A Prospective Analysis of the Association Between Indwelling Surgical Drains and Surgical Site Infection in Plastic Surgery

Use of prolonged closed suction drainage for synovial fluid-draining wounds around the ankle

OBJECTIVE

When synovial fluid drains through a wound, cells necessary to form tissue required for healing are washed away. This results in failure of wound closure, often necessitating a pedicled or free flap reconstruction. We hypothesised that prolonged (>48 hours post surgery) closed suction drainage can reduce the fluid draining through the wound, enabling wound healing and eliminating the need for a pedicled or free flap reconstruction. We also aimed to determine whether prolonged application of closed suction drainage would increase postoperative infection.

METHOD

A retrospective study was performed between August 2015 and December 2020. Patients with fluid-draining wounds around the ankle which had failed to respond to treatment with delayed closure and which required the use of prolonged closed suction drainage were included. Closed suction (Jackson-Pratt, JP) drainage was applied from the time of wound closure until the wound healed.

RESULTS

A total of 20 patients (12 male: eight female; mean age: 52 years; range: 21-74 years) were included in the study. The results showed the JP drain being kept for a mean of 14.1±1.8 (range: 9-16) postoperative days. Prolonged closed suction drainage helped achieve wound closure in 19 (95%) patients. Only one patient with Achilles tendon exposure underwent sural flap surgery. None of the patients developed an infection due to prolonged use of the JP drain. With regards to patient satisfaction, four (21%), 10 (53%), four (21%) and one (5%) patients were 'very satisfied', 'satisfied', 'fair' and 'dissatisfied', respectively, with the results of the treatment technique at follow-up (mean: 29.9; range: 12-72 months). The remaining patient was lost to follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Prolonged application of closed suction drainage made wound closure possible for synovial fluid-draining wounds, eliminating the need for a pedicled or free flap surgery, without increasing the rates of wound infection. This technique could be used as an adjunct to the local flap, negative pressure wound therapy or other reconstructive techniques at the time of revision surgery.

Perceptions of Surgical Drains among Breast Reconstruction Patients and Health Care Staff: A Qualitative Survey Study

BACKGROUND

 Surgical drains are a key component for recovery in breast reconstruction procedures. However, they are often cumbersome and carry a risk of infection with prolonged use. We aimed to develop a more thorough understanding of patient and health care provider perspectives on surgical drains, to inform future efforts in improving the breast reconstruction patient experience.

METHODS

 Twenty-nine breast reconstruction patients and eight plastic surgery providers were recruited to complete surveys focused on surgical drains. Likert scales ranging from 1 to 5 were developed to gauge how bothersome drains felt, as well as concern for infection. Ordinal variable and categorical multiple-choice analyses were applied as appropriate.

RESULTS

 Fifteen (51.7%) patients underwent implant-based breast reconstruction, and 14 (48.3%) patients underwent autologous breast reconstruction. The most common duration of drain placement was 2 weeks (N = 13). The surgical site infection (SSI) rate requiring antibiotics was 28% (N = 8). On a scale of 1 to 5, both patients (median = 3) and providers (median = 2.5) viewed drains as bothersome. Patients were "frequently" concerned about infection risk (median = 3). Other high-frequency patient concerns included general pain and discomfort.

CONCLUSION

 Surgical drains are a common component of breast reconstruction procedures and are viewed as cumbersome by both patients and providers. Patients expressed concerns about drain site pain, discomfort, and tugging on clothing. Patients and providers both believed that drains could contribute to SSI. Overall, these data provide insight to drive future improvements in the patient drain experience.

Surgical Trauma Comparison of Inframammary Fold versus Endoscopic Transaxillary Approaches in Breast Augmentation: A 7-Year Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess differences in surgical trauma between the inframammary fold approach and endoscopic transaxillary approach in breast augmentation surgery.

METHODS

One hundred and ninety-four patients who underwent breast augmentation using either an inframammary fold or endoscopic transaxillary approach were enrolled. All procedures were primary and bilateral cases. Patients' demographics and indicators, such as operation duration, postoperative volume of drainage, drainage duration, length of hospital stay, and postoperative pain scores, were observed and analyzed.

