The Sural Compendium: Reconstruction of Complex Soft-Tissue Defects of Leg and Foot by Utilizing the Posterior Calf Tissue

Distally based peroneal artery perforator-plus fasciocutaneous flap in the reconstruction of soft tissue defects over the distal forefoot: a retrospectively analyzed clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Distally based peroneal artery perforator-plus fasciocutaneous (DPAPF) flaps are widely used for reconstructing soft-tissue defects of the lower extremity. However, reports on the reconstruction of the defects over the distal forefoot using the DPAPF flaps are scarce. Herein, we describe our experience on the reconstruction of these defects using DPAPF flaps in a considerable sample size.

METHODS

Between February 2005 and August 2019, a total of 56 DPAPF flaps in 56 patients were used to reconstruct soft-tissue defects in the forefoot. In order to reduce the length of fascial pedicle and the total length of the DPAPF flaps, the ankles were fixed in dorsiflexion using a Kirschner wire before designing the flaps. The flaps were elevated by the anterograde-retrograde approach. Patient factors and flap factors were compared between the "survival" and "partial necrosis" groups.

RESULTS

Overall, 47 flaps had survived completely in one stage. Partial necrosis developed in nine flaps, with only one remnant defect covered using a local flap. By fixing the ankles in dorsiflexion, the length of the fascial pedicle was reduced approximately 2.35 ± 0.58 cm, the total length of the flap was simultaneously shortened by the same amount as the length of the fascial pedicle. The width of the fascia pedicle varied from 3.0 cm to 6.0 cm. The fascial pedicle width > 4 cm was found in 21 flaps. The partial necrosis rate of the DPAPF flaps with the top edge located in the 8th zone was significantly lower than that in the 9th zone (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The DPAPF flaps can be effectively used to reconstruct the defects over the distal forefoot because of convenient harvest and reliability. By fixing the ankle in dorsiflexion with Kirschner wire and widening the fascial pedicle appropriately, the top edge and LWR of the flaps will be decreased, and thus the procedures are helpful for the flaps survival.

Early Reconstruction of Distal Leg and Foot in Acute High-Voltage Electrical Burn: Does Location of Pedicle in the Zone of Injury Affect the Outcome of Distally Based Sural Flap?

BACKGROUND

Distally based fasciocutaneous sural flap is popular in the reconstruction of distal leg and foot burns. However, utilization of this technique in high-voltage electrical injury has been challenging.

AIMS

The present study aimed to compare the outcome of early aggressive debridement and coverage of contact point of acute high-voltage electrical injury using distally based fasciocutaneous sural flap between high-risk and low-risk patients defined by the anatomic proximity of the flap pedicle to the zone of injury.

METHODS

A total of 51 patients with contact point of high-voltage electrical burn (HVEB) in distal leg and foot undergoing distally based fasciocutaneous sural flap were included in this prospective clinical study. In 28 patients, the flap pedicle was not involved in the contact point of high-voltage electrical injury (low risk/control group), whereas in 21 patients, it was located inside the zone of injury (high-risk/case group). Patients were followed up for a median of 21 months (range, 12-44 months).

RESULTS

Wound dimensions to be covered were relatively similar between the 2 groups. Complications of flap survival (primary outcome) and other minor early and late complications (secondary outcome) did not significantly differ between the 2 groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Provided that early and completed debridements of contact points of HVEB were achieved, distally based sural flap is feasible and there is reliable coverage in HVEB even in patients with flap pedicle located in vicinity of the zone of injury.

A convenient flap for repairing the donor area of a distally based sural flap: Gastrocnemius perforator island flap

OBJECTIVE

The reconstruction of complex lower leg and foot defects is difficult for plastic surgeons. The distally based sural flap (DBSF) is an option for non-free flap lower leg reconstruction. However, one of the major drawbacks of the DBSF is its aesthetically non-acceptable donor area scarring.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight patients (six men and two women) who had lower leg or foot defects were evaluated in this study. We used an ipsilateral or cross-leg DBSF to repair the defect. A medial or lateral gastrocnemius perforator island flap (average size 8.1 × 6.1 cm) was used to cover the donor area of the DBSF in a two-stage operative procedure.

RESULTS

We did not observe any complications with the gastrocnemius perforator island flap. Two patients had local infections under the DBSF and were treated with bacteria-specific antibiotherapy. All patients were followed up for 1 year postoperatively. The donor areas of the distally based sural flaps were aesthetically acceptable. Patients gained ambulatory status during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Reconstruction of the donor area of a DBSF with a gastrocnemius perforator island flap allows for more acceptable aesthetics and functional results than do other reconstructive procedures.

