Combined Internal and External Le Fort III Distraction Osteogenesis-the "Elusive Vector"

Three-dimensional Camera Imaging in Postoperative Evaluation of Distraction Osteogenesis

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Distraction osteogenesis needs to be regularly assessed in some way to monitor the degree of advancement. X-ray is used for the general evaluation of osteotomy. However, radiation exposure should be avoided. The purpose of this study is to evaluate 3-dimensional (3D) camera imaging for postoperative evaluation. Three patients who underwent Le Fort I or III advancement osteotomy using rigid external distraction and internal distraction were observed in this study. The degrees of the distractions were evaluated using VECTRA H1 3D imaging in addition to computed tomographic (CT) scans. In the VECTRA 3D imaging, the tilt and size of the faces were corrected using the dedicated software for imaging. The preoperative and postoperative images were superimposed, and the distances of motion between the landmarks were measured. In CT scans, the bone distances between osteotomy points of the pterygomaxillary junction were analyzed. As the VECTRA 3D imaging can be compared by overlaying previous photographs, it served as a good tool to evaluate the distractions. However, both the soft-tissue movement measured by VECTRA and CT bony measurements did not match the total amount of movement for the internal distraction devices. The bony advancements were less than the amount of distraction. The soft tissues shrank after the distraction was completed in all cases. Three-dimensional camera imaging is considered to be a useful tool for the evaluation of distraction osteogenesis.

A novel use of the rigid external distraction frame: acute on-table distraction with autologous bone grafting

Distraction osteogenesis with an external distraction device such as the rigid external distraction (RED) frame has become an established method for treating midface hypoplasia. It allows for greater advancement of the midface than achievable with traditional Le Fort III osteotomies; however, there are a number of problems associated with frame application such as pin site migration and need for frame removal. We present 2 cases of the novel use of the RED frame, in both a pediatric patient and an adult patient. The RED frame was used to achieve table soft tissue distraction, greater than previously achievable with traditional Le Fort III osteotomy. This was then combined with acute bone grafting, allowing the RED frame to be removed intraoperatively and thereby removing the complications associated with long-term frame application. We believe this to be the first reported use of the RED frame for acute on-table distraction of the midface. This has allowed far greater advancement of the midface than would be achievable with traditional Le Fort III advancement but, when combined with autologous bone grafting, has allowed intraoperative removal of the frame, thus negating some of the complications of long-term distraction osteogenesis using the RED frame.