RESULTS

One hundred and five patients underwent inframammary fold incisions, while the remaining 89 received transaxillary incisions. The operation duration was significantly shorter in the inframammary fold group than in the transaxillary group, while the VAS scores were significantly lower (p < 0.001). Similarly, differences in the age and fertility status between the two groups were statistically significant (p < 0.05). However, no statistically significant differences were noted in the scores of the remaining indicators (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This research demonstrated that while patients in the endoscopic transaxillary group were typically younger, which is commonly hypothesized to result in superior results, the inframammary fold approach may offer a surgical option with reduced trauma and pain and concomitantly greater convenience and efficiency, yielding high satisfaction levels among Chinese women.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Colonic duplication cyst with secondary septic peritonitis in a cat

Case summary

A 5-month-old male castrated domestic shorthair cat was evaluated for acute onset of emesis. Abdominal radiographs identified a suspected colonic foreign body and abdominal-focused assessment with sonography for trauma, triage and tracking (AFAST) evaluation revealed a large amount of peritoneal effusion. Cytology of the peritoneal effusion was consistent with a septic exudate. An exploratory celiotomy identified a ruptured ileocecocolic mass and a resection and anastomosis was performed. No foreign material was identified and histopathology confirmed that the ruptured mass was a colonic duplication cyst. Recurrent septic peritonitis was diagnosed based on cytologic evaluation of fluid from a silicone bulb reservoir of a closed suction drain. No abnormalities were surgically identified, the cat recovered without complication, was discharged at 7 days postoperatively and has continued to remain healthy 8 months after surgical intervention.

Relevance and novel information

To our knowledge, this is the first known instance of a histopathologically confirmed non-communicating colonic duplication cyst causing septic peritonitis in the veterinary literature.

Early drain removal does not increase the rate of surgical site infections following an open transversus abdominis release

PURPOSE

Intraoperative drain placement during an open transversus abdominis release (TAR) is common practice. However, evidence detailing the optimal timing of drain removal is lacking. Surgical dogma teaches that drains should remain in place until output is minimal. This practice increases the risk of drain-associated complications (infection, pain, and skin irritation) and prolongs the burden of surgical drain maintenance. The objective of this study is to review infectious outcomes following TAR with early or late drain removal.

METHODS

Patients who underwent an open bilateral TAR from 1/2018 to 1/2020 were eligible for the study. Prior to 2019, one of the two intraoperative drains was left in place at discharge. In 2019, clinical practice shifted to remove both drains at hospital discharge irrespective of output. The rate of infectious morbidity was compared between the two cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 184 patients were included: 89 late and 95 early drain removal. No differences in wound complications existed between the two cohorts: surgical site occurrence (SSO): 21.3% vs. 18.9% (p = 0.68); surgical site infection (SSI): 14.6% vs. 10.5% (p = 0.40); abscess: 8.9% vs. 4.2% (p = 0.20); seroma: 6.7% vs. 10.5% (p = 0.36); cellulitis: 14.6% vs. 8.4% (p = 0.19%); or SSO requiring procedural intervention (SSOPI): 5.6% vs. 5.2% (p = 0.92). Rates of antibiotic prescription and 30-day readmission were also similar (p = 0.69 and p = 0.89).

CONCLUSIONS

Early removal of abdominal wall surgical drains at discharge irrespective of drain output does not increase the prevalence of infectious morbidity following TAR. It is likely safe to remove all drains at discharge regardless of drain output.

Ten-Year experience with vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap for reconstruction of abdominoperineal resection defects

Purpose

We evaluate outcomes of our single center using vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flaps for reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection (APR). Our goal was to analyze factors that may affect perineal wound healing, a problematic complication with APR reconstructions due to location and high frequency of neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

Methods

This single-center, retrospective study analyzed all VRAM flap perineal reconstruction patients after APR defect over a 10-year period (from July 2008 to June 2018). Outcome measures focused on factors that may affect perineal wound healing complication rates: cancer stage (I/II vs III/IV), neoadjuvant chemoradiation, surgeon's years in practice (<5 years vs >5 years), and pelvic closed suction drain use.

Results

Twenty-eight patients met inclusion criteria. The overall major perineal wound complication rate was 14.3% (4 patients). Lack of perioperative closed suction pelvic drain use was associated with a significantly higher rate of major perineal wound complications (28.6% vs 0% and p = 0.031). All four major wound complications occurred in patients who did not have a pelvic drain. The major perineal wound complication rate for patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation was 22% vs 0% with no neoadjuvant chemoradiation (p = 0.107).