Distally based perforator propeller sural flap for foot and ankle reconstruction: a modified flap dissection technique

BACKGROUND

Distally based perforator propeller sural flaps that pedicled on an isolated perforator from the peroneal artery or posterior tibial artery are a versatile local reconstructive option for defects of the foot and ankle region. However, flap venous congestion is yet a difficult problem after operation. We hypothesize that containing some adipofascial tissues around the axial perforator can preserve some tiny venous return routes, improve venous drainage, and ultimately enhance flap safety in distally based sural flaps.

METHODS

A prospective case series of 12 patients undergoing distally based perforator sural flaps for foot and ankle coverage were included in this study from January 2008 to December 2010. There were 7 posterior tibial artery perforator flaps from the posteromedial sural region and 5 peroneal artery perforator flaps from the posterolateral sural region. After identifying the proper viable perforator during operation as the pivot point, the whole flap was designed in an eccentric propeller shape. The proximal larger blade was a fasciocutaneous flap, whereas the distal smaller blade was a subdermal vascular plexus flap, preserving at least a quarter area of adipofascial tissue intact around the perforator. Postoperatively, flap swelling was classified into a 5-grade assessment scale. Flap survival, complications, and patient functional recovery were evaluated.

RESULTS

The proximal fasciocutaneous flap measured 4 × 8 to 6 × 18 cm (mean, 57.8 cm), and the distal subdermal cutaneous flap measured 2 × 2 to 4 × 4 cm (mean, 9.2 cm). The flaps were rotated 160 to 180 degrees. Postoperatively, flap swelling was noted under grade 2 in 9 cases, grade 3 in 2, and grade 4 in 1 with some distal superficial skin necrosis, which occurred in the largest flap in our series. All flaps survived uneventfully. After a mean of 13 months of follow-up, the wounds were cured successfully. All patients recovered walking and shoe wearing function.

CONCLUSION

Keeping a quadrant adipofascial tissue around the distal pivot perforator to form a perforator-adipofascial-pedicle can preserve more venous return routes and relieve flap swelling. This technique should be recommended in distally perforator-pedicled propeller flaps because it enhances flap safety yet does not increase the difficulty of 180-degree rotation.

Risk factors associated with complications in lower-extremity reconstruction with the distally based sural flap: a systematic review and pooled analysis

The distally based sural fasciocutaneous flap is one of the few options available for local flap reconstruction of soft-tissue defects in the lower one-third of the leg. Few studies have assessed risk factors associated with poor outcomes in this flap. A literature search was performed of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library for articles evaluating the use of sural artery fasciocutaneous flaps for soft-tissue reconstruction of the leg. Data were pooled and a univariate analysis was performed to identify characteristics associated with increased morbidity. A logistic regression model was created, and odds ratios and p values associated with the development of complications were calculated. Sixty-one papers were identified which included data on 907 patients. The majority of sural flaps were used to cover defects of the heel (28.2%), foot (14.4%) or ankle (25.8%). Trauma was the most common indication, followed by ulcers and open fractures. Flap complications were recorded in 26.4% of cases with a flap loss rate of 3.2%. With multivariate analysis, venous insufficiency and increasing age were independent risk factors for complications. Patients with venous insufficiency had nine times the risk of developing a complication compared to patients without venous insufficiency.

Lower extremity reconstruction after limb-sparing sarcoma resection of the proximal tibia in the pediatric population: case series, with algorithm

Limb salvage surgery (LSS) is the current treatment of choice for bone sarcomas in children. These procedures require composite resection and reconstruction, and are subject to high functional demands. Proximal tibia tumours, in particular, pose a significant challenge to treatment and reconstruction. A retrospective review was performed of all patients undergoing resection of proximal tibia bone sarcomas at a single centre over a 12-year period. Twenty-one patients (14 male, seven female) with an average age of 14.4 years (range = 8.3-19.2 years) underwent resection of a proximal tibial sarcoma. Pathology included osteosarcoma (OS) in 16, and Ewing's sarcoma family of tumours (ESFT) in five. Seventeen patients had bone tumour reconstruction with modular endoprsothesis, one patient with allograft, and three patients with an expandable endoprosthesis. One patient had primary closure; 20 patients had combined gastrocnemius and soleus flap reconstruction; three patients required subsequent bipedicled flap reconstruction, and two patients required subsequent sural artery flap reconstruction. No patients required free flap reconstruction. The average length of tibial osteotomy was 15 cm (range = 12.7-22.5 cm). Median soft tissue mass volume resected was 293 cm(3) (range = 211-1141 cm(3)). Median follow-up was 2.8 years (range = 0.5-6.8 years). Two patients died from metastatic disease. Two patients ultimately required amputation. Nineteen patients were ambulatory at last follow-up. This study presents an algorithm for soft-tissue reconstruction after resection of bone sarcomas of the proximal tibia. These techniques minimise complications, and maximise function in the paediatric population.