Management of Medially Displaced Sub-Condylar Mandibular Fractures in Pediatric Population Using Novel Atraumatic Approach

Management of Pediatric Mandibular Condyle Fractures: A Literature Review

This narrative review evaluates the literature on the management of mandibular condyle fractures in growing patients. It aims to illustrate some fundamental biological principles and to offer a series of considerations applicable to clinical practice. The discussion is based on 116 papers published in PubMed and two relevant textbooks. Condylar fractures may be overlooked, especially in pre-scholar children, where compliance is usually reduced. However, these injuries can have disabling sequelae such as ankyloses, facial deformities, malocclusion, and chronic pain in some patients if not diagnosed and managed correctly. Due to their significance, mandibular condyle fractures in children are a subject of considerable clinical interest. As of today, there is consensus about their treatment. Four management options are available: expectative (analgesia, soft food and follow-up), functional protocols (guiding elastics, orthodontic appliances and exercises), maxillomandibular fixation (MMF), and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Nondisplaced and minimally displaced fractures should be treated expectantly; severely displaced non-comminuted fractures can be safely operated on if the expertise is available, even in patients with deciduous dentition. Moderately displaced fractures can be managed with functional protocols or operatively, depending on the background and know-how of the specialist. Functional protocols can achieve good outcomes, especially in patients with deciduous dentition. MMF should be foregone in children due to its many drawbacks.

Management of Mandibular Condyle Fractures in Paediatric Patients: a Systematic Review

Objectives

This systematic review searched three of the most used databases to assess if current evidence suggested a difference between surgical and non-surgical management of mandibular condyle fractures in paediatric patients.

Material and Methods

An electronic literature search was conducted of three well known databases - Ovid, PubMed and Web of Science. Studies included were conducted paediatric patients, in humans, written in English and published from January 1st 1996 until April 1st 2022. Data collection was carried out by two independent reviewers. Data collated from studies without high risk of bias was pooled for surgical vs non-surgical management and total tallies of all outcomes presented. Presence or absence of complications was recorded in 4 x 4 tables for each outcome and compared using a Chi-Square test.

Results

After duplicate records were removed, 182 records were screened. After exclusion of unsuitable reports, 20 were included in the review. Further analysis showed the included studies had high risk of bias. Given this, comparison of this pooled data showed no significant difference between management methods.

Conclusions

Presently it appears conservative management is functionally adequate without risks associated with surgical management, even though incidence of these risks was shown to be low in the studies included in this review.

Condylar Fractures: Multistep Surgical Planning by Mini-Invasive Approach, Patient Series

PURPOSE

Surgical treatment for condylar fractures is a challenging procedure most debated in scientific literature without a broad consensus on the selection of surgical techniques to be used and relative indications.The goal of this work is to propose a multistep surgical planning for condylar fractures based on an effective mini-invasive approach and safe procedure aimed to avoid as much as possible skin incision in the aesthetic areas of the face and neck, to decrease the risk of facial nerve injury.

METHODS

Ten patients with dislocated condylar neck fractures and sub-condylar fractures were included in this study.All the patients were studied with radiological images, computed tomography scans with three-dimensional reconstructions preoperatively and immediate postoperatively.Patients were evaluated pre- and post-operatively for dental occlusion, bone fragment alignment after reduction and after fixation, facial nerve functionality, skin scarring, temporomandibular joint functionality, temporomandibular joint symptomatology, and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

Results were satisfactory for different parameters evaluated. No significant complications resulted in follow-up, particularly for facial nerve injury. By using this multistep procedure with each stage functional to the following one, the authors achieved satisfactory results following treatment of dislocated condylar fractures.

Modified Blair Approach for the Treatment of Mandibular Condyle Fractures

PURPOSE

The management of fractures of the condyle of the mandible has been a topic of debate and still no consensus exists in the literature about the most appropriate approach. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the modified Blair approach for the open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular condyle fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on 18 patients with 20 mandibular condyle fractures from 2014 to 2020. All patients were treated surgically using the modified Blair approach. Postoperative occlusion status and mouth opening were assessed for treatment outcomes. Also, the rate of complications such as facial nerve paralysis, wound infection, hematoma, salivary fistula, Frey syndrome, and greater auricular nerve paraeesthesia evaluated.

RESULTS

Seventeen out of 18 patients (94.4%) achieved their original pretraumatic occlusion after the surgery. One patient (5.5%) had postoperative occlusal interference due to premature dental contact. The maximal postoperative interincisal distance was measured with a range between 33 and 41 mm (mean 37.6 mm). One patient (5.6%) had transient facial nerve palsy. Also, salivary fistula developed in 1 (5.6%) patient in the postoperative period.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study revealed that the modified Blair approach provides satisfactory clinical outcomes with low complication rates and may offer an alternative, safe, and effective method for open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular condyle fracture.

New Minimally Invasive Intraoral Procedure for Condylar Fractures: Clinical Presentation and Considerations on Current Techniques

ABSTRACT

Mandibular fractures are the third most prevalent maxillofacial traumatic events. Surgical approaches to the condyle are a debated topic. This study describes a mini-invasive technique for condylar fracture reduction. The patient of this study suffered multiple traumatic injuries including a carotid artery dissecting aneurysm, which contraindicated the standard open reduction and internal fixation technique. The novel minimally invasive technique involves intraoral access and fracture fragment realignment using a periosteal elevator, a molar occlusal splint, and intermaxillary fixation after intraoperative radiologic imaging confirmation of condyle reposition.The approach avoids skin incisions and tissue dissection, with good aesthetic outcomes and facial nerve preservation. This technique proved to be safe and simple to be less demanding for the patient, with a shorter recovery time than experienced with other techniques.The results suggest this technique is a good option for the surgical treatment of condylar neck fractures showing favorable rim morphology with primary stability after reduction.