

 ERAS pathways maintain benefits in the morbidly obese population undergoing abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction, including decreased LOS, ICU utilization, opioid use, and cost while maintaining successful reconstruction outcomes.

Meta analysis of 2059 patients assessing early discharge after DIEP flap breast reconstruction: Comprehensive outcomes before post-operative day 5

Autologous reconstruction with DIEP flap has illustrated greater patient satisfaction with both aesthetic satisfaction and reconstructive treatment process when compared to implant-based reconstruction longitudinally. However, DIEP flap breast reconstruction is associated with longer in-patient hospitalizations to monitor flap status. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to report outcomes regarding the use of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols, particularly looking at the impact on complication rates in patients who undergo DIEP flap procedures and are discharged within 5 days after surgery. A computerized search was conducted on September 29th, 2023 using the MeSH terms "Free Tissue Flaps" OR "Myocutaneous Flap" OR "Surgical Flaps" AND "Patient Discharge". Twenty-four papers reporting on 2059 patients were included in the study, and four study groups were created by length of stay as follows: LOS 1-1.99 days = Group 1, LOS 2-2.99 days = Group 2, LOS 3-3.99 = Group 3, and LOS 4-5 days = Group 4 (control). An independent samples t-test was performed to compare the mean rates of each complication between Groups 1 and 4, Groups 2 and 4, and Groups 3 and 4. This meta-analysis showed no significant differences between rates of hematoma, seroma, infection and reoperation between groups. There was a significantly lower rate of total flap loss in all 3 groups with LOS less than 4 days when compared to the group with LOS between 4 and 5 days. This meta-analysis shows that appropriate patients may be discharged safely as early as POD1 following DIEP flap.

Multiple intramuscular ropivacaine injections to donor sites reduces pain in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Local anesthetic infiltration at the surgical site has been studied in various surgical disciplines; however, its impact on deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction has not been previously assessed. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of multiple intramuscular ropivacaine injections on donor site pain during DIEP flap breast reconstruction.

METHODS

The study included 65 patients who received local ropivacaine injections during DIEP reconstructions between March 2022 and February 2023, compared to 55 patients who underwent surgeries without ropivacaine from October 2018 to July 2020. A total of 20 cc of 0.75% ropivacaine solution was evenly administered at 20 sites along the abdominal wall muscles. The effect of intramuscular ropivacaine injection on postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) was evaluated using linear mixed-effect model. Opioid consumption and hospital days were also compared.

RESULTS

The daily median VAS score was lower in the ropivacaine group (all p-values < 0.001). When analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model, those who received ropivacaine had significantly lower VAS scores over the first 5 days postoperatively (p-value < 0.001). The rate of VAS score decline was also faster in the ropivacaine group over the first 24 h postoperative (p-value = 0.045). Although opioid consumption was comparable between the groups, those receiving ropivacaine had significantly shorter hospital stay (p-value = 0.001) and no complications related to the injections were observed.

CONCLUSION

Multiple intramuscular injections of ropivacaine to the donor site may reduce postoperative pain and shorten hospital stays, without increasing opioid consumption.

Pedicle stabilization with fibrin sealant in DIEP flap breast reconstruction

Microsurgical procedures are nowadays routinely performed worldwide in reconstructive surgery. The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap has become the gold standard in breast reconstruction due to its excellent outcomes and lower donor site morbidity. However, complications, including flap failure, still occur in DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Often, according to our experience, these complications result from pedicle disorders, which can be attributed to postoperative mobilization. In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of using a fibrin sealant as a method for pedicle stabilization to prevent pedicle mobilization in the postoperative period. With our technique, after the flap insetting and microsurgical anastomosis, the pedicle was stabilized by applying a fibrin sealant (TISSEEL™) around and over the entire pedicle. Our study included a homogeneous series of 70 patients who received a delayed DIEP flap breast reconstruction. A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate this novel technique compared to the conventional method. In our experience, the fibrin glue allowed us to reduce the strain for correct pedicle positioning and all subsequent efforts to avoid displacements in the postoperative period. Our preliminary results suggest that this method may lead to a reduction in overall complications attributable to pedicle disorders.

Patient and Provider Experiences With a Digital App to Improve Compliance With Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols: Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Canadian Experience

BACKGROUND

Of all the care provided in health care systems, major surgical interventions are the costliest and can carry significant risks. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a bundle of interventions that help improve patient outcomes and experience along their surgical journey. However, given that patients can be overwhelmed by the multiple tasks that they are expected to follow, a digital application, the ERAS app, was developed to help improve the implementation of ERAS.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this work was to conduct a thorough assessment of patient and provider experiences using the ERAS app.

