Abdominal Contouring in Super Obese Patients: A Single-Surgeon Review of 22 Cases

Abdominal Panniculectomy Can Simplify Kidney Transplantation in Obese Patients

BACKGROUND

Obesity is frequently present in patients suffering from end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, overweight kidney transplant candidates are a challenge for the transplant surgeon. Obese patients tend to develop a large abdominal panniculus after weight loss creating an area predisposed to wound-healing disorders. Due to concerns about graft survival and postoperative complications after kidney transplantation, obese patients are often refused in this selective patient cohort. The study aimed to analyze the effect of panniculectomies on postoperative complications and transplant candidacy in an interdisciplinary setting.

METHODS

A retrospective database review of 10 cases of abdominal panniculectomies performed in patients with ESRD prior to kidney transplantation was conducted.

RESULTS

The median body mass index was 35.2 kg/m2 (range 28.5-53.0 kg/m2) at first transplant-assessment versus 31.0 kg/m2 (range 28.0-34.4 kg/m2) at panniculectomy, and 31.6 kg/m2 (range 30.3-32.4 kg/m2) at kidney transplantation. We observed no major postoperative complications following panniculectomy and minor wound-healing complications in 2 patients. All aside from 1 patient became active transplant candidates 6 weeks after panniculectomy. No posttransplant wound complications occurred in the transplanted patients.

CONCLUSION

Abdominal panniculectomy is feasible in patients suffering ESRD with no major postoperative complications, thus converting previously ineligible patients into kidney transplant candidates. An interdisciplinary approach is advisable in this selective patient cohort.

Operating on the Edge? Body Contouring Procedures in Patients with Body Mass Index Greater 35

BACKGROUND

Body contouring surgery after massive weight loss was shown to ameliorate the patient's quality of life and to enhance physical and psychological well-being. However, numerous patients are still obese when presenting for body contouring surgery, not able to lose additional weight for various reasons. Data regarding general feasibility, outcome, and postoperative complications in obese patients is rare. The aim of this study was to investigate the outcome in body contouring procedures in obese patients.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 65 cases in 42 patients was performed. Patients with a body mass index (BMI) > 35 kg/m² at the time of operation were enrolled and all different types of body contouring surgery were included. Complications were classified as major (need for surgical intervention) and minor complications.

RESULTS

The median BMI of all patients was 38 kg/m² (range 35.1-65.1 kg/m²). The majority of performed types of body contouring was abdominal body contouring (panniculectomy n = 27 (42%), abdominoplasty n = 12 (18%)). Complications occurred in 27 cases (41.5%). Twenty-one cases (32.3%) were classified as minor complications, six (9.2%) as major complications. The most common major complications were hematoma and wound dehiscence; the most common minor complication was seroma.

CONCLUSION

A reasonable risk for complications is well known in body contouring surgery especially in obese patients. It is imperative to discuss related risks and expected results. Taking several points into account concerning the perioperative management, reduction of major complications is possible even in still obese patients, making body contouring surgery a discussible option.

Safety and Utility of the Drainless Abdominoplasty in the Post-Bariatric Surgery Patient

INTRODUCTION

Surgical drains are used in abdominoplasty patients to combat wound closure disruption by hematoma or seroma formation. Several recent publications have described techniques that allow abdominoplasty to be performed safely without the need for surgical drains. This has not, however, been described in the case of the bariatric patient, who is often considered to be of higher postoperative complication risk. Here, we describe our experience of the drainless abdominoplasty in patients who have undergone massive weight loss (MWL) after a bariatric procedure.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of 172 patients who had undergone drainless abdominoplasty using the progressive tension suture technique from 2011 to 2014. Thirty-five patients who had undergone MWL after bariatric surgery were assigned to group A. One hundred thirty-seven patients who had not undergone MWL with no history of bariatric surgery were assigned to group B. Demographics, intraoperative outcomes, and postoperative outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Patients in group A were older (mean age, 48.7 vs 42.7 years; P = 0.003) and had a higher body mass index (26.6 vs 24.6 kg/m, P = 0.01), a significantly larger tissue resection (2379 vs 1228 g, P = 0.0001), and a higher estimated blood loss (100 vs 120 mL, P = 0.049). There was also a significant group-to-group difference in the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification distribution, with a higher percentage of MWL patients having higher scores. Despite these differences, group A did not have a statistically higher incidence of complications. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of seroma formation (11% vs 2%, P = 0.055), wound infection (2.9% vs 4.4%, P = 0.68), wound dehiscence (8.6% vs 8.0%, P = 0.91), meralgia paresthetica (2.8% vs 1.5%, P = 0.51), or rate of reoperation (11.4% vs 13.9%, P = 0.7) between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Despite post-bariatric surgery patients being considered higher risk for postoperative complications, drainless abdominoplasty can be safely offered to this population by using a progressive tension suture technique.