Conclusion

While our cohort represents a relatively small single-center study, our 14.3% rate of major perineal wound complications is consistent with previous studies in the literature. Our findings show that perioperative pelvic closed suction drain use is associated with a lower rate of perineal wound complications. While neoadjuvant chemoradiation trended toward a higher incidence of perineal wound complications, it did not reach statistical significance.

Muscle Flap Closure following Complex Spine Surgery: A Decade of Experience

BACKGROUND

Advances in surgical technology and adjuvant therapies along with an aging and increasingly morbid U.S. population have led to an increase in complex spine surgery. With this increase comes an elevated risk of complications, including those related to the surgical wound, with some studies demonstrating wound complication incidences approaching 45 percent. The authors hypothesize that immediate muscle flap closure improves outcomes in high-risk patients.

METHODS

Three hundred one consecutive index cases of spinal wound closure using local muscle flaps performed by the senior author at a single institution between 2006 and 2018 were reviewed. The primary outcome was major wound complication (reoperation and/or readmission because of surgical-site infection, late infection, dehiscence, seroma, or hematoma). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of this endpoint.

RESULTS

Major wound complications occurred in 6.6 percent of patients (reoperation, 3.6 percent; readmission, 3.0 percent), with a 6.0 percent infection rate and five cases requiring instrumentation removal because of infection. Risk factors identified included radiotherapy (OR, 5.9; p = 0.004), age 65 years or older (OR, 2.8; p = 0.046), and prior spine surgery (OR, 4.3; p = 0.027). The incidence of major wound complication increased dramatically with each additional risk factor. Mean drain dwell duration was 21.1 ± 10.0 days and not associated with major wound complications, including infection (OR, 1.04; p = 0.112).

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate local muscle flap closure following complex spine surgery on high-risk patients is associated with an acceptable rate of wound complications and, as these data demonstrate, is safe and effective. Consideration should be given to immediate muscle flap closure in appropriately selected patients.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

Do Postoperative Prophylactic Antibiotics Reduce Highly Virulent Infections?: An Analysis of 660 Tissue Expander Breast Reconstructions

BACKGROUND

Many surgeons are reluctant to discontinue prophylactic antibiotics after 24 hours in tissue expander breast reconstruction (TEBR) because of fear of increased risk of surgical site infection (SSI). Currently, there is no consensus regarding antibiotic prophylaxis duration in TEBR. In addition, there remains a lack of research investigating microorganisms involved in SSI across various perioperative antibiotic protocols. The purpose of this study was to examine how 2 different prophylactic antibiotic regimens impacted the bacterial profiles of SSI and rate of implant loss after TEBR.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective review of immediate TEBRs between 2001 and 2018 was performed. Surgical site infections requiring hospitalization before stage 2 were included. Highly virulent organisms were defined as ESKAPE pathogens (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter species). Implant loss was defined as removal of tissue expander without immediate replacement.

RESULTS

Of 660 TEBRs, 85 (12.9%) developed an SSI requiring hospitalization before stage 2. Fifty-six (65.9%) received less than 24 hours of perioperative intravenous antibiotics and oral antibiotics after discharge (group 1), and 29 (34.1%) received less than 24 hours of intravenous antibiotics only (group 2). There was no significant difference in demographics, preoperative chemotherapy/radiation, acellular dermal matrix usage, or treatment of SSI between groups. In group 1, 64% (n = 36) developed culture positive SSIs, compared with 83% (n = 24) in group 2 (P = 0.076). Staphylococcus aureus was the most common bacteria in both groups. Group 2 demonstrated a significantly increased incidence of gram-positive organisms (46.4% vs 72.4%, P = 0.022) and S. aureus (21.4% vs 55.2%, P = 0.002). However, there was no significant difference in overall highly virulent (P = 0.168), gram-negative (P = 0.416), or total isolated organisms (P = 0.192). Implant loss between groups 1 and 2 (62.5% vs 62.1%, P = 0.969) respectively, was nearly identical.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that, despite differences in bacterial profiles between 2 antibiotic protocols, prolonged postoperative antibiotic use did not protect against overall highly virulent infections or implant loss. Antibiotic stewardship guidelines against the overuse of prolonged prophylactic regimens should be considered. Further analysis regarding timing of SSIs and antibiotic treatment is warranted.