METHODS

Patients undergoing colorectal or gynecological oncology surgery at 2 different hospitals in the province of Alberta, Canada, were invited to use the ERAS app and report on their experiences using it. Likewise, care providers were recruited to participate in this study to provide feedback on the performance of this app. Data were collected by an online survey and using qualitative interviews with participants. NVivo was used to analyze qualitative interview data, while quantitative data were analyzed using Excel and SPSS.

RESULTS

Overall, patients found the app to be helpful in preparation for and recovery after surgery. Patients reported having access to reliable unbiased information regarding their surgery, and the app provided them with clarity of actions needed along their surgical journey and enhanced the self-management of their care. Clinicians found that the ERAS app was easy to navigate, was simple for older adults, and has the potential to decrease unnecessary visits and phone calls to care providers. Overall, this proof-of-concept study on the use of a digital health app to accompany patients during their health care journey has shown positive results.

CONCLUSIONS

This is an important finding considering the massive investment and interest in promoting digital health in health care systems around the world.

Enhanced recovery after surgery pathways for deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) surgery is one of the most difficult breast reconstruction techniques available, both in terms of operating complexity and patient recovery. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways were recently introduced in numerous subspecialties to reduce recovery time, patient pain, and cost by providing multimodal perioperative care. Plastic surgery has yet to widely integrate ERAS with DIEP reconstruction, mostly due to insufficient data on patient outcomes with this combined approach.

METHODS

Five major medical databases were queried using predetermined search criteria according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. Statistical analysis was performed using Cochrane's RevMan (v5.4).

RESULTS

A total of 466 articles were identified. A total of 14 studies were included in the review with a combined sample of 2102 patients. Eight studies were included in the meta-analysis with a combined sample of 1679 patients. On average, the included studies utilized 11.69 of 18 suggested protocols for ERAS with breast reconstruction. Our primary outcome, length of stay, was reduced by a mean of 1.12 (95% confidence interval [CI] [-1.30, -0.94], n = 1627, p < 0.001) days in the ERAS group. Postoperative oral morphine equivalents (OME) were also reduced in the ERAS group by 104.02 (95% CI [-181.43, -26.61], n = 545, p = 0.008) OME. The ERAS group saw a significant 3.54 (95% CI [-4.43, -2.65], n = 527, p < 0.001) standardized mean difference cost reduction relative to the control groups. The surgery time was reduced by 60.46 (95% CI [-125, 4.29], n = 624, p < 0.07) min, although this was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The ERAS pathway in DIEP breast reconstruction is consistently associated with reduced hospital stay, opioid use, and patient cost. Moreover, there appears to be no evidence of serious adverse outcomes associated with the application of the ERAS protocol.

Survey of Surgeon-reported Postoperative Protocols for Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap in Breast Reconstruction

Background

The use of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps is a well-established breast reconstruction technique.

Methods

A 29-question survey was e-mailed to 3186 active American Society of Plastic Surgeons members, aiming to describe postoperative monitoring practice patterns among surgeons performing DIEP flaps.

Results

From 255 responses (8%), 79% performing DIEP surgery were analyzed. Among them, 34.8% practiced for more than 20 years, 34.3% for 10-20 years, and 30.9% for less than 10 years. Initial 24-hour post-DIEP monitoring: intensive care unit (39%) and floor (36%). Flap monitoring: external Doppler (71%), tissue oximetry (41%), and implantable Doppler (32%). Postoperative analgesia: acetaminophen (74%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (69%), neuromodulators (52%), and opioids (4.4%) were administered on a scheduled basis. On postoperative day 1, 61% halt intravenous fluids, 67% allow ambulation, 70% remove Foley catheter, and 71% start diet. Most surgeons discharged patients from the hospital on postoperative day 3+. Regardless of experience, patients were commonly discharged on day 3. Half of the surgeons are in academic/nonacademic settings and discharge on/after day 3.

Conclusions

This study reveals significant heterogeneity among the practice patterns of DIEP surgeons. In light of these findings, it is recommended that a task force be convened to establish standardized monitoring protocols for DIEP flaps. Such protocols have the potential to reduce both the length of hospital stays and overall care costs all while ensuring optimal pain management and vigilant flap monitoring.