Reconstruction of a Compound Oromandibular Defect by Means of Chimeric Scapular–Parascapular Free Flap Assisted by Virtual Surgical Planning:

The versatility of the scapular free flap: A workhorse flap? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The scapular free flap (SFF) is essential in complex reconstructive surgery and often indicated in complex defects with compromised or poor local tissue integrity. This review aims to assess the versatility and reliability of the SFF during reconstruction.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review of multiple databases was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. An analysis of pooled data was performed to evaluate flap failure rate for any anatomical unit using SFF as the primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints included other complication rates after reconstruction such as partial flap loss, revision surgery, fistula, hematoma, and infection.

RESULTS

A total of 110 articles were included, with 1447 pooled flaps. The main recipient site was the head and neck region (89.0%). Major indications for reconstruction were malignancy (55.3%), burns (19.2%), and trauma (9.3%). The most common types of flaps were osteocutaneous (23.3%), cutaneous (22.6%), and chimeric (18.0%). The pooled flap failure rate was 2% (95%CI: 1%-4%). No significant heterogeneity was present across studies (Q statistic 20.2, p = .69; I2 .00%, p = .685). Nonscapular supplementary flaps and grafts were required in 61 cases. The average length and surface area of bone flaps were 7.2 cm and 24.8cm2, respectively. The average skin paddle area was 134.2cm2.

CONCLUSION

The SFF is a useful adjunct in the reconstructive surgeon's armamentarium as evidence by its intrinsic versatility and diverse clinical indications. Our data suggest a low failure rate in multicomponent defect reconstruction, especially in head and neck surgery. SFFs enable incorporation of multiple tissue types and customizable dimensions-both for vascularized bone and cutaneous skin-augmenting its value in the microsurgeon's repertoire as a chimeric flap. Further research is necessary to overcome the conventional barriers to SFF utilization and to better comprehend the specific scenarios in which the SFF can serve as the preferred alternative workhorse flap.

Patient-specific 3-dimensional lung modelling: next-generation imaging helps guide precise surgical resection

Recent strides have allowed the consolidation of routine imaging modalities with highly accurate reconstruction software to aid the operating surgeon generate patient-specific three-dimensional models. In this preliminary report, we describe our initial experience using a patient-specific reconstruction software to guide surgical resection for 2 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Digital imaging and communications in medicine data from patient chest CT scans was configured into IQQA BodyImaging Lung software to generate highly accurate maps of airways, vessels and segments as well as estimates of lung volumes. Models generated aided us in planning appropriate lung cancer resection procedures.

Complications and Outcomes of Chimeric Free Flaps: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Ablations of locally advanced or recurrent head and neck cancer commonly result in large composite orofacial defects. Chimeric flaps represent a unique surgical option for these defects, as they provide diverse tissue types from a single donor site. The purpose of the study was to consolidate the literature on chimeric flaps with regard to postoperative complication rates to help inform surgical decision making.

DATA SOURCES

The librarian created search strategies with a combination of keywords and controlled vocabulary in Ovid Medline (1946), Embase (1947), Scopus (1823), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Clinicaltrails.gov (1997).

REVIEW METHODS

Candidate articles were independently reviewed by 2 authors familiar with the subject material, and inclusion/exclusion criteria were uniformly applied for article selection. Articles were considered eligible if they included patients who received a single chimeric flap for reconstruction of head and neck defects and if they provided data on complication rates.

RESULTS

A total of 521 chimeric flaps were included in the study. The major complication rate was 22.6%, while the minor complication rate was 14.0%. There were 7 flap deaths noted in the series. Median operative time and harvest time were 15.0 and 2.5 hours, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Chimeric flaps represent a viable option for reconstruction of complex head and neck defects and have complication rates similar to those of double free flaps and single free flaps with locoregional flap while only modestly increasing total operative time.