Autologous fat grafting in secondary breast reconstruction

Minimally invasive scar release by autologous adipose tissue transfer for post-traumatic neuropathic pain

Introduction

Addressing post traumatic lower limb neuropathic pain is challenging across medical specialties. To address this potentially devastating condition, several invasive and non-invasive approaches have been proposed with inconsistent results. Adipose fat transfer (AFT), also known as fat grafting, is a regenerative medicine technique in which a patient's own fat is harvested from one area of the body (usually through liposuction) and then injected into another area for various purposes, such as aesthetic contour enhancement or reconstruction and regeneration of scarred tissues.

Methods

We analyze the effects of fat grafting for neuropathic pain combined with neuroma excision (hybrid technique, hAFT) or alone (AFT). A retrospective review was conducted on 22 patients with neuropathic lower limb pain, after trauma or orthopedic surgery treated with hAFT (n = 9) or AFT (n = 13).

Results

Reduction in VAS scale more than 50 % was observed in 6 patients (66 %) treated with hybrid technique and in eleven patients (85 %) treated with AFT alone. Among these, complete pain reduction (>91 %) was achieved in 33.3 % of hAFT and 54 % of AFT technique. A 3.2 points reduction in VAS was found in the hAFT group versus 5.8 points in the AFT group (p = 0.035).

Conclusion

This pioneering use of AFT emerges as a minimally invasive breakthrough, promising significant improvement in reconstructing scarred subcutaneous tissue and managing neuropathic pain.

Bovine Acellular Dermal Matrix-Based Breast Reconstruction in Previously Irradiated Breasts: Complications and Outcomes From a Single-Center Experience

ABSTRACT

Radiation therapy is considered today an integral part of the management of breast cancer. However, radiotherapy significantly increases the incidence of total complications in breast reconstruction. Several procedures have been adopted to reduce complication rates in irradiated fields, including the use of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs). We conducted a retrospective analysis of our single-center experience with ADM-assisted implant-based reconstruction or revision surgeries for capsular contracture treatment in irradiated breasts. We divided our population into 4 groups based on prior surgical history: group A (previous quadrantectomy), group B (previous mastectomy and expander reconstruction), group C (previous mastectomy and implant reconstruction), and group D (prior quadrantectomy followed by mastectomy and implant reconstruction). At the European Oncology Institute in Milan, Italy, between June 2017 and April 2019, we identified 84 patients for a total of 86 irradiated breasts reconstructed with implant and ADM. We observed a total of 12 reconstructive failure, with the highest rate of failure in group B (16.6%) and in group D (15.38%). Overall, we recorded 22 total complications (24.4%): 12 major complications and 10 minor complications. The most common complication was infection, with 9 cases (10.4%), 6 of which were classified as severe and required implant removal. In group B, we observed the highest complication rate, both major and minor, with 7 of 42 patients (16.6%) experiencing each. Before reconstruction with ADM, the Baker grade ranged from 3 to 4, with a mean of 3.25. At the 2-year follow-up, the Baker grade ranged from 1 to 4, with a mean of 1.9. Surgeons were highly satisfied with the aesthetic result in 72.1% of cases, moderately in 8.1% and unsatisfied in 5.81%, and in 13.9%, the outcome was not assessable because of reconstructive failure. The worst aesthetic result was in group B. We observed significant reduction in capsular contracture in revision surgeries despite a moderately high rate of complications in previous quadrantectomy and radiotherapy. In our experience, breast reconstruction with implant and ADM is not the primary surgical indication in case of prior irradiation, but it can be considered as a valid alternative with reasonable safety profile, to be used in selected cases.

Fat-Augmented Latissimus Dorsi Flap for Secondary Breast Reconstruction in Small to Medium-Sized Irradiated Breasts

BACKGROUND

Secondary breast reconstruction (BR) is recognized as a challenging procedure, particularly when radiotherapy (RT) has previously been performed. The aim of this study was to compare operative data and aesthetic outcomes between secondary irradiated and immediate BR using the fat-augmented latissimus dorsi (FALD) flap.

METHODS

The authors conducted a prospective clinical study between September of 2020 and September of 2021. Patients were divided into two groups: group A included secondary BR using the FALD flap in previously irradiated breasts, and group B included immediate BR with the FALD flap. Demographics and surgical data were compared, and an aesthetic analysis was performed. Chi-square and t tests were performed for categorical and continuous variables, respectively.

RESULTS

Twenty cases of FALD flap-based BR for each group were included. The two groups were found to be homogeneous for the demographic variables. The difference in mean operative time (263.1 minutes versus 265.1 minutes; P = 0.467) and complications ( P = 0.633) between the two groups were not significant. There was statistically significant difference in term of immediate fat grafting volume in favor of group A (218.2 cc versus 133.0 cc; P < 0.0001). Regarding aesthetic outcomes, the mean global score evaluation showed no statistically significant differences between groups (17.86 versus 18.21; P = 0.209).

CONCLUSIONS

The authors' study states that the FALD flap can be considered a reliable procedure for secondary reconstruction in previously irradiated breasts, although it is not indicated for patients with larger breasts. This surgical technique allowed us to achieve a totally autologous BR with good aesthetic results and low complication rates, even in secondary irradiated cases.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, II.

Autologous Fat Grafting in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: An Historical Perspective

Autologous fat grafting (AFG or lipofilling) is a common technique used in plastic and reconstructive surgery that involves the transfer of autologous fat tissue from one region of the body to another. The indications and techniques of AFG have changed dramatically over the years. We recount the historic milestones to the current state.

AUtologous fat graft in foot calcaneal postsurgical chronic ulcer

INTRODUCTION

Post-traumatic injury of talus's posterior area and ankle joint with consequent scar formation is often complicated by an unhealing trophic ulcer. Aim of this paper is to evaluate the autologous fat graft effectiveness in treating Achilles tendon area wounds.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From October 2011 to March 2014 we treated with fat graft a total of 7 patients with post-surgical painful chronic ulcer of calcaneal area. Mean age was 38.6 years (range 22-64 years). One patient was a professional football player who was presenting a post-injury ulcer not respondant to advanced dressings.

RESULTS

Wound rehepitelization was observed in all cases treated within one month and fat grafting resolved pain related to the wound. All patient returned to their daily normal activities. In all cases treated we observed an increased softness of perilesional post-surgical scars. Our professional football player came back able to perform an usual training 5 days post-operation obtaining complete rehepitelization within 3 weeks.

DISCUSSION

Our surgical approach showed a therapeutic effect that relies on biological properties of adipose tissue; those properties are clear in both procedures of chronic ulcer's rehepitelization stimulation and perilesional tissue's enhancement obtaining pain control. The procedure is safe, with low rate of complication.

The Safety, Effectiveness, and Efficiency of Autologous Fat Grafting in Breast Surgery

Background:

For years, the safety and effectiveness of autologous fat grafting (AFG) for breast reconstruction have been in question, with particular concern over fat necrosis, calcifications, cyst formation, and interfering with the detection of breast cancer. However, increasing evidence suggests that the complication rates and clinical results are generally acceptable to both clinicians and patients. The emerging challenge is the numerous AFG techniques and systems, where there are limited knowledge and data. The objective of this study was to conduct a literature review that focuses on the safety, effectiveness, and efficiency of various AFG techniques as applied to the breast.

Methods:

A PubMed search using terms related to AFG was performed over a 5-year period (April 1, 2010–April 30, 2015). Original articles focused on AFG to the breast, with outcomes on safety, effectiveness, and efficiency, were included.

Results:

Five hundred ninety-eight articles were identified with 36 articles included (n = 4306 patients). Satisfaction rates were high although the prevalence of complications was low—similar to previous findings. Seven studies reported average operating room time with an overall mean of 125 minutes (range: 40–210). The mean volume of fat harvested was 558 mL (range: 120–1299), and fat injected was 145 mL (range: 20–607). A positive association between injection volume and operating time was observed.

Conclusions:

This review validates previous findings on the safety and effectiveness of AFG to the breast and highlights its efficiency. The efficiency data available, although limited, suggest that there is an opportunity to achieve time and cost savings while not sacrificing safety and effectiveness.

Autologous fat graft in postmastectomy pain syndrome following breast conservative surgery and radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide, affecting one in eight women. Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) has become a well-established alternative to mastectomy in the treatment of breast cancer, providing a less invasive treatment. Just as life expectancy after breast cancer has improved, so has morbidity increased. One of the most relevant and debilitating consequences of oncological breast surgery is postmastectomy pain syndrome (PMPS). Our results published in 2011 on the treatment of PMPS in patients who had undergone mastectomy and radiotherapy and our experience in scar treatment with fat grafts were the theoretical bases for this prospective study.

METHODS

From April 2011 to April 2012 a total of 96 patients, who had undergone lumpectomy and radiation therapy, with the diagnosis of PMPS were considered for fat grafts. We performed autologous fat grafting in 59 patients (study group), whereas 37 patients did not receive any further surgical procedure (control group). Pain assessment was performed using the visual analog scale (VAS) before and after treatment in the treated group and in the control group at the first visit and the control visit, with a mean follow-up of 10 months. Results were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.

RESULTS

Four patients were lost to follow-up (two patients in the control group and two patients in the treated group). A significant VAS pain decrease was detected in patients treated with autologous fat grafting (3.1 point reduction, p ≤ 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Because of the safety, efficacy, and optimal tolerability of the procedure, we believe that fat grafting can be considered useful in treating PMPS in patients who have undergone BCS and radiotherapy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.