Use of Prolonged Prophylactic Antibiotics with Closed Suction Drains in Ventral Abdominal Hernia Repair

Closed suction drains (CSD) are commonly used in ventral hernia repair (VHR), with or without prolonged postoperative prophylactic antibiotics (PPA) for the duration of their use. We examine the evidence that PPA with CSD reduce surgical site infection (SSI) in patients undergoing VHR. We also examine the evidence assessing the association between SSI and CSD in VHR. A systematic review of PubMed, CIHNL, and Cochrane databases was performed to identify studies analyzing rates of SSI with CSD in patients undergoing abdominal VHR and related procedures with or without the concomitant use of PPA. The primary outcome was the rate of SSI. Five studies totaling 772 patients were identified, 525 patients were confirmed to have CSD, and 434 patients received prolonged antibiotics while drains were in place. PPA had no significant effect on SSI in two studies and were associated with decreased SSI in one study (Odds ratio 0.235, 95% confidence interval 0.090–0.617, P = 0.003). Two studies documented a higher rate of SSI in patients with CSD (79% vs 49% and 19% vs 10%) on univariate analysis. One study demonstrated a very low risk of SSI despite CSD (4.2%) and another demonstrated no increased risk with or without CSD. The use of drains is not clearly associated with an increased risk of SSI in VHR, and there is limited evidence to support antibiotic use while the drains are in place to decrease the potential risk. Prospective randomized studies are needed to more clearly assess these associations.

Closed-Suction Drains After Subcutaneous Mastectomy for Gynecomastia: Do They Reduce Complications?

BACKGROUND

In cases of refractory gynecomastia, surgical excision of excess glandular breast tissue is often warranted. Closed-suction drain placement is commonplace; however, the effect of drains on preventing complications after male breast surgery has not been fully elucidated in the literature.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of drains on reducing seroma and hematoma after subcutaneous mastectomy for gynecomastia.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of patients undergoing subcutaneous mastectomy for gynecomastia over a 10-year period. Charts were reviewed for demographics, BMI, comorbidities, type of local anesthesia, specimen weight, use of liposuction, and placement of drains. Outcomes were determined by seroma or hematoma in the 30-day postoperative period.

RESULTS

A total of 163 breasts were studied (group I = no-drain, n = 46; group II = drain, n = 117). Group I had a higher rate of clinically significant seromas requiring needle aspiration than group II (6.5 vs 0%, p = 0.0214). There was no difference in rates of hematoma (group I vs II, 2.2 vs 6.0%, p = 0.443) and total fluid collections (group I vs II, 19.6 vs 16.2%, p = 0.647). BMI, use of local anesthesia, specimen weight, and use of liposuction were not significantly associated with postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Closed-suction drains may reduce rates of clinically significant seromas requiring needle aspiration. Though drains carry their own pertinent adverse effects (e.g., patient discomfort and anxiety, cost, and additional clinic visits), there remains no universal standard of care and surgeon practices vary widely. Given the potential to reduce seroma rates, we recommend that surgeons consider placing drains and discuss with patients the benefits and risks of drains after surgical treatment of gynecomastia.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Can Abdominal Wall Reconstruction be Safely Performed without Drains?

The use of closed suction drains in the abdominal wall is a common practice in abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) operations. Drains can be a conduit for bacteria and can cause pain and discomfort for patients after surgery. A single hernia program has implemented the principles of clinical quality improvement in an attempt to improve outcomes for hernia patients. An attempt at a process improvement was implemented to eliminate the use of drains in AWR by adapting the technique. A total of 102 patients undergoing AWR were included between 8/11 and 9/15 (49 months). Compared with the group before the attempt at eliminating the use of abdominal wall drains (8/11–9/13), the group of patients after the implementation of the attempted process improvement (9/13–9/15) had less wound and pulmonary complications, a shorter hospital stay, less time in the postanesthesia care unit, and less opioid use in the postanesthesia care unit as well as for the entire hospital stay. In this group of AWR patients, an attempt at process improvement that eliminated the use of drains led to improved outcomes. Abdominal wall drains may be able to be safely eliminated with appropriate technique adaptation for AWR.

Are Prophylactic Postoperative Antibiotics Necessary for Immediate Breast Reconstruction? Results of a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Closed-suction drains, implants, and acellular dermal matrix (ADM) are routinely used in tissue expander-based immediate breast reconstruction (TE-IBR). Each of these factors is thought to increase the potential for surgical site infection (SSI). Although CDC guidelines recommend only 24 hours of antibiotic prophylaxis after TE-IBR, current clinical practices vary significantly. This study evaluated the difference in SSI between 2 different prophylactic antibiotic durations.

STUDY DESIGN

A noninferiority randomized controlled trial was designed in which TE-IBR patients received antibiotics either 24 hours postoperatively or until drain removal. The primary outcome was SSI, as defined by CDC criteria. Operative and postoperative protocols were standardized. Secondary endpoints included clinical outcomes up to 1 year and all implant loss, or reoperation.

RESULTS

There were 112 TE-IBR patients (180 breasts) using ADM who were randomized into 2 study arms, with 62 patients in the 24-hour group and 50 in the extended group. Surgical site infection was diagnosed in 12 patients in the 24-hour group and 11 in the extended group (19.4% vs 22.0%, p = 0.82). The extended group had 7 patients who required IV antibiotics and an overall implant loss in 7 patients (14.0%). The 24-hour group had 4 patients who required IV antibiotics, with 3 requiring removal (4.8%). Patients with diabetes, postoperative seroma, or wound dehiscence were all more likely to develop SSI (p < 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

In a randomized controlled noninferiority trial, 24 hours of antibiotics is equivalent to extended oral antibiotics for SSI in TE-IBR patients. Additional multicenter trials will further assess this important aspect of TE-IBR postoperative care.

Vertically drained closed incision NPWT. A novel method for managing surgical incisions: a case series

Topical negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is being used with increasing frequency to treat closed surgical incisions that are at high risk for wound complications. Known benefits of topical NPWT include improved perfusion, physical wound support and isolation. This case series report of four colon operations introduces a method to manage closed surgical incisions that is designed to potentiate the effects of topical NPWT. Channel drains are placed vertically through a closed incision and in contact with the foam sponge of a NPWT dressing. The drains transmit negative pressure into the wound in order to enhance fluid removal, reduce dead space and improve tissue apposition for primary healing.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

Dr Leiboff received no funding for this study. Dr Leiboff is President of Tools for Surgery, L.L.C.

Risk factors associated with early failure in complex abdominal wall reconstruction: a 5 year single surgeon experience

Complex abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) is commonly performed, but with a significant rate of surgical complications and hernia recurrence. The aim of this experiential review is to assess risk factors for hernia recurrence after complex AWR. A retrospective review of AWR patients from 2007-2012 was performed. Rates of hernia recurrence were assessed. Univariate analyses and subsequent multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess independent predictors of early hernia recurrence. One hundred and thirty-four consecutive cases of AWR were performed over a 5-year period. Hernia recurrence developed in 14 (10.4%) patients. Hernias derived from trauma (OR = 19.76, p = 0.011) and those who experienced postoperative wound infections (OR = 18.81, p = 0.004) were at increased risk for hernia recurrence. In conclusion, increased vigilance must be paid to patients presenting after trauma with massive loss of domain and those who experience postoperative infection, as these cohorts are at added risk for failed reconstruction.

A multi-disciplinary review of the potential association between closed-suction drains and surgical site infection

BACKGROUND

Despite the putative advantages conferred by closed-suction drains (CSDs), the widespread utilization of post-operative drains has been questioned due to concerns regarding both efficacy and safety, particularly with respect to the risk of surgical site infection (SSI). Although discipline-specific reports exist delineating risk factors associated with SSI as they relate to the presence of CSDs, there are no broad summary studies to examine this issue in depth.

METHODS

The pertinent medical literature exploring the relationship between CSDs and SSI across multiple surgical disciplines was reviewed.

RESULTS

Across most surgical disciplines, studies to evaluate the risk of SSI associated with routine post-operative CSD have yielded conflicting results. A few studies do suggest an increased risk of SSI associated with drain placement, but are usually associated with open drainage and not the use of CSDs. No studies whatsoever attribute a decrease in the incidence of SSI (including organ/space SSI) to drain placement.

CONCLUSIONS

Until additional, rigorous randomized trials are available to address the issue definitively, we recommend judicious use and prompt, timely removal of CSDs. Given that the evidence is scant and weak to suggest that CSD use is associated with increased risk of SSI, there is no justification for the prolongation of antibiotic prophylaxis to "cover" an indwelling